Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 3/2018

16.03.2018 | Research Article

Introducing Short Interpulse Intervals in High-Rate Pulse Trains Enhances Binaural Timing Sensitivity in Electric Hearing

verfasst von: Sridhar Srinivasan, Bernhard Laback, Piotr Majdak, Bertrand Delgutte

Erschienen in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology | Ausgabe 3/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Common envelope-based stimulation strategies for cochlear implants (CIs) use relatively high carrier rates in order to properly encode the speech envelope. For such rates, CI listeners show poor sensitivity to interaural time differences (ITDs), which are important for horizontal-plane sound localization and spatial unmasking of speech. Based on the findings from previous studies, we predicted that ITD sensitivity can be enhanced by including pulses with short interpulse intervals (SIPIs), to a 1000-pulses-per-second (pps) reference pulse train. We measured the sensitivity of eight bilateral CI listeners to ITD while systematically varying both the rate at which SIPIs are introduced (“SIPI rate”) and the time interval between the two pulses forming a SIPI (“SIPI fraction”). Results showed largely enhanced ITD sensitivity relative to the reference condition, with the size of the improvement increasing with decreasing SIPI rate and decreasing SIPI fraction. For the lowest SIPI fraction, insertion of extra pulses brought ITD sensitivity to the level measured for low-rate pulse trains with rates matching the SIPI rates. The results appear promising for the goal of enhancing ITD sensitivity with envelope-based CI strategies by inserting SIPI pulses at strategic times in speech stimuli.
Fußnoten
1
A recent unpublished study, however, reported ITD sensitivity of CI listeners to a speech token presented via a clinical envelope-based stimulation strategy (Kan et al. 2017).
 
2
These data were fit with a logistic psychometric function using the psignifit version 3.0 software package (see http://​psignifit.​sourceforge.​net/) for Matlab, which implements the maximum-likelihood method described by Fruend et al. (2011). Thresholds at the 75 % point of the psychometric function were estimated with a logistic psychometric function with three parameters (slope, lower and upper asymptote) using the maximum-likelihood method.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Aronoff JM, Yoon Y-S, Freed DJ, Vermiglio AJ, Pal I, Soli SD (2010) The use of interaural time and level difference cues by bilateral cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 127:EL87–EL92CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Aronoff JM, Yoon Y-S, Freed DJ, Vermiglio AJ, Pal I, Soli SD (2010) The use of interaural time and level difference cues by bilateral cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 127:EL87–EL92CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Arora K, Dawson P, Dowell R, Vandali A (2009) Electrical stimulation rate effects on speech perception in cochlear implants. Int J Audiol 48:561–567CrossRefPubMed Arora K, Dawson P, Dowell R, Vandali A (2009) Electrical stimulation rate effects on speech perception in cochlear implants. Int J Audiol 48:561–567CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Buechel B, Hancock K, Delgutte B (2015a) Improved neural coding of ITD with bilateral cochlear implants by introducing short inter-pulse intervals. Presented at the: 38th Midwinter meeting of the Association of the Research in Otolaryngology Buechel B, Hancock K, Delgutte B (2015a) Improved neural coding of ITD with bilateral cochlear implants by introducing short inter-pulse intervals. Presented at the: 38th Midwinter meeting of the Association of the Research in Otolaryngology
Zurück zum Zitat Buechel B, Hancock K, Delgutte B (2015b) Short inter-pulse intervals improve neural ITD coding with bilateral cochlear implants. Presented at the: Conference on implantable auditory prostheses Buechel B, Hancock K, Delgutte B (2015b) Short inter-pulse intervals improve neural ITD coding with bilateral cochlear implants. Presented at the: Conference on implantable auditory prostheses
Zurück zum Zitat Buechel B, Hancock K, Chung Y, Delgutte B (2016) Neural coding of ITD with bilateral cochlear implants using short inter-pulse intervals and amplitude modulation. Presented at the: 39th Midwinter meeting of the Association of the Research in Otolaryngology Buechel B, Hancock K, Chung Y, Delgutte B (2016) Neural coding of ITD with bilateral cochlear implants using short inter-pulse intervals and amplitude modulation. Presented at the: 39th Midwinter meeting of the Association of the Research in Otolaryngology
Zurück zum Zitat Cai S, Ma W-LD, Young ED (2009) Encoding intensity in ventral cochlear nucleus following acoustic trauma: implications for loudness recruitment. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 10:5–22CrossRefPubMed Cai S, Ma W-LD, Young ED (2009) Encoding intensity in ventral cochlear nucleus following acoustic trauma: implications for loudness recruitment. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 10:5–22CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Carlyon RP, Deeks JM, McKay CM (2015) Effect of pulse rate and polarity on the sensitivity of auditory brainstem and cochlear implant users to electrical stimulation. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 16:653–668CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Carlyon RP, Deeks JM, McKay CM (2015) Effect of pulse rate and polarity on the sensitivity of auditory brainstem and cochlear implant users to electrical stimulation. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 16:653–668CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Churchill TH, Kan A, Goupell MJ, Litovsky RY (2014) Spatial hearing benefits demonstrated with presentation of acoustic temporal fine structure cues in bilateral cochlear implant listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 136:1246–1256CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Churchill TH, Kan A, Goupell MJ, Litovsky RY (2014) Spatial hearing benefits demonstrated with presentation of acoustic temporal fine structure cues in bilateral cochlear implant listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 136:1246–1256CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Delgutte B (1996) Physiological models for basic auditory percepts. In: Hawkins HL, McMullen TA, Popper AN, Fay RR (eds) Auditory computation. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 157–220CrossRef Delgutte B (1996) Physiological models for basic auditory percepts. In: Hawkins HL, McMullen TA, Popper AN, Fay RR (eds) Auditory computation. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 157–220CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Egger K, Majdak P, Laback B (2016) Channel interaction and current level affect across-electrode integration of interaural time differences in bilateral cochlear-implant listeners. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 17:55–67CrossRefPubMed Egger K, Majdak P, Laback B (2016) Channel interaction and current level affect across-electrode integration of interaural time differences in bilateral cochlear-implant listeners. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 17:55–67CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Egger K, Majdak P, Laback B (2017) Binaural timing information in electric hearing at low rates: effects of inaccurate encoding and loudness. J Acoust Soc Am 141:3164–3174CrossRefPubMed Egger K, Majdak P, Laback B (2017) Binaural timing information in electric hearing at low rates: effects of inaccurate encoding and loudness. J Acoust Soc Am 141:3164–3174CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Fletcher H, Munson WA (1933) Loudness, its definition, measurement and calculation. Bell Labs Tech J 12:377–430CrossRef Fletcher H, Munson WA (1933) Loudness, its definition, measurement and calculation. Bell Labs Tech J 12:377–430CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fruend I, Haenel NV, Wichmann FA (2011) Inference for psychometric functions in the presence of nonstationary behavior. J Vis 11:16–16CrossRef Fruend I, Haenel NV, Wichmann FA (2011) Inference for psychometric functions in the presence of nonstationary behavior. J Vis 11:16–16CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Grantham DW, Ashmead DH, Ricketts TA, Haynes DS, Labadie RF (2008) Interaural time and level difference thresholds for acoustically presented signals in post-lingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants using CIS+ processing. Ear Hear 29:33–44PubMed Grantham DW, Ashmead DH, Ricketts TA, Haynes DS, Labadie RF (2008) Interaural time and level difference thresholds for acoustically presented signals in post-lingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants using CIS+ processing. Ear Hear 29:33–44PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Grothe B, Pecka M, McAlpine D (2010) Mechanisms of sound localization in mammals. Physiol Rev 90:983–1012CrossRefPubMed Grothe B, Pecka M, McAlpine D (2010) Mechanisms of sound localization in mammals. Physiol Rev 90:983–1012CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Hafter ER, Buell TN (1990) Restarting the adapted binaural system. J Acoust Soc Am 88:806–812CrossRefPubMed Hafter ER, Buell TN (1990) Restarting the adapted binaural system. J Acoust Soc Am 88:806–812CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Hafter ER, Dye RHJ (1983) Detection of interaural differences of time in trains of high-frequency clicks as a function of interclick interval and number. J Acoust Soc Am 73:644–651CrossRefPubMed Hafter ER, Dye RHJ (1983) Detection of interaural differences of time in trains of high-frequency clicks as a function of interclick interval and number. J Acoust Soc Am 73:644–651CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Hancock KE, Chung Y, Delgutte B (2012) Neural ITD coding with bilateral cochlear implants: effect of binaurally coherent jitter. J Neurophysiol 108:714–728CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hancock KE, Chung Y, Delgutte B (2012) Neural ITD coding with bilateral cochlear implants: effect of binaurally coherent jitter. J Neurophysiol 108:714–728CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Hu H, Dietz M (2015) Comparison of interaural electrode pairing methods for bilateral cochlear implants. Trends Hear 19:2331216515617143PubMedPubMedCentral Hu H, Dietz M (2015) Comparison of interaural electrode pairing methods for bilateral cochlear implants. Trends Hear 19:2331216515617143PubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Jesteadt W (1980) An adaptive procedure for subjective judgments. Percept Psychophys 28:85–88CrossRefPubMed Jesteadt W (1980) An adaptive procedure for subjective judgments. Percept Psychophys 28:85–88CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Kan A, Litovsky RY (2015) Binaural hearing with electrical stimulation. Hear Res 322:127–137CrossRefPubMed Kan A, Litovsky RY (2015) Binaural hearing with electrical stimulation. Hear Res 322:127–137CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Kidd G Jr, Mason CR, Best V, Marrone N (2010) Stimulus factors influencing spatial release from speech-on-speech masking. J Acoust Soc Am 128:1965–1978CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kidd G Jr, Mason CR, Best V, Marrone N (2010) Stimulus factors influencing spatial release from speech-on-speech masking. J Acoust Soc Am 128:1965–1978CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Kiefer J, Hohl S, Stürzebecher E, Pfennigdorff T, Gstöettner W (2001) Comparison of speech recognition with different speech coding strategies (SPEAK, CIS, and ACE) and their relationship to telemetric measures of compound action potentials in the nucleus CI 24M cochlear implant system. Audiology 40:32–42CrossRefPubMed Kiefer J, Hohl S, Stürzebecher E, Pfennigdorff T, Gstöettner W (2001) Comparison of speech recognition with different speech coding strategies (SPEAK, CIS, and ACE) and their relationship to telemetric measures of compound action potentials in the nucleus CI 24M cochlear implant system. Audiology 40:32–42CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Kistler DJ, Wightman FL (1992) A model of head-related transfer functions based on principal components analysis and minimum-phase reconstruction. J Acoust Soc Am 91:1637–1647CrossRefPubMed Kistler DJ, Wightman FL (1992) A model of head-related transfer functions based on principal components analysis and minimum-phase reconstruction. J Acoust Soc Am 91:1637–1647CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Laback B, Egger K, Majdak P (2015) Perception and coding of interaural time differences with bilateral cochlear implants. Hear Res 322:138–150CrossRefPubMed Laback B, Egger K, Majdak P (2015) Perception and coding of interaural time differences with bilateral cochlear implants. Hear Res 322:138–150CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Laback B, Majdak P (2008) Binaural jitter improves interaural-time difference sensitivity of cochlear implantees at high pulse rates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:814–817CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Laback B, Majdak P (2008) Binaural jitter improves interaural-time difference sensitivity of cochlear implantees at high pulse rates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:814–817CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Laback B, Pok S-M, Baumgartner W-D, Deutsch WA, Schmid K (2004) Sensitivity to Interaural level and envelope time differences of two bilateral cochlear implant listeners using clinical sound processors. Ear Hear 25:488–500CrossRefPubMed Laback B, Pok S-M, Baumgartner W-D, Deutsch WA, Schmid K (2004) Sensitivity to Interaural level and envelope time differences of two bilateral cochlear implant listeners using clinical sound processors. Ear Hear 25:488–500CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Laback B, Zimmermann I, Majdak P, Baumgartner W-D, Pok S-M (2011) Effects of envelope shape on interaural envelope delay sensitivity in acoustic and electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 130:1515–1529CrossRefPubMed Laback B, Zimmermann I, Majdak P, Baumgartner W-D, Pok S-M (2011) Effects of envelope shape on interaural envelope delay sensitivity in acoustic and electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 130:1515–1529CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Lachs G, Al-Shaikh R, Bi Q, Saia RA, Teich MC (1984) A neural-counting model based on physiological characteristics of the peripheral auditory system. V. Application to loudness estimation and intensity discrimination. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern SMC-14:819–836CrossRef Lachs G, Al-Shaikh R, Bi Q, Saia RA, Teich MC (1984) A neural-counting model based on physiological characteristics of the peripheral auditory system. V. Application to loudness estimation and intensity discrimination. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern SMC-14:819–836CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Levitt H (1971) Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J Acoust Soc Am 49:467–477CrossRef Levitt H (1971) Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J Acoust Soc Am 49:467–477CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Loizou PC, Poroy O, Dorman M (2000) The effect of parametric variations of cochlear implant processors on speech understanding. J Acoust Soc Am 108:790–802CrossRefPubMed Loizou PC, Poroy O, Dorman M (2000) The effect of parametric variations of cochlear implant processors on speech understanding. J Acoust Soc Am 108:790–802CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Long CJ, Eddington DK, Colburn HS, Rabinowitz WM (2003) Binaural sensitivity as a function of interaural electrode position with a bilateral cochlear implant user. J Acoust Soc Am 114:1565–1574CrossRefPubMed Long CJ, Eddington DK, Colburn HS, Rabinowitz WM (2003) Binaural sensitivity as a function of interaural electrode position with a bilateral cochlear implant user. J Acoust Soc Am 114:1565–1574CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Macpherson EA, Middlebrooks JC (2002) Listener weighting of cues for lateral angle: the duplex theory of sound localization revisited. J Acoust Soc Am 111:2219–2236CrossRefPubMed Macpherson EA, Middlebrooks JC (2002) Listener weighting of cues for lateral angle: the duplex theory of sound localization revisited. J Acoust Soc Am 111:2219–2236CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Majdak P, Laback B, Baumgartner W-D (2006) Effects of interaural time differences in fine structure and envelope on lateral discrimination in electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 120:2190–2201CrossRefPubMed Majdak P, Laback B, Baumgartner W-D (2006) Effects of interaural time differences in fine structure and envelope on lateral discrimination in electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 120:2190–2201CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat McKay CM, Henshall KR, Farrell RJ, McDermott HJ (2003) A practical method of predicting the loudness of complex electrical stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am 113:2054–2063CrossRefPubMed McKay CM, Henshall KR, Farrell RJ, McDermott HJ (2003) A practical method of predicting the loudness of complex electrical stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am 113:2054–2063CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat McKay CM, McDermott HJ (1998) Loudness perception with pulsatile electrical stimulation: the effect of interpulse intervals. J Acoust Soc Am 104:1061–1074CrossRefPubMed McKay CM, McDermott HJ (1998) Loudness perception with pulsatile electrical stimulation: the effect of interpulse intervals. J Acoust Soc Am 104:1061–1074CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Noel VA, Eddington DK (2013) Sensitivity of bilateral cochlear implant users to fine-structure and envelope interaural time differences. J Acoust Soc Am 133:2314–2328CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Noel VA, Eddington DK (2013) Sensitivity of bilateral cochlear implant users to fine-structure and envelope interaural time differences. J Acoust Soc Am 133:2314–2328CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Poon BB, Eddington DK, Noel V, Colburn HS (2009) Sensitivity to interaural time difference with bilateral cochlear implants: development over time and effect of interaural electrode spacing. J Acoust Soc Am 126:806–815CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Poon BB, Eddington DK, Noel V, Colburn HS (2009) Sensitivity to interaural time difference with bilateral cochlear implants: development over time and effect of interaural electrode spacing. J Acoust Soc Am 126:806–815CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Relkin EM, Doucet JR (1997) Is loudness simply proportional to the auditory nerve spike count? J Acoust Soc Am 101:2735–2740CrossRefPubMed Relkin EM, Doucet JR (1997) Is loudness simply proportional to the auditory nerve spike count? J Acoust Soc Am 101:2735–2740CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Riss D, Hamzavi J-S, Blineder M, Honeder C, Ehrenreich I, Kaider A, Baumgartner WD, Gstoettner W, Arnoldner C (2014) FS4, FS4-p, and FSP: a 4-month crossover study of three fine structure sound-coding strategies. Ear Hear 35:e272–e281CrossRefPubMed Riss D, Hamzavi J-S, Blineder M, Honeder C, Ehrenreich I, Kaider A, Baumgartner WD, Gstoettner W, Arnoldner C (2014) FS4, FS4-p, and FSP: a 4-month crossover study of three fine structure sound-coding strategies. Ear Hear 35:e272–e281CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Seeber BU, Fastl H (2008) Localization cues with bilateral cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 123:1030–1042CrossRefPubMed Seeber BU, Fastl H (2008) Localization cues with bilateral cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 123:1030–1042CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Shannon RV (1985) Threshold and loudness functions for pulsatile stimulation of cochlear implants. Hear Res 18:135–143CrossRefPubMed Shannon RV (1985) Threshold and loudness functions for pulsatile stimulation of cochlear implants. Hear Res 18:135–143CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Smith Z (2010) Improved discrimination of interaural time differences in speech with an asynchronous cochlear implant sound coding strategy. Presented at the: 33th Midwinter meeting of the Association of the Research in Otolaryngology (ARO) Smith Z (2010) Improved discrimination of interaural time differences in speech with an asynchronous cochlear implant sound coding strategy. Presented at the: 33th Midwinter meeting of the Association of the Research in Otolaryngology (ARO)
Zurück zum Zitat Strutt JW (1876) Our perception of the direction of a source of sound. Nature 14:32–33CrossRef Strutt JW (1876) Our perception of the direction of a source of sound. Nature 14:32–33CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat van Hoesel RJM (2004) Exploring the benefits of bilateral cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol 9:234–246CrossRefPubMed van Hoesel RJM (2004) Exploring the benefits of bilateral cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol 9:234–246CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat van Hoesel RJM, Jones GL, Litovsky RY (2009) Interaural time-delay sensitivity in bilateral cochlear implant users: effects of pulse rate, modulation rate, and place of stimulation. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 10:557–567CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van Hoesel RJM, Jones GL, Litovsky RY (2009) Interaural time-delay sensitivity in bilateral cochlear implant users: effects of pulse rate, modulation rate, and place of stimulation. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 10:557–567CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat van Hoesel RJM, Tyler RS (2003) Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 113:1617–1630CrossRefPubMed van Hoesel RJM, Tyler RS (2003) Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 113:1617–1630CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Wilson BS, Finley CC, Lawson DT, Wolford RD, Eddington DK, Rabinowitz WM (1991) Better speech recognition with cochlear implants. Nature 352:236–238CrossRefPubMed Wilson BS, Finley CC, Lawson DT, Wolford RD, Eddington DK, Rabinowitz WM (1991) Better speech recognition with cochlear implants. Nature 352:236–238CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Introducing Short Interpulse Intervals in High-Rate Pulse Trains Enhances Binaural Timing Sensitivity in Electric Hearing
verfasst von
Sridhar Srinivasan
Bernhard Laback
Piotr Majdak
Bertrand Delgutte
Publikationsdatum
16.03.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology / Ausgabe 3/2018
Print ISSN: 1525-3961
Elektronische ISSN: 1438-7573
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-018-0659-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2018

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 3/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update HNO

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.