nach oben

The European Journal of Health Economics

Erschienen in:

01.08.2010 | Original Paper

Mapping the QLQ-C30 quality of life cancer questionnaire to EQ-5D patient preferences

verfasst von: Ralph Crott, Andrew Briggs

Erschienen in: The European Journal of Health Economics | Ausgabe 4/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Although cancer-specific Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) are commonly included in randomized clinical trials or other prospective non-randomized clinical studies, it is rare that preference-based instruments are used that allow the calculation of a utility weight suitable for estimating quality-adjusted life-years gained.

Objective

To develop a mapping algorithm to transform the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire responses into EQ-5D derived utilities.

Study design

Retrospective data analysis of a multicentre, multicountry prospective clinical trial in breast cancer patients.

Methods

Regression analysis of individual pairs of EQ-5D and QLQ-C30 scores.

Results

A model that explained 80% of the variance was developed to estimate EQ-5D Utilities from QLQ-C30 scores at individual level. From this reliable group level means and deviations can be derived.

Conclusions

Mapping from QLQ-C30 scores to EQ-5D-derived utilities when only QLQ-C30 data are available has been shown to be possible with good accuracy. Validation of the proposed algorithm in other external clinical datasets should be encouraged.

Because we did not have access to the clinical data aside from the QOL data, it was not possible to further assess the responses by patients’ characteristics. However, in order to keep the practical application of the mapping algorithm across patient samples as general as possible, one does not want to include in the mapping equation any socio-demographic variables when considering mapping.

Utilities were transformed to Disutilities because this results in a right-skewed distribution bounded by zero on the left. This changes only the sign of the coefficients in the regressions.

The data provided to us were extracted from the cleaned and frozen clinical trial database from the EORTC, raising the suspicion of the existence of genuine outliers.

Efficace, F., Bottomley, A., Osoba, D., Gotay, C., Flechtner, H., D’haese, S., Zurlo, A.: Beyond the development of health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) measures: a checklist for evaluating HRQOL outcomes in cancer clinical trials—does HRQOL evaluation in prostate cancer research inform clinical decision making? J. Clin. Oncol. 21(18), 3502–3511 (2003)CrossRef

Fayers, P.M., Aaronson, N.K., Bjordal, K., Groenvold, M., Curran, D., Bottomley, A., on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group: The EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring manual, 3rd edn. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels (2001)

Gotay, C.C., Kawamoto, C.T., Bottomley, A., Efficace, F.: The prognostic significance of patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials. J. Clin. Oncol. 26(8), 1355–1363 (2008)CrossRef

Therasse, P., Mauriac, L., Welnicka-Jaskiewicz, M., Bruning, P., Cufer, T., Bonnefoi, H., Tomiak, E., Pritchard, K.I., Hamilton, A., Piccart, M.J.: Final results of a randomized phase III trial comparing cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil with a dose-Intensified epirubicin and cyclophosphamide–filgrastim as neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced breast cancer: an EORTC-NCIC-SAKK multicenter study. J. Clin. Oncol. 21(5), 843–850 (2003)CrossRef

EQ-5D Value sets: inventory, comparative review and user guide. In: Szende, A., Oppe, M., Devlin, N. (Eds.) EuroQol Group Monographs. Springer, Dordrecht (2007), ISBN 978-1402055102

Efficace, F., Therasse, P., Piccart, M.J., Coens, C., Van Steen, K., Welnicka-Jaskiewicz, M., Cufer, T., Dyczka, J., Lichinitser, M., Shepherd, L., de Haes, H., Sprangers, M.A., Bottomley, A.: Health-related quality of life parameters as prognostic factors in a nonmetastatic breast cancer population: an international multicenter study. J. Clin. Oncol. 22(16), 3381–3388 (2004)CrossRef

Bottomley, A., Therasse, P., Piccart, M., Efficace, F., Coens, C., Gotay, C., Welnicka-Jaskiewicz, M., Dyczka, L.M.J., Cufer, T., Lichinitser, M.R., Schornagel, J.H., Bonnefoi, H., Shepherd, L., For the European Organisation for Researchand Treatment of Cancer Breast Cancer Group, the National Cancer Institute of Canada, Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research: Health-related quality of life in survivors of locally advanced breast cancer: an international randomised controlled phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 6, 287–294 (2005)CrossRef

http://groups.eortc.be/qol/questionnaires_modules.htm

Dolan, P.: Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med. Care 35(11), 1095–1108 (1997)CrossRef

10.

Dolan, P., Gudex, C., Kind, P., Williams, A.: The time trade-off method: results from a general population study. Health Econ. 5, 141–154 (1996)CrossRef

11.

Szende, A., Oppe, M., Devlin, N.: EQ-5D value sets, inventory, comparative review and user guide. Springer, Berlin (2006)

12.

McKenzie, L., Van der Pol, M.: Mapping the EORTC QLQ C-30 onto the EQ-5D instrument: the potential to estimate QALY’s without generic preference data. Value Health 12(1), 167–171 (2009)CrossRef

13.

Gray, A.M., Rivero-Arias, O., Clarke, P.M.: Estimating the association between SF-12 responses and EQ-5D utility values by response mapping. Med. Decis. Mak. 26, 18–29 (2006)CrossRef

14.

Brazier, J.E., Yang, Y., Tsuchiya, A., Rowen, D.L.: A review of studies mapping (or cross walking) non-preference based measures of health to generic preference-based measures. Eur. J. Health Econ. (2009). doi:10.1007/s10198-009-0168-z

15.

Peat, J., Barton, B.: Medical statistics: a guide to data analysis and critical appraisal, 1st edn., p. 150. BMJ Books, Oxford (2005)

16.

Hardin, J.W., Hilbe, J.M.: Generalized estimation equations. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton (2003)

17.

Doornebosch, P.G., Tollenaar, R.A., Gosselink, M.P., Stassen, L.P., Dijkhuis, C.M., Schouten, W.R., van de Velde, C.J., de Graaf, E.J.: Quality of life after transanal endoscopic microsurgery and total Mesorectal excision in early rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 9(6), 553–558 (2007)CrossRef

18.

Gosselink, M.P., Busschbach, J.J., Dijkhuis, C.M., Stassen, L.P., Hop, W.C., Schouten, W.R.: Quality of life after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 8(1), 15–22 (2006)CrossRef

19.

Krabbe, P.F., Peerenboom, L., Langenhoff, B.S., Ruers, T.J.: Responsiveness of the generic EQ-5D summary measure compared to the disease-specific EORTC QLQ C-30. Qual. Life Res. 13(7), 1247–1253 (2004)CrossRef

20.

Krahn, M., Bremner, K.E., Tomlinson, G., Ritvo, P., Irvine, J., Naglie, G.: Responsiveness of disease-specific and generic utility instruments in prostate cancer patients. Qual. Life Res. 16(3), 509–522 (2007)CrossRef

21.

Wu, E.Q., Mulani, P., Farrell, M.H., Sleep, D.: Mapping FACT-P and EORTC QLQ-C30 to patient health status measured by EQ-5D in metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients. Value Health 10(5), 408–414 (2007)CrossRef

22.

Kind, P.: Measuring the quality of life on cancer: an index based on QLQ-C30 presentation, ASCO 2005 Annual Meeting, Category Health Services Research, abstract published in JCO, vol. 23, No. 16S, Part I of II, June 1 Supplement, 2005:6013

23.

Kontodimopoulos, N., Aletras, V.H., Paliouras, D.: Mapping the cancer-specific EORTC QLQ-C30 to the preference-based EQ-5D, SF-6D and 15D instruments. Value Health, 12(8), 1151–1157 (2009)

24.

McKenzie, L., Van der Pol, M.: Mapping the EORTC QLQ C-30 onto the EQ-5D instrument: the potential to estimate QALY’s without generic preference DATA. Value Health 12(1), 167–171 (2009)CrossRef

25.

Pickard, A.S., Shaw, J.W., Lin, H.W., Trask, P.C., Aaronson, N., Lee, T.A., Cella, D.: A patient-based utility measure of health for clinical trials of cancer therapy based on the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire. Value Health 12(6), 977–988 (2009)CrossRef

26.

Jang, R.W., Mittmann, N., Isogai, P., Bradbury, P.A., Leighl, N.B.: Derivation of utility values from EORTC QLQ-C30 values in lung cancer, ISPOR 2008, Toronto (Poster abstract PCN78). Value Health 11(3), A77 (2008)

27.

Petrillo, J., Cairns, J.: Concerting condition-specific measures into preference-based outcomes for use in economic evaluation. Expert Rev. Pharmacoecon. Outcomes Res. 8(5), 453–461 (2008)

28.

Bleeker, S.E., Moll, H.A., Steyerberg, E.W., Donders, A.R., Derksen-Lubsen, G., Grobbee, D.E., Moons, K.G.: External validation is necessary in prediction research: a clinical example. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 56(9), 826–832 (2003)CrossRef

29.

Steyerberg, E.W., Bleeker, S.E., Moll, H.A., Grobbee, D.E., Moons, K.G.: Internal and external validation of predictive models: a simulation study of bias and precision in small samples. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 56(5), 441–447 (2003)CrossRef

30.

Luo, N., Johnson, J.A., Shaw, J.W., Coons, S.J.: A comparison of the EQ-5D index scores derived from the US and UK population-based scoring functions. Med. Decis. Mak. 27, 321–326 (2007)CrossRef

31.

Chay, K.Y., Powell, J.L.: Semiparametric censored regression models. J. Econ. Perspect. 15(4), 29–42 (2001)CrossRef

32.

Sullivan, P., Ghushchyan, V.: Preference-based EQ-5D index scores for chronic conditions in the United States. Med. Decis. Mak. 26, 410–420 (2006)CrossRef

Titel: Mapping the QLQ-C30 quality of life cancer questionnaire to EQ-5D patient preferences
verfasst von: Ralph Crott
Andrew Briggs
Publikationsdatum: 01.08.2010
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: The European Journal of Health Economics / Ausgabe 4/2010
Print ISSN: 1618-7598
Elektronische ISSN: 1618-7601
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-010-0233-7

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Mapping the QLQ-C30 quality of life cancer questionnaire to EQ-5D patient preferences

Abstract

Background

Objective

Study design

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

Objective

Study design

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2010

Substituting inpatient for outpatient care: what is the impact on hospital costs and efficiency?

Modeling stroke management: a qualitative review of cost-effectiveness analyses

Adverse selection in the health insurance market: some empirical evidence

The challenge of corporatisation: the experience of Portuguese public hospitals

Optimal savings and health spending over the life cycle

Geographic distribution of physicians in Portugal