Skip to main content
Log in

On the clustering term in ecological analysis: how do different prior specifications affect results?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Statistical Methods and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study how different prior assumptions on the spatially structured heterogeneity term of the convolution hierarchical Bayesian model for spatial disease data could affect the results of an ecological analysis when response and exposure exhibit a strong spatial pattern. We show that in this case the estimate of the regression parameter could be strongly biased, both by analyzing the association between lung cancer mortality and education level on a real dataset and by a simulation experiment. The analysis is based on a hierarchical Bayesian model with a time dependent covariate in which we allow for a latency period between exposure and mortality, with time and space random terms and misaligned exposure-disease data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Besag J (1974) Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems (with discussion). J R Stat Soc B 36: 192–236

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Besag J, York JC, Mollié A (1991) Bayesian image restoration, with two applications in spatial statistics (with discussion). Ann Inst Stat Math 43: 1–59

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Best N, Richardson S, Thomson A (2005) A comparison of Bayesian spatial models for disease mapping. Stat Meth Med Res 14: 35–59

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Breslow NE, Clayton DG (1993) Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models. J Am Stat Assoc 88: 9–25

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Catelan D, Biggeri A, Dreassi E, Lagazio C (2006) Space-cohort Bayesian models in ecological studies. Stat Model 6: 159–173

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton DJ (1996) Generalized linear mixed models. In: Gilks WR, Richardson S, Spiegelhalter DJ (eds) Markov Chain Monte Carlo in practice. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 275–301

  • Clayton DJ, Bernardinelli L, Montomoli C (1993) Spatial Correlation in Ecological Analysis. Int J Epidemiol 22: 1193–1202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton DG, Kaldor J (1987) Empirical Bayes estimates of age-standardized relative risks for use in disease mapping. Biometrics 43: 671–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cressie NA (1993) Statistics for Spatial Data. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Diggle PJ, Tawn JA, Moyeed RA (1998) Model-based geostatistics. Appl Stat 47: 299–350

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dreassi E, Biggeri A, Catelan D (2005) Space-time models with time dependent covariates for the analysis of the temporal lag between socio-economic factors and lung cancer mortality. Stat Med 24: 1919–1932

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Green PJ, Richardson S (2002) Hidden Markov models and disease mapping. J Am Stat Assoc 97: 1–16

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kelsall J, Wakefield J (2002) Modeling spatial variation in disease risk: a geostatistical approach. J Am Stat Assoc 97: 692–701

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Held L (2000) Bayesian modelling of inseparable space-time variation in disease risk. Stat Med 17–18: 2555–2568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laud P, Ibrahim J (1995) Predictive Model Selection. J R Stat Soc B 57: 247–262

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Spiegelhalter DJ, Thomas A, Best NG, Gilks WR (2000) WinBugs. Medical Research Council Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge

  • Stern HS, Cressie NA (1999) Inference for extreme in disease mapping. In: Lawson A, Biggeri A, Bohning D, Lesaffre E, Viel JF, Bertolini R (eds) Disease mapping and risk assessment for public health. Wiley, Chichester, pp 63–84

  • Sun D, Tsutakawa RK, Kim H, He Z (2000) Spatio temporal interaction with disease mapping. Stat Med 19: 2015–2035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner MA, Wong WH (1987) The calculation of posterior distributions by data augmentation. J Am Stat Assoc 82: 528–540

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Vigotti MA, Biggeri A, Dreassi E, Protti MA, Cislaghi C (2001) Atlas of mortality in Tuscany 1971–94. Edizioni Plus, Università degli studi di Pisa

  • Wakefield J (2003) Sensitivity Analysis for Ecological Regression. Biometrics 59: 9–17

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Waller LA, Carlin BP, Hong X, Gelfand AE (1997) Hierarchical spatio-temporal mapping of disease rates. J Am Stat Assoc 92: 607–617

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Corrado Lagazio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Catelan, D., Biggeri, A. & Lagazio, C. On the clustering term in ecological analysis: how do different prior specifications affect results?. Stat Methods Appl 18, 49–61 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-007-0089-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-007-0089-x

Keywords

Navigation