Skip to main content
Log in

Six Characteristics of Effective Structured Reporting and the Inevitable Integration with Speech Recognition

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The reporting of radiological images is undergoing dramatic changes due to the introduction of two new technologies: structured reporting and speech recognition. Each technology has its own unique advantages. The highly organized content of structured reporting facilitates data mining and billing, whereas speech recognition offers a natural succession from the traditional dictation–transcription process. This article clarifies the distinction between the process and outcome of structured reporting, describes fundamental requirements for any effective structured reporting system, and describes the potential development of a novel, easy-to-use, customizable structured reporting system that incorporates speech recognition. This system should have all the advantages derived from structured reporting, accommodate a wide variety of user needs, and incorporate speech recognition as a natural component and extension of the overall reporting process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Shrastri K: The future of radiology reporting. In: Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Weiss DL Eds. Electronic Reporting in the Digital Medical Enterprise: Society for Computer Applications in Radiology, Great Falls, 2003, pp 83–104

  2. S Seltzer P Kelly D Adams et al. (1994) ArticleTitleExpediting the turnaround of radiology reports: Use of total quality management to facilitate radiologists' report signing Am J Roentgenol 162 775–781 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuC1cbjvFI%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. B Holman P Aliabadi S Silverman et al. (1994) ArticleTitleMedical impact of unedited preliminary radiology reports Radiology 191 519–521 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuB3cvitlQ%3D Occurrence Handle8153332

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. J Sobel M Pearson K Gross et al. (1996) ArticleTitleInformation content and clarity of radiologists' reports for chest radiography Acad Radiol 3 709–717 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1076-6332(96)80407-7 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiD3sjovVY%3D Occurrence Handle8883510

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine Standards Committee. (2000) DICOM Supplement 23: Structured Reporting Storage SOP Classes (proposed final text). National Electrical Manufacturers Association, Rosslyn, VA

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dai BY, Thompson L, Dionisio JDN, Kangarloo H, Taira R, Sinha U: The Next Step.http://www.imagingeconomics.com/library/200004-03.asp

  7. CP Langlotz L Meininger (2000) ArticleTitleEnhancing the expressiveness and usability of structured image reporting systems Proc AMIA Symp 2000 467–471

    Google Scholar 

  8. D Liu GD Berman RN Gray (2003) ArticleTitleThe use of structured radiology reporting at a community hospital: A 4-year case study of more than 200,000 reports Appl Radiol 32 23–26 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXksl2gtLs%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine Standards Committee. DICOM Supplement 23: Structured Reporting Storage SOP Classes (proposed final text). National Electrical Manufacturers Association, Rosslyn, VA, 2000

  10. Bajai S: Expanding the reach of speech recognition: extending speech technology benefits to transcription workflow can boost productivity—medical practice Health Management Technology. March, 2004.http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0DUD/is_3_25/ai_114167703/

  11. Batchelor JS: Optimizing alternative reporting strategies, 16 July, 2004. http://www.auntminnie.com/index.asp?Sec=sup&Sub=ris&Pag=dis&ItemId=62275

  12. Baumann J: Voice Recognition, 25 Sep. 2004. http://www.hitl.washington.edu/scivw/EVE/I.D.2.d.VoiceRecognition.html>

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Liu.

Appendix: Glossary of Terms

Appendix: Glossary of Terms

Data Mining:

The retrieval of meaningful information and relationships from databases

DICOM SR:

Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Structured Reporting (SR); the set of guidelines for the radiology and cardiology imaging industries that specify standards for structuring information about radiological and other images

Dynamic Menu:

A menu that changes when the user presses a modifier key

Guidepost:

A shortcut that takes a user to a menu of macros, knowledge tree selections, or user inputs such as dictation

Lexicon:

The vocabulary of a special language or field

Macro:

A sequence of computer steps that can be recorded so that they can be triggered by one or a small number of keystrokes, mouse clicks, or voice commands

Macro Behavior:

A macro that is an action as opposed to a simple set of words

Menu Navigation:

The process of moving a computer's attention from one part of a list of choices to another or from one list of choices to another

PACS:

Picture archiving and communication systems

RIS:

Radiology information systems

Structured Reporting:

The capturing of standardized/organized information from templates navigated via menus

Template:

Something that is copied. StructuRad's unique use: data elements from which a report is constructed

Talking Template:

A voice-based, interactive template

Taxonomy:

A classification

Voice recognition software:

Software that can translate vocal input into text or commands

Voice User Interface (VUI):

Computer interface that enables users to interact with a computer using speech

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, D., Zucherman, M. & Tulloss, W.B. Six Characteristics of Effective Structured Reporting and the Inevitable Integration with Speech Recognition. J Digit Imaging 19, 98–104 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-005-8734-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-005-8734-0

Key words

Navigation