Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Digital Imaging 1/2013

01.02.2013

ACR–AAPM–SIIM Technical Standard for Electronic Practice of Medical Imaging

verfasst von: James T. Norweck, J. Anthony Seibert, Katherine P. Andriole, David A. Clunie, Bruce H. Curran, Michael J. Flynn, Elizabeth Krupinski, Ralph P. Lieto, Donald J. Peck, Tariq A. Mian, Margaret Wyatt

Erschienen in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Ausgabe 1/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
The ACR Medical Legal Committee defines official interpretation as that written report (and any supplements or amendments thereto) that attach to the patient’s permanent record. In healthcare facilities with a privilege delineation system, such a written report is prepared only by a qualified physician who has been granted specific delineated clinical privileges for that purpose by the facility’s governing body upon the recommendation of the medical staff.
 
2
The ACR Rules of Ethics state: “It is proper for a diagnostic radiologist to provide a consultative opinion on radiographs and other images regardless of their origin. A diagnostic radiologist should regularly interpret radiographs and other images only when the radiologist reasonably participates in the quality of medical imaging, utilization review, and matters of policy which affect the quality of patient care.”
 
3
The ACR Medical Legal Committee defines official interpretation as that written report (and any supplements or amendments thereto) that attach to the patient’s permanent record. In health care facilities with a privilege delineation system, such a written report is prepared only by a qualified physician who has been granted specific delineated clinical privileges for that purpose by the facility’s governing body upon the recommendation of the medical staff.
 
4
The ACR Rules of Ethics state: “it is proper for a diagnostic radiologist to provide a consultative opinion on radiographs and other images regardless of their origin. A diagnostic radiologist should regularly interpret radiographs and other images only when the radiologist reasonably participates in the quality of medical imaging, utilization review, and matters of policy which affect the quality of patient care.”
 
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Rockette HE, Johns CM, Weissman JL, Holbert JM, Sumkin JH, King JL, Gur D. Relationship of subjective ratings of image quality and observer performance. Medical Imaging 1997: Image Perception Conference. Vol 3036. Newport Beach, Calif: SPIE; 1997. Rockette HE, Johns CM, Weissman JL, Holbert JM, Sumkin JH, King JL, Gur D. Relationship of subjective ratings of image quality and observer performance. Medical Imaging 1997: Image Perception Conference. Vol 3036. Newport Beach, Calif: SPIE; 1997.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Guidance for the Submission of Premarket Notifications for Medical Image Management Devices. Rockville, Md: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; July 2000. Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Guidance for the Submission of Premarket Notifications for Medical Image Management Devices. Rockville, Md: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; July 2000.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Brennan PC, McEntee M, Evanoff M, Phillips P, O’Connor WT, Manning DJ: Ambient lighting: effect of illumination on soft-copy viewing of radiographs of the wrist. AJR 188:W177–W180, 2007PubMedCrossRef Brennan PC, McEntee M, Evanoff M, Phillips P, O’Connor WT, Manning DJ: Ambient lighting: effect of illumination on soft-copy viewing of radiographs of the wrist. AJR 188:W177–W180, 2007PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Chawla AS, Samei E: Ambient illumination revisited: a new adaptation-based approach for optimizing medical imaging reading environments. Med Phys 34:81–90, 2007PubMedCrossRef Chawla AS, Samei E: Ambient illumination revisited: a new adaptation-based approach for optimizing medical imaging reading environments. Med Phys 34:81–90, 2007PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Mendelson DS, Bak PR, Menschik E, Siegel E: Informatics in radiology: image exchange: IHE and the evolution of image sharing. Radiographics 28:1817–1833, 2008PubMedCrossRef Mendelson DS, Bak PR, Menschik E, Siegel E: Informatics in radiology: image exchange: IHE and the evolution of image sharing. Radiographics 28:1817–1833, 2008PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Samei E, Badano A, Chakaraborty, et al. Assessment of Display Performance for Medical Imaging Systems: American Association of Physicists in Medicine; 2005. AAPM On-Line Report No. 3. Samei E, Badano A, Chakaraborty, et al. Assessment of Display Performance for Medical Imaging Systems: American Association of Physicists in Medicine; 2005. AAPM On-Line Report No. 3.
Metadaten
Titel
ACR–AAPM–SIIM Technical Standard for Electronic Practice of Medical Imaging
verfasst von
James T. Norweck
J. Anthony Seibert
Katherine P. Andriole
David A. Clunie
Bruce H. Curran
Michael J. Flynn
Elizabeth Krupinski
Ralph P. Lieto
Donald J. Peck
Tariq A. Mian
Margaret Wyatt
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2013
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Ausgabe 1/2013
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Elektronische ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-012-9522-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2013

Journal of Digital Imaging 1/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.