Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 2/2006

01.02.2006 | Original Contributions

Consequences of Conversion in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery

verfasst von: Rodrigo Gonzalez, M.D., C. Daniel Smith, M.D., Edward Mason, M.D., Titus Duncan, M.D., Russell Wilson, M.D., Jacqueline Miller, M.D., Bruce J. Ramshaw, M.D.

Erschienen in: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum | Ausgabe 2/2006

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Introduction

Laparoscopic procedures converted to open approaches have been associated with higher complication rates than laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy and appendectomy. Laparoscopic colorectal resections have relatively high conversion rates compared with other laparoscopic procedures. This study was designed to evaluate outcomes of conversions compared with laparoscopic and open colorectal resections.

Methods

We reviewed 498 consecutive colorectal resections performed between 1995 and 2002. Procedures were divided into laparoscopic colorectal resections, open colorectal resections, or conversions. Demographics, underlying disease, type of procedure performed, and operative outcomes were compared between groups.

Results

Of the 238 laparoscopic procedures performed, 182 were completed laparoscopically and 56 (23 percent) required conversion; 260 were performed open. Conversions were associated with greater blood loss (200 (range, 50–750) vs. 100 (range, 30–900) ml), longer time to first bowel movement (82 (range, 40–504) vs. 72 (range, 12–420) hr), and longer length of stay (6 (range, 2–67) vs.. 5 (range, 2–62) days) than the laparoscopic colorectal resections group. There was no difference in operative time, transfusion requirements, intraoperative and postoperative complications, or mortality between conversions and laparoscopic colorectal resections. Conversions resulted in fewer patients requiring transfusions (4 vs. 14 percent), shorter time to first bowel movement (82 (range, 40–504) vs. 93 (range, 24–240) hr), and shorter length of stay (6 (range, 2–67) vs. 7 (range, 2–180) days) than in the open colorectal resections group. There were no differences in complications or mortality between the conversion group and the open colorectal resections group.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic colorectal resections has a relatively high conversion rate; however, the converted cases have outcomes similar to open colorectal resections. In fact, the converted group required fewer blood transfusions than the open group. Experience and good judgment are fundamental for timely conversion of a laparoscopic procedure to open to decrease complication rates. Despite a high conversion rate, surgeons should consider laparoscopic colorectal resections, because even when necessary, conversion does not result in poorer outcomes than laparoscopic colorectal resections or open colorectal resections.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hildebrandt, U, Kessler, K, Plusczyk, T, et al. 2003Comparison of surgical stress between laparoscopic and open colonic resectionsSurg Endosc17242246CrossRefPubMed Hildebrandt, U, Kessler, K, Plusczyk, T,  et al. 2003Comparison of surgical stress between laparoscopic and open colonic resectionsSurg Endosc17242246CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hasegawa, H, Kabeshima, Y, Watanabe, M, et al. 2003Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open colectomy for advanced colorectal cancerSurg Endosc17636640CrossRefPubMed Hasegawa, H, Kabeshima, Y, Watanabe, M,  et al. 2003Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open colectomy for advanced colorectal cancerSurg Endosc17636640CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Braga, M, Vignali, A, Gianotti, L, et al. 2002Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery. A randomized trial on short-term outcomeAnn Surg236759767CrossRefPubMed Braga, M, Vignali, A, Gianotti, L,  et al. 2002Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery. A randomized trial on short-term outcomeAnn Surg236759767CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Senagore, AJ, Duepree, HJ, Delaney, CP, Dissanaike, S, Brady, KM, Fazio, VW 2002Cost structure of laparoscopic and open sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: similarities and differencesDis Colon Rectum45485490CrossRefPubMed Senagore, AJ, Duepree, HJ, Delaney, CP, Dissanaike, S, Brady, KM, Fazio, VW 2002Cost structure of laparoscopic and open sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: similarities and differencesDis Colon Rectum45485490CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Dwivedi, A, Chahin, F, Agrawal, S, et al. 2002Laparoscopic colectomy vs. open colectomy for sigmoid diverticular diseaseDis Colon Rectum4513091315CrossRefPubMed Dwivedi, A, Chahin, F, Agrawal, S,  et al. 2002Laparoscopic colectomy vs. open colectomy for sigmoid diverticular diseaseDis Colon Rectum4513091315CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Lacy, AM, García-Valdecasas, JC, Delgado, S, et al. 2002Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for the treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomized trialLancet35922242229CrossRefPubMed Lacy, AM, García-Valdecasas, JC, Delgado, S,  et al. 2002Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for the treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomized trialLancet35922242229CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Schlachta, CM, Mamazza, J, Seshadri, PA, Cadeddu, MO, Fregoire, R, Poulin, EC 2001Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resectionsDis Colon Rectum44217222CrossRefPubMed Schlachta, CM, Mamazza, J, Seshadri, PA, Cadeddu, MO, Fregoire, R, Poulin, EC 2001Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resectionsDis Colon Rectum44217222CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Reissman, P, Cohen, S, Weiss, EG, Wexner, SD 1996Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: ascending the learning curveWorld J Surg20277282CrossRefPubMed Reissman, P, Cohen, S, Weiss, EG, Wexner, SD 1996Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: ascending the learning curveWorld J Surg20277282CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Gervaz, P, Pikarsky, A, Utech, M, et al. 2001Converted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. A meta-analysisSurg Endosc15827832CrossRefPubMed Gervaz, P, Pikarsky, A, Utech, M,  et al. 2001Converted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. A meta-analysisSurg Endosc15827832CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Chaisermartin, C, Panis, Y, Mognol, P, Valleur, P 2003Sigmoïdectomie laparoscopique pour diverticulite: la phase d'apprentissage est-elle associée à une sur-morbidité?Ann Chir1288187CrossRef Chaisermartin, C, Panis, Y, Mognol, P, Valleur, P 2003Sigmoïdectomie laparoscopique pour diverticulite: la phase d'apprentissage est-elle associée à une sur-morbidité?Ann Chir1288187CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Lo, C-M, Fan, S-T, Liu, C-L, et al. 1997Early decision for conversion of laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy for treatment of acute cholecystitisAm J Surg173513517CrossRefPubMed Lo, C-M, Fan, S-T, Liu, C-L,  et al. 1997Early decision for conversion of laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy for treatment of acute cholecystitisAm J Surg173513517CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hellberg, A, Rudberg, C, Enochsson, L, et al. 2001Conversion from laparoscopic to open appendectomy: a possible drawback of the laparoscopic technique?Eur J Surg167209213PubMedCrossRef Hellberg, A, Rudberg, C, Enochsson, L,  et al. 2001Conversion from laparoscopic to open appendectomy: a possible drawback of the laparoscopic technique?Eur J Surg167209213PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Sanabria, JR, Gallinger, S, Croxford, R, Strasberg, SM 1994Risk factors in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for conversion to open cholecystectomyJ Am Coll Surg179696704PubMed Sanabria, JR, Gallinger, S, Croxford, R, Strasberg, SM 1994Risk factors in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for conversion to open cholecystectomyJ Am Coll Surg179696704PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwandner, O, Schiedeck, TH, Bruch, H-P 1999The role of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Do predictive factors exist?Surg Endosc13151156CrossRefPubMed Schwandner, O, Schiedeck, TH, Bruch, H-P 1999The role of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Do predictive factors exist?Surg Endosc13151156CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Schlachta, CM, Mamazza, J, Seshadri, PA, et al. 2000Determinants of outcomes in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. A multiple regression analysis of 416 resectionsSurg Endosc14258263PubMedCrossRef Schlachta, CM, Mamazza, J, Seshadri, PA,  et al. 2000Determinants of outcomes in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. A multiple regression analysis of 416 resectionsSurg Endosc14258263PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmidt, CM, Talamini, MA, Kaurman, HS, et al. 2001Laparoscopic surgery for Crohn's disease: reasons for conversionAnn Surg233733739CrossRefPubMed Schmidt, CM, Talamini, MA, Kaurman, HS,  et al. 2001Laparoscopic surgery for Crohn's disease: reasons for conversionAnn Surg233733739CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Marusch, F, Gastinger, I, Schneider, C, et al. 2001Importance of conversion for results obtained with laparoscopic colorectal surgeryDis Colon Rectum44207216CrossRefPubMed Marusch, F, Gastinger, I, Schneider, C,  et al. 2001Importance of conversion for results obtained with laparoscopic colorectal surgeryDis Colon Rectum44207216CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Moine, M-C, Fabre, J-M, Vacher, C, et al. 2003Factors and consequences of conversion in laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticular diseaseBr J Surg90232236PubMedCrossRef Moine, M-C, Fabre, J-M, Vacher, C,  et al. 2003Factors and consequences of conversion in laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticular diseaseBr J Surg90232236PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Slim, K, Pezet, D, Riff, Y, et al. 1995High morbidity rate after converted laparoscopic colorectal surgeryBr J Surg8214061408PubMed Slim, K, Pezet, D, Riff, Y,  et al. 1995High morbidity rate after converted laparoscopic colorectal surgeryBr J Surg8214061408PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Tittel, A, Schippers, E, Anurov, M, et al. 2001Shorter postoperative agony after laparoscopic-assisted colonic resection? An animal studySurg Endosc15508512PubMedCrossRef Tittel, A, Schippers, E, Anurov, M,  et al. 2001Shorter postoperative agony after laparoscopic-assisted colonic resection? An animal studySurg Endosc15508512PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Tung, PH, Smith, CD 1999Laparoscopic insufflation with room air causes exaggerated interleukin-6 responseSurg Endosc13473475CrossRefPubMed Tung, PH, Smith, CD 1999Laparoscopic insufflation with room air causes exaggerated interleukin-6 responseSurg Endosc13473475CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Consequences of Conversion in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery
verfasst von
Rodrigo Gonzalez, M.D.
C. Daniel Smith, M.D.
Edward Mason, M.D.
Titus Duncan, M.D.
Russell Wilson, M.D.
Jacqueline Miller, M.D.
Bruce J. Ramshaw, M.D.
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2006
Erschienen in
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum / Ausgabe 2/2006
Print ISSN: 0012-3706
Elektronische ISSN: 1530-0358
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-005-0258-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2006

Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 2/2006 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.