Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 3/2006

01.03.2006 | Original Contributions

A Comparison of POSSUM, P-POSSUM and Colorectal POSSUM for the Prediction of Postoperative Mortality in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Resection

verfasst von: Thangiah Ramkumar, M.R.C.S., Vivien Ng, M.R.C.S., Lucy Fowler, M.B.B.S., Ridzuan Farouk, M.Ch., F.R.C.S.

Erschienen in: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum | Ausgabe 3/2006

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Purpose

POSSUM (Physiologic and Operative Severity Score for enUmeration of Morbidity & Mortality) and P-POSSUM have been validated as scoring tools for the prediction of postoperative complications in general surgical patients. More recently a colorectal-specific POSSUM has been developed for mortality prediction. This study was designed to evaluate and compare the accuracy for mortality prediction of POSSUM, P-POSSUM, and colorectal POSSUM after major and complex major colorectal procedures.

Methods

The relationship between the observed and expected morbidity and mortality was examined in 347 consecutive patients (321 elective, 26 urgent) undergoing a major or complex major colorectal resection using POSSUM, P-POSSUM, and Colorectal POSSUM. The accuracy of using these scoring tools to predict mortality was assessed using Receiver Operator Characteristic curve analysis.

Results

A total of 347 consecutive patients (median age, 69 (range, 34–92) years) were assessed. Seventy-one patients (20.5 percent) suffered a postoperative complication and 15 patients (4.3 percent) died. The observed: expected POSSUM ratio for morbidity was 0.71 and mortality 0.68. The area under curve from Receiver Operator Characteristic curve analysis for POSSUM was 0.752. The observed:expected mortality ratio for P-POSSUM was 0.71, and the area under curve from Receiver Operator Characteristic curve analysis was 0.749. The observed:expected mortality ratio for colorectal POSSUM was 0.75, and the area under the curve from Receiver Operator Characteristic curve analysis was 0.781.

Conclusions

Colorectal POSSUM provides comparable prediction of mortality risk after colorectal resection compared with POSSUM and P-POSSUM.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Copeland, GP, Jones, D, Walters, M 1991POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical auditBr J Surg78355360PubMed Copeland, GP, Jones, D, Walters, M 1991POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical auditBr J Surg78355360PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones, DR, Copeland, GP, Cossart, L 1992Comparison of POSSUM with APACHE II for prediction of outcome from a surgical high dependency unitBr J Surg7912931296PubMed Jones, DR, Copeland, GP, Cossart, L 1992Comparison of POSSUM with APACHE II for prediction of outcome from a surgical high dependency unitBr J Surg7912931296PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Whiteley, MS, Prytherch, DR, Higgins, B, Weaver, PC, Prout, WG 1996An evaluation of the POSSUM surgical scoring systemBr J Surg83812815PubMed Whiteley, MS, Prytherch, DR, Higgins, B, Weaver, PC, Prout, WG 1996An evaluation of the POSSUM surgical scoring systemBr J Surg83812815PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Prytherch, DR, Whiteley, MS, Higgins, B, Weaver, PC, Prout, WG 1998POSSUM and P-POSSUM for predicting mortality. Results from 10,000 surgical patientsBr J Surg8512171220CrossRefPubMed Prytherch, DR, Whiteley, MS, Higgins, B, Weaver, PC, Prout, WG 1998POSSUM and P-POSSUM for predicting mortality. Results from 10,000 surgical patientsBr J Surg8512171220CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Shuhaiber, JH, Hankins, M, Robless, P, Whitehead, SM 2002Comparison of POSSUM and P-POSSUM for prediction of mortality in infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repairAnn Vasc Surg16736741CrossRefPubMed Shuhaiber, JH, Hankins, M, Robless, P, Whitehead, SM 2002Comparison of POSSUM and P-POSSUM for prediction of mortality in infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repairAnn Vasc Surg16736741CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Zafirellis, KD, Fountolakis, A, Dolan, K, Martin, IG, Sue-Ling, HM 2002Evaluation of POSSUM in patients with oesophageal cancer undergoing resectionBr J Surg8911501155CrossRefPubMed Zafirellis, KD, Fountolakis, A, Dolan, K, Martin, IG, Sue-Ling, HM 2002Evaluation of POSSUM in patients with oesophageal cancer undergoing resectionBr J Surg8911501155CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Midwinter, MJ, Tytherleigh, M, Ashley, S 1999Estimation of mortality and morbidity risk in vascular surgery using POSSUM and the Portsmouth predictor equationBr J Surg86471474PubMed Midwinter, MJ, Tytherleigh, M, Ashley, S 1999Estimation of mortality and morbidity risk in vascular surgery using POSSUM and the Portsmouth predictor equationBr J Surg86471474PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Menon, KV, Farouk, R 2002An analysis of the accuracy of P-POSSUM scoring for mortality risk assessment after surgery for colorectal cancerColorectal Dis4197200CrossRefPubMed Menon, KV, Farouk, R 2002An analysis of the accuracy of P-POSSUM scoring for mortality risk assessment after surgery for colorectal cancerColorectal Dis4197200CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Association of Coloproctology Colorectal Cancer Study. 2002. Part B: risk adjusted outcomes. The ACPGBI colorectal cancer model. Available at: http://www.nbocap.org.uk. Association of Coloproctology Colorectal Cancer Study. 2002. Part B: risk adjusted outcomes. The ACPGBI colorectal cancer model. Available at: http://​www.​nbocap.​org.​uk.​
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Tekkis, PP, Prythcherch, DR, Kocher, HM, et al. 2004Development of a dedicated risk adjustment scoring system for colorectal surgery (colorectal POSSUM)Br J Surg9111741182PubMed Tekkis, PP, Prythcherch, DR, Kocher, HM,  et al. 2004Development of a dedicated risk adjustment scoring system for colorectal surgery (colorectal POSSUM)Br J Surg9111741182PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Report of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain & Ireland Bowel Cancer Study. June 2004. Available at: http://www.nbocap.org.uk. Report of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain & Ireland Bowel Cancer Study. June 2004. Available at: http://​www.​nbocap.​org.​uk.​
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Tekkis, PP, Poloniecki, JD, Thompson, MR, Stamatakis, JD 2003Operative mortality in colorectal cancer: prospective national studyBMJ32711961201CrossRefPubMed Tekkis, PP, Poloniecki, JD, Thompson, MR, Stamatakis, JD 2003Operative mortality in colorectal cancer: prospective national studyBMJ32711961201CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanley, JA, McNeil, BJ 1982The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curveRadiology1432936PubMed Hanley, JA, McNeil, BJ 1982The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curveRadiology1432936PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Longo, WE, Virgo, KS, Johnson, FE, et al. 2000Risk factors for morbidity and mortality after colectomy for colorectal cancerDis Colon Rectum438391CrossRefPubMed Longo, WE, Virgo, KS, Johnson, FE,  et al. 2000Risk factors for morbidity and mortality after colectomy for colorectal cancerDis Colon Rectum438391CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Tekkis, PP, Kinsman, R, Thompson, MR, Stamatakis, JD 2004The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland study of large bowel obstruction caused by colorectal cancerAnn Surg2407681PubMed Tekkis, PP, Kinsman, R, Thompson, MR, Stamatakis, JD 2004The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland study of large bowel obstruction caused by colorectal cancerAnn Surg2407681PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Senagore, AJ, Warmuth, AJ, Delaney, CP, Tekkis, PP, Fazio, VW 2004POSSUM, P-POSSUM, and Cr-POSSUM: implementation in a United States health care system for prediction of outcome for colon cancer resectionDis Colon Rectum4714351441CrossRefPubMed Senagore, AJ, Warmuth, AJ, Delaney, CP, Tekkis, PP, Fazio, VW 2004POSSUM, P-POSSUM, and Cr-POSSUM: implementation in a United States health care system for prediction of outcome for colon cancer resectionDis Colon Rectum4714351441CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Julious, SA, Mullee, MA 2000Crude rates of outcomeBr J Surg8789PubMed Julious, SA, Mullee, MA 2000Crude rates of outcomeBr J Surg8789PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Daley, J, Forbes, MG, Young, GJ, et al. 1997Validating risk-adjusted surgical outcomes: site visit assessment of process and structure. National VA Surgical Risk StudyJ Am Coll Surg185341351PubMed Daley, J, Forbes, MG, Young, GJ,  et al. 1997Validating risk-adjusted surgical outcomes: site visit assessment of process and structure. National VA Surgical Risk StudyJ Am Coll Surg185341351PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
A Comparison of POSSUM, P-POSSUM and Colorectal POSSUM for the Prediction of Postoperative Mortality in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Resection
verfasst von
Thangiah Ramkumar, M.R.C.S.
Vivien Ng, M.R.C.S.
Lucy Fowler, M.B.B.S.
Ridzuan Farouk, M.Ch., F.R.C.S.
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2006
Erschienen in
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum / Ausgabe 3/2006
Print ISSN: 0012-3706
Elektronische ISSN: 1530-0358
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-005-0290-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2006

Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 3/2006 Zur Ausgabe

Announcements

Announcements

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.