Abstract
A 44-year-old woman was referred to our hospital because of a cystic lesion in the pancreatic body that was found by computed tomography (CT) as a result of a screening for impaired liver function after the patient presented with a high fever in 2011. Trans-abdominal ultrasonography (US) revealed a 33-mm unilocular cyst within the pancreatic body and a 5-mm hypoechoic mass in the pancreatic neck. Contrast-enhanced CT showed a slight enhancement around the cyst and a mild dilation of the main pancreatic duct, but neither septum nor nodule was detected inside. Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography (CE-EUS) revealed a hyperechoic elevated lesion inside the cystic lesion without enhancement in the pancreatic body; CE-EUS also revealed a 5-mm homogeneous hypoechoic mass with a remarkable enhancement in the pancreatic neck with the use of Sonazoid® as a contrast medium. These lesions were diagnosed as a pancreatic pseudocyst and a neuroendocrine tumor (NET), respectively, and were followed up with periodic examinations. The cystic lesion showed contraction 6 months after the initial exam. However, US revealed an enlargement of the cystic lesion to 40 mm in diameter 2 years after the initial exam, and EUS showed irregular thickening of the wall with a cyst-in-cyst appearance. The diagnoses of a mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN) and a concomitant small NET were made after a distal pancreatectomy. We herein report a rare case of MCN that showed various morphological changes over 2 years of observation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Reddy RP, Smyrk TC, Zapiach M, et al. Pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasm defined by ovarian stroma: demographics, clinical features, and prevalence of cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;2:1026–31.
Suzuki Y, Atomi Y, Sugiyama M, et al. Cystic neoplasm of the pancreas: a Japanese multiinstitutional study of intraductal papillary mucinous tumor and mucinous cystic tumor. Pancreas. 2004;28:241–6.
Tanaka M, Chari S, Adsay V, et al. International consensus guidelines for management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. Pancreatology. 2006;6:17–32.
Ooi LL, Ho GH, Chew SP, et al. Cystic tumours of the pancreas: a diagnostic dilemma. Aust N Z J Surg. 1998;68:844–6.
Yamashita Y, Ito K, Noda Y, et al. A case of mucinous cyst adenoma of the pancreas resected after a 10-year follow-up. Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi. 2011;108:1280–7.
Fukuda J, Tanaka S, Nakao M, et al. A case of pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasm: long-term follow-up with ultrasonography. Jpn J Med Ultrasonics. 2011;38:19–24.
Nomura N, Kanazumi N, Watanabe I, et al. A case of mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of pancreas resected after a follow-up for a long term. Jpn J Gastroenterol Surg. 2007;40:319–24.
Testini M, Gurrado A, Lissidini G, et al. Management of mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:5682–92.
Yamao K, Nakamura T, Suzuki T, et al. Endoscopic diagnosis and staging of mucinous cystic neoplasms and intraductal papillary-mucinous tumors. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2003;10:142–6.
Ishikawa T, Goto H, Hirooka Y, et al. Usefulness of EUS combined with contrast-enhancement in the differential diagnosis of malignant versus benign and preoperative localization of pancreatic endocrine tumors. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:951–9.
Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH et al. WHO classification of tumours. IARC WHO classification of tumours, No 3 2010.
Conflict of interest
Takuya Ishikawa, Jun-ichi Haruta, Takeo Yamaguchi, Masao Doisaki, Tsuyoki Yama, Kentarou Murate, Shun Hattori, Kenta Yamada, and Jun Yashika declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical standard
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Ishikawa, T., Haruta, Ji., Yamaguchi, T. et al. A case of mucinous cystic neoplasm of the pancreas misdiagnosed as a pancreatic pseudocyst at the initial exam and resected after a 2-year follow-up. J Med Ultrasonics 42, 257–265 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-014-0581-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-014-0581-5