Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Biomechanical Assessment of Brain Dynamic Responses Due to Blast Pressure Waves

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A mechanized and integrated computational scheme is introduced to determine the human brain responses in an environment where the human head is exposed to explosions from trinitrotoluene (TNT), or other high-yield explosives, in military applications. The procedure is based on a three-dimensional (3-D) non-linear finite element method (FEM) that implements a simultaneous conduction of explosive detonation, shock wave propagation, blast–head interactions, and the confronting human head. The processes of blast propagation in the air and blast interaction with the head are modeled by an Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian (ALE) multi-material FEM formulation, together with a penalty-based fluid/structure interaction (FSI) algorithm. Such a model has already been successfully validated against experimental data regarding air-free blast and plate–blast interactions. The human head model is a 3-D geometrically realistic configuration that has been previously validated against the brain intracranial pressure (ICP), as well as shear and principal strains under different impact loadings of cadaveric experimental tests of Hardy et al. [Hardy W. N., C. Foster, M. Mason, S. Chirag, J. Bishop, M. Bey, W. Anderst, and S. Tashman. A study of the response of the human cadaver head to impact. Proc. 51 st Stapp. Car Crash J. 17–80, 2007]. Different scenarios have been assumed to capture an appropriate picture of the brain response at a constant stand-off distance of nearly 80 cm from the core of the explosion, but exposed to different amounts of a highly explosive (HE) material such as TNT. The overpressures at the vicinity of the head are in the range of about 2.4–8.7 atmosphere (atm), considering the reflected pressure from the head. The methodology provides brain ICP, maximum shear stresses and maximum principal strain within the milli-scale time frame of this highly dynamic phenomenon. While focusing on the two mechanical parameters of pressure, and also on the maximum shear stress and maximum principal strain to predict the brain injury, the research provides an assessment of the brain responses to different amounts of overpressure. The research also demonstrates the ability to predict the ICP, as well as the stress and strain within the brain, due to such an event. The research cannot identify, however, the specific levels of ICP, stress and strain that necessarily lead to traumatic brain injury (TBI) because there is no access to experimental data regarding head–blast interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alia, A., and M. Souli. High explosive simulation using multi-material formulations. Appl. Thermal. Eng. 26:1032–1042, 2006.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, R. W. G., C. J. Brown, P. C. Blumbergs, G. Scott, J. W. Finney, N. R. Jones, and A. J. Mclean. Mechanisms of axonal injury: an experimental and numerical study of a sheep model of head impact. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on the Biomechanics of Impact, pp. 107–120, 1999.

  3. Bain, A. C., and D. F. Meaney. Tissue-level thresholds for axonal damage in an experimental model of central nervous system white matter injury. J. Biomech. Eng. 16:615–622, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Benson, D. J. A mixture theory for contact in multi-material Eulerian formulations. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 140:59–86, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bradshaw, D. R. S., and C. L. Morfey. Pressure and shear response in brain injury models. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2001.

  6. Chafi, M. S., V. Dirisala, G. Karami, and M. Ziejewski. A finite element method parametric study of the dynamic response of the human brain with different cerebrospinal fluid constitutive properties. Proc. IMechE Vol. 223 Part H: J. Eng. Med. doi:10.1243/09544119JEIM631.

  7. Chafi, M. S., V. Dirisala, G. Karami, and M. Ziejewski. Biomechanical examination of brain-skull relative motion and brain strain, and intracranial pressure under kinematical impact loading. Comput. Math. Methods Med. (under review), 2009.

  8. Chafi, M. S., G. Karami, and M. Ziejewski. Numerical analysis of blast-induced wave propagation using FSI and ALE multi-material formulations. Int. J. Impact Eng. doi:10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.03.007.

  9. Denny-Brown, D., and W. R. Russell. Experimental cerebral concussion. Brain 64:93–164, 1941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dobratz, B. M. LLNL Explosives Handbook, Properties of Chemical Explosives and Explosive Stimulants. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Univ. of Calif. Rept. UCRL-52997, 1981.

  11. Elsayed, N. M. Toxicology of blast overpressure. Toxicology 121:1–15, 1997.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gefen, A., and S. S. Margulies. Are in vivo and in situ brain tissues mechanically similar? J. Biomech. 37:1339–1352, 2004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gilchrist, M. D. Modeling and accident reconstruction of head impact injuries. Key Eng. Mater. 245–246:417–429, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gurdjian, E., and E. S. Gurdjian. Acute head injuries. Surgery 146:805–820, 1978.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hardy, W. N., C. Foster, M. Mason, S. Chirag, J. Bishop, M. Bey, W. Anderst, and S. Tashman. A study of the response of the human cadaver head to impact. Proc. 51st Stapp. Car Crash J. 17–80, 2007.

  16. Horgan, T. J., and M. D. Gilchirst. The creation of three-dimensional finite element models for simulating head impact biomechanics. Int. J. Crashworthiness 8:1–14, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kang, H. S., R. Willimger, B. M. Diaw, and B. Chinn. Modeling of the human head under impact conditions: a parametric study. In: Proceedings of the 41st Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE Paper No. 973338, 1997.

  18. Kleiven, S., and W. N. Hardy. Correlation of an FE model of the human head with local brain motion—consequences for injury prediction. In: Proceedings of the 46th Stapp Car Crash Conference, pp. 123–143, 2002.

  19. Kleiven, S., and H. Von Holst. Consequences of head size following trauma to the human head. J. Biomech. 35:153–160, 2002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ls-dyna keyword user manual. Version 971, Livermore Software Technology Corporation, 2006.

  21. Mayorga, M. A. The pathology of primary blast overpressure injury. Toxicology 121:17–28, 1997.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mclean, A. J. Brain injury without head impact? J. Neurotrauma 12:621–625, 1995.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mendis, K. K., R. K. Stalnaker, and S. H. Advani. A constitutive relationship for large deformation finite element modeling of brain tissue. J. Biomech. Eng. Trans. ASME 117:279–285, 1995.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Miller, R. T., S. S. Margulies, M. Leoni, M. Nonaka, X. Chen, D. H. Smith, and D. F. Meaney. Finite element modeling approaches for predicting injury in an experimental model of severe diffuse axonal injury. In: Proceedings of the 42nd Stapp Car Crash Conference, pp. 155–166, 1998.

  25. Morrision, III, B., H. L. Cater, C. C.-B. Wang, F. C. Thomas, C. T. Hung, G. A. Ateshian, and L. E. Sundstrom. A tissue level tolerance criterion for living brain developed with an in vitro model of traumatic mechanical loading. Stapp Car Crash J. 47:93–105, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nahum, A. M., R. Smith, and C. C. Ward. Intracranial pressure dynamics during head impact. In: Proceedings of the 21st Stapp Car Crash Conference, pp. 337–366, 1977.

  27. O’Donoghue, D., and M. D. Gilchrist. Strategies for modeling brain impact injuries. Irish J. Med. Sci. 167:263–264, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ommaya, A. K. The mechanical properties of tissues of the nervous system. J. Biomech. 2:1–12, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ommaya, A. K. Head injury mechanisms and the concept of preventive management: a review and critical synthesis. J. Neurotrauma 12:527–546, 1995.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Prange, M. T., and S. S. Margulies. Regional, directional, and age-dependent properties of the brain undergoing large deformation. J. Biomech. Eng. 124:244–252, 2002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ruan, J. S., T. B. Khalil, and A. I. King. Human head dynamic response to side impact by finite element modeling. ASME J. Biomech. Eng. 113:276–283, 1991.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Sano, K., N. Nakamura, and K. Hirakawa. Mechanism of and dynamics of closed head injuries. Neurol. Mediochir. 9:21–23, 1967.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Shreiber, D. I., A. C. Bain, and D. F. Meaney. In vivo thresholds for mechanical injury to the blood–brain barrier. In: Proceedings of the 41st Stapp Car Crash Conference, pp. 277–291, 1997.

  34. Shuck, L., and S. Advani. Rheological response of human brain tissue in shear. J. Basic Eng. 94:905–911, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Souli, M., A. Ouahsine, and L. Lewin. ALE formulation for fluid–structure interaction problems. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 190:659–675, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Taber, K. H., D. L. Warden, and R. A. Hurley. Blast-related traumatic brain injury: what is known? J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 18:141–145, 2006.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Takhounts, E. G., J. R. Crandall, and K. K. Darvish. On the importance of nonlinearity of brain tissue under large deformations. Stapp Car Crash J. 47:107–134, 2003.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ward, C. C., M. Chan, and A. M. Nahum. Intracranial pressure—a brain injury criterion. In: Proceedings, 24th Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE Paper No. 801304, 1980.

  39. Willinger, R., H. Kang, and B. Diaw. Three-dimensional human head finite-element model validation against two experimental impacts. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 27:403–410, 1999.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Willinger, R., L. Taleb, and C. M. Kopp. Modal and temporal analysis of head mathematical models. J. Neurotrauma 12:743–754, 1995.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Willinger, R., L. Taled, and P. Pradore. Head biomechanics: from the finite element model to the physical model. In: Proceedings of the IRCOBI Conference. Brunnen, Switzerland, International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Impact, Bron, France, pp. 245–260, 1995.

  42. Zhou, C., T. B. Khalil, and A. I. King. A new model comparing impact responses of the homogeneous and inhomogeneous human brain. In: Proceedings of the 39th Stapp Car Crash Conference, pp. 121–137, 1995.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) for the financial support of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, 58105-5285, USA

    M. S. Chafi, G. Karami & M. Ziejewski

Authors
  1. M. S. Chafi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. Karami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Ziejewski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. S. Chafi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chafi, M.S., Karami, G. & Ziejewski, M. Biomechanical Assessment of Brain Dynamic Responses Due to Blast Pressure Waves. Ann Biomed Eng 38, 490–504 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-009-9813-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-009-9813-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation