Abstract
Surface electrodes are commonly used electrodes clinically, in applications such as functional electrical stimulation for the restoration of motor functions, pain relief, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, electrocardiographic monitoring, defibrillation, surface cardiac pacing, and advanced drug delivery systems. Common to these applications are occasional reports of pain, tissue damage, rash, or burns on the skin at the point where electrodes are placed. In this study, we quantitatively analyzed the effects of acute noninvasive electrical stimulation from concentric ring electrodes (CRE) to determine the maximum safe current limit. We developed a three-dimensional multi-layer model and calculated the temperature profile under the CRE and the corresponding energy density with electrical-thermal coupled field analysis. Infrared thermography was used to measure skin temperature during electrical stimulation to verify the computer simulations. We also performed histological analysis to study cell morphology and characterize any resulting tissue damage. The simulation results are accurate for low energy density distributions. It can also be concluded that as long as the specified energy density applied is kept below 0.92 (A2/cm4·s−1), the maximum temperature will remain within the safe limits. Future work should focus on the effects of the electrode paste.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ambler, J. J., D. M. Sado, D. A. Zideman, and C. D. Deakin. The incidence and severity of cutaneous burns following external DC cardioversion. Resuscitation 61:281–288, 2004.
Auletta, C. Current in vivo assays for cutaneous toxicity: local and systemic toxicity testing. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 95:201–208, 2004.
Balmaseda, Jr., M. T., M. T. Fatehi, S. H. Koozekanani, and J. S. Sheppard. Burns in functional electric stimulation: two case reports. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 68:452–453, 1987.
Besio, W., H. Cao, and P. Zhou. Application of tripolar concentric electrodes and pre-feature selection algorithm for brain-computer interface. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 16(2):191–194, 2008.
Besio, W., K. Koka, R. Aakula, and W. Dai. Tri-polar concentric electrode development for high resolution EEG Laplacian electroencephalography using tri-polar concentric ring electrodes. IEEE Trans. BME 53(5):926–933, 2006.
Besio, W., K. Koka, and A. Cole. Effects of noninvasive transcutaneous electrical stimulation via concentric ring electrodes on pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus in rats. Epilepsia 48(12):2273–2279, 2007.
Cowan, S., J. McKenna, E. McCrum-Gardner, M. Johnson, K. Sluka, and D. Walsh. An investigation of the hypoalgesic effects of TENS delivered by a glove electrode. J. Pain 10:694–701, 2009.
Danielsen, L., M. Gniadecka, H. K. Thomsen, F. Pedersen, S. Strange, K. G. Nielsen, and H. D. Petersen. Skin changes following defibrillation. The effect of high voltage direct current. Forensic Sci. Int. 134:134–141, 2003.
Davey, K., C. Epstein, M. George, and D. Bohning. Measuring the effects of electrical conductivity of the head on the induced electric field in the brain during magnetic stimulation. Clin. Neurophys. 114(11):2204–2209, 2003.
Fregni, F., S. Thome-Souza, M. Nitsche, S. Freedman, K. Valente, and A. Pascual-Leone. A controlled clinical trial of cathodal DC polarization in patients with refractory epilepsy. Epilepsia 47:335–342, 2006.
Grossi, E. A., M. A. Parish, M. R. Kralik, L. R. Glassman, R. A. Esposito, G. H. Ribakove, A. C. Galloway, and S. B. Colvin. Direct-current injury from external pacemaker results in tissue electrolysis. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 56:156–157, 1993.
Kerber, R., R. Kieso, M. Kienzle, B. Olshansky, A. Waldo, M. Carlson, D. Wilber, A. Aschoff, S. Birger, and F. Charbonnier. Current-based transthoracic defibrillation. Am. J. Cardiol. 78:1113–1118, 1996.
Kim, Y., and P. H. Schimpf. Electrical behavior of defibrillation and pacing electrodes. Proc. IEEE 84:446–456, 1996.
Kim, Y., J. G. Webster, and W. J. Tompkins. Simulated and experimental studies of temperature elevation around electrosurgical dispersive electrodes. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 31:681–692, 1984.
Koka, K., and W. Besio. Improvement of spatial selectivity and decrease of mutual information of tri-polar concentric ring electrodes. J. Neurosci. Methods 165:216–222, 2007.
Kowalski, T., J. Silny, and H. Buchner. Current density threshold for the stimulation of neurons in the motor cortex area. Bioelectromagnetics 23(6):421–428, 2002.
Krasteva, V. T., and S. P. Papazov. Estimation of current density distribution under electrodes for external defibrillation. Biomed. Eng. Online 16:1–7, 2002.
Lambert, H., E. De Baetselier, G. Vanalme, and G. D. Mey. Skin burn risk using transcutaneous direct current. Proceedings of IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 17th Annual Conference, 1995, pp. 477–478.
Lippmann, M., and W. A. Fields. Burns of the skin caused by a peripheral-nerve stimulator. Anesthesiology 40:82–84, 1974.
Merrill, D., M. Bikson, and J. Jefferys. Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols. J. Neurosci. Methods 141:171–198, 2005.
Miranda, P. C., M. Lomarev, and M. Hallett. Modeling the current distribution during transcranial direct current stimulation. Clin. Neurophysiol. 117(7):1623–1629, 2006.
Moritz, R., and F. C. Henriques. Studies of thermal injury: II. The relative importance of time and surface temperature in the causation of skin burns. Am. J. Pathol. 23:695–720, 1947.
Oosterom, A. V., and J. Strackee. Computing the lead field of electrodes with axial symmetry. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 21:473–481, 1983.
Overmeyer, K. M., J. A. Pearce, and D. P. DeWitt. Measurements of temperature distributions at electrosurgical dispersive electrode sites. J. Biomech. Eng. 101:66–72, 1979.
Pacelat, E., R. Magjarevic, and V. Isgum. Measurement of electrode-tissue interface characteristics during high current transcranial pulse electrical stimulation. Measurement 27:133–143, 2000.
Papazov, S., Z. Kostov, and I. Daskalov. Electrical current distribution under transthoracic defibrillation and pacing electrodes. J. Med. Eng. Technol. 26:22–27, 2002.
Patriciu, A., K. Yoshida, J. J. Struijk, T. P. DeMonte, M. L. Joy, and H. Stodkilde-Jorgensen. Current density imaging and electrically induced skin burns under surface electrodes. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 52:2024–2031, 2005.
Pearce, J. A., L. A. Geddes, J. F. Van Vleet, K. Foster, and J. Allen. Skin burns from electrosurgical current. Med. Instrum. 17:225–231, 1983.
Sackeim, H. Convulsant and anticonvulsant properties of ECT towards a focal form of brain stimulation. Clin. Neurosci. Res. 4:39–57, 2004.
Shah, R. N., and J. G. Webster. Burns under electrosurgical dispersive electrodes. Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting AAMI, Vol. 20, Las Vagas, NV, 1979, p. 292.
Stoner, D. L., J. H. Yoo, R. W. Feldtman, and W. Stanford. Human skin burns induced by defibrillator default current. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 72:157–161, 1976.
Takamiya, M., K. Saigusa, N. Nakayashiki, and Y. Aoki. A histological study on the mechanism of epidermal nuclear elongation in electrical and burn injuries. Int. J. Legal Med. 115:152–157, 2001.
Vedovato, J. W., V. P. Polvora, and D. F. Leonardi. Burns as a complication of the use of diathermy. J. Burn Care Rehabil. 25:120–123, 2004.
Wiley, J. D., and J. G. Webster. Analysis and control of the current distribution under circular dispersive electrodes. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 29:381–385, 1982.
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to thank Green Family Chiropractic of Farmerville Louisiana for the use of there infrared thermography system and Dr. Mesut Sahin for rat experimental training and use of his laboratory.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Associate Editor Berj L. Bardakjian oversaw the review of this article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Besio, W., Sharma, V. & Spaulding, J. The Effects of Concentric Ring Electrode Electrical Stimulation on Rat Skin. Ann Biomed Eng 38, 1111–1118 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-009-9891-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-009-9891-y