Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Konkret geht es um den Diabetes-Patienten mit kardiovaskulären Erkrankungen oder Risiken, die Herzinsuffizienz sowie die kardiovaskuläre Primär- und Sekundärprävention. Sind Sie hier schon auf dem neuesten Stand? Unsere Experten beleuchten, wo und warum das bisherige Procedere geändert werden soll und was in der Praxis sinnvoll ist. Holen Sie sich Ihr Update und 2 CME-Punkte beim MMW-Webinar am 24. April von 17.30 bis 19 Uhr. 
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
AIDS and Behavior
Erschienen in: AIDS and Behavior 7/2016

19.02.2016 | Original Paper

Framing HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) for the General Public: How Inclusive Messaging May Prevent Prejudice from Diminishing Public Support

verfasst von: Sarah K. Calabrese, Kristen Underhill, Valerie A. Earnshaw, Nathan B. Hansen, Trace S. Kershaw, Manya Magnus, Douglas S. Krakower, Kenneth H. Mayer, Joseph R. Betancourt, John F. Dovidio

Erschienen in: AIDS and Behavior | Ausgabe 7/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Strategic framing of public messages about HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) may influence public support for policies and programs affecting access. This survey study examined how public attitudes toward PrEP differed based on the social group PrEP was described as benefiting (“beneficiary”) and the moderating effect of prejudice. Members of the general public (n = 154) recruited online were randomly assigned to three beneficiary conditions: general population, gay men, or Black gay men. All participants received identical PrEP background information before completing measures of PrEP attitudes (specifying beneficiary), racism, and heterosexism. Despite anticipating greater PrEP adherence among gay men and Black gay men and perceiving PrEP as especially beneficial to the latter, participants expressed lower support for policies/programs making PrEP affordable for these groups vs. the general population. This disparity in support was stronger among participants reporting greater prejudice. Inclusive framing of PrEP in public discourse may prevent prejudice from undermining implementation efforts.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
Within our sample, participants recruited via Amazon’s Mechanical Turk compared to those recruited via the Yale School of Management eLab did not significantly differ in terms of age, ethnicity, race, sexual orientation, or education. The only significant sociodemographic difference identified was with regard to gender, with a greater proportion of Mechanical Turk participants than eLab participants being male [55 vs. 29 %, respectively, χ2(1) = 9.73, p < .01]. Gender was adjusted for in all primary and post hoc analyses.
 
2
We repeated these tests using non-parametric tests (Mann–Whitney U and Fisher’s exact tests) given the small size of the attention/manipulation check failure group, yielding the same results.
 
3
The other significant disparities in PrEP attitudes by PrEP beneficiary group involving (a) perceived community benefit/support for access and (b) predicted adherence, which had been identified via ANCOVA analyses, were opposite to our hypotheses, favoring gay men and Black gay men over the general population. We nonetheless tested condition × racism, condition × heterosexism, and condition × racism × heterosexism interactions relative to both outcomes as planned a priori. No significant interactions were found for either outcome for gay men vs. the general population or for Black gay men vs. the general population (ps > .05).
 
Literatur
1.
Schneider A, Ingram H. Social construction of target populations—implications for politics and policy. Am Polit Sci Rev. 1993;87(2):334–47.CrossRef
2.
Schneider A, Sidney M. What is next for policy design and social construction theory? Policy Stud J. 2009;37(1):103–19.CrossRef
3.
Donovan MC. Social constructions of people with AIDS: target populations and United States policy, 1981-1990. Rev Policy Res. 1993;12(3/4):3–29.CrossRef
4.
Institute of Medicine. The health of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people: building a foundation for better understanding. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine; 2011.
5.
Grant RM, Anderson PL, McMahan V, Liu A, Amico KR, Mehrotra M, et al. Uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis, sexual practices, and HIV incidence in men and transgender women who have sex with men: a cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14(9):820–9.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Baeten JM, Donnell D, Ndase P, Mugo NR, Campbell JD, Wangisi J, et al. Antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV prevention in heterosexual men and women. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(5):399–410.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Choopanya K, Martin M, Suntharasamai P, Sangkum U, Mock PA, Leethochawalit M, et al. Antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV infection in injecting drug users in Bangkok, Thailand (the Bangkok Tenofovir Study): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2013;381(9883):2083–90.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Grant RM, Lama JR, Anderson PL, McMahan V, Liu AY, Vargas L, et al. Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(27):2587–99.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Thigpen MC, Kebaabetswe PM, Paxton LA, Smith DK, Rose CE, Segolodi TM, et al. Antiretroviral preexposure prophylaxis for heterosexual HIV transmission in Botswana. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(5):423–34.CrossRefPubMed
10.
McCormack S, Dunn DT, Desai M, Dolling DI, Gafos M, Gilson R, et al. Pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent the acquisition of HIV-1 infection (PROUD): effectiveness results from the pilot phase of a pragmatic open-label randomised trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10013):53–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Molina JM, Capitant C, Spire B, Pialoux G, Cotte L, Charreau I, et al. On-demand preexposure prophylaxis in men at high risk for HIV-1 infection. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(23):2237–46.CrossRefPubMed
12.
13.
14.
Smith DK, Van Handel M, Wolitski RJ, Stryker JE, Hall HI, Prejean J, et al. Vital signs: estimated percentages and numbers of adults with indications for preexposure prophylaxis to prevent HIV acquisition - United States, 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64(46):1291–5.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Krakower DS, Jain S, Mayer KH. Antiretrovirals for primary HIV prevention: the current status of pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2015;12(1):127–38.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Mayer KH, Ramjee G. The current status of the use of oral medication to prevent HIV transmission. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2015;10(4):226–32.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Mayer KH, Krakower DS. If PrEP decreases HIV transmission, what is impeding its uptake? Clin Infect Dis. 2015 (Advance online publication).
18.
Horberg M, Raymond B. Financial policy issues for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis: cost and access to insurance. Am J Prev Med. 2013;44(1 Suppl 2):S125–8.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Mayer KH, Levine K, Grasso C, Krakower DS, Mimiaga M. Recent increases in PrEP utilization at a Boston community health center 2011–2014: transition from research to clinical practice. Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections; 2015; Seattle, WA.
20.
Burstein P. The impact of public opinion on public policy: a review and an agenda. Polit Res Q. 2003;56(1):29–40.CrossRef
21.
Winter N. Dangerous frames: how ideas about race and gender shape public opinion. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press; 2008.CrossRef
22.
23.
Gilliam FD Jr, Iyengar S. Prime suspects: the influence of local television news on the viewing public. Am J Pol Sci. 2000;44(3):560–73.CrossRef
24.
Harell A, Soroka S, Ladner K. Public opinion, prejudice and the racialization of welfare in Canada. Ethn Racial Stud. 2014;37(14):2580–97.CrossRef
25.
Hurwitz J, Peffley M. Playing the race card in the post-Willie Horton era: the impact of racialized code words on support for punitive crime policy. Public Opin Q. 2005;69(1):99–112.CrossRef
26.
Kennedy B, Fisher E, Bailey C. Framing in race-conscious, antipoverty advocacy: a science-based guide to delivering your most persuasive message. Clearinghouse Rev J on Poverty L. 2010;43(9–10):408–21.
27.
28.
Ford CL, Whetten KD, Hall SA, Kaufman JS, Thrasher AD. Black sexuality, social construction, and research targeting ‘The Down Low’ (‘The DL’). Ann Epidemiol. 2007;17(3):209–16.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Hequembourg AL, Brallier SA. An exploration of sexual minority stress across the lines of gender and sexual identity. J Homosex. 2009;56(3):273–98.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Bowleg L, Teti M, Massie JS, Patel A, Malebranche DJ, Tschann JM. ‘What does it take to be a man? What is a real man?’: ideologies of masculinity and HIV sexual risk among Black heterosexual men. Cult Health Sex. 2011;13(5):545–59.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Herek GM, Capitanio JP. AIDS stigma and sexual prejudice. Am Behav Sci. 1999;42(7):1130–47.CrossRef
32.
Rosenberg ES, Millett GA, Sullivan PS, Del Rio C, Curran JW. Understanding the HIV disparities between black and white men who have sex with men in the USA using the HIV care continuum: a modeling study. The Lancet HIV. 2014;1(3):e112–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
Cohen SE, Vittinghoff E, Bacon O, Doblecki-Lewis S, Postle BS, Feaster DJ, et al. High interest in pre-exposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men at risk for HIV-infection: baseline data from the US PrEP demonstration Project. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015;68(4):439–48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
Wade Taylor S, Mayer KH, Elsesser SM, Mimiaga MJ, O’Cleirigh C, Safren SA. Optimizing content for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) counseling for men who have sex with men: Perspectives of PrEP users and high-risk PrEP naive men. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(5):871–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Aizenman N. New guidelines for gay men: a daily anti-HIV pill. National Public Radio. July 11, 2014.
36.
Stern MJ. There is a daily pill that prevents HIV. Gay men should take it. Slate. January 6, 2014.
37.
Hoff CC, Chakravarty D, Bircher AE, Campbell CK, Grisham K, Neilands TB, et al. Attitudes towards PrEP and anticipated condom use among concordant HIV-negative and HIV-discordant male couples. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2015;29(7):408–17.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Brooks RA, Landovitz RJ, Regan R, Lee S-J, Allen VC, Jr. Perceptions of and intentions to adopt HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among black men who have sex with men in Los Angeles. Int J STD AIDS. 2015;26(14):1040–8.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Eaton LA, Driffin DD, Bauermeister J, Smith H, Conway-Washington C. Minimal awareness and stalled uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among at risk, HIV-negative, Black men who have sex with men. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2015;29(8):423–9.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Mutchler MG, McDavitt B, Ghani MA, Nogg K, Winder TJ, Soto JK. Getting PrEPared for HIV prevention navigation: young Black gay men talk about HIV prevention in the biomedical era. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2015;29(9):490–502.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Reynolds D. In their own words: Men of color explain why they take PrEP. Advocate.com. October 22, 2014.
42.
Rodriguez-Jimenez J. Are Black gay men on board with using PrEP? HIV Plus. July 29, 2014.
43.
Dovidio JF, Hewstone M, Glick P, Esses VM. Prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination: theoretical and empirical overview. In: Dovidio JF, Hewstone M, Glick P, Esses VM, editors. The SAGE handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.; 2010.
44.
Buhrmester M, Kwang T, Gosling SD. Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011;6(1):3–5.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Mason W, Suri S. Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Behav Res Methods. 2012;44(1):1–23.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Brooks RA, Kaplan RL, Lieber E, Landovitz RJ, Lee SJ, Leibowitz AA. Motivators, concerns, and barriers to adoption of preexposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention among gay and bisexual men in HIV-serodiscordant male relationships. AIDS Care. 2011;23(9):1136–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
47.
Saberi P, Gamarel KE, Neilands TB, Comfort M, Sheon N, Darbes LA, et al. Ambiguity, ambivalence, and apprehensions of taking HIV-1 pre-exposure prophylaxis among male couples in San Francisco: a mixed methods study. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(11):e50061.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
48.
Smith DK, Toledo L, Smith DJ, Adams MA, Rothenberg R. Attitudes and program preferences of African American urban young adults about pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). AIDS Educ Prev. 2012;24(5):408–21.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Galindo GR, Walker JJ, Hazelton P, Lane T, Steward WT, Morin SF, et al. Community member perspectives from transgender women and men who have sex with men on pre-exposure prophylaxis as an HIV prevention strategy: implications for implementation. Implement Sci. 2012;7:116.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
50.
White JM, Mimiaga MJ, Krakower DS, Mayer KH. Evolution of Massachusetts physician attitudes, knowledge, and experience regarding the use of antiretrovirals for HIV prevention. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2012;26(7):395–405.PubMedPubMedCentral
51.
Arnold EA, Hazelton P, Lane T, Christopoulos KA, Galindo GR, Steward WT, et al. A qualitative study of provider thoughts on implementing pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in clinical settings to prevent HIV infection. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(7):e40603.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
52.
Tripathi A, Ogbuanu C, Monger M, Gibson JJ, Duffus WA. Preexposure prophylaxis for HIV infection: healthcare providers’ knowledge, perception, and willingness to adopt future implementation in the southern US. South Med J. 2012;105(4):199–206.CrossRefPubMed
53.
Tellalian D, Maznavi K, Bredeek UF, Hardy WD. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV infection: results of a survey of HIV healthcare providers evaluating their knowledge, attitudes, and prescribing practices. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2013;27(10):553–9.CrossRefPubMed
54.
Karris MY, Beekmann SE, Mehta SR, Anderson CM, Polgreen PM. Are we prepped for preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP)? Provider opinions on the real-world use of PrEP in the United States and Canada. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58(5):704–12.CrossRefPubMed
55.
Puro V, Palummieri A, De Carli G, Piselli P, Ippolito G. Attitude towards antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) prescription among HIV specialists. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:217.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
56.
Senn H, Wilton J, Sharma M, Fowler S, Tan DH. Knowledge of and opinions on HIV preexposure prophylaxis among front-line service providers at Canadian AIDS service organizations. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2013;29(9):1183–9.PubMedPubMedCentral
57.
Wheelock A, Eisingerich AB, Gomez GB, Gray E, Dybul MR, Piot P. Views of policymakers, healthcare workers and NGOs on HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP): a multinational qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2012;2(4):e001234.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
58.
McConahay JB. Modern racism, ambivalence, and the Modern Racism Scale. In: Dovidio JF, Gaertner SL, editors. Prejudice, discrimination, and racism. San Diego: Academic Press; 1986. p. 91–125.
59.
Kite ME, Deaux K. Attitudes toward homosexuality: assessment and behavioral consequences. Basic Appl Soc Psych. 1986;7(2):137–62.CrossRef
60.
Hayes AF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2013.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
Grant RM, Weber S, Glidden DV, Liu A, Buchbinder S, Cohen R, et al. Scale-up of preexposure prophylaxis in San Francisco to impact HIV incidence. Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections; 2015; Seattle, WA.
69.
Bush S, Ng L, Magnuson D, Piontkowsky D, Mera R. Significant uptake of Truvada for pre-exposure prophylaxis utilization in the U.S. in 2014. 10th International Conference on HIV Treatment and Prevention Adherence; 2015; Miami, FL.
70.
Bartholomew BP. Kaiser Permanente reverses coverage change for HIV drugs, but cost concerns remain with other insurers. The San Francisco Examiner. February 23, 2015.
71.
Boerner H. This story made an insurance company cover AIDS drugs. The Daily Beast. May 18, 2015.
72.
Jacobs DB, Sommers BD. Using drugs to discriminate–adverse selection in the insurance marketplace. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(5):399–402.CrossRefPubMed
73.
Newman E. Capping coinsurance payments for PrEP and HIV meds. BETA. April 29, 2015.
74.
Stevelee. Health insurance company stops covering Truvada as PrEP. LGBT Weekly. May 7, 2015.
75.
Grindley L. Why LGBT Americans are leery of Supreme Court’s Hobby Lobby ruling. The Advocate. June 30, 2014.
76.
Maza C. How the Hobby Lobby decision could undermine the fight against HIV/AIDS. Media Matters for America. July 1, 2014.
77.
Moriarty K. Will the Hobby Lobby decision open the door for HIV-related health insurance restrictions? The Body. July 17, 2014.
78.
Myers JE, Sepkowitz KA. A pill for HIV prevention: Deja vu all over again? Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56(11):1604–12.CrossRefPubMed
79.
80.
Beyrer C, Baral SD, van Griensven F, Goodreau SM, Chariyalertsak S, Wirtz AL, et al. Global epidemiology of HIV infection in men who have sex with men. Lancet. 2012;380(9839):367–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
81.
McCune JQ Jr. Sexual discretion: Black masculinity and the politics of passing. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press; 2014.
82.
Tapia R, McCune J, Brody JD. Dangerous profiling: recent media representations of Black male sexuality. In: Barnes SL, editor. Black sexualities. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press; 2009. p. 119–137.
83.
Millett GA, Peterson JL, Flores SA, Hart TA, Jeffries WL, Wilson PA, et al. Comparisons of disparities and risks of HIV infection in black and other men who have sex with men in Canada, UK, and USA: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2012;380(9839):341–8.CrossRefPubMed
84.
Golub SA, Gamarel KE, Surace A. Demographic differences in PrEP-related stereotypes: implications for implementation. AIDS Behav. 2015;17(2):737–47.
85.
86.
Gomez GB, Borquez A, Case KK, Wheelock A, Vassall A, Hankins C. The cost and impact of scaling up pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention: a systematic review of cost-effectiveness modelling studies. PLoS Med. 2013;10(3):e1001401.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
87.
Kessler J, Myers JE, Nucifora KA, Mensah N, Toohey C, Khademi A, et al. Evaluating the impact of prioritization of antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis in New York. AIDS. 2014;28(18):2683–91.CrossRefPubMed
88.
Dovidio JF, Gaertner SL. Intergroup bias. In: Fiske ST, Gilbert DT, Lindzey G, editors. Handbook of Social Psychology, vol. 2. Hoboken: Wiley; 2010. p. 1084–121.
89.
Lieb S, Fallon SJ, Friedman SR, Thompson DR, Gates GJ, Liberti TM, et al. Statewide estimation of racial/ethnic populations of men who have sex with men in the U.S. Public Health Rep. 2011;126(1):60–72.PubMedPubMedCentral
90.
Ghavami N, Peplau LA. An intersectional analysis of gender and ethnic stereotypes: testing three hypotheses. Psychol Women Q. 2013;37(1):113–27.CrossRef
91.
Calabrese SK, Earnshaw VA, Underhill K, Hansen NB, Dovidio JF. The impact of patient race on clinical decisions related to prescribing HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP): assumptions about sexual risk compensation and implications for access. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(2):226–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
92.
Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.; 2009.
93.
Hair JFJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC. Multivariate Data Analysis. 5th ed. Dehli, Chennai: Pearson Education, Inc.; 1998.
Metadaten
Titel
Framing HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) for the General Public: How Inclusive Messaging May Prevent Prejudice from Diminishing Public Support
verfasst von
Sarah K. Calabrese
Kristen Underhill
Valerie A. Earnshaw
Nathan B. Hansen
Trace S. Kershaw
Manya Magnus
Douglas S. Krakower
Kenneth H. Mayer
Joseph R. Betancourt
John F. Dovidio
Publikationsdatum
19.02.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
AIDS and Behavior / Ausgabe 7/2016
Print ISSN: 1090-7165
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3254
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-016-1318-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2016

AIDS and Behavior 7/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Original Paper

Seasons of Risk: Anticipated Behavior on Vacation and Interest in Episodic Antiretroviral Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Among a Large National Sample of U.S. Men Who have Sex with Men (MSM)

Original Paper

Correlates of PrEP Indication in a Multi-Site Cohort of Young HIV-Uninfected Transgender Women

Original Paper

Differences in Attitudes About HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Use Among Stimulant Versus Alcohol Using Men Who Have Sex with Men

Original Paper

Increasing Belief in the Effectiveness of HIV Treatment as Prevention: Results of Repeated, National Surveys of Australian Gay and Bisexual Men, 2013–15

Original Paper

Self-reported Recent PrEP Dosing and Drug Detection in an Open Label PrEP Study

Original Paper

Correlates of Awareness of and Willingness to Use Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) in Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men Who Use Geosocial-Networking Smartphone Applications in New York City

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

24.04.2024 | DGIM 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Metformin rückt in den Hintergrund

24.04.2024 | DGIM 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Myokarditis nach Infekt – richtig schwierig wird es bei Profisportlern

24.04.2024 | DGIM 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Thrombophiliescreening – Wenn, dann richtig und nur bei therapeutischer Konsequenz

24.04.2024 | DGIM 2024 | Nachrichten

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!
weitere anzeigen

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise