Skip to main content
Log in

Patterns of a Rectal Microbicide Placebo Gel Use in a Preparatory Stage for a Phase I Trial Among Young Men Who Have Sex with Men

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined young gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men’s (YGBMSM) usage patterns of a pre-coital, applicator-administered rectal placebo gel. An ethnically diverse sample of 94 YGBMSM (aged 18–30 years) were asked to insert hydroxyethylcellulose placebo gel rectally before receptive anal intercourse (RAI) and report their gel use through an interactive voice response system (IVRS) across 12 weeks. We used trajectory analyses to characterize participants’ use of the rectal gel over the 12 weeks, and examine whether these trajectories varied based on participants’ sociodemographic characteristics, sexual behaviors, application and insertion behaviors, and experiences using the placebo gel. A cubic model was the best fit for these longitudinal data, with two distinct trajectories of gel use observed. The first trajectory (‘High with Varying Gel Use per Week’) represented YGBMSM (N = 38; 40.3%) who reported using the rectal gel on several occasions per week. The second trajectory (‘Low and Consistent Gel Use per Week’) represented participants (N = 56; 59.7%) who reported a consistent average use of one gel per week. Participants in the High with Varying Gel Use Trajectory reported trying out a greater number of positions when inserting the gel across the 12-weeks than peers in the Low and Consistent Gel Use Trajectory. YGBMSM reporting more RAI occasions during the trial were more likely be present in the High with Varying Gel Use Trajectory than peers in the Low and Consistent Gel Use Trajectory. Future research examining how to facilitate gel application and adherence among YGBMSM is merited.

Resumen

Examinamos los patrones de uso de un gel placebo en una muestra de jóvenes gays, bisexuales y otros hombres que tienen relaciones sexuales con hombres (YGBMSM). Una muestra étnicamente diversa de jóvenes (N = 94; 18 a 30 años) participaron en el estudio, donde se les pidió que insertaran el gel rectalmente antes del coito anal receptivo e informaran su uso a través de un sistema de respuesta interactiva por voz a lo largo de 12 semanas. Utilizamos un análisis de trayectoria para caracterizar el uso del gel rectal durante las 12 semanas y examinar si estas trayectorias variaban según las características sociodemográficas, comportamientos sexuales, comportamientos de aplicación e inserción y experiencias usando el gel placebo de los participantes. Un modelo cúbico se utilizó para estos datos longitudinales; dos trayectorias distintas fueron observadas. La primera trayectoria (‘Alta con uso de gel variable por semana’) representó a participantes (N = 38; 40.3%) quienes usaron el gel rectal en varias ocasiones por semana. La segunda trayectoria (“Uso bajo y consistente del gel por semana”) representó a aquellos participantes (N = 56; 59.7%) caracterizados por un uso promedio y consistente de un gel por semana. Los participantes en la primera trayectoria reportaron haber probado un mayor número de posiciones al insertar el gel a lo largo de las 12 semanas que sus pares en la segunda trayectoria. YGBMSM informando más ocasiones de sexo anal receptivo durante el estudio tuvieron mayor probabilidad de ser clasificados en la primera trayectoria. Estudios que examinen cómo facilitar la aplicación y la adherencia al gel entre YGBMSM ameritan atención en el futuro.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV among gay and bisexual men. 2017. https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/group/msm/. Retrieved 6 Mar 2017.

  2. McGowan I. Rectal microbicides: can we make them and will people use them? AIDS Behav. 2011;15(Suppl 1):66–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Underhill K, Operario D, Mimiaga MJ, Skeer MR, Mayer KH. Implementation science of pre-exposure prophylaxis: preparing for public use. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2010;7(4):210–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. McGowan I. The development of rectal microbicides for HIV prevention. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2014;11:69–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Carballo-Diéguez A, Dolezal C, Bauermeister JA, O’Brien W, Ventuneac A, Mayer K. Preference for gel over suppository as delivery vehicle for a rectal microbicide: results of a randomised, crossover acceptability trial among men who have sex with men. Sex Transm Infect. 2008;84(6):483–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Carballo-Diéguez A, Exner T, Dolezal C, Pickard R, Lin P, Mayer KH. Rectal microbicide acceptability: results of a volume escalation trial. Sex Transm Dis. 2007;34(4):224–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tang E, Galea JT, Kinsler JJ, Gonzales P, Sobieszczyk ME, Sanchez J, Lama J. Using conjoint analysis to determine the impact of product and user characteristics on acceptability of rectal microbicides for HIV prevention among Peruvian men who have sex with men. Sex Transm Infect. 2015;92(3):200–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mantell JE, Myer L, Carballo-Diéguez A, Stein Z, Ramjee G, Morar NS, Harrison PF. Microbicide acceptability research: current approaches and future directions. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60(2):319–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gorbach PM, Kelly CW, Borgerding J, Ramjee G, Tembo T, Kumwenda N, Musara P, Roberts S, Maslankowski L. Effects of partnership change on microbicide gel adherence in a clinical trial (HPTN 035). AIDS Behav. 2014;18(5):855–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Van Der Straten A, Montgomery ET, Cheng H, Wegner L, Masenga G, Von Mollendorf C, Bekker L, Ganesh S, Young K, Romano J, Nel A, Woodsong C. High acceptability of a vaginal ring intended as a microbicide delivery method for HIV prevention in African women. AIDS Behav. 2012;16(7):1775–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Clark JL, Salvatierra HJ, Segura ER, Salazar X, Konda K, Galea J, Klausner JD, Coates TJ, Caceres C. Frequency, patterns, and preferences of lubricant use during anal intercourse within male sexaul partnerships in Lima, Peru: implications for a rectal microbicide HIV prevention intervention. AIDS Care. 2013;25:579–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Murphy DA, Lea T, de Wit J, Ellard JM, Kippax SC, Rosengarten M, Holt M. Interest in using rectal microbicides among Australian gay men is associated with HIV vulnerability and engaging in condomless sex with casual partners: results from a national study. Sex Transm Infect. 2015;91:266–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pines HA, Gorbach PM, Weiss RE, Hess K, Murphy R, Saunders T, Brown J, Anton PA, Cranston RD. Acceptability of potential rectal microbicide delivery systems for HIV prevention: a randomized crossover trial. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(3):1002–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Newman P, Roungprakhon S, Tepjan S. A social ecology of rectal microbicide acceptability among young men who have sex with men and transgender women in Thalian. J Int AIDS Soc. 2013;16:18476.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Morrow KM, Ruiz MS. Assessing microbicide acceptability: a comprehensive and integrated approach. AIDS Behav. 2008;12(2):272–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bauermeister JA, Giguere R, Dolezal C, Leu CS, Febo RD, Cranston RD, Mayer K, McGowan I, Carballo-Diéguez A. To use a rectal microbicide, first insert the applicator: gel and applicator satisfaction among young men who have sex with men. AIDS Educ Prev. 2016;28(1):1–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Lin AH, Breger TL, Barnhart M, Kim A, Vangsgaard C, Harris E. Learning from the private sector: towards a keener understanding of the end-user for microbicide introduction planning. J Int AIDS Soc. 2014;17(Suppl 2):19162.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. McGowan I, Cranston RD, Mayer KH, Febo I, Duffill K, Siegel A, Engstrom JC, Nikiforov A, Park SY, Brand RM, Jacobson C, Giguere R, Dolezal C, Frasca T, Leu CS, Schwartz JL, Carballo-Dieguez A. Project Gel: a randomized rectal microbicide safety and acceptability study in young men and transgender women. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(6):e0158310.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Carballo-Dieguez A, Giguere R, Dolezal C, Bauermeister J, Leu CS, Valladares J, Frasca T, Labbett R, Cranston RD, Febo I, Mayer K, McGowan I. Adherence to rectal gel use among mainly ethnic minority young men who have sex with men during a 3-month placebo gel trial: implications for microbicide research. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(9):1726–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Bauermeister JA, Giguere R, Leu CS, Febo I, Cranston R, Mayer K, McGowan I, Carballo-Dieguez A. Interactive voice response system: data considerations and lessons learned during a rectal microbicide placebo adherence trial for young men who have sex with men. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(6):e207.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Nagin D. Analyzing developmental trajectories: a semiparametric, group-based approach. Psychol Methods. 1999;4(2):139–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bauermeister JA. Sexual partner typologies among single young men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2015;19(6):1116–28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Janulis P, Feinstein BA, Phillips G, Newcomb M, Birkett M, Mustanski B. Sexual partner typologies and the association between drug use and sexual risk behavior among young men who have sex with men. Arch Sex Behav. 2017;. doi:10.1007/s10508-016-0909-x.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Giguere R, Dolezal C, Bauermeister JA, Frasca T, Valladares J, Febo I, Cranston R, Mayer K, McGowan I, Carballo-Dieguez A. Influence of partner type on acceptability and likelihood of use of a rectal microbicide among young men who have sex with men in the United States and Puerto Rico. J Sex Res. 2016;53(6):633–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mitchell JW, Sophus A, Lee JY, Petroll A. Anal douche practices and willingness to use a rectal microbicide enema for HIV prevention and associated factors among an internet sample of HIV-negative and HIV-discordant male couples in the US. AIDS Behav. 2016;20(11):2578–87.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We greatly appreciate the hard work of the study staff at the sites, and are indebted to the study participants for volunteering their time. This research was sponsored by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH), including NICHD and NIMH, under R01 HD59533 (Carballo-Diéguez and McGowan, Co-PIs) and co-sponsored by CONRAD. Additional support came from the National Institute of Mental Health to the HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies at NY State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University (P30-MH43520; Principal Investigator: Robert Remien). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of NIH.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José A. Bauermeister.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bauermeister, J.A., Giguere, R., Leu, C.S. et al. Patterns of a Rectal Microbicide Placebo Gel Use in a Preparatory Stage for a Phase I Trial Among Young Men Who Have Sex with Men. AIDS Behav 22, 412–420 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-017-1847-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-017-1847-x

Keywords

Navigation