Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

New approaches for establishing conservation priorities for socio-economically important plant species

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The establishment of priorities among species is a crucial step in any conservation strategy since financial resources are generally limited. Traditionally, priorities for conservation of plant species have been focused on endemicity, rarity and particularly on their threatened status. Crop wild relatives (CWR) and wild harvested plants (WHP) are important elements of biodiversity with actual or potential socio-economic value. In this study, eight prioritisation criteria were used along with different prioritisation systems and applied to the Portuguese CWR and WHP. The top 50 species obtained by each of these methods were identified. The final top CWR were those that occurred as a priority in most methods. Twenty CWR were identified as the highest priorities for conservation in Portugal and they include wild relatives of the crop genera Allium, Daucus, Dianthus, Epilobium, Festuca, Herniaria, Narcissus, Quercus, Plantago, Trifolium, and Vicia. Eighteen WHP were recognised as priorities for conservation and include several Narcissus and Thymus species, among others. The advantages, limitations and level of subjectivity of each of the methods used in this exercise are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almeida JD (2005) Flora exótica subespontânea de Portugal Continental (plantas vasculares). Catálogo das plantas vasculares exóticas que ocorrem subespontâneas em Portugal Continental e compilação de informações sobre estas plantas, 3rd edn. Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernal M, Laínz M, Muñoz Garmendia F (1990) Dianthus. In: Castroviejo S, Laínz M, López González G, Monserrat P, Muñoz Garmendia F, Paiva J, Villar L (eds) Flora Ibérica, plantas vasculares de la Península Ibérica e Islas Baleares, vol II. Plantanaceae–Plumbaginaceae. Real Jardín Botánico, CSIC, Madrid, pp 426–462

  • Bishop RC (1978) Endangered species and uncertainty: the economics of the safe minimum standard. Am J Agric Econ 60:10–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs J, Leigh J (1988) Rare and threatened Australian plants. Australian Natural Parks and Wild. Serv Spec Publs 14

  • CALM (1994) Setting priorities for the conservation of Western Australia’s threatened flora and fauna. Policy statement 50. Department of Conservation and Land Management, CALM, Perth

  • Camejo-Rodrigues J, Ascensão L, Àngels Bonet M, Vallès J (2003) An ethnobotanical study of medicinal and aromatic plants in the Natural Park of “Serra de São Mamede” (Portugal). J Ethnopharmacol 89:199–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carter MF, Barker K (1993) An interactive database for setting conservation priorities for western Neotropical migrants. In: Finch DM, Stangel PW (eds) Status and management of Neotropical migratory birds; 1992 September 21–25, Estes Park, Colorado. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-229. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, pp 120–127

  • Carter MF, Hunter WC, Pashley DN, Rosenberg KV (2000) Setting conservation priorities for landbirds in the United States: the partners in flight approach. Auk 117(2):541–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castroviejo S, Talavera S, Aedo C, Romero Zarco C, Sáez L, Salgueiro FJ, Velayos M (eds) (1986–2003) Flora Iberica, plantas vasculares de la Península Ibérica e Islas Baleares, vols I–VIII, X, XIV, XXI. Real Jardín Botánico, CSIC, Madrid

  • CBD (2002) Global strategy for plant conservation. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhri MN (1990) Herniaria. In: Castroviejo S, Laínz M, López González G, Monserrat P, Muñoz Garmendia F, Paiva J, Villar L (eds) Flora Ibérica, plantas vasculares de la Península Ibérica e Islas Baleares, vol II, Plantanaceae–Plumbaginaceae. Real Jardín Botánico, CSIC, Madrid, pp 118–134

  • Coates DJ, Atkins KA (2001) Priority setting and the conservation of Western Australia’s diverse and highly endemic flora. Biol Conserv 97:251–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook FEM (1995) Economic botany—data collection standard. Prepared for the international working group on taxonomic databases for plant sciences (TDWG). Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK

  • Cosson E (1883–1887) Flore des États Barbaresques, Algérie, Tunisie et Maroc, vol 2. Imprimerie Nationale, Paris

  • Council Decision 82/72/EEC of 3 December 1981, concerning the conclusion of the convention on the conservation of European wildlife and natural habitats (Bern convention). OJ L 38, 10.2.1982:3

  • Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora. OJ L 206, 22.7.1992:7–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe (1977) List of rare, threatened and endemic plants in Europe. Nature and environment series 14. Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg

  • Council of Europe (1983) List of rare, threatened and endemic plants in Europe. Nature and environment series 27. Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg

  • Cubas P (1999) Ulex. In: Talavera S, Aedo C, Castroviejo S, Romero Zarco C, Saez L, Salgueiro FJ, Velayos M (eds) Flora Ibérica, plantas vasculares de la Península Ibérica e Islas Baleares, vol VII (I). Leguminosae (partim). Real Jardín Botánico, CSIC, Madrid, pp 212–239

  • Department of the Environment (1996) Towards methodology for costing biodiversity targets in UK. Department of the Environment, London

    Google Scholar 

  • DGPC (Direcção Geral da Protecção das Culturas) (2003) Catálogo nacional de variedades. Ministério da Agricultura, Desenvolvimento Rural e Pescas

  • Dhar U, Rawal RS, Upreti J (2000) Setting priorities for conservation of medicinal plants—a case study in the Indian Himalaya. Biol Conserv 95:57–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dias SR (2002) Ecogeographic distribution of Lupinus germplasm and strategy gap filling collecting—study of the Lupinus germplasm collection held by the Genebank-Genetics, EAN/INIA, Portugal. A thesis presented to the Faculty of Science of the University of Birmingham in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Conservation and Utilisation of Plant Genetic Resources

  • Direcção Geral do Ambiente (2000) Relatório do estado do Ambiente—1999. Ministério do Ambiente e do Ordenamento do Território

  • Dray AM (1985) Plantas a proteger em Portugal Continental. Serviço Nacional de Parques, Reservas e Conservação da Natureza, Lisboa

    Google Scholar 

  • EU (European Union) (2003a) Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species. 22nd complete edition (2003/C 308 A/01). Official Journal of the European Union 18.12.2003

  • EU (European Union) (2003b) Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species. 22nd complete edition (2003/C 91 A/01). Official Journal of the European Union 16.04.2003

  • Euro+Med PlantBase (2005) The information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. http://www.euromed.org.uk. Accessed January 2005

  • Europa Planta (2008) A sustainable future for Europe, the European strategy for plant conservation 2008–2014. Plantlife International and the Council of Europe, Salisbury

    Google Scholar 

  • Faith DP (1992) Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biol Conserv 61:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (1996) Global plan of action for the conservation and sustainable utilization of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture and the Leipzig declaration. Adopted by the international technical conference on plant genetic resources, Leipzig, Germany

  • FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (1998) The state of the world’s plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. Annex 1–4. State of the art: legal and economic methods relevant to PGRFA. FAO, Rome, pp 393–442

  • FAOSTAT (2005) FAO statistical databases. http://faostat.fao.org/. Accessed February 2005

  • Fink AH, Brücher T, Krüger A, Leckebusch GC, Pinto JG, Ulbrich U (2004) The 2003 European summer heatwaves and drought—synoptic diagnosis and impact. Weather 59:209–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitter R, Fitter M (1987) The road to extinction. IUCN/UNEP, IUCN, Gland/Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Flor A, Bettencourt E, Arriegas PI, Dias SR (2004) Indicators for the CWR species’ list prioritisation (European Crop Wild Relative criteria for conservation). Paper presented at the workshop 5—genetic erosion and pollution assessment. European Crop Wild Relative Diversity assessment and Conservation Forum (briefing document), Terceira Island, Azores, Portugal, 8–11 September 2004. http://www.pgrforum.org/Documents/WP_5_Documents/WS5_Briefing_Document.pdf. Accessed 13 July 2006

  • Ford-Lloyd B, Kell SP, Maxted N (2008) Establishing conservation priorities for crop wild relatives. In: Maxted N, Ford-Lloyd BV, Kell SP, Iriondo JM, Dullo E, Turok J (eds) Crop wild relative conservation and use. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 110–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Franco JA (1971) Nova Flora de Portugal (continente e Açores), vol I, Lycopodiaceae–Umbelliferae. Sociedade Astória Lda, Lisboa

  • Franco JA (1990) Quercus. In: Castroviejo S, Laínz M, López González G, Monserrat P, Muñoz Garmendia F, Paiva J, Villar L (eds) Flora Ibérica, plantas vasculares de la Península Ibérica e Islas Baleares, vol I, Lycopodiaceae–Papaveraceae. Real Jardín Botánico, CSIC, Madrid, pp 15–36

  • GBIF Data Portal (nd) www.gbif.net. Accessed 31 March 2008

  • Given DR, Norton DA (1993) A multivariate approach to assessing threat and for priority setting in threatened species conservation. Biol Conserv 64:57–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guijt I (1998) Valuing wild plants with economics and participatory methods: an overview of the hidden harvest methodology. In: Prendergast HDV, Etkin NL, Harris DR, Houghton PJ (eds) Plants for food and medicine. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, pp 223–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlan JR, de Wet JMJ (1971) Towards a rational classification of cultivated plants. Taxon 20:09–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heywood VH (1999) Use and potential of wild plants in farm households. Farm systems management series 15. FAO, Rome

  • Heywood VH (2008) Challenges of in situ conservation of crop wild relatives. Turk J Bot 32:421–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood VH, Casas A, Ford-Lloyd B, Kell S, Maxted N (2007) Conservation and sustainable use of crop wild relatives. Agric Ecosyst Environ 121:245–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann MH, Welk E (1999) A method for the estimation of the global population sizes of plant species—the area-abundance-index. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 8:39–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter WC, Carter MF, Pashley DN, Barker K (1993) The partners in flight species prioritization scheme. In: Finch DM, Stangel PW (eds) Status and management of neotropical migratory birds; September 21–25 1992, Estes Park, Colorado. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-229. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, pp 109–119

  • INE (Instituto Nacional de Estatística) (2001) Estatísticas agrícolas 2000. Instituto Nacional de Estatística, Lisboa

  • INE (Instituto Nacional de Estatística) (2002a) Estatísticas agrícolas 2001. Instituto Nacional de Estatística, Lisboa

  • INE (Instituto Nacional de Estatística) (2002b) Estatísticas regionais da produção vegetal e animal 1990–2000. Instituto Nacional de Estatística, Lisboa

  • INE (Instituto Nacional de Estatística) (2003a) Estatísticas agrícolas 2002. Instituto Nacional de Estatística, Lisboa

  • INE (Instituto Nacional de Estatística) (2003b) Contas económicas da Agricultura 2002. Instituto Nacional de Estatística, Lisboa

  • INE (Instituto Nacional de Estatística) (2004) Estatísticas agrícolas 2003. Instituto Nacional de Estatística, Lisboa

  • IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2007) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. In: Parry M, Canziani O, Palutikof J, van der Linden P, Hanson C (eds) Contribution of working group II to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. http://www.ipcc-wg2.org/index.html. Accessed 19 July 2006

  • IPK (Institut für pflanzengenetik und kulturpflanzenforschung Gatersleben) (2003) Mansfeld’s world database of agricultural and horticultural crops. Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research. http://mansfeld.ipk-gatersleben.de/pls/htmldb_pgrc/f?p=185:3:950745470569513::NO. Accessed February 2005

  • IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources) (2001) IUCN Red List categories and criteria: version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission, Gland. http://www.iucn.org/themes/ssc/redlists/redlistcatsenglish.pdf. Accessed 5 January 2005

  • Jain SK (1975) Genetic reserves. In: Frankel OH, Hawkes JG (eds) Crop genetic resources for today and tomorrow. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 379–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Kala CP, Farooquee NA, Dhar U (2004) Prioritization of medicinal plants on the basis of available knowledge, existing practices and use value status in Uttaranchal, India. Biodivers Conserv 13:453–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kell SP, Knüpffer H, Jury SL, Maxted N, Ford-Lloyd BV (2005) Catalogue of crop wild relatives for Europe and the Mediterranean. Available online via the Crop Wild Relative Information System (CWRIS—http://cwris.ecpgr.org/) and on CD-ROM. University of Birmingham, UK

  • Kornas J (1990) Plant invasions in Central Europe: historical and ecological aspects. In: Di Castri F, Hansen AJ, Debussche M (eds) Biological invasions in Europe and the Mediterranean Basin. Monogr Biol 65:19–36

  • Legume Web (nd) International legume database and information service. www.ildis.org/LegumeWeb. Accessed 26 July 2004

  • Lidén M (1986) Fumaria. In: Castroviejo S, Laínz M, López González G, Monserrat P, Muñoz Garmendia F, Paiva J, Villar L (eds) Flora Ibérica, plantas vasculares de la Península Ibérica e Islas Baleares, vol I, Lycopodiaceae–Papaveraceae. Real Jardín Botánico, CSIC, Madrid, pp 447–467

  • Linder HP (1995) Setting conservation priorities: the importance of endemism and phylogeny in the Southern African orchid genus Herschelia. Conserv Biol 9:585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lunney D, Curtin A, Ayers D, Cogger HG, Dickman CR (1996) An ecological approach to identifying the endangered fauna of New South Wales. Pac Conserv Biol 2:212–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Magos Brehm J (2004) Conservation of wild legumes in Portugal. A thesis presented to the Faculty of Science of the University of Birmingham in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Conservation and Utilisation of Plant Genetic Resources. School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, UK

  • Magos Brehm J (2009) Conservation of wild plant genetic resources in Portugal. PhD thesis, University of Birmingham, UK

  • Magos Brehm J, Maxted N, Ford-Lloyd BV, Martins-Loução MA (2008a) National inventories of crop wild relatives and wild harvested plants: case-study for Portugal. Genet Resour Crop Evol 55:779–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magos Brehm J, Mitchell M, Maxted N, Ford-Lloyd BV, Martins-Loução MA (2008b) IUCN Red Listing of crop wild relatives: is a national approach as difficult as some think? In: Maxted N, Ford-Lloyd BV, Kell SP, Iriondo JM, Dullo E, Turok J (eds) Crop wild relative conservation and use. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 211–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Maire R (1952–1987) Flore de l’Afrique du Nord (Maroc, Algérie, Tunisie, Tripolitaine, Cyrénaique et Sahara), vols I–XVI. Paul Lechevalier, Paris

  • Master LL (1991) Assessing threats and setting priorities for conservation. Conserv Biol 5:559–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxted N, Kell SP (2009) Establishment of a global network for the in situ conservation of crop wild relatives: status and needs. FAO Consultancy Report. Rome, FAO, pp 1–265

  • Maxted N, Hawkes JG, Guarino L, Sawkins M (1997) Towards the selection of taxa for plant genetic conservation. Genet Resour Crop Evol 44:337–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxted N, Ford-Lloyd BV, Jury S, Kell SP, Scholten MA (2006) Towards a definition of a crop wild relative. Biodivers Conserv 15(8):2673–2685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxted N, Ford-Lloyd BV, Kell SP (2008) Crop wild relatives: establishing the context. In: Maxted N, Ford-Lloyd BV, Kell SP, Iriondo J, Dulloo E, Turok J (eds) Crop wild relative conservation and use. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 3–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Millsap BA, Gore JA, Runde DE, Cerulean SI (1990) Setting priorities for the conservation of fish and wildlife in Florida. Wildl Monogr 111:1–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministério da Agricultura, do Desenvolvimento Rural e das Pescas (1997) Decreto Lei no 11/97, de 14 de Julho. Aprova a protecção dos montados de sobro e azinho. Diário da República, Série I, Parte A, no 11

  • Ministério da Agricultura, do Desenvolvimento Rural e das Pescas (2003) Anuário 2003 Vegetal. Gabinete de Planeamento e Política Agro-Alimentar. Ministério da Agricultura, Desenvolvimento Rural e Pescas, Lisboa

  • Ministério da Agricultura, do Desenvolvimento Rural e das Pescas (2005a) Produtos tradicionais. Instituto de Desenvolvimento Rural e Hidraulica. http://www.idrha.min-agricultura.pt/produtos_tradicionais/. Accessed 8 April 2005

  • Ministério da Agricultura, do Desenvolvimento Rural e das Pescas (2005b) Nomes qualificados—resumo geral da situação. Instituto de Desenvolvimento Rural e Hidráulica. http://www.idrha.min-agricultura.pt/produtos_tradicionais/Nomes_qualificados/index.htm. Accessed 8 April 2005

  • Ministério do Ambiente (1981) Decreto-Lei no 95/81, de 23 de Julho. Convenção de Berna Relativa à Protecção da Vida Selvagem e do Ambiente Natural na Europa de 19-09-1979. Diário da República, Série I, no 167, pp 1835–1857

  • Ministério do Ambiente (1999a) Decreto-Lei no 565/99 de 21 de Dezembro. Diário da República, Série I, Parte A, no 295, pp 12–21

  • Ministério do Ambiente (1999b) Decreto-Lei no 140/99 de 24 de Abril. Diário da República, Série I, Parte A, no 96, pp 2183–2212

  • Ministério do Planeamento e Administração do Território (1989) Decreto-Lei n. 423/89 de 4 de Dezembro. Diário da Republica, Série I, no 278, p 5291

  • Miranda P, Coelho FES, Tomé AR, Valente MA (2002) 20th century Portuguese climate and climate scenarios. In: Santos FD, Forbes K, Moita R (eds) Climate change in Portugal. Scenarios, impacts and adaptation measures—SIAM project. Gradiva, Lisboa, pp 23–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitteau M, Soupizet F (2000) Preparation of a preliminary list of priority target species for in situ conservation in Europe. In: Laliberté B, Maggioni L, Maxted N, Negri V (compilers) ECP/GR in situ and on-farm conservation network report of a task force on wild species conservation in genetic reserves and a task force on on-farm conservation and management joint meeting, Isola Polvese, Italy, 18–20 May 2000

  • Morales R (1993) Jonopsidum. In: Castroviejo S, Aedo C, Gómez Campo C, Laínz M, Monserrat P, Morales R, Muñoz Garmendia F, Nieto Feliner G, Rico E, Talavera S, Villar L (eds) Flora Ibérica, plantas vasculares de la Península Ibérica e Islas Baleares, vol IV, Cruciferae–Monotropaceae. Real Jardín Botánico, CSIC, Madrid, pp 250–252

  • Morse LE (1993) Standard and alternative taxonomic data in the multi-institutional Natural Heritage Data Centre Network. In: Bisby FA, Russell GF, Pankhurst RJ (eds) Designs for a global plant species information system. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 69–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Munby (1847) Flore de l’Algérie ou Catalogue des Plantes Indigènes du Royaume d’Álger. J.-B. Baillière, Paris

  • Muñoz Rodríguez A, Devesa JA, Talavera S (2000) Trifolium. In: Talavera S, Aedo C, Castroviejo S, Herrero A, Romero Zarco C, Salgueiro FJ, Velayos M (eds) Flora Iberica, plantas vasculares de la Península Ibérica e Islas Baleares, vol VII (II). Real Jardín Botánico, CSIC, Madrid, pp 647–719

  • Nieto Feliner G (1997) Epilobium. In: Castroviejo S, Aedo C, Benedí C, Laínz M, Muñoz Garmendia F, Nieto Feliner G, Paiva J (eds) Flora Ibérica, plantas vasculares de la Península Ibérica e Islas Baleares, vol VIII, Halogaraceae–Euphrobiaceae. Real Jardín Botánico, CSIC, Madrid, pp 101–131

  • Nogueira I, Muñoz Garmendia F, Navarro C (1993) Halimium. In: Castroviejo S, Aedo C, Cirujano S, Laínz M, Montserrat P, Morales R, Muñoz Garmendia F, Navarro C, Paiva J, Soriano C (eds) Flora Ibérica, plantas vasculares de la Península Ibérica e Islas Baleares, vol III, Plumbaginaceae (Partim)-Capparaceae. Real Jardín Botánico, CSIC, Madrid, pp 338–351

  • Norton BG (1994) On what we should save: the role of culture in determining conservation targets. In: Forey FL, Humphries CJ, Vane-Wright RI (eds) Systematics and conservation evaluation. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 23–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlove BS, Brush SB (1996) Anthropology and the conservation of biodiversity. Annu Rev Anthropol 25:329–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker PF (1981) The endemic plants of metropolitan Portugal, a survey. Boletim da Sociedade Broteriana, Série 2, 53(2):943–994

    Google Scholar 

  • Perring FH, Farrell L (1983) Vascular plants. British red data book, vol I, 2nd edn. Royal Society for Nature Conservation, Nettleham

    Google Scholar 

  • Pujadas Salvà AJ (2003) Daucus. In: Castroviejo S, Nieto Feliner G, Jury SL, Herrero A (eds) Flora Ibérica, plantas vasculares de la Península Ibérica e Islas Baleares, vol X, Araliaceae–Umbelliferae. Real Jardín Botánico, CSIC, Madrid, pp 97–125

  • Rabinowitz D (1981) Seven forms of rarity. In: Synge H (ed) The biological aspects of rare plant conservation. Wiley, Chichester, pp 205–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowitz D, Cairns S, Dillon T (1986) Seven forms of rarity and their frequency in the flora of British Isles. In: Soule ME (ed) Conservation biology: science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer Associate, Sunderland, pp 182–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratnayake RSS, Kariyawasam CS (2008) Conservation and use of wild-harvested medicinal plants in Sri Lanka. In: Maxted N, Ford-Lloyd BV, Kell SP, Iriondo JM, Dullo E, Turok J (eds) Crop wild relative conservation and use. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 625–631

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawat N, Tiwari VK, Singh N, Randhawa GS, Singh K, Chhuneja P, Dhaliwal HS (2008) Evaluation and utilization of Aegilops and wild Triticum species for enhancing iron and zinc content in wheat. Genet Resour Crop Evol 56(1):53–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray JC, Hunter L, Zigouris J (2005) Setting conservation and research priorities for larger African carnivores. WCS working paper 24. Wildlife Conservation Society, New York

  • Romero Zarco C (1999) Vicia. In: Talavera S, Aedo C, Castroviejo S, Romero Zarco C, Saez L, Salgueiro FJ, Velayos M (eds) Flora Ibérica, plantas vasculares de la Península Ibérica e Islas Baleares, vol VII(I), Leguminosae. Real Jardín Botánico, CSIC, Madrid, pp 360–417

  • Rosenberg KV, Wells JV (2005) Conservation priorities for terrestrial birds in the North-eastern United States. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-191. http://www.fs.fed.us/psw/publications/documents/psw_gtr191/Asilomar/pdfs/236-253.pdf. Accessed 12 July 2006

  • Santos FD, Miranda P (2006) Alterações climáticas em Portugal, cenários, impactos e medidas de adaptação, Projecto SIAM II, 1st edn. Gradiva Publicações Ltd, Lisboa

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapir Y, Shmida A, Fragman O (2003) Constructing Red Numbers for setting conservation priorities of endangered plant species: Israeli flora as a test case. J Nat Conserv 11:91–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider A, Molnár I, Molnár-Láng M (2008) Utilisation of Aegilops (goatgrass) species to widen the genetic diversity of cultivated wheat. Euphytica 163:1–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schoen DJ, Brown AHD (1993) Conservation of allelic richness in wild crop relatives is aided by assessment of genetic markers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90(22):10623–10627

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schousboe P-K-A (1874) Observations sur le règne végétal au Maroc, Paris

  • Stein BA (1993) Towards common goals: collections information in conservation databases. Assoc Syst Collect Newsl 21(1):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Tambutii M, Aldama A, Sánchez O, Medeellin R, Soberón J (2001) La determinación del riesgo de extincion de especies silvestres en Mexico. Gac Ecol 61:11–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burges NA, Moore DM, Valentine DH, Walters SM, Webb DA (2001) Flora Europaea on CD ROM. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • UNECE/FAO (United Nations Economic Commission for Europe/Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2000) Database on temperate and boreal forest resources assessment, version 3.1 (TBFRA-2000). Timber Section UNECE/FAO. http://www.unece.org/trade/timber/fra/welcome.htm. Accessed March 2005

  • UNEP (United National Environment Programme) (1992) Convention on biological diversity: text and annexes. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi

  • UNEP (United National Environment Programme) (1995) In: Heywood V (ed) Global biodiversity assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Unknown author and date. Flore d’Algérie, deuxème partie, Phanérogamie. Gramineae

  • Valdés B, Talavera S, Fernández-Galiano E (1987) Flora vascular de Andalucía Occidental, vols 1–3. Ketres Editora SA, Barcelona

  • Vane-Wright RI, Humphries CJ, Williams CH (1991) What to protect? Systematics and the agony of choice. Biol Conserv 55:235–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villar L (1993) Rhododendron. In: Castroviejo S, Aedo C, Gómez Campo C, Laínz M, Monserrat P, Morales R, Muñoz Garmendia F, Nieto Feliner G, Rico E, Talavera S, Villar L (eds) Flora Ibérica, plantas vasculares de la Península Ibérica e Islas Baleares, vol IV, Cruciferae–Monotropaceae. Real Jardín Botánico, CSIC, Madrid, pp 508–510

  • Whitten AJ (1990) Recovery: a proposed programme for Britain’s protected species. Nature Conservancy Council, CSD Report, 1089

Download references

Acknowledgements

Joana Magos Brehm was financed by the Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT, Portugal) with the grant number SFRH/BD/16508/2004.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joana Magos Brehm.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brehm, J.M., Maxted, N., Martins-Loução, M.A. et al. New approaches for establishing conservation priorities for socio-economically important plant species. Biodivers Conserv 19, 2715–2740 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9871-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9871-4

Keywords

Navigation