Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2012

01.10.2012 | Brief Report

Preoperative breast MRI in early-stage breast cancer

Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Ausgabe 3/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Rapid uptake of new imaging technology is a major contributor to rising healthcare costs. Preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for patients with early-stage breast cancer has dramatically increased in use without the evidence of improved outcomes compared to standard assessment and is associated with higher rates of mastectomy. A decision analytic model was developed to evaluate the impact of adding breast MRI to the preoperative evaluation of women with early-stage breast cancer who were candidates for breast-conserving therapy on patient outcomes measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Model inputs, including survival, recurrence rates, and health utilities, were obtained from a comprehensive literature review. One-way sensitivity analyses were performed to estimate threshold values for key parameters at which adding MRI would become the optimal imaging strategy over standard assessment. Preoperative MRI resulted in 17.77 QALYs compared to 17.86 QALYs with standard assessment, a decrease of 0.09 QALYs or 34 days. In sensitivity analyses, standard assessment was associated with better patient outcomes than preoperative breast MRI across all plausible probabilities for mastectomy, local recurrence, and health utilities. For routine preoperative breast MRI to become the optimal strategy, the conversion rate to mastectomy after preoperative MRI would need to be <1 % (versus the range of 3.6–33 % reported in the literature). Routine preoperative breast MRI appears to confer no advantage over the standard diagnostic evaluations for early-stage breast cancer and may lead to worse patient outcomes.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Baker LC, Atlas SW, Afendulis CC (2008) Expanded use of imaging technology and the challenge of measure value. Health Aff (Millwood) 27:1467–1478CrossRef Baker LC, Atlas SW, Afendulis CC (2008) Expanded use of imaging technology and the challenge of measure value. Health Aff (Millwood) 27:1467–1478CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Dinan MA, Curtis LH, Hammill BG et al (2010) Changes in the use and costs of diagnostic imaging among Medicare beneficiaries with cancer, 1996–2006. JAMA 303:1625–1631PubMedCrossRef Dinan MA, Curtis LH, Hammill BG et al (2010) Changes in the use and costs of diagnostic imaging among Medicare beneficiaries with cancer, 1996–2006. JAMA 303:1625–1631PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Houssami N, Hayes DF (2009) Review of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in breast cancer: should MRI be performed on all women with newly diagnosed, early stage breast cancer? CA Cancer J Clin 59:290–302PubMedCrossRef Houssami N, Hayes DF (2009) Review of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in breast cancer: should MRI be performed on all women with newly diagnosed, early stage breast cancer? CA Cancer J Clin 59:290–302PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bilimoria KY, Cambic A, Hansen NM et al (2007) Evaluating the impact of preoperative breast magnetic imaging on the surgical management of newly diagnosed breast cancers. Arch Surg 142:441–445PubMedCrossRef Bilimoria KY, Cambic A, Hansen NM et al (2007) Evaluating the impact of preoperative breast magnetic imaging on the surgical management of newly diagnosed breast cancers. Arch Surg 142:441–445PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Deurloo EE, Peterse JL, Rutgers EJ et al (2005) Additional breast lesions in patients eligible for breast-conserving therapy by MRI: impact on preoperative management and potential benefit of computerized analysis. Eur J Cancer 41:1393–1401PubMedCrossRef Deurloo EE, Peterse JL, Rutgers EJ et al (2005) Additional breast lesions in patients eligible for breast-conserving therapy by MRI: impact on preoperative management and potential benefit of computerized analysis. Eur J Cancer 41:1393–1401PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS et al (2004) Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 233:830–849PubMedCrossRef Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS et al (2004) Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 233:830–849PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Bagley FH (2004) The role of magnetic resonance imaging mammography in the surgical management of the index breast cancer. Arch Surg 139:380–383PubMedCrossRef Bagley FH (2004) The role of magnetic resonance imaging mammography in the surgical management of the index breast cancer. Arch Surg 139:380–383PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang Y, Fukatsu H, Naganawa S et al (2002) The role of contrast-enhanced MR mammography for determining candidates for breast conservation surgery. Breast Cancer 9:231–239PubMedCrossRef Zhang Y, Fukatsu H, Naganawa S et al (2002) The role of contrast-enhanced MR mammography for determining candidates for breast conservation surgery. Breast Cancer 9:231–239PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Tan JE, Orel SG, Schnall MD et al (1999) Role of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance imaging-guided surgery in the evaluation of patients with early-stage breast cancer for breast conservation. Am J Clin Oncol 22:414–418PubMedCrossRef Tan JE, Orel SG, Schnall MD et al (1999) Role of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance imaging-guided surgery in the evaluation of patients with early-stage breast cancer for breast conservation. Am J Clin Oncol 22:414–418PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hollingsworth AB, Stough RG (2006) Preoperative breast MRI for locoregional staging. J Okla Stage Med Assoc 99:505–515 Hollingsworth AB, Stough RG (2006) Preoperative breast MRI for locoregional staging. J Okla Stage Med Assoc 99:505–515
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Schelfout K, Van Goethem M, Kersschot E et al (2004) Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of breast lesions and effect on treatment. Eur J Surg Oncol 30:501–507PubMedCrossRef Schelfout K, Van Goethem M, Kersschot E et al (2004) Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of breast lesions and effect on treatment. Eur J Surg Oncol 30:501–507PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Bedrosian I, Mick R, Orel SG et al (2003) Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer 98:468–473PubMedCrossRef Bedrosian I, Mick R, Orel SG et al (2003) Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer 98:468–473PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Hlawatsch A, Teifke A, Schmidt M et al (2002) Preoperative assessment of breast cancer: sonography versus MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:1493–1501PubMed Hlawatsch A, Teifke A, Schmidt M et al (2002) Preoperative assessment of breast cancer: sonography versus MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:1493–1501PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E (1999) Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology 213:881–888PubMed Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E (1999) Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology 213:881–888PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Orel SG, Schnall MD, Powell CM et al (1995) Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect o MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy. Radiology 196:115–122PubMed Orel SG, Schnall MD, Powell CM et al (1995) Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect o MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy. Radiology 196:115–122PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Katipamula R, Degnim AC, Hoskin T et al (2009) Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol 27:4082–4088PubMedCrossRef Katipamula R, Degnim AC, Hoskin T et al (2009) Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol 27:4082–4088PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Hede K (2009) Preoperative MRI in breast cancer grows contentious. J Natl Cancer Inst 10:1667–1669CrossRef Hede K (2009) Preoperative MRI in breast cancer grows contentious. J Natl Cancer Inst 10:1667–1669CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Center for Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health (2010) The cost-effectiveness analysis registry. Institute for Clinical Research Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston. www.cearegistry.org. Accessed 8 June 2010 Center for Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health (2010) The cost-effectiveness analysis registry. Institute for Clinical Research Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston. www.​cearegistry.​org. Accessed 8 June 2010
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Turnbull LW, Brown SR, Olivier C et al (2010) Multicenter randomised controlled trial examining the cost-effectiveness of contrast-enhanced high field magnetic resonance imaging in women with primary breast cancer scheduled for wide local excision (COMICE). Health Technol Assess 14:1–182PubMed Turnbull LW, Brown SR, Olivier C et al (2010) Multicenter randomised controlled trial examining the cost-effectiveness of contrast-enhanced high field magnetic resonance imaging in women with primary breast cancer scheduled for wide local excision (COMICE). Health Technol Assess 14:1–182PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Turnbull LW, Brown SR, Harvey I et al (2010) Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 375:563–571PubMedCrossRef Turnbull LW, Brown SR, Harvey I et al (2010) Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 375:563–571PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L et al (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1227–1232PubMedCrossRef Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L et al (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1227–1232PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) (2005) Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomized trials. Lancet 366:2087–2106 Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) (2005) Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomized trials. Lancet 366:2087–2106
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Dowsett M, Cuzick J, Ingle J et al (2010) Meta-analysis of breast cancer outcomes in adjuvant trials of aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen. J Clin Oncol 28:509–518PubMedCrossRef Dowsett M, Cuzick J, Ingle J et al (2010) Meta-analysis of breast cancer outcomes in adjuvant trials of aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen. J Clin Oncol 28:509–518PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Norum J, Olsen JA, Wist EA (1997) Lumpectomy or mastectomy? Is breast conserving surgery too expensive? Breast Cancer Res Treat 45:7–14PubMedCrossRef Norum J, Olsen JA, Wist EA (1997) Lumpectomy or mastectomy? Is breast conserving surgery too expensive? Breast Cancer Res Treat 45:7–14PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Hayman JA, Harris JR, Hillner BE et al (1998) Cost-effectiveness of routine radiation therapy following conservative surgery for early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 16:1022–1029PubMed Hayman JA, Harris JR, Hillner BE et al (1998) Cost-effectiveness of routine radiation therapy following conservative surgery for early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 16:1022–1029PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat de Koning HJ, Collette HJ, de Haes JC et al (1991) Breast cancer screening and cost-effectiveness; policy alternatives, quality of life considerations and the possible impact of uncertain factors. Int J Cancer 49:531–537PubMedCrossRef de Koning HJ, Collette HJ, de Haes JC et al (1991) Breast cancer screening and cost-effectiveness; policy alternatives, quality of life considerations and the possible impact of uncertain factors. Int J Cancer 49:531–537PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Hayman JA, Hillner BE, Haris JR et al (2000) Cost-effectiveness of adding an electron-beam boost to tangential radiation therapy in patients with negative margins after conservative surgery for early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 18:287–295PubMed Hayman JA, Hillner BE, Haris JR et al (2000) Cost-effectiveness of adding an electron-beam boost to tangential radiation therapy in patients with negative margins after conservative surgery for early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 18:287–295PubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Suh WW, Hillner BE, Pierce LJ et al (2005) Cost-effectiveness of radiation therapy following conservative surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 61:1054–1061PubMedCrossRef Suh WW, Hillner BE, Pierce LJ et al (2005) Cost-effectiveness of radiation therapy following conservative surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 61:1054–1061PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Holland ML, Huston A, Noyes K (2009) Cost-effectiveness of testing for breast cancer susceptibility genes. Value Health 12:207–216PubMedCrossRef Holland ML, Huston A, Noyes K (2009) Cost-effectiveness of testing for breast cancer susceptibility genes. Value Health 12:207–216PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee JH, Glick HA, Hayman JA et al (2002) Decision-analytic model and cost-effectiveness of evaluation of postmastectomy radiation therapy in high-risk premenopausal breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 20:2713–2725PubMedCrossRef Lee JH, Glick HA, Hayman JA et al (2002) Decision-analytic model and cost-effectiveness of evaluation of postmastectomy radiation therapy in high-risk premenopausal breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 20:2713–2725PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Tengs TO (2000) The cost effectiveness of testing for the BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility genes. Dis Manag Clin Outcomes 1:15–24 Tengs TO (2000) The cost effectiveness of testing for the BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility genes. Dis Manag Clin Outcomes 1:15–24
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Sher DJ, Wittenberg E, Suh WW et al (2009) Partial-breast irradiation versus whole-breast irradiation for early-stage breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 74:440–446PubMedCrossRef Sher DJ, Wittenberg E, Suh WW et al (2009) Partial-breast irradiation versus whole-breast irradiation for early-stage breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 74:440–446PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK et al (2007) MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med 356:1295–1303PubMedCrossRef Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK et al (2007) MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med 356:1295–1303PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Bleicher RJ, Ciocca RM, Egleston BL et al (2009) Association of routine pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging with time to surgery, mastectomy rate, and margin status. J Am Coll Surg 209:180–187PubMedCrossRef Bleicher RJ, Ciocca RM, Egleston BL et al (2009) Association of routine pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging with time to surgery, mastectomy rate, and margin status. J Am Coll Surg 209:180–187PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Lohrisch C, Paltiel C, Gelmon K et al (2006) Impact on survival of time from definitive surgery to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage. J Clin Oncol 24:4888–4894PubMedCrossRef Lohrisch C, Paltiel C, Gelmon K et al (2006) Impact on survival of time from definitive surgery to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage. J Clin Oncol 24:4888–4894PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat OM (Institute of Medicine) (2009) Initial national priorities for comparative effectiveness research. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC OM (Institute of Medicine) (2009) Initial national priorities for comparative effectiveness research. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Bartelink H, Horiot JC, Poortmans P et al (2001) Recurrence rates after treatment of breast cancer with standard radiotherapy with or without additional radiation. N Engl J Med 345:1378–1387PubMedCrossRef Bartelink H, Horiot JC, Poortmans P et al (2001) Recurrence rates after treatment of breast cancer with standard radiotherapy with or without additional radiation. N Engl J Med 345:1378–1387PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Baer A, Bechar N, Coehn G et al (2010) Basic steps to building a research program. J Oncol Pract 6:45–47PubMedCrossRef Baer A, Bechar N, Coehn G et al (2010) Basic steps to building a research program. J Oncol Pract 6:45–47PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284PubMedCrossRef Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284PubMedCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Bailey SR (2001) Past and present attempts to prevent radiocontrast nephropathy. Rev Cardiovasc Med 2(supp 1):S14–S18PubMed Bailey SR (2001) Past and present attempts to prevent radiocontrast nephropathy. Rev Cardiovasc Med 2(supp 1):S14–S18PubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J et al (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1233–1241PubMedCrossRef Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J et al (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1233–1241PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Preoperative breast MRI in early-stage breast cancer
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2012
Erschienen in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Ausgabe 3/2012
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-012-2207-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2012

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.