Skip to main content
Log in

Do What Consumers Say Matter? The Misalignment of Preferences with Unconstrained Ethical Intentions

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nearly all studies of consumers’ willingness to engage in ethical or socially responsible purchasing behavior is based on unconstrained survey response methods. In the present article we ask the question of how well does asking consumers the extent to which they care about a specific social or ethical issue relate to how they would behave in a more constrained environment where there is no socially acceptable response. The results of a comparison between traditional survey questions of “intention to purchase” and estimates of individuals willingness-to-pay for social attributes in products reveal that simple survey questions are too “noisy” to provide operationally meaningful information and overstate intentions to a considerable extent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Khatib J. A., Stanton A. D., Rawwas M. Y. A.: 2005, Ethical Segmentation of Consumers in Developing Countries: A Comparative Analysis, International Marketing Review 22(2), 225–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auger P., Burke P., Devinney T. M., Louviere J. J.: 2003, What Will Consumers Pay for Social Product Features? Journal of Business Ethics 42(3): 281–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auger, P., T. M. Devinney, T. M., and J. J. Louviere: 2007, 'Using Best-Worst Scaling Methodology to Investigate Consumer Ethical Beliefs Across Countries', Journal of Business Ethics, (in press)

  • Boulstridge E., Carrigan M.: 2000, Do Conusmers Really Care about Corporate Responsibility? Highlighting the Attitude-Behavior Gap, Journal of Communication Management 4(4): 355–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Box-Steffensmeier J. M., Jacobson G. C., Grant J. T.: 2000, Question Wording and the House Vote Choice: Some Experimental Evidence, Public Opinion Quarterly 64(3): 257–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calder B.: 1982, The Concept of External Validity, Journal of Consumer Research 9(4): 240–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calder B., Phillips L., Tybout A.: 1981, Designing Research for Application, Journal of Consumer Research 8(3): 197–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrigan M., Attala A.: 2001, The Myth of the Ethical Consumer-Do Ethics Matter in Purchase Behaviour? Journal of Consumer Marketing 18(7): 560–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrigan M., Szmigin I., Wright J.: 2004, Shopping for a Better World? An Interpretive Study of the Potential for Ethical Consumption Within the Older Market, Journal of Consumer Marketing 21(6):401–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, R. T., T. Groves and M. J. Machina: 2000, ‚Incentive and Informational Properties of Preference Questions’, Unpublished Working Paper, University of California, San Diego

  • Chen C., Lee S.-Y., Stevenson H. W.: 1995, Response Styles and Cross-Cultural Comparisons of Rating Scales Among East Asian and North American Students, Psychological Science 6(3): 170–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie R., Geis F. L.: 1970, Studies in Machiavellianism. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane A.: 2001, Unpacking the Ethical Product, Journal of Business Ethics 30(4): 361–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane A., Matten D.: 2004, Business Ethics: A European Perspective: Managing Corporate Citizenship and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Creyer E. H., Ross W. T.: 1997, The Influence of Firm Behavior on Purchase Intention: Do Consumers Really Care About Business Ethics? Journal of Consumer Marketing 14(6): 421–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, K. A. and R. B. Freeman: 2001, ‚White Hats or Don Quixotes? Human Rights Vigilantes in the Global Economy’, National Bureau of Economic Research (8102), Cambridge, MA

  • Forsyth D. R.: 1980, A Taxonomy of Ethical Ideologies, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39(1): 175–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser E. L., Laibson D. I., Scheinkman J. A., Soutter C. L.: 2000, Measuring Trust, Quarterly Journal of Economics 115(3): 811–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison R.: 2003, Corporate Social Responsibility and the Consumer Movement, Consumer Policy Review 13(4): 127–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein J. G., Smith N. C., John A.: 2004, Why We Boycott: Consumer Motivations for Boycott Participation, Journal of Marketing 68(3): 92–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler P.: 1997, Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation, and Control. Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Louviere J. J., Hensher D. A., Swait J. D.: 2000, Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Marymount-University: 1999, The Consumers and Sweatshops, Vol. 1999 (Marymount University Center for Ethical Concerns)

  • Mason, T.: 2000, ‚The Importance of Being Ethical’, Marketing 26 October, 27

  • Miller A. S., Mitamura T.: 2003, Are Surveys on Trust Trustworthy? Social Psychology Quarterly 66(1): 62–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus D. L.: 1991, Measurement and Control of Response Bias, in Robinson J. P., Shaver P. R., Wright L. S. (eds.), Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 17–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, D.: 1998, `Ethical Tactics Arouse Public Doubt', Marketing (August 6), 12–13

  • Rucinski D.: 1993, Rush to Judgment? Fast Reaction Polls in Anita Hill-Clarence Thomas Controversy, Public Opinion Quarterly 57(4): 575–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz N.: 1999, Self-Reports: How the Questions Shape the Answers, American Psychologist 54(2): 93–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz N.: 2003, Self-Reports in Consumer Research: The Challenge of Comparing Cohorts and Cultures, Journal of Consumer Research 29(4): 588–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz N., Grayson C. E., Knauper B.: 1998, Formal Features of Rating Scales and the Interpretation of Question Meaning, International Journal of Public Opinion Research 10(2): 177–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz N., Hippler H. J.: 1995, Subsequent Questions May Influence Answers to Preceding Questions in Mail Surveys, Public Opinion Quarterly 59(1): 93–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz N., Oyserman D.: 2001, Asking Questions about Behavior: Cognition, Communication, and Questionnaire Construction, American Journal of Evaluation 22(2): 127–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon F. L.: 1995, Global Corporate Philanthropy: A Strategic Framework, International Marketing Review 12(4): 20–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spar D. L., La Mure L. T.: 2003, The Power of Activism: Assessing the Impact of NGOs on Global Business, California Management Review 45(3): 78–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp J.-B. E. M., Ter Hofstede F.: 2002, International Market Segmentation: Issues and Outlook, International Journal of Research in Marketing 19(3): 185–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strong C.: 1996, Features Contributing to the Growth of Ethical Consumerism: A Preliminary Investigation, Marketing Intelligence & Planning 14(5): 5–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tourangeau R., Smith T. W.: 1996, Asking Sensitive Questions: The Impact of Data Collection Mode, Question Format, and Question Context, Public Opinion Quarterly 60(2): 275–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich P., Sarasin C.: 1995, Facing Public Interest: The Ethical Challenge to Business Policy and Corporate Communications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Uusitalo O., Oksanen R.: 2004, Ethical Consumerism: A View from Finland, International Journal of Consumer Studies 28(3): 214–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwick R., Chen X.: 1999, What Price Fairness? A Bargaining Study, Management Science 45(6): 804–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported financially by the Australian Research Council through its Discovery Grant program. Additional financial support was forthcoming from the Centre for Corporate Change at the Australian Graduate School of Management.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pat Auger.

Additional information

Pat Auger is Associate Professor at the Melbourne Business School. Timothy M. Devinney is Professor and Professorial Research Fellow at the Australian Graduate School of Management.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Auger, P., Devinney, T.M. Do What Consumers Say Matter? The Misalignment of Preferences with Unconstrained Ethical Intentions. J Bus Ethics 76, 361–383 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9287-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9287-y

Keywords

Navigation