nach oben

The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging

Erschienen in:

06.03.2017 | Original Paper

A systematic review of imaging anatomy in predicting functional significance of coronary stenoses determined by fractional flow reserve

verfasst von: Miao Chu, Neng Dai, Junqing Yang, Jelmer Westra, Shengxian Tu

Erschienen in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | Ausgabe 7/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the current gold standard to assess the physiological significance of coronary stenoses. With the development of coronary imaging techniques, several anatomic parameters have been investigated in vivo and their associations with FFR have been studied. The aim of this review is to summarize the accuracy of anatomic parameters derived by the present coronary imaging techniques including invasive coronary angiography, coronary computed tomography angiography, intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography, in predicting a significant FFR. The impact of patient characteristics, lesion locations, variability of FFR and imaging resolution on the predictive ability are discussed.

Tu S, Barbato E, Koszegi Z, Yang J, Sun Z, Holm NR, Tar B, Li Y, Rusinaru D, Wijns W et al (2014) Fractional flow reserve calculation from 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography and TIMI frame count: a fast computer model to quantify the functional significance of moderately obstructed coronary arteries. JACC Cardiovasc Intervention 7(7):768–777.

Tu S, Echavarria-Pinto M, Birgelen CV, Holm NR, Pyxaras SA, Kumsars I, Ming KL, Valkenburg I, Toth GG, Li Y (2015) Fractional flow reserve and coronary bifurcation anatomy : a novel quantitative model to assess and report the stenosisseverity of bifurcation lesions. Jacc Cardiovasc Interventions 8(4):564–574.

Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van’ t Veer M, Klauss V, Manoharan G, Engstrom T, Oldroyd KG et al (2009) Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. New England. J Med 360(3):213–224

De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Kalesan B, Barbato E, Tonino PA, Piroth Z, Jagic N, Mobius-Winkler S, Rioufol G, Witt N et al (2012) Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 367(11):991–1001CrossRefPubMed

Fearon WF, Shilane D, Pijls NH, Boothroyd DB, Tonino PA, Barbato E, Juni P, De Bruyne B, Hlatky MA (2013) Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation I: Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with stable coronary artery disease and abnormal fractional flow reserve. Circulation 128(12):1335–1340CrossRefPubMed

Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, Boersma E, Bech JW, van’t Veer M, Bar F, Hoorntje J, Koolen J, Wijns W (2007) Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 49(21):2105–2111CrossRefPubMed

Reiber JH, Tu S, Tuinenburg JC, Koning G, Janssen JP, Dijkstra J: QCA, IVUS and OCT in interventional cardiology in 2011. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 1(1):57–70.

Gould KL, Johnson NP, Bateman TM, Beanlands RS, Bengel FM, Bober R, Camici PG, Cerqueira MD, Chow BJW, Carli MFD (2013) Anatomic Versus Physiologic Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease : Role of Coronary Flow Reserve, Fractional Flow Reserve, and Positron Emission Tomography Imaging in Revascularization Decision-Making. J Am Coll Cardiol 62(18):1639–1653CrossRefPubMed

Doh JH, Koo BK, Nam CW, Kim JH, Min JK, Nakazato R, Silalahi T, Prawira H, Choi H, Lee SY et al (2014) Diagnostic value of coronary CT angiography in comparison with invasive coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound in patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis: results from the prospective multicentre FIGURE-OUT (Functional Imaging criteria for GUiding REview of invasive coronary angiOgraphy, intravascular Ultrasound, and coronary computed Tomographic angiography) study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 15(8):870–877CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Reith S, Battermann S, Jaskolka A, Lehmacher W, Hoffmann R, Marx N, Burgmaier M (2013) Relationship between optical coherence tomography derived intraluminal and intramural criteria and haemodynamic relevance as determined by fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary stenoses of patients with type 2 diabetes. Heart 99(10):700–707CrossRefPubMed

11.

Toth G, Hamilos M, Pyxaras S, Mangiacapra F, Nelis O, De Vroey F, Di Serafino L, Muller O, Van Mieghem C, Wyffels E et al (2014) Evolving concepts of angiogram: fractional flow reserve discordances in 4000 coronary stenoses. Eur Heart J 35(40):2831–2838CrossRefPubMed

12.

Chung WY, Choi BJ, Lim SH, Matsuo Y, Lennon RJ, Gulati R, Sandhu GS, Holmes DR Jr, Rihal CS, Lerman A (2015) Three dimensional quantitative coronary angiography can detect reliably ischemic coronary lesions based on fractional flow reserve. J Korean Med Sci 30(6):716–724CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Arashi H, Yamaguchi J, Nakazawa M, Otsuki H, Haruki S, Nakao M, Kamishima K, Jujo K, Minami Y, Takagi A et al (2016) Lesion characteristics of coronary arteries associated with a mismatch between angiographic severity of stenosis and fractional flow reserve. Cardiovasc Intervention Ther.

14.

Pyxaras SA, Tu S, Barbato E, Barbati G, Di Serafino L, De Vroey F, Toth G, Mangiacapra F, Sinagra G, De Bruyne B et al (2013) Quantitative angiography and optical coherence tomography for the functional assessment of nonobstructive coronary stenoses: comparison with fractional flow reserve. Am Heart J 166(6):1010–1018 e1011.

15.

Yong AS, Ng AC, Brieger D, Lowe HC, Ng MK, Kritharides L (2011) Three-dimensional and two-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography, and their prediction of reduced fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J 32(3):345–353CrossRefPubMed

16.

Saad M, Toelg R, Khattab AA, Kassner G, Abdel-Wahab M, Richardt G (2009) Determination of haemodynamic significance of intermediate coronary lesions using three-dimensional coronary reconstruction. EuroIntervention 5(5):573–579CrossRefPubMed

17.

Fischer JJ, Samady H, McPherson JA, Sarembock IJ, Powers ER, Gimple LW, Ragosta M (2002) Comparison between visual assessment and quantitative angiography versus fractional flow reserve for native coronary narrowings of moderate severity. Am J Cardiol 90(3):210–215CrossRefPubMed

18.

Tu S, Echavarria-Pinto M, von Birgelen C, Holm NR, Pyxaras SA, Kumsars I, Lam MK, Valkenburg I, Toth GG, Li Y et al (2015) Fractional flow reserve and coronary bifurcation anatomy: a novel quantitative model to assess and report the stenosis severity of bifurcation lesions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 8(4):564–574CrossRefPubMed

19.

Park SJ, Kang SJ, Ahn JM, Shim EB, Kim YT, Yun SC, Song H, Lee JY, Kim WJ, Park DW et al (2012) Visual-functional mismatch between coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 5(10):1029–1036CrossRefPubMed

20.

Zhang YJ, Zhu H, Shi SY, Muramatsu T, Pan DR, Ye F, Zhang JJ, Tian NL, Bourantas CV, Chen SL (2016) Comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography for the prediction of functional severity in true bifurcation lesions: Insights from the randomized DK-CRUSH II, III, and IV trials. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 87(Suppl 1):589–598CrossRefPubMed

21.

Tu S (2016) Diagnostic accuracy of a fast computational approach to derive FFR from coronary X-ray angiography: results from the international multicenter FAVOR (Functional Assessment by Various Flow Reconstructions) pilot study. EuroPCR. 19 May 2016. Paris, France

22.

Wong DT, Narayan O, Ko BS, Leong DP, Seneviratne S, Potter EL, Cameron JD, Meredith IT, Malaiapan Y (2015) A novel coronary angiography index (DILEMMA score) for prediction of functionally significant coronary artery stenoses assessed by fractional flow reserve: A novel coronary angiography index. Am Heart J 169(4):564–571 e564.CrossRef

23.

Hoffmann U, Bamberg F, Chae CU, Nichols JH, Rogers IS, Seneviratne SK, Truong QA, Cury RC, Abbara S, Shapiro MD et al (2009) Coronary computed tomography angiography for early triage of patients with acute chest pain: the ROMICAT (Rule Out Myocardial Infarction using Computer Assisted Tomography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 53(18):1642–1650CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Opolski MP, Kepka C, Achenbach S, Pregowski J, Kruk M, Staruch AD, Kadziela J, Ruzyllo W, Witkowski A (2014) Advanced computed tomographic anatomical and morphometric plaque analysis for prediction of fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary lesions. Eur J Radiol 83(1):135–141CrossRefPubMed

25.

Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, Gitter M, Sutherland J, Halamert E, Scherer M, Bellinger R, Martin A, Benton R et al (2008) Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 52(21):1724–1732CrossRefPubMed

26.

Hollander JE, Chang AM, Shofer FS, McCusker CM, Baxt WG, Litt HI (2009) Coronary computed tomographic angiography for rapid discharge of low-risk patients with potential acute coronary syndromes. Ann Emerg Med 53(3):295–304CrossRefPubMed

27.

Budoff MJ, Nakazato R, Mancini GB, Gransar H, Leipsic J, Berman DS, Min JK (2016) CT angiography for the prediction of hemodynamic significance in intermediate and severe lesions: head-to-head comparison with quantitative coronary angiography using fractional flow reserve as the reference standard. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 9(5):559–564CrossRefPubMed

28.

Meijboom WB, Van Mieghem CA, van Pelt N, Weustink A, Pugliese F, Mollet NR, Boersma E, Regar E, van Geuns RJ, de Jaegere PJ et al (2008) Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol 52(8):636–643CrossRefPubMed

29.

Nakazato R, Shalev A, Doh JH, Koo BK, Gransar H, Gomez MJ, Leipsic J, Park HB, Berman DS, Min JK (2013) Aggregate plaque volume by coronary computed tomography angiography is superior and incremental to luminal narrowing for diagnosis of ischemic lesions of intermediate stenosis severity. J Am Coll Cardiol 62(5):460–467CrossRefPubMed

30.

Wang R, Baumann S, Schoepf UJ, Meinel FG, Rier JD, Morris JZ, Mollmann H, Hamm CW, Steinberg DH, Renker M (2015) Comparison of quantitative stenosis characteristics at routine coronary computed tomography angiography with invasive fractional flow reserve for assessing lesion-specific ischemia. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 9(6):546–552CrossRefPubMed

31.

Tesche C, De Cecco CN, Caruso D, Baumann S, Renker M, Mangold S, Dyer KT, Varga-Szemes A, Baquet M, Jochheim D et al (2016) Coronary CT angiography derived morphological and functional quantitative plaque markers correlated with invasive fractional flow reserve for detecting hemodynamically significant stenosis. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 10(3):199–206CrossRefPubMed

32.

Koo BK, Erglis A, Doh JH, Daniels DV, Jegere S, Kim HS, Dunning A, DeFrance T, Lansky A, Leipsic J et al (2011) Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 58(19):1989–1997CrossRefPubMed

33.

Min JK, Leipsic J, Pencina MJ, Berman DS, Koo BK, van Mieghem C, Erglis A, Lin FY, Dunning AM, Apruzzese P et al (2012) Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography. Jama 308(12):1237–1245CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

34.

Kristensen TS, Engstrom T, Kelbaek H, von der Recke P, Nielsen MB, Kofoed KF (2010) Correlation between coronary computed tomographic angiography and fractional flow reserve. Int J Cardiol 144(2):200–205CrossRefPubMed

35.

Kruk M, Wardziak L, Demkow M, Pleban W, Pregowski J, Dzielinska Z, Witulski M, Witkowski A, Ruzyllo W, Kepka C (2016) Workstation-based calculation of CTA-based FFR for intermediate stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 9(6):690–699CrossRefPubMed

36.

Gaur S, Ovrehus KA, Dey D, Leipsic J, Botker HE, Jensen JM, Narula J, Ahmadi A, Achenbach S, Ko BS et al (2016) Coronary plaque quantification and fractional flow reserve by coronary computed tomography angiography identify ischaemia-causing lesions. Eur Heart J 37(15):1220–1227CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

37.

Diaz-Zamudio M, Dey D, Schuhbaeck A, Nakazato R, Gransar H, Slomka PJ, Narula J, Berman DS, Achenbach S, Min JK et al (2015) Automated quantitative plaque burden from coronary CT angiography noninvasively predicts hemodynamic significance by using fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary lesions. Radiology 276(2):408–415CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

38.

Stuijfzand WJ, Danad I, Raijmakers PG, Marcu CB, Heymans MW, van Kuijk CC, van Rossum AC, Nieman K, Min JK, Leipsic J et al (2014) Additional value of transluminal attenuation gradient in CT angiography to predict hemodynamic significance of coronary artery stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 7(4):374–386CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

39.

Wang R, Renker M, Schoepf UJ, Wichmann JL, Fuller SR, Rier JD, Bayer RR 2nd, Steinberg DH, De Cecco CN, Baumann S (2015) Diagnostic value of quantitative stenosis predictors with coronary CT angiography compared to invasive fractional flow reserve. Eur J Radiol 84(8):1509–1515CrossRefPubMed

40.

Wong DT, Ko BS, Cameron JD, Nerlekar N, Leung MC, Malaiapan Y, Crossett M, Leong DP, Worthley SG, Troupis J et al (2013) Transluminal attenuation gradient in coronary computed tomography angiography is a novel noninvasive approach to the identification of functionally significant coronary artery stenosis: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol 61(12):1271–1279CrossRefPubMed

41.

Kang SJ, Lee JY, Ahn JM, Mintz GS, Kim WJ, Park DW, Yun SC, Lee SW, Kim YH, Lee CW et al (2011) Validation of intravascular ultrasound-derived parameters with fractional flow reserve for assessment of coronary stenosis severity. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 4(1):65–71CrossRefPubMed

42.

Takagi A, Tsurumi Y, Ishii Y, Suzuki K, Kawana M, Kasanuki H (1999) Clinical potential of intravascular ultrasound for physiological assessment of coronary stenosis: relationship between quantitative ultrasound tomography and pressure-derived fractional flow reserve. Circulation 100(3):250–255CrossRefPubMed

43.

Koo BK, Yang HM, Doh JH, Choe H, Lee SY, Yoon CH, Cho YK, Nam CW, Hur SH, Lim HS et al (2011) Optimal intravascular ultrasound criteria and their accuracy for defining the functional significance of intermediate coronary stenoses of different locations. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 4(7):803–811CrossRefPubMed

44.

Kang SJ, Lee JY, Ahn JM, Song HG, Kim WJ, Park DW, Yun SC, Lee SW, Kim YH, Mintz GS et al (2011) Intravascular ultrasound-derived predictors for fractional flow reserve in intermediate left main disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 4(11):1168–1174CrossRefPubMed

45.

Jasti V, Ivan E, Yalamanchili V, Wongpraparut N, Leesar MA (2004) Correlations between fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound in patients with an ambiguous left main coronary artery stenosis. Circulation 110(18):2831–2836CrossRefPubMed

46.

Yang HM, Tahk SJ, Lim HS, Yoon MH, Choi SY, Choi BJ, Jin XJ, Hwang GS, Park JS, Shin JH (2014) Relationship between intravascular ultrasound parameters and fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary artery stenosis of left anterior descending artery: intravascular ultrasound volumetric analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc 83(3):386–394.

47.

Lee CH, Tai BC, Soon CY, Low AF, Poh KK, Yeo TC, Lim GH, Yip J, Omar AR, Teo SG et al (2010) New set of intravascular ultrasound-derived anatomic criteria for defining functionally significant stenoses in small coronary arteries (results from Intravascular Ultrasound Diagnostic Evaluation of Atherosclerosis in Singapore [IDEAS] study). Am J Cardiol 105(10):1378–1384CrossRefPubMed

48.

Takayama T, Hodgson JM (2001) Prediction of the physiologic severity of coronary lesions using 3D IVUS: validation by direct coronary pressure measurements. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 53(1):48–55CrossRefPubMed

49.

Lopez-Palop R, Carrillo P, Agudo P, Frutos A, Cordero A, Lopez-Aranda MA, Ramos D (2013) Correlation between intracoronary ultrasound and fractional flow reserve in long coronary lesions. A three-dimensional intracoronary ultrasound study. Rev Esp Cardiol 66(9):707–714CrossRefPubMed

50.

Park SJ, Ahn JM, Kang SJ, Yoon SH, Koo BK, Lee JY, Kim WJ, Park DW, Lee SW, Kim YH et al (2014) Intravascular ultrasound-derived minimal lumen area criteria for functionally significant left main coronary artery stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 7(8):868–874CrossRefPubMed

51.

Han JK, Koo BK, Park KW, Ben-Dor I, Waksman R, Pichard A, Nam CW, Doh JH, Murata N, Tanaka N et al (2014) Optimal intravascular ultrasound criteria for defining the functional significance of intermediate coronary stenosis: an international multicenter study. Cardiology 127(4):256–262CrossRefPubMed

52.

Kang SJ, Ahn JM, Song H, Kim WJ, Lee JY, Park DW, Yun SC, Lee SW, Kim YH, Lee CW et al (2012) Usefulness of minimal luminal coronary area determined by intravascular ultrasound to predict functional significance in stable and unstable angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 109(7):947–953CrossRefPubMed

53.

Gonzalo N, Escaned J, Alfonso F, Nolte C, Rodriguez V, Jimenez-Quevedo P, Banuelos C, Fernandez-Ortiz A, Garcia E, Hernandez-Antolin R et al (2012) Morphometric assessment of coronary stenosis relevance with optical coherence tomography: a comparison with fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 59(12):1080–1089CrossRefPubMed

54.

Kang SJ, Kweon J, Yang DH, Lee JG, Jung J, Kim N, Mintz GS, Kang JW, Lim TH, Park SW et al (2016) Mathematically derived criteria for detecting functionally significant stenoses using coronary computed tomographic angiography-based myocardial segmentation and intravascular ultrasound-measured minimal lumen area. Am J Cardiol 118(2):170–176CrossRefPubMed

55.

Waksman R, Legutko J, Singh J, Orlando Q, Marso S, Schloss T, Tugaoen J, DeVries J, Palmer N, Haude M et al (2013) FIRST: fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound relationship study. J Am Coll Cardiol 61(9):917–923CrossRefPubMed

56.

Ben-Dor I, Torguson R, Deksissa T, Bui AB, Xue Z, Satler LF, Pichard AD, Waksman R (2012) Intravascular ultrasound lumen area parameters for assessment of physiological ischemia by fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary artery stenosis. Cardiovasc Revascularization Med 13(3):177–182.

57.

Naganuma T, Latib A, Costopoulos C, Takagi K, Naim C, Sato K, Miyazaki T, Kawaguchi M, Panoulas VF, Basavarajaiah S et al (2014) The role of intravascular ultrasound and quantitative angiography in the functional assessment of intermediate coronary lesions: correlation with fractional flow reserve. Cardiovasc Revascularization Med 15(1):3–7.

58.

Briguori C, Anzuini A, Airoldi F, Gimelli G, Nishida T, Adamian M, Corvaja N, Di Mario C, Colombo A (2001) Intravascular ultrasound criteria for the assessment of the functional significance of intermediate coronary artery stenoses and comparison with fractional flow reserve. Am J Cardiol 87(2):136–141CrossRefPubMed

59.

Voros S, Rinehart S, Vazquez-Figueroa JG, Kalynych A, Karmpaliotis D, Qian Z, Joshi PH, Anderson H, Murrieta L, Wilmer C et al (2014) Prospective, head-to-head comparison of quantitative coronary angiography, quantitative computed tomography angiography, and intravascular ultrasound for the prediction of hemodynamic significance in intermediate and severe lesions, using fractional flow reserve as reference standard (from the ATLANTA I and II Study). Am J Cardiol 113(1):23–29CrossRefPubMed

60.

Chung JH, Ann SH, Singh GB, Nam CW, Doh JH, Kim HI, Koo BK, Shin ES (2016) Segmental assessments of coronary plaque morphology and composition by virtual histology intravascular ultrasound and fractional flow reserve. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 32(3):373–380CrossRefPubMed

61.

Kang SJ, Yang DH, Kweon J, Kim YH, Lee JG, Jung J, Kim N, Mintz GS, Kang JW, Lim TH et al (2016) Better diagnosis of functionally significant intermediate sized narrowings using intravascular ultrasound-minimal lumen area and coronary computed tomographic angiography-based myocardial segmentation. Am J Cardiol 117(8):1282–1288CrossRefPubMed

62.

Ben-Dor I, Torguson R, Gaglia MA Jr, Gonzalez MA, Maluenda G, Bui AB, Xue Z, Satler LF, Suddath WO, Lindsay J et al (2011) Correlation between fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound lumen area in intermediate coronary artery stenosis. EuroIntervention 7(2):225–233CrossRefPubMed

63.

Chen SL, Xu B, Chen JB, Xu T, Ye F, Zhang JJ, Kwan TW, Tian NL, Liu ZZ (2013) Lin S: Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative angiographic and intravascular ultrasound parameters predicting the functional significance of single de novo lesions. Int J Cardiol 68(2):1364–1369CrossRef

64.

Costa MA, Sabate M, Staico R, Alfonso F, Seixas AC, Albertal M, Crossman A, Angiolillo DJ, Zenni M, Sousa JE et al (2007) Anatomical and physiologic assessments in patients with small coronary artery disease: final results of the physiologic and anatomical evaluation prior to and after stent implantation in small coronary vessels (PHANTOM) trial. Am Heart J 153(2):296 e291–297.

65.

Tanaka S, Noda T, Segawa T, Iwama M, Minagawa T, Watanabe S, Minatoguchi S (2010) Relation between functional stenosis and tissue characterization of intermediate coronary plaques in patients with stable coronary heart disease. J Cardiol 55(3):296–302CrossRefPubMed

66.

Huseyinova G, Aslanger E, Cakir O, Atici A, Panc C, Demirkiran A, Surmen S, Sarikaya R, Erdogan O, Golcuk E et al (2015) Potential contribution of virtual histology plaque composition to hemodynamic-morphologic dissociation in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome. Int J Cardiol 187:33–38CrossRefPubMed

67.

Reith S, Battermann S, Hellmich M, Marx N, Burgmaier M (2015) Correlation between OCT-derived intrastent dimensions and fractional flow reserve measurements after coronary stent implantation and impact on clinical outcome. J Invasive Cardiol 27(5):222–228PubMed

68.

Lee SY, Shin DH, Shehata I, Kim JS, Kim BK, Ko YG, Choi D, Jang Y, Hong MK (2016) Association between fractional flow reserve and coronary plaque characteristics assessed by optical coherence tomography. J Cardiol 68(4):342–345CrossRefPubMed

69.

Kobayashi Y, Johnson NP, Berry C, Bruyne BD, Gould KL, Jeremias A, Oldroyd KG, Pijls NHJ, Fearon WF (2016) The influence of lesion location on the diagnostic accuracy of adenosine-free coronary pressure wire measurements. Jacc Cardiovasc Interv 9(23):2390.

70.

Petraco R, Sen S, Nijjer S, Echavarria-Pinto M, Escaned J, Francis DP, Davies JE (2013) Fractional flow reserve-guided revascularization: practical implications of a diagnostic gray zone and measurement variability on clinical decisions. Jacc Cardiovasc Interv 6(3):222.

71.

Tu S, Xu L, Ligthart J, Xu B, Witberg K, Sun Z, Koning G, Reiber JH, Regar E (2012) In vivo comparison of arterial lumen dimensions assessed by co-registered three-dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 28(6):1315–1327CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

72.

Reith S, Battermann S, Hellmich M, Marx N, Burgmaier M (2015) Correlation between optical coherence tomography-derived intraluminal parameters and fractional flow reserve measurements in intermediate grade coronary lesions: a comparison between diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Clin Res Cardiol 104(1):59–70CrossRefPubMed

73.

Ahmadi A, Stone GW, Leipsic J, Serruys PW, Shaw L, Hecht H, Wong G, Norgaard BL, O’Gara PT, Chandrashekhar Y et al (2016) Association of Coronary Stenosis and Plaque Morphology With Fractional Flow Reserve and Outcomes. JAMA Cardiol 1(3):350–357.

74.

Van De Hoef TP, Meuwissen M, Escaned J, Davies JE, Siebes M, Spaan JA, Piek JJ (2013) Fractional flow reserve as a surrogate for inducible myocardial ischaemia. Nat Rev Cardiol 10(8):439–452CrossRefPubMed

75.

Tu S WJ, Yang J, von Birgelen C, Ferrara A, Pellicano M, Nef H, Tebaldi M, Murasato Y, Lansky A, Barbato E, van der Heijden LC, Reiber JHC, Holm NR, Wijns W (2016) Diagnostic accuracy of fast computational approaches to derive fractional flow reserve from diagnostic coronary X-ray angiography in the international multicenter favor (functional assessment by various flow reconstructions) pilot study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2016, In press

76.

Shiono Y, Kitabata H, Kubo T, Masuno T, Ohta S, Ozaki Y, Sougawa H, Orii M, Shimamura K, Ishibashi K et al (2012) Optical coherence tomography-derived anatomical criteria for functionally significant coronary stenosis assessed by fractional flow reserve. Circ J 76(9):2218–2225CrossRefPubMed

77.

Pawlowski T, Prati F, Kulawik T, Ficarra E, Bil J, Gil R (2013) Optical coherence tomography criteria for defining functional severity of intermediate lesions: a comparative study with FFR. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 29(8):1685–1691CrossRefPubMed

78.

Zafar H, Ullah I, Dinneen K, Matiullah S, Hanley A, Leahy MJ, Sharif F (2014) Evaluation of hemodynamically severe coronary stenosis as determined by fractional flow reserve with frequency domain optical coherence tomography measured anatomical parameters. J Cardiol 64(1):19–24CrossRefPubMed

79.

Belkacemi A, Stella PR, Ali DS, Novianti PW, Doevendans PA, van Belle E, Agostoni P (2013) Diagnostic accuracy of optical coherence tomography parameters in predicting in-stent hemodynamic severe coronary lesions: validation against fractional flow reserve. Int J Cardiol 168(4):4209–4213CrossRefPubMed

Titel: A systematic review of imaging anatomy in predicting functional significance of coronary stenoses determined by fractional flow reserve
verfasst von: Miao Chu
Neng Dai
Junqing Yang
Jelmer Westra
Shengxian Tu
Publikationsdatum: 06.03.2017
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging / Ausgabe 7/2017
Print ISSN: 1569-5794
Elektronische ISSN: 1875-8312
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-017-1085-3

Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie

23.04.2024 | Ablationstherapie | Nachrichten

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

A systematic review of imaging anatomy in predicting functional significance of coronary stenoses determined by fractional flow reserve

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

Europäische Ernährungsgewohnheiten: Das sind die häufigsten Fehler

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Antihypertensiva schützen auch alte Menschen noch vor Demenz

Update Kardiologie

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2017

Numerical and experimental investigations of the flow–pressure relation in multiple sequential stenoses coronary artery

Validation of the “smart” minimum FFR Algorithm in an unselected all comer population of patients with intermediate coronary stenoses

Non-invasive coronary wave intensity analysis

Assessment of left anterior descending artery stenosis of intermediate severity by fractional flow reserve, instantaneous wave-free ratio, and non-invasive coronary flow reserve

Whence we came, whither we go?

High wall shear stress and high-risk plaque: an emerging concept

Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

Europäische Ernährungsgewohnheiten: Das sind die häufigsten Fehler

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Antihypertensiva schützen auch alte Menschen noch vor Demenz

Update Kardiologie