nach oben

The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging

Erschienen in:

09.03.2017 | Original Paper

CT myocardial perfusion imaging: current status and future perspectives

verfasst von: Dong Hyun Yang, Young-Hak Kim

Erschienen in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | Ausgabe 7/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Computed tomography myocardial perfusion (CTP) combined with coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) may constitute a “1-stop shop” for the noninvasive diagnosis of hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis during a single CT examination. CTP shows high diagnostic performance and provides incremental value over CCTA for the detection of hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis in patients with a high Agatston calcium score or coronary artery stents. Future studies should determine the optimal protocol and clinical value of CTP for guiding revascularization strategy and prognostication. In this article, we review the current status and future perspectives of CTP, focusing on technical considerations, clinical applications, and future research topics.

Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG et al (2008) Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:1724–1732. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.07.031 CrossRefPubMed

Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M et al (2008) Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med 359:2324–2336. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0806576 CrossRefPubMed

Meijboom WB, Meijs MF, Schuijf JD et al (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:2135–2144. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.08.058 CrossRefPubMed

Meijboom WB, Van Mieghem CA, van Pelt N et al (2008) Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:636–643. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.024 CrossRefPubMed

Rochitte CE, George RT, Chen MY et al (2014) Computed tomography angiography and perfusion to assess coronary artery stenosis causing perfusion defects by single photon emission computed tomography: the CORE320 study. Eur Heart J 35:1120–1130. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht488 CrossRefPubMed

Ko BS, Cameron JD, Meredith IT et al (2012) Computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients considered for revascularization: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J 33:67–77. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehr268 CrossRefPubMed

Yang DH, Kim YH, Roh JH et al (2015) Stress myocardial perfusion CT in patients suspected of having coronary artery disease: visual and quantitative analysis-validation by using fractional flow reserve. Radiology 276:715–723. doi:10.1148/radiol.2015141126 CrossRefPubMed

Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Peels K et al (1996) Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med 334:1703–1708. doi:10.1056/NEJM199606273342604 CrossRefPubMed

Takx RA, Blomberg BA, El Aidi H et al (2015) Diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion imaging compared to invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. doi:10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002666 PubMed

10.

Salerno M, Beller GA (2009) Noninvasive assessment of myocardial perfusion. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2:412–424. doi:10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.109.854893 CrossRefPubMed

11.

Ko BS, Cameron JD, Leung M et al (2012) Combined CT coronary angiography and stress myocardial perfusion imaging for hemodynamically significant stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 5:1097–1111. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.09.004 CrossRefPubMed

12.

Rief M, Zimmermann E, Stenzel F et al (2013) Computed tomography angiography and myocardial computed tomography perfusion in patients with coronary stents: prospective intraindividual comparison with conventional coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 62:1476–1485. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.03.088 CrossRefPubMed

13.

Shehata ML, Basha TA, Hayeri MR, Hartung D, Teytelboym OM, Vogel-Claussen J (2014) MR myocardial perfusion imaging: insights on techniques, analysis, interpretation, and findings. Radiographics 34:1636–1657. doi:10.1148/rg.346140074 CrossRefPubMed

14.

Koo HJ, Yang DH, Kim YH et al (2016) CT-based myocardial ischemia evaluation: quantitative angiography, transluminal attenuation gradient, myocardial perfusion, and CT-derived fractional flow reserve. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 32(Suppl 1):1–19. doi:10.1007/s10554-015-0825-5 CrossRefPubMed

15.

Williams MC, Newby DE (2016) CT myocardial perfusion imaging: current status and future directions. Clin Radiol 71:739–749. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2016.03.006 CrossRefPubMed

16.

Blankstein R, Shturman LD, Rogers IS et al (2009) Adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging using dual-source cardiac computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 54:1072–1084. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.06.014 CrossRefPubMed

17.

George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller JM et al (2009) Adenosine stress 64- and 256-row detector computed tomography angiography and perfusion imaging: a pilot study evaluating the transmural extent of perfusion abnormalities to predict atherosclerosis causing myocardial ischemia. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2:174–182. doi:10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.108.813766 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Bastarrika G, Ramos-Duran L, Rosenblum MA, Kang DK, Rowe GW, Schoepf UJ (2010) Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial CT perfusion imaging: initial clinical experience. Invest Radiol 45:306–313. doi:10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181dfa2f2 CrossRefPubMed

19.

Ko SM, Choi JW, Song MG et al (2011) Myocardial perfusion imaging using adenosine-induced stress dual-energy computed tomography of the heart: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and conventional coronary angiography. Eur Radiol 21:26–35. doi:10.1007/s00330-010-1897-1 CrossRefPubMed

20.

Bamberg F, Becker A, Schwarz F et al (2011) Detection of hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis: incremental diagnostic value of dynamic CT-based myocardial perfusion imaging. Radiology 260:689–698. doi:10.1148/radiol.11110638 CrossRefPubMed

21.

Bettencourt N, Chiribiri A, Schuster A et al (2013) Direct comparison of cardiac magnetic resonance and multidetector computed tomography stress-rest perfusion imaging for detection of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 61:1099–1107. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.12.020 CrossRefPubMed

22.

Kim SM, Choi JH, Chang SA, Choe YH (2013) Detection of ischaemic myocardial lesions with coronary CT angiography and adenosine-stress dynamic perfusion imaging using a 128-slice dual-source CT: diagnostic performance in comparison with cardiac MRI. Br J Radiol 86:20130481. doi:10.1259/bjr.20130481 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Cury RC, Kitt TM, Feaheny K et al (2015) A randomized, multicenter, multivendor study of myocardial perfusion imaging with regadenoson CT perfusion vs single photon emission CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 9(103–112):e101–e102. doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2015.01.002

24.

Hsiao EM, Rybicki FJ, Steigner M (2010) CT coronary angiography: 256-slice and 320-detector row scanners. Curr Cardiol Rep 12:68–75. doi:10.1007/s11886-009-0075-z CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Bischoff B, Bamberg F, Marcus R et al (2013) Optimal timing for first-pass stress CT myocardial perfusion imaging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 29:435–442. doi:10.1007/s10554-012-0080-y CrossRefPubMed

26.

Feuchtner G, Goetti R, Plass A et al (2011) Adenosine stress high-pitch 128-slice dual-source myocardial computed tomography perfusion for imaging of reversible myocardial ischemia: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 4:540–549. doi:10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.110.961250 CrossRefPubMed

27.

Ho KT, Chua KC, Klotz E, Panknin C (2010) Stress and rest dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging by evaluation of complete time-attenuation curves with dual-source CT. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 3:811–820. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.05.009 CrossRefPubMed

28.

Bezerra HG, Loureiro R, Irlbeck T et al (2011) Incremental value of myocardial perfusion over regional left ventricular function and coronary stenosis by cardiac CT for the detection of acute coronary syndromes in high-risk patients: a subgroup analysis of the ROMICAT trial. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 5:382–391. doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2011.10.004 CrossRefPubMed

29.

Techasith T, Cury RC (2011) Stress myocardial CT perfusion: an update and future perspective. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 4:905–916. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.04.017 CrossRefPubMed

30.

Ko SM, Park JH, Hwang HK, Song MG (2014) Direct comparison of stress- and rest-dual-energy computed tomography for detection of myocardial perfusion defect. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 30(Suppl 1):41–53. doi:10.1007/s10554-014-0410-3 CrossRefPubMed

31.

So A, Lee TY, Imai Y et al (2011) Quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging using rapid kVp switch dual-energy CT: preliminary experience. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 5:430–442. doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2011.10.008 CrossRefPubMed

32.

Ruzsics B, Schwarz F, Schoepf UJ et al (2009) Comparison of dual-energy computed tomography of the heart with single photon emission computed tomography for assessment of coronary artery stenosis and of the myocardial blood supply. Am J Cardiol 104:318–326. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.03.051 CrossRefPubMed

33.

Zoghbi GJ, Dorfman TA, Iskandrian AE (2008) The effects of medications on myocardial perfusion. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:401–416. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.04.035 CrossRefPubMed

34.

Taillefer R, Ahlberg AW, Masood Y et al (2003) Acute beta-blockade reduces the extent and severity of myocardial perfusion defects with dipyridamole Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 42:1475–1483CrossRefPubMed

35.

Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V et al (2002) Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 105:539–542CrossRefPubMed

36.

Kikuchi Y, Oyama-Manabe N, Naya M et al (2014) Quantification of myocardial blood flow using dynamic 320-row multi-detector CT as compared with (1)(5)O-H(2)O PET. Eur Radiol 24:1547–1556. doi:10.1007/s00330-014-3164-3 CrossRefPubMed

37.

Bamberg F, Marcus RP, Becker A et al (2014) Dynamic myocardial CT perfusion imaging for evaluation of myocardial ischemia as determined by MR imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 7:267–277. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.06.008 CrossRefPubMed

38.

Greif M, von Ziegler F, Bamberg F et al (2013) CT stress perfusion imaging for detection of haemodynamically relevant coronary stenosis as defined by FFR. Heart 99:1004–1011. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2013-303794 CrossRefPubMed

39.

Coenen A, Lubbers MM, Kurata A et al (2016) Diagnostic value of transmural perfusion ratio derived from dynamic CT-based myocardial perfusion imaging for the detection of haemodynamically relevant coronary artery stenosis. Eur Radiol. doi:10.1007/s00330-016-4567-0 PubMedCentral

40.

Bettencourt N, Ferreira ND, Leite D et al (2013) CAD detection in patients with intermediate-high pre-test probability: low-dose CT delayed enhancement detects ischemic myocardial scar with moderate accuracy but does not improve performance of a stress-rest CT perfusion protocol. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 6:1062–1071. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.04.013 CrossRefPubMed

41.

Kimura F, Matsuo Y, Nakajima T et al (2010) Myocardial fat at cardiac imaging: how can we differentiate pathologic from physiologic fatty infiltration? Radiographics 30:1587–1602. doi:10.1148/rg.306105519 CrossRefPubMed

42.

Yang DH, Kim YH, Roh JH et al (2016) Diagnostic performance of on-site CT-derived fractional flow reserve versus CT perfusion. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. doi:10.1093/ehjci/jew094

43.

Choo KS, Hwangbo L, Kim JH et al (2013) Adenosine-stress low-dose single-scan CT myocardial perfusion imaging using a 128-slice dual-source CT: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. Acta Radiol 54:389–395. doi:10.1177/0284185113475440 CrossRefPubMed

44.

Pelgrim GJ, Dorrius M, Xie X et al (2015) The dream of a one-stop-shop: meta-analysis on myocardial perfusion CT. Eur J Radiol 84:2411–2420. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.12.032 CrossRefPubMed

45.

George RT, Mehra VC, Chen MY et al (2014) Myocardial CT perfusion imaging and SPECT for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a head-to-head comparison from the CORE320 multicenter diagnostic performance study. Radiology 272:407–416. doi:10.1148/radiol.14140806 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

46.

Leeflang MMG, Rutjes AWS, Reitsma JB, Hooft L, Bossuyt PMM (2013) Variation of a test’s sensitivity and specificity with disease prevalence. Can Med Assoc J (CMAJ) 185:E537–E544. doi:10.1503/cmaj.121286 CrossRef

47.

Hoppe C (2013) A test is not a test. Nat Rev Neurosci 14:877. doi:10.1038/nrn3475-c5 CrossRefPubMed

48.

Min JK, Leipsic J, Pencina MJ et al (2012) Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography. JAMA 308:1237–1245. doi:10.1001/2012.jama.11274 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

49.

Wong DT, Ko BS, Cameron JD et al (2014) Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of combined assessment using adenosine stress computed tomography perfusion + computed tomography angiography with transluminal attenuation gradient + computed tomography angiography against invasive fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol 63:1904–1912. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.557 CrossRefPubMed

50.

Ko BS, Cameron JD, Defrance T, Seneviratne SK (2011) CT stress myocardial perfusion imaging using multidetector CT—a review. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 5:345–356. doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2011.10.005 CrossRefPubMed

51.

Kim SM, Cho YK, Choe YH (2014) Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging using 128-slice dual-source CT in patients with normal body mass indices: effect of tube voltage, tube current, and iodine concentration on image quality and radiation dose. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 30(Suppl 2):95–103. doi:10.1007/s10554-014-0524-7 CrossRefPubMed

52.

Kim SM, Kim YN, Choe YH (2012) Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging using 128-slice dual-source CT: optimization of the CT protocol to reduce the radiation dose. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. doi:10.1007/s10554-012-0138-x

53.

Gaemperli O, Schepis T, Valenta I et al (2007) Cardiac image fusion from stand-alone SPECT and CT: clinical experience. J Nucl Med 48:696–703. doi:10.2967/jnumed.106.037606 CrossRefPubMed

54.

Danad I, Fayad ZA, Willemink MJ, Min JK (2015) New applications of cardiac computed tomography: dual-energy, spectral, and molecular CT imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 8:710–723. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.03.005 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

55.

Hadamitzky M, Achenbach S, Al-Mallah M et al (2013) Optimized prognostic score for coronary computed tomographic angiography: results from the CONFIRM registry (COronary CT Angiography EvaluatioN For Clinical Outcomes: An InteRnational Multicenter Registry). J Am Coll Cardiol 62:468–476. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.04.064 CrossRefPubMed

56.

Pundziute G, Schuijf JD, Jukema JW et al (2007) Prognostic value of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:62–70. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.07.070 CrossRefPubMed

57.

Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Kiat H et al (1996) Exercise myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients without known coronary artery disease: incremental prognostic value and use in risk stratification. Circulation 93:905–914CrossRefPubMed

58.

Abbasi SA, Heydari B, Shah RV et al (2014) Risk stratification by regadenoson stress magnetic resonance imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 114:1198–1203. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.07.041 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

59.

van Werkhoven JM, Schuijf JD, Gaemperli O et al (2009) Prognostic value of multislice computed tomography and gated single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 53:623–632. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.10.043 CrossRefPubMed

60.

Kang SJ, Yang DH, Koo HJ et al (2016) Intravascular ultrasound-derived morphological predictors of myocardial ischemia assessed by stress myocardial perfusion computed tomography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. doi:10.1002/ccd.26710

Titel: CT myocardial perfusion imaging: current status and future perspectives
verfasst von: Dong Hyun Yang
Young-Hak Kim
Publikationsdatum: 09.03.2017
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging / Ausgabe 7/2017
Print ISSN: 1569-5794
Elektronische ISSN: 1875-8312
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-017-1102-6

Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie

19.04.2024 | Vorhofflimmern | Nachrichten

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

CT myocardial perfusion imaging: current status and future perspectives

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Antihypertensiva schützen auch alte Menschen noch vor Demenz

Sind Betablocker auch für ältere herzschwache Personen nützlich?

Stillende Frauen haben geringeres kardiovaskuläres Risiko

Update Kardiologie

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2017

Fractional flow reserve: a clinical perspective

Non-invasive coronary wave intensity analysis

Validation of the “smart” minimum FFR Algorithm in an unselected all comer population of patients with intermediate coronary stenoses

Numerical and experimental investigations of the flow–pressure relation in multiple sequential stenoses coronary artery

Targeting the dominant mechanism of coronary microvascular dysfunction with intracoronary physiology tests

Coronary flow capacity: concept, promises, and challenges

Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Antihypertensiva schützen auch alte Menschen noch vor Demenz

Sind Betablocker auch für ältere herzschwache Personen nützlich?

Stillende Frauen haben geringeres kardiovaskuläres Risiko

Update Kardiologie