Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A clinical and radiological evaluation of DFDBA with amniotic membrane versus bovine derived xenograft with amniotic membrane in human periodontal grade II furcation defects

  • Published:
Cell and Tissue Banking Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to clinically and radiographically evaluate and compare the efficacy of demineralized freeze dried bone allograft (DFDBA) and bovine derived xenogenic bone graft (BDX) [Bio-Oss] with amniotic membrane (AM) as guided tissue regeneration (GTR) in the treatment of human periodontal Grade II buccal furcation defects. Ten patients suffering from chronic periodontitis, displaying bilateral Grade II buccal furcation defect, were randomly treated using DFDBA with AM (Experimental site A) or using bovine derived xenograft (BDX) with AM (Experimental site B). The clinical and radiographic parameters were recorded at baseline, 6 and 9 months. Healing was uneventful in all patients except one site which was treated with BDX + AM. At 9 months after therapy, soft tissue measurements for the DFDBA + AM group showed pocket depth (PD) reduction of 4.7 mm ± 0.58, and relative attachment level gain of 4.8 mm + 0.32, while the BDX + AM group showed a PD reduction of 4.4 mm ± 0.27, and AL gain of 5.1 mm ± 0.09. Osseous measurements showed bone fill of 2.1 mm ± 0.36 for the DFDBA + AM group and 2.43 mm ± 0.38 for the BDX + AM group. Percentage gain in bone was 76.3% for the DFDBA + AM group and 79.6% for the BDX + AM group. Statistical analysis revealed there was no statistical difference between the two materials in all measurements. Within the limits of the present study, it can be concluded that: (1) at 9 months after surgery both therapies resulted in significant PD reductions and CAL gains and (2) significant improvement was seen in bone fill and percentage gain with both the material, however, there was no significant difference between both.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bowers GM, Chadroff B, Carnevale R, Mellonig J, Corio R, Emerson J, Stevens M, Romberg E (1989a) Histologic evaluation of new attachment apparatus in humans. Part I. J Periodontol 60:675–682

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers GM, Chadroff B, Carnevale R et al (1989b) Histologic evaluation of new attachment apparatus formation in humans, Part III. J Periodontol 60:683–693

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers G, Chadroff B, Carnevale R, Mellonig J, Corio E, Emerson J, Stevens J, Romberg E (1989c) Histologic evaluation of new attachment apparatus formation in humans: Part III. J Periodontol 60:683–693

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brunsvold MA, Mellonig JT (1993) Bone grafts and periodontal regeneration. Periodontology 2000(1):80–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camargo PM, Lekovic V, Weinlaender M, Nedic M, Vasilic N, Wolinsky LE, Kenney EB (2000) A controlled re-entry study on the effectiveness of bovine porous bone mineral used in combination with a collagen membrane of porcine origin in the treatment of intrabony defects in humans. J Clin Periodontol 27:889–896

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Camelo M, Nevins ML, Schenk R, Simion M, Rasperini G, Lynch S, Nevins M (1998) Clinical, radiographic, and histologic evaluation of human periodontal defects treated with Bio-Oss and Bio-Gide. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 18:321–331

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carranza FA, Newman MG (1996) Clinical Periodontology, 8th edn. WB Saunders & Co, Philadelphia, pp 61–82

  • Clergeau LP, Danan M, Clergeau-Guerithault S, Brion M (1996) Healing response to anorganic bone implantation in periodontal Intrabony defects in dogs. Part I. Bone regeneration. A microradiographic study. J Periodontol 67:140–149

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen P, Tobaly K, Danan M, Pare C, Sauven J, Brion M (1990) Treatment of intraosseous lesions with anorganic bovine bone plus collagen. Entret Bichat, Odontol et Stomatol xx:91–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortellini P, Bowers GM (1995) Periodontal regeneration of Intrabony defects: An evidence-based treatment approach. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 15(12):8–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Dragoo M, Sullivan M (1973) A clinical and histologic evaluation of autogenous iliac bone grafts in humans. Part I. wound healing 2–8 months. J of Periodontol 44:599–612

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes M, Sridhar MS, Sangwan VS, Rao GN (2005) Amniotic membrane transplantation for ocular surface reconstruction. Cornea 24:643–653

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gottlow Jan (1993) Guided tissue regeneration using bioresorbable and non-resorbable devices: initial healing and long-term results. J Periodontol 64:1157–1165

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guillemin MR, Mellonig JT, Brunsvold MA (1993) Healing in periodontal defects treated by DFDBA in combination with ePTFE membranes (I). Clinical and scanning electron microscope analysis. J Clin Periodontol 1993(20):528–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen SS, Aaboe M, Pinholt EM, Hjorting-Hansen E, Melsen F, Ruyter IE (1996) Tissue reaction and material characteristics of four bone substitutes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 11:55–66

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Libin BM, Ward HL, Fishman L (1975) Decalcified, lyophilized bone allografts for use in human periodontal defects. J Periodontol 46(5):1–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Machtei EE, Schallhorn RG (1995) Successful regeneration of mandibular class II furcation defects: An evidence-based treatment approach. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 15:146–167

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mellonig J (1984) Decalcified freeze-dried bone allograft as an implant material in human periodontal defects. Int J Periodontol Restorative Dent 4:40–55

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mellonig JT (1992) Autogenous and allogeneic bone grafts in periodontal therapy. Crit Rev Oral Biol 3:333–352

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mellonig J (2000) Human histologic evaluation of a bovine-derived xenograft in the treatment of periodontal osseous defects. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 20:19–29

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Niknejad H, Peirovi H, Jorjani M, Ahmadiani A, Ghanavi J, Seifalian Alexander (2008) Properties of the amniotic membrane for potential use in tissue engineering. Eur Cells Mater 15:88–99

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pihlstrom BL, Michalowicz BS, Johnson NW (2005) Periodontal diseases. Lancet 366:1809–1820

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Polimeni G, Xiropaidis AV, Wikesjo UM (2006) Biology and principles of periodontal wound healing/regeneration. Periodontal 2000(41):30–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quintero G, Mellonig J, Gambill V, Pelleu G Jr (1982) A 6-month clinical evaluation of decalcified freeze-dried bone allografts in periodontal osseous defects. J Periodontol 53:726–730

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson CR, Mellonig JT, Brunsvold MA, McDonnell HT, Cochran DL (1999) Clinical evaluation of Bio-Oss: a bovine-derived xenograft for the treatment of periodontal osseous defects in humans. J Clin Periodontol 26:421–428

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sander L, Karring T (1995) Healing of periodontal lesions in monkeys following the guided tissue regeneration procedure. A histological study. J Clin Periodontol 22:332–337

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz Z, Somers A, Mellonig JT et al (1998) Ability of commercial demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft to induce new bone formation is dependent on donor age but not gender. J Periodontol 69:470–478

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sculean A, Chiantella GC, Windisch P, Gera I, Reich E (2002) Clinical evaluation of an enamel matrix protein derivative (Emdogains) combined with a bovine derived xenograft (Bio-Oss) for the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects in humans. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 22:259–267

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Urist MR (1965) Bone: Formation by autoinduction. Science 150(698):893–899

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank; (1) Tissue Bank, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India for providing us the DFDBA and AM. (2) Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, KLE’s Institute of Dental Sciences, Belgaum, Karnataka, India for allowing us to use RVG.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaila V. Kothiwale.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kothiwale, S.V., Anuroopa, P. & Gajiwala, A.L. A clinical and radiological evaluation of DFDBA with amniotic membrane versus bovine derived xenograft with amniotic membrane in human periodontal grade II furcation defects. Cell Tissue Bank 10, 317–326 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-009-9126-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-009-9126-3

Keywords

Navigation