Abstract
This review provides an overview of an important aspect of early childhood home visiting research: understanding how parents are involved in program services and activities. Involvement is defined as the process of the parent connecting with and using the services of a program to the best of the client’s and the program’s ability. The term includes two broad dimensions: participation, or the quantity of intervention a family receives; and engagement, or the emotional quality of the family’s interaction with the program. Research that includes examination of parent involvement is reviewed, including examples from the Early Head Start Research and Evaluation Project. Factors that influence involvement are noted, including parent characteristics, qualities of the home visitor, and program features. The need for further measurement development and implications of these findings for home visiting programs are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The term parent is used to represent the primary adult caregiver for the target child, although others besides the parent (such as grandparents) may be in this role (see also the later section on family context).
One prominent meta-analysis of home visiting programs provides mixed support for a link between parent involvement and program outcomes, in that it demonstrated a relation between amount of home visiting and child cognitive outcomes, but no relation between other measures of participation and any other program outcomes (Sweet and Appelbaum 2004).
References
Administration for Children, Families. (1998). Head Start Program performance measures: Second progress report. Washington, DC: DHHS.
Administration for Children, Families. (2002). Making a difference in the lives of children and families: The impacts of Early Head Start Programs on young children and their families. Summary report. Washington, DC: DHHS.
Baker, A. J. L., Piotrkowski, C. S., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (1999). The home instruction program for preschool youngsters (HIPPY). The Future of Children, 9, 116–133. doi:10.2307/1602724.
Barnard, K. E., Magyary, D., Sumner, G., Booth, C. L., Mitchell, S. K., & Spieker, S. (1988). Prevention of parenting alterations for women of low social support. Psychiatry, 51, 248–253.
Belsky, J. (1986). A tale of two variances: Between and within. Child Development, 57, 1301–1305. doi:10.2307/1130453.
Blue-Banning, M., Summers, J. A., Frankland, C., Nelson, L. G., & Beegle, G. (2004). Dimensions of family and professional partnerships: Constructive guidelines for collaboration. Exceptional Children, 70, 167–184.
Bordin, E. S. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 16(3), 252–260.
Brookes, S., Summers, J. A., Thornburg, K. R., Ispa, J. M., & Lane, V. J. (2006). Building successful home visitor-mother relationships and reaching program goals in two Early Head Start Programs: A qualitative look at contributing factors. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21, 25–45. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2006.01.005.
Brooks-Gunn, J. (2003). Do you believe in magic? What we can expect from early childhood intervention programs. SRCD Social Policy Report, 17(1).
Castro, D. C., Bryant, D. M., Peisner-Feinberg, E. S., & Skinner, M. L. (2004). Parent involvement in Head Start Programs: the role of parent, teacher and classroom characteristics. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 413–431. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2004.07.005.
Chaffin, M. (2004). Is it time to rethink healthy start/healthy families? Child Abuse & Neglect, 28, 589–595. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2004.04.004.
Cole, R., Kitzman, H., Olds, D., & Sidora, K. (1998). Family context as a moderator of program effects in prenatal and early childhood home visitation. Journal of Community Psychology, 26, 37–48. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6629(199801)26:1<37::AID-JCOP4>3.0.CO;2-Z.
Collins, L. M., & Sayer, A. G. (2001). New methods for the analysis of Change. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Connell, J. P., & Kubisch, A. C. (1998). Applying a theories of change approach to the design and evaluation of comprehensive community initiatives: Progress, prospects, and problems. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.
Daro, D. (2006). Home visitation: Assessing progress, managing expectations. Chicago: Chapin Hall Center for Children. Retrieved November 21, 2006, at http://www.chapinhall.org/article_abstract.aspx?ar=1438&L2=61&L3=129.
Daro, D. A., & Harding, K. A. (1999). Healthy families America: Using research to enhance practice. The Future of Children, 9, 152–176. doi:10.2307/1602726.
Daro, D., McCurdy, K., Falconnier, L., & Stojanovic, D. (2003). Sustaining new parents in home visitation services: key participant and program factors. Child Abuse & Neglect, 27, 1101–1125. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2003.09.007.
Duggan, A., Caldera, D., Rodriguez, K., Burrell, L., Rohde, C., & Crowne, S. S. (2007). Impact of a statewide home visiting program to prevent child abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31, 801–827. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2006.06.011.
Duggan, A., Fuddy, L., Burrell, L., Higman, S. M., McFarlane, E., Windham, A., et al. (2004). Randomized trial of a statewide home visiting program to prevent child abuse: impact in reducing parental risk factors. Child Abuse & Neglect, 28, 623–643.
Duggan, A. K., McFarlan, E. C., Windham, A. M., Rhode, C. A., Salkever, D. S., Fuddy, L., et al. (1999). Evaluation of Hawaii’s Healthy Start Program. The Future of Children, 9, 66–90. doi:10.2307/1602722.
Dunst, C. J., & Paget, K. D. (1991). Parent-professional partnerships and family empowerment. In M. Fine (Ed.), Collaborative involvement with parents of exceptional children (pp. 25–44). BrandonVT: Clinical Psychology Publishing Company, Inc.
Fantuzzo, J., Tighe, E., & Childs, S. (2000). Family involvement questionnaire: A multivariate assessment of family participation in early childhood education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 367–376. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.367.
Florian, V., Mikulincer, M., & Bucholtz, I. (1995). Effects of adult attachment style on the perception and search for social support. Journal of Psychology, 129, 665–676.
Fuddy, L. J. (1992). Healthy start data & evaluation: What have we learned along the road to success. Paper presented at the Hawaii Healthy Start Conference, Honolulu, HI.
Gomby, D. (2005). Home visitation in 2005: Outcomes for children and parents. Invest in Kids Working Paper No. 7. Committee for Economic Development: Invest in Kids Working Group. www.ced.org/projects/kids.shtml. Accessed 30 Aug 2006
Gomby, D. S. (2007). The promise and limitations of home visiting: Implementing effective programs. Child Abuse and Neglect, 31, 793–799. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.07.001.
Gomby, D. S., Culross, P. L., & Behrman, R. E. (1999). Home visiting: Recent program evaluations-analysis and recommendations. The Future of Children, 9, 4–26. doi:10.2307/1602719.
Gray, S. W., & Wandersman, L. P. (1980). The methodology of home-based intervention studies: Problems and promising solutions. Child Development, 51, 993–1009. doi:10.2307/1129537.
Green, B. L., Johnson, S. A., & Rodgers, A. (1999). Understanding patterns of service delivery and participation in community-based family support programs. Children’s Services: Social Policy, Research, and Practice, 2, 1–22. doi:10.1207/s15326918cs0201_1.
Green, B. L., McAllister, C. A., & Tarte, J. (2004). The strengths-based practices inventory: A measure of strengths-based practices for social service programs. Families in Society, 85, 326–335.
Greenspan, S., Wieder, S., Lieberman, A. F., Nover, R., Robinson, M., & Lourie, R. (Eds.). (1987). Infants in multirisk families. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
Guralnick, M. J. (1997). Second-generation research in the field of early intervention. In M. J. Guarlnick (Ed.), The Effectiveness of Early Intervention (pp. 3–20). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
Guskin, K. A., & O’Brien, R. A. (2006). Using logic models to strengthen implementation and outcome evaluation: Collaborations among early childhood home visitation programs. Poster presented at the Head Start Eighth National Research Conference. Washington, DC.
Hans, S., & Korfmacher, J. (2002). The professional development of paraprofessionals. Zero To Three, 23(2), 4–8.
Head Start Bureau (2007). Head Start Program fact sheet: Fiscal Year 2007. http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/hsb/about/fy2007.html. Accessed 1 Nov 2007.
Hebbeler, K. M., & Gerlach-Downie, S. G. (2002). Inside the black box of home visiting: A qualitative analysis of why intended outcomes were not achieved. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 17, 28–51. doi:10.1016/S0885-2006(02) 00128-X.
Heffron, M. C., Ivins, B., & Weston, D. R. (2005). Finding an authentic voice—use of self: Essential learning processes for relationship-based work. Infants & Young Children, 18, 323–336.
Heinicke, C. M., Goorsky, M., Moscov, S., Dudley, K., Gordon, J., Schneider, C., et al. (2000). Relationship-based intervention with at-risk mothers: Factors affecting variations in outcome. Infant Mental Health Journal, 21, 133–155. doi:10.1002/1097-0355(200007)21:3<133::AID-IMHJ1>3.0.CO;2-P.
Hiatt, S. W., Sampson, D., & Baird, D. (1997). Paraprofessional home visitation: Conceptual and pragmatic considerations. Journal of Community Psychology, 25, 77–93. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6629(199701)25:1<77::AID-JCOP6>3.0.CO;2-#.
Hill, J. L., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Waldfogel, J. (2003). Sustained effects of participation in an early intervention for low-birth-weight premature infants. Developmental Psychology, 39, 730–744. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.39.4.730.
Horvath, A. O., & Bedi, R. P. (2002). The alliance. In J. C. Norcross (Ed.), Psychotherapy Relationships that Work: Therapist Contributions and Responsiveness to Patients (pp. 37–69). New York: Oxford University Press.
Horvath, A. O. (2000). The therapeutic relationship: From transference to alliance. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56(2), 163–173. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(200002)56:2<163::AID-JCLP3>3.0.CO;2-D.
Kazdin, A. E., & Wassell, G. (1999). Barriers to treatment participation and therapeutic change among children referred for conduct disorder. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 28, 160–172. doi:10.1207/s15374424jccp2802_4.
Kelly, J. F., Buehlman, K., & Caldwell, K. (2000). Training personnel to promote quality parent–child interaction in families who are homeless. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20, 174–185.
King, C. (1995). The people of Kids Place: Creating and maintaining comprehensive services for young children and their families in small rural communities. Zero to Three, 15, 10–13.
Kitzman, H. J., Cole, R., Yoos, H. L., & Olds, D. (1997a). Challenges experienced by home visitors: A qualitative study of program implementation. Journal of Community Psychology, 25, 95–109. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6629(199701)25:1<95::AID-JCOP7>3.0.CO;2-1.
Kitzman, H., Yoos, H. L., Cole, R., Korfmacher, J., & Hanks, C. (1997b). Prenatal and early childhood home visitation processes: A case illustration. Journal of Community Psychology, 25, 27–46. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6629(199701)25:1<27::AID-JCOP3>3.0.CO;2-#.
Korfmacher, J., Adam, E., Ogawa, J., & Egeland, B. (1997). Adult attachment: Implications for the therapeutic process in a home visitation intervention. Applied Developmental Science, 1, 43–52. doi:10.1207/s1532480xads0101_5.
Korfmacher, J., Green, B., Spellman, M., & Thornburg, K. (2007). Parent report of the helping relationship in early childhood home visiting. Infant Mental Health Journal, 28, 459–480. doi:10.1002/imhj.20148.
Korfmacher, J., Kitzman, H. K., & Olds, D. L. (1998). Intervention processes as conditioners of home visitation program effects. Journal of Community Psychology, 26, 49–64. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6629(199801)26:1<49::AID-JCOP5>3.0.CO;2-X.
Korfmacher, J., & Marchi, I. (2002). The helping relationship in a paraprofessional teen parenting program. Zero To Three, 23(2), 21–26.
Korfmacher, J., O’Brien, R., Hiatt, S., & Olds, D. (1999). Differences in program implementation between nurses and paraprofessionals in prenatal and infancy home visitation: A randomized trial. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 1847–1851.
LeLaurin, K. (1992). Infant and toddler models of service delivery: Are they detrimental for some children and families? Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 12, 82–104.
Lieberman, A. F., Weston, D., & Pawl, J. H. (1991). Preventive intervention and outcome with anxiously attached dyads. Child Development, 62, 199–209. doi:10.2307/1130715.
Littell, J. H., Alexander, L. B., & Reynolds, W. W. (2001). Client participation: Central and underinvestigated elements of intervention. Social Services Review, 75, 1–28.
Love, J. M., Kisker, E. E., Ross, C., Raikes, H., Constantine, J., Boller, K., et al. (2005). The effectiveness of Early Head Start for 3-year-old children and their parents: Lessons for policy and programs. Developmental Psychology, 41, 885–901.
Luze, G., Peterson, C. A., & Wu, S. (2002). The process of home visits: Different views of what is happening. Paper presented at Head Start’s Sixth National Research Conference. Washington, DC.
McAllister, C., & Green, B. L. (2000). Which families are engaged and why? Program and research perspectives on participation in Early Head Start. Poster presented at the Fifth National Head Start Research Conference. Washington, D.C.
McBride, S. L., & Peterson, C. A. (1997). Home-based early intervention with families of children with disabilities: Who is doing what? Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 17, 209–233.
McCurdy, K., & Daro, D. (2001). Parent involvement in family support: An integrated theory. Family Relations, 50, 113–121. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2001.00113.x.
McCurdy, K., Gannon, R. A., & Daro, D. (2003). Participation patterns in home-based family support programs: Ethnic variations. Family Relations, 52, 3–11. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2003.00003.x.
McDermott, P. A. (1998). MEG: Megacluster analytic strategy for multistage hierarchical grouping with relocations and replications. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 677–686. doi:10.1177/0013164498058004010.
McGuigan, W. M., Katzev, A. R., & Pratt, C. C. (2003). Multi-level determinants of retention in a home visiting child abuse prevention program. Child Abuse and Neglect, 27, 363–378. doi:10.1016/S0145-2134(03) 00024-3.
Nauta, M. J., & Hewett, K. (1988). Studying complexity: The case of the Child and Family Resource Program. In H. B. Weiss & F. H. Jacobs (Eds.), Evaluating family programs (pp. 389–406). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Olds, D. L., Henderson, C. R., Kitzman, H. J., Eckenrode, J. J., Cole, R. E., & Tatelbaum, R. C. (1999). Prenatal and infancy home visitation by nurses: Recent findings. Future of Children, 9(1), 44–65. doi:10.2307/1602721.
Olds, D. L., & Korfmacher, J. (1998). Maternal psychological characteristics as influences on home visitation contact. Journal of Community Psychology, 26, 23–36. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6629(199801)26:1<23::AID-JCOP3>3.0.CO;2-2.
Olds, D., Kitzman, H., Cole, R., & Robinson, J. (1998). Theoretical foundations of a program of home visitation for pregnant women and parents of young children. Journal of Community Psychology, 25, 9–25. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6629(199701)25:1<9::AID-JCOP2>3.0.CO;2-V.
Osofsky, J. D., Culp, A. M., & Ware, L. M. (1988). Intervention challenges with adolescent mothers and their infants. Psychiatry, 51, 236–241.
Parlakian, R. (2001). Look, listen, & learn: Reflective supervision and relationship-based Work. Washington, D.C.: Zero To Three.
Pawl, J. H., & John, M. (1998). How you are is as important as what you do. Washington, DC: Zero To Three.
Peterson, C. A., Luze, G. J., Eshbaugh, E. M., Jeon, H., & Kantz, K. R. (2007). Enhancing parent–child interactions through home visiting: Promising practice or unfulfilled promise? Journal of Early Intervention, 29, 119–140. doi:10.1177/105381510702900205.
Pharis, M. E., & Levin, V. S. (1991). “A person to talk to who really cared”: High-risk mothers’ evaluations of services in an intensive intervention research program. Child Welfare, 70, 307–320.
Powell, C., & Grantham-McGregor, S. (1989). Home visiting of varying frequency and child development. Pediatrics, 84, 157–164.
Powell, D. R. (2005). Searches for what works in parenting interventions. In T. Luster & L. Okagaki (Eds.), Parenting: An Ecological Perspective (2nd ed., pp. 343–373). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Raikes, H., Green, B., Atwater, J., Kisker, E., Constantine, J., & Chazan-Cohen, R. (2006). Involvement in Early Head Start home visiting services: Demographic predictors and relations to child and parent outcomes. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21, 2–24. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2006.01.006.
Ramey, C. T., Bryant, D. M., Wasik, B. H., Sparling, J. J., Fendt, K. H., & LaVange, L. M. (1992). Infant Health and Development Program for low birth weight, premature infants: Program elements, family participation, and child intelligence. Pediatrics, 89, 454–465.
Rauh, V. A., Achenbach, T. M., Nurcombe, B., Howell, C. T., & Teti, D. M. (1988). Minimizing adverse effects of low birthweight: Four year results of an early intervention program. Child Development, 59, 544–553. doi:10.2307/1130556.
Rector-Staerkel, F. (2002). Early Head Start: Home Visiting and Parenting Group Program uptake—an implementation study. UMI Dissertation Services. Seattle, WA.
Roberts, R. N., Akers, A. L., & Behl, D. D. (1996). Family-level service coordination within home visiting programs. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 16(3), 279–301.
Robinson, J. L., Korfmacher, J., Green, S., Song, N., Soden, R., & Emde, R. N. (2002). Predicting program use and acceptance by parents enrolled in Early Head Start. NHSA Dialog, 5(2/3), 311–324. doi:10.1207/s19309325nhsa0502&3_11.
Roggman, L. A., Boyce, L. K., Cook, G. A., & Cook, J. (2002). Getting dads involved: Predictors of father involvement in Early Head Start and with their children. Infant Mental Health Journal, 23, 62–78. doi:10.1002/imhj.10004.
Roggman, L. A., Boyce, L. K., Cook, G. A., & Jump, V. K. (2001). Inside home visits: A collaborative look at process and quality. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 16, 53–71. doi:10.1016/S0885-2006(01)00085-0.
Roggman, L. A., Cook, G. A., Peterson, C., & Raikes, H. (in press). Who drops out of Early Head Start home visiting programs? Early Education and Development.
Rosenbaum, P., & Rubin, D. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55. doi:10.1093/biomet/70.1.41.
Shonkoff, J. P., & Phillips, D. A. (2000). From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early childhood development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Slaughter-Defoe, D. T. (1993). Home visiting with families in poverty: Introducing the concept of culture. The Future of Children, 3(3), 172–183. doi:10.2307/1602549.
Spieker, S. J., Solchany, J., McKenna, M., DeKlyen, M., & Barnard, K. B. (2000). The story of mothers who are difficult to engage. In J. D. Osofsky & H. I. Fitzgerald (Eds.), World association of infant mental health handbook of infant mental health, Vol 3: Parenting and child care (pp. 172–209). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
St. Pierre, R. G., & Layzer, J. I. (1999). Using home visits for multiple purposes: The Comprehensive Child Development Program. Future of Children, 9(1), 134–151. doi:10.2307/1602725.
Sweet, M. A., & Appelbaum, M. I. (2004). Is home visiting an effective strategy? A meta-analytic review of home visiting programs for families with young children. Child Development, 75, 1435–1456. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00750.x.
United States Department of Education. (2006). FR Document 06–2936: Overview information; parental information and resource centers (PIRC); notice inviting applications for new awards for fiscal year (FY). Federal Register, 71(58), 15314–15320.
United States Public Health Service. (2000). Report of the surgeon general’s conference on children’s mental health: A national action Agenda. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services.
Wagner, M. M., & Clayton, S. L. (1999). The parents as teachers program: Results from two demonstrations. Future of Children, 9(1), 91–115. doi:10.2307/1602723.
Wagner, M., Spiker, D., Gerlach-Downie, S., & Hernandez, F. (2000). Parental engagement in home visiting programs–Findings from the Parents as Teachers multisite evaluation. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
Wagner, M., Spiker, D., Hernandez, F., Song, J., & Gerlach-Downie, S. (2001). Multisite parents as teachers evaluation. Experiences and outcomes for children and families. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
Wallace, J., & Vaux, A. (1993). Social support network orientation: The role of adult attachment style. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 12, 354–365.
Wasik, B. H., & Bryant, D. M. (2001). Home visiting: Procedures for helping families (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Weiss, H., Caspe, M., Lopez, E., (2006). Family involvement in early childhood education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Family Research Project. http://www.gse.harvard.edu/hfrp/projects/fine/resources/research/earlychildhood.html. Accessed 9 Oct 2006.
Acknowledgments
The findings reported here are based on research conducted as part of the national Early Head Start Research and Evaluation Project funded by the Administration for Children and Families (ACF), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under contract 105-95-1936 to Mathematica Policy Research, Princeton, NJ, and Columbia University’s Center for Children and Families, Teachers College, in conjunction with the Early Head Start Research Consortium. The Consortium consists of representatives from 17 programs participating in the evaluation, 15 local research teams, the evaluation contractors, and ACF. Research institutions in the Consortium (and principal researchers for conducting this research through 36 months of age) include ACF (Rachel Chazan Cohen, Judith Jerald, Esther Kresh, Helen Raikes, and Louisa Tarullo); Catholic University of America (Michaela Farber, Harriet Liebow, Nancy Taylor, Elizabeth Timberlake, and Shavaun Wall); Columbia University (Lisa Berlin, Christy Brady-Smith, Jeanne Brooks-Gunn, and Allison Sidle Fuligni); Harvard University (Catherian Ayoub, Barbara Alexander Pan, and Catherine Snow); Iowa State University (Dee Draper, Gayle Luze, Susan McBride, Carla Peterson); Mathematica Policy Research (Kimberly Boller, Jill Constantine, Ellen Eliason Kisker, John M. Love, Diane Paulsell, Christine Ross, Peter Schochet, Cheri Vogel, and Welmoet van Kammen); Medical University of South Carolina (Richard Faldowski, Gui-Young Hong, and Susan Pickrel); Michigan State University (Hiram Fitzgerad, Tom Reischl, and Rachel Schiffman); New York University (Mark Spellmann and Catherine Tamis-LeMonda); University of Arkansas (Robert Bradley, Richard Clubb, Andrea Hart, Mark Swanson, and Leanne Witeside-Mansell); University of California, Los Angeles (Carollee Howes and Claire Hamilton); University of Colorado Health Sciences Center (Robert Emde, Jon Korfmacher, JoAnn Robinson, Paul Spicer, and Norman Watt); University of Kansas (Jane Atwater, Judith Carta, and Jean Ann Summers); University of Missouri-Columbia (Mark Fine, Jean Ispa, and Kathy Thornburg); University of Pittsburgh (Beth Green, Carol McAllister, and Robert McCall); University of Washington School of Education (Eduardo Armijo and Joseph Stowitschek); University of Washington School of Nursing (Kathryn Barnard and Susan Spieker), and Utah State University (Lisa Boyce, Gina Cook, Catherine Callow-Heusser, and Lori Roggman).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Korfmacher, J., Green, B., Staerkel, F. et al. Parent Involvement in Early Childhood Home Visiting. Child Youth Care Forum 37, 171–196 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-008-9057-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-008-9057-3