Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 10/2006

01.10.2006 | Original Paper

Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on Hepatopancreatic Surgery

verfasst von: Toshimi Kaido

Erschienen in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Ausgabe 10/2006

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The randomized controlled trial (RCT) is an important research method, providing the highest evidence and playing a pivotal role in the performance of evidence-based medicine. However, RCTs on hepatopancreatic surgery have been performed less frequently than RCTs in other fields. Therefore, this review analyzes the characteristics of RCTs on hepatic and pancreatic surgery to propose a breakthrough. We retrieved studies performed via a MEDLINE search to identify prospective RCTs on hepatopancreatic surgery in the last decade. Eligible RCTs were analyzed using the following items: study design, publication year, geographical area, sample size, multicenter study, and impact factor. Studies comparing surgical technique or methods have composed the majority of the RCTs involving hepatectomy and pancreatectomy. About half of the RCTs on hepatectomy have been performed in East Asia, whereas most of the RCTs on pancreatectomy were undertaken in Western countries. The average sample number of RCT on hepatectomy is significantly smaller than those in other fields. Moreover, multicenter studies are less frequently performed on hepatectomy compared with pancreatectomy. Promoting the organization of multicenter studies would be the best way to increase the number and sample size of RCTs on hepatectomy. Adequate RCTs observing the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statements are necessary to obtain reliable evidence.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaido T (2004) Randomized controlled trials on hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 11:381–389PubMedCrossRef Kaido T (2004) Randomized controlled trials on hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 11:381–389PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Arii S, Yamaoka Y, Futagawa S, Inoue K, Kobayashi K, Kojiro M, Makuuchi M, Nakamura Y, Okita K, Yamada R (2000) Results of surgical and nonsurgical treatment for small-sized hepatocellular carcinomas: a retrospective and nationwide survey in Japan. The Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan. Hepatology 32:1224–1229PubMedCrossRef Arii S, Yamaoka Y, Futagawa S, Inoue K, Kobayashi K, Kojiro M, Makuuchi M, Nakamura Y, Okita K, Yamada R (2000) Results of surgical and nonsurgical treatment for small-sized hepatocellular carcinomas: a retrospective and nationwide survey in Japan. The Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan. Hepatology 32:1224–1229PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Imamura M, Doi R, Imaizumi T, Funakoshi A, Wakasugi H, Sunamura M, Ogata Y, Hishinuma S, Asano T, Aikou T, Hosotani R, Maetani S (2004) A randomized multicenter trial comparing resection and radiochemotherapy for resectable locally invasive pancreatic cancer. Surgery 136:1003–1011PubMedCrossRef Imamura M, Doi R, Imaizumi T, Funakoshi A, Wakasugi H, Sunamura M, Ogata Y, Hishinuma S, Asano T, Aikou T, Hosotani R, Maetani S (2004) A randomized multicenter trial comparing resection and radiochemotherapy for resectable locally invasive pancreatic cancer. Surgery 136:1003–1011PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Takayama T, Makuuchi M, Kubota K, Harihara Y, Hui AM, Sano K, Ijichi M, Hasegawa K (2001) Randomized comparison of ultrasonic vs clamp transection of the liver. Arch Surg 136:922–928PubMedCrossRef Takayama T, Makuuchi M, Kubota K, Harihara Y, Hui AM, Sano K, Ijichi M, Hasegawa K (2001) Randomized comparison of ultrasonic vs clamp transection of the liver. Arch Surg 136:922–928PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Belghiti J, Noun R, Malafosse R, Jagot P, Sauvanet A, Pierangeli F, Marty J, Farges O (1999) Continuous versus intermittent portal triad clamping for liver resection: a controlled study. Ann Surg 229:369–375PubMedCrossRef Belghiti J, Noun R, Malafosse R, Jagot P, Sauvanet A, Pierangeli F, Marty J, Farges O (1999) Continuous versus intermittent portal triad clamping for liver resection: a controlled study. Ann Surg 229:369–375PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Clavien PA, Selzner M, Rudiger HA, Graf R, Kadry Z, Rousson V, Jochum W (2003) A prospective randomized study in 100 consecutive patients undergoing major liver resection with versus without ischemic preconditioning. Ann Surg 238:843–850PubMedCrossRef Clavien PA, Selzner M, Rudiger HA, Graf R, Kadry Z, Rousson V, Jochum W (2003) A prospective randomized study in 100 consecutive patients undergoing major liver resection with versus without ischemic preconditioning. Ann Surg 238:843–850PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu CL, Fan ST, Lo CM, Wong Y, Ng IO, Lam CM, Poon RT, Wong J (2004) Abdominal drainage after hepatic resection is contraindicated in patients with chronic liver diseases. Ann Surg 239:194–201PubMedCrossRef Liu CL, Fan ST, Lo CM, Wong Y, Ng IO, Lam CM, Poon RT, Wong J (2004) Abdominal drainage after hepatic resection is contraindicated in patients with chronic liver diseases. Ann Surg 239:194–201PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Pedrazzoli S, DiCarlo V, Dionigi R, Mosca F, Pederzoli P, Pasquali C, Kloppel G, Dhaene K, Michelassi F (1998) Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy associated with pancreatoduodenectomy in the surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Lymphadenectomy Study Group. Ann Surg 228:508–517PubMedCrossRef Pedrazzoli S, DiCarlo V, Dionigi R, Mosca F, Pederzoli P, Pasquali C, Kloppel G, Dhaene K, Michelassi F (1998) Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy associated with pancreatoduodenectomy in the surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Lymphadenectomy Study Group. Ann Surg 228:508–517PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, Horton R, Moher D, Olkin I, Pitkin R, Rennie D, Schulz KF, Simel D, Stroup DF (1996) Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. JAMA 276:637–639PubMedCrossRef Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, Horton R, Moher D, Olkin I, Pitkin R, Rennie D, Schulz KF, Simel D, Stroup DF (1996) Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. JAMA 276:637–639PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG, for the CONSORT Group (2001) The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. Lancet 357:1191–1194CrossRef Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG, for the CONSORT Group (2001) The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. Lancet 357:1191–1194CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on Hepatopancreatic Surgery
verfasst von
Toshimi Kaido
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2006
Erschienen in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Ausgabe 10/2006
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-006-9219-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2006

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 10/2006 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.