Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Documenta Ophthalmologica 3/2010

01.12.2010 | Original research article

Multifocal visual evoked potential recordings in compressive optic neuropathy secondary to pituitary adenoma

verfasst von: Manju Jayaraman, S. Ambika, Rashmin Anilkumar Gandhi, Shikha Rajesh Bassi, Priya Ravi, Parveen Sen

Erschienen in: Documenta Ophthalmologica | Ausgabe 3/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

To investigate the effect of pituitary adenoma compressing the optic chiasm on multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) responses and to compare these responses with visual field defects seen on static automated perimetry (SAP). Eight eyes of four subjects (median age, 41.50 years; interquartile range, 33–51 years) who were diagnosed with pituitary adenoma on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and seen to have a bitemporal visual field defect on standard automated perimetry (SAP), and twelve age-matched normal subjects (median age, 47.00 years; interquartile range, 34.75–51.75 years) were subjected to multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) testing. The monocular latencies and monocular amplitudes of each sector of cases were compared with the responses of normative database. The topography of the mfVEP response was compared with corresponding field defect as seen in total deviation threshold on SAP to allow a comparison with conventional subjective perimetry. The mfVEP amplitudes were reduced in the areas with visual field defect on SAP. In 6 out of 8 eyes, locations with preserved amplitudes and no visual defects showed prolonged latency. A prolonged median latency of 9.17 ms (interquartile range, 3.44–17.69 ms) in cases was seen when compared to the median latency of 1.67 ms (interquartile range, 0.94–4.17 ms) in age-matched controls with P value of 0.054. Chiasmal compression due to pituitary adenoma causes the reduction of amplitudes and prolongation of latencies of the mfVEP response. The mfVEP can be used to assess objectively the topography of the visual field in compressive optic neuropathy secondary to pituitary adenomas. It can be used in assessing the subjects whose visual field report is unreliable and prolonged median latency can be an early sign of the disease.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Ezzat S, Asa SL, Couldwell WT, Barr CE, Dodge WE, Vance ML, McCutcheon IE (2004) The prevalence of pituitary adenomas: a systematic review. Cancer 101:613–619CrossRefPubMed Ezzat S, Asa SL, Couldwell WT, Barr CE, Dodge WE, Vance ML, McCutcheon IE (2004) The prevalence of pituitary adenomas: a systematic review. Cancer 101:613–619CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hornyak M, Digre K, Couldwell WT (2009) Neuro-ophthalmological manifestations of benign anterior skull base lesions. Postgrad Med 121:103–114CrossRefPubMed Hornyak M, Digre K, Couldwell WT (2009) Neuro-ophthalmological manifestations of benign anterior skull base lesions. Postgrad Med 121:103–114CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Stavern GP, Newman NJ (2001) Optic neuropathies. An overview. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 14(viii):61–71PubMed Van Stavern GP, Newman NJ (2001) Optic neuropathies. An overview. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 14(viii):61–71PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Behbehani R (2007) Clinical approach to optic neuropathies. Clin Ophthalmol 3:233–246 Behbehani R (2007) Clinical approach to optic neuropathies. Clin Ophthalmol 3:233–246
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Prasad S, Volpe NJ, Balcer LJ (2010) Approach to optic neuropathies: clinical update. Neurologist 16:23–34CrossRefPubMed Prasad S, Volpe NJ, Balcer LJ (2010) Approach to optic neuropathies: clinical update. Neurologist 16:23–34CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Holder GE (2001) Chiasmal and retrochiasmal lesions. In: Arden GB, Heckenlively JR (eds) Principles and practice of clinical electrophysiology of vision, 2nd edn. MIT press, Cambridge, pp 857–865 Holder GE (2001) Chiasmal and retrochiasmal lesions. In: Arden GB, Heckenlively JR (eds) Principles and practice of clinical electrophysiology of vision, 2nd edn. MIT press, Cambridge, pp 857–865
8.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Holder GE, Gale RP, Acheson JF, Robson AG (2009) Electrodiagnostic assessment in optic nerve disease. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 22:3–10 Holder GE, Gale RP, Acheson JF, Robson AG (2009) Electrodiagnostic assessment in optic nerve disease. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 22:3–10
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Holder GE (1978) The effects of chiasmal compression on the pattern visual evoked potential. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 45:278–280CrossRefPubMed Holder GE (1978) The effects of chiasmal compression on the pattern visual evoked potential. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 45:278–280CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Halliday AM, Halliday E, Kriss A, McDonald WI, Mushin J (1976) The pattern evoked potential in compression of the anterior visual pathways. Brain 99:357–374CrossRefPubMed Halliday AM, Halliday E, Kriss A, McDonald WI, Mushin J (1976) The pattern evoked potential in compression of the anterior visual pathways. Brain 99:357–374CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Flanagan JG, Harding GFA (1987) Multi-channel visual evoked potentials in early compressive lesions of the optic chiasm. Doc Ophthalmol 69:271–282CrossRef Flanagan JG, Harding GFA (1987) Multi-channel visual evoked potentials in early compressive lesions of the optic chiasm. Doc Ophthalmol 69:271–282CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Semela L, Yang EB, Hedges TR, Vuong L, Odel JG, Hood DC (2007) Multifocal visual-evoked potential in unilateral compressive optic neuropathy. Br J Ophthalmol 91:445–448CrossRefPubMed Semela L, Yang EB, Hedges TR, Vuong L, Odel JG, Hood DC (2007) Multifocal visual-evoked potential in unilateral compressive optic neuropathy. Br J Ophthalmol 91:445–448CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Semela L, Hedges TR, Vuong L (2007) Serial multifocal visual Evoked potential recordings in compressive optic neuropathy. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 38:250–253PubMed Semela L, Hedges TR, Vuong L (2007) Serial multifocal visual Evoked potential recordings in compressive optic neuropathy. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 38:250–253PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Baseler HA, Sutter EE, Klein SA, Carney T (1994) The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 90:65–81CrossRefPubMed Baseler HA, Sutter EE, Klein SA, Carney T (1994) The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 90:65–81CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Hood DC, Greenstein VC (2003) Multifocal VEP and ganglion cell damage: applications and limitations for the study of glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res 22:201–251CrossRefPubMed Hood DC, Greenstein VC (2003) Multifocal VEP and ganglion cell damage: applications and limitations for the study of glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res 22:201–251CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Hood DC, Odel JG, Winn BJ (2003) The multifocal visual evoked potential. J Neurophthalmol 23:279–289 Hood DC, Odel JG, Winn BJ (2003) The multifocal visual evoked potential. J Neurophthalmol 23:279–289
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Hood DC (2004) Electrophysiologic imaging of retinal and optic nerve damage: the multifocal technique. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 17:69–88CrossRefPubMed Hood DC (2004) Electrophysiologic imaging of retinal and optic nerve damage: the multifocal technique. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 17:69–88CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Chan HH, Ng FY, Chu PH (2005) Clinical application of mfERG/VEP in assessing superior altitudinal hemifield loss. Clin Exp Optom 88:253–257CrossRefPubMed Chan HH, Ng FY, Chu PH (2005) Clinical application of mfERG/VEP in assessing superior altitudinal hemifield loss. Clin Exp Optom 88:253–257CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Seiple W, Holopigian K, Clemens C, Greenstein VC, Hood DC (2005) The multifocal visual evoked potential: an objective measure of visual fields? Vision Res 45:1155–1163CrossRefPubMed Seiple W, Holopigian K, Clemens C, Greenstein VC, Hood DC (2005) The multifocal visual evoked potential: an objective measure of visual fields? Vision Res 45:1155–1163CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Hasegawa S, Abe H (2001) Mapping of glaucomatous visual field defects by multifocal VEPs. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42:3341–3348PubMed Hasegawa S, Abe H (2001) Mapping of glaucomatous visual field defects by multifocal VEPs. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42:3341–3348PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldberg I, Graham SL, Klistorner AI (2002) Multifocal objective perimetry in the detection of the glaucomatous visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol 133:29–39CrossRefPubMed Goldberg I, Graham SL, Klistorner AI (2002) Multifocal objective perimetry in the detection of the glaucomatous visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol 133:29–39CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Odom JV, Bach M, Barber C, Brigell M, Marmor MF, Tormene AP, Holder GE, Vaegan (2004) Visual evoked potentials. Doc Ophthalmol 108:115–123CrossRefPubMed Odom JV, Bach M, Barber C, Brigell M, Marmor MF, Tormene AP, Holder GE, Vaegan (2004) Visual evoked potentials. Doc Ophthalmol 108:115–123CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Hood DC, Zhang X, Hong JE, Chen CS (2002) Quantifying the benefits of additional channels of multifocal VEP recording. Doc Ophthalmol 104:303–320CrossRefPubMed Hood DC, Zhang X, Hong JE, Chen CS (2002) Quantifying the benefits of additional channels of multifocal VEP recording. Doc Ophthalmol 104:303–320CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Fortune B, Zhang X, Hood DC, Demirel S, Johnson CA (2004) Normative ranges and specificity of the Multifocal VEP. Doc Ophthalmol 109:87–100CrossRefPubMed Fortune B, Zhang X, Hood DC, Demirel S, Johnson CA (2004) Normative ranges and specificity of the Multifocal VEP. Doc Ophthalmol 109:87–100CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang X, Hood DC, Chen CS, Hong JE (2002) A signal-to-noise analysis of multifocal VEP responses: an objective definition for poor records. Doc Ophthalmol 104:287–302CrossRefPubMed Zhang X, Hood DC, Chen CS, Hong JE (2002) A signal-to-noise analysis of multifocal VEP responses: an objective definition for poor records. Doc Ophthalmol 104:287–302CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Hood DC, Zhang X, Winn BJ (2003) Detecting glaucomatous damage with multifocal visual evoked potentials: how can a monocular test work? J Glaucoma 12:3–15CrossRefPubMed Hood DC, Zhang X, Winn BJ (2003) Detecting glaucomatous damage with multifocal visual evoked potentials: how can a monocular test work? J Glaucoma 12:3–15CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Hood DC, Zhang X, Greenstein VC, Kangovi S, Odel JG, Liebmann JM, Ritch R (2000) An interocular comparison of the multifocal VEP: a possible technique for detecting local damage to the optic nerve. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:1580–1587PubMed Hood DC, Zhang X, Greenstein VC, Kangovi S, Odel JG, Liebmann JM, Ritch R (2000) An interocular comparison of the multifocal VEP: a possible technique for detecting local damage to the optic nerve. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:1580–1587PubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Hood DC, Ohri N, Yang EB, Rodarte C, Zhang X, Fortune B, Johnson CA (2004) Determining abnormal latencies of multifocal visual evoked potentials: a monocular analysis. Doc Ophthalmol 109:189–199CrossRefPubMed Hood DC, Ohri N, Yang EB, Rodarte C, Zhang X, Fortune B, Johnson CA (2004) Determining abnormal latencies of multifocal visual evoked potentials: a monocular analysis. Doc Ophthalmol 109:189–199CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang EB, Hood DC, Rodarte C, Zhang X, Odel JG, Behrens MM (2007) Improvement in conduction velocity after optic neuritis measured with the multifocal VEP. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:692–698CrossRefPubMed Yang EB, Hood DC, Rodarte C, Zhang X, Odel JG, Behrens MM (2007) Improvement in conduction velocity after optic neuritis measured with the multifocal VEP. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:692–698CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Hood DC, Greenstein VC, Odel JG, Zhang X, Ritch R, Leibmann JM, Hong JE, Chen CS, Thienprasiddhi P (2002) Visual field defects and multifocal visual evoked potentials. Arch Ophthalmol 120:1672–1681PubMed Hood DC, Greenstein VC, Odel JG, Zhang X, Ritch R, Leibmann JM, Hong JE, Chen CS, Thienprasiddhi P (2002) Visual field defects and multifocal visual evoked potentials. Arch Ophthalmol 120:1672–1681PubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Fortune B, Demirel S, Zhang X, Hood DC, Patterson E, Jamil A, Mansberger SL, Cioffi GA, Johnson CA (2007) Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:1173–1180CrossRefPubMed Fortune B, Demirel S, Zhang X, Hood DC, Patterson E, Jamil A, Mansberger SL, Cioffi GA, Johnson CA (2007) Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:1173–1180CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Hood DC, Zhang X (2000) Multifocal ERG and VEP responses and visual fields: comparing disease-related changes. Doc Ophthalmol 100:115–137CrossRef Hood DC, Zhang X (2000) Multifocal ERG and VEP responses and visual fields: comparing disease-related changes. Doc Ophthalmol 100:115–137CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Watanabe K, Shinoda K, Kimura I, Mashima Y, Oguchi Y, Ohde H (2007) Discordance between subjective perimetric visual fields and objective multifocal visual evoked potential-determined visual fields in patients with hemianopia. Am J Ophthalmol 143:295–304CrossRefPubMed Watanabe K, Shinoda K, Kimura I, Mashima Y, Oguchi Y, Ohde H (2007) Discordance between subjective perimetric visual fields and objective multifocal visual evoked potential-determined visual fields in patients with hemianopia. Am J Ophthalmol 143:295–304CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Hedges TR III, Quireza ML (2004) Multifocal visual evoked potential, multifocal electroretinography, and optical coherence tomography in the diagnosis of subclinical loss of vision. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 17:89–105CrossRefPubMed Hedges TR III, Quireza ML (2004) Multifocal visual evoked potential, multifocal electroretinography, and optical coherence tomography in the diagnosis of subclinical loss of vision. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 17:89–105CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Klistorner AI, Graham SL, Grigg J, Balachandran C (2005) Objective perimetry using the multifocal visual evoked potential in central visual pathway lesions. Br J Ophthalmol 89:739–744CrossRefPubMed Klistorner AI, Graham SL, Grigg J, Balachandran C (2005) Objective perimetry using the multifocal visual evoked potential in central visual pathway lesions. Br J Ophthalmol 89:739–744CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Betsuin Y, Mashima Y, Ohde H, Inoue R, Oguchi Y (2001) Clinical application of the multifocal VEPs. Curr Eye Res 22:54–63CrossRefPubMed Betsuin Y, Mashima Y, Ohde H, Inoue R, Oguchi Y (2001) Clinical application of the multifocal VEPs. Curr Eye Res 22:54–63CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Danesh-Meyer H, Caroll SC, Gaskin BJ, Gao A, Gamble GD (2006) Correlation of the multifocal visual evoked potential and standard automated perimetry in compressive optic neuropathies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47:1458–1463CrossRefPubMed Danesh-Meyer H, Caroll SC, Gaskin BJ, Gao A, Gamble GD (2006) Correlation of the multifocal visual evoked potential and standard automated perimetry in compressive optic neuropathies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47:1458–1463CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Klistorner AI, Graham SL, Grigg J, Billson FA (1998) Multifocal topographic visual evoked potential: improving objective detection of local visual field defects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39:937–950PubMed Klistorner AI, Graham SL, Grigg J, Billson FA (1998) Multifocal topographic visual evoked potential: improving objective detection of local visual field defects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39:937–950PubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Pakrou N, Casson R, Kaines A, Selva D (2006) Multifocal objective perimetry compared with Humphrey full-threshold perimetry in patients with optic neuritis. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 34:562–567CrossRefPubMed Pakrou N, Casson R, Kaines A, Selva D (2006) Multifocal objective perimetry compared with Humphrey full-threshold perimetry in patients with optic neuritis. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 34:562–567CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Graham SL, Klistorner AI, Goldberg I (2005) Clinical application of objective perimetry using multifocal visual evoked potentials in glaucoma practice. Arch Ophthalmol 123:729–739CrossRefPubMed Graham SL, Klistorner AI, Goldberg I (2005) Clinical application of objective perimetry using multifocal visual evoked potentials in glaucoma practice. Arch Ophthalmol 123:729–739CrossRefPubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Balachandran C, Graham SL, Klistorner A, Goldberg I (2006) Comparison of objective diagnostic tests in glaucoma heidelberg retinal tomography and multifocal visual evoked potentials. J Glaucoma 15:110–116CrossRefPubMed Balachandran C, Graham SL, Klistorner A, Goldberg I (2006) Comparison of objective diagnostic tests in glaucoma heidelberg retinal tomography and multifocal visual evoked potentials. J Glaucoma 15:110–116CrossRefPubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Hood DC, Thienprasiddhi P, Greenstein VC, Winn BJ, Ohri N, Liebmann JM, Ritch R (2004) Detecting early to mild glaucomatous damage: a comparison of the multifocal VEP and automated perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:492–498CrossRefPubMed Hood DC, Thienprasiddhi P, Greenstein VC, Winn BJ, Ohri N, Liebmann JM, Ritch R (2004) Detecting early to mild glaucomatous damage: a comparison of the multifocal VEP and automated perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:492–498CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Multifocal visual evoked potential recordings in compressive optic neuropathy secondary to pituitary adenoma
verfasst von
Manju Jayaraman
S. Ambika
Rashmin Anilkumar Gandhi
Shikha Rajesh Bassi
Priya Ravi
Parveen Sen
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2010
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Documenta Ophthalmologica / Ausgabe 3/2010
Print ISSN: 0012-4486
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2622
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-010-9246-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2010

Documenta Ophthalmologica 3/2010 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Update Augenheilkunde

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.