Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

SWOG 0514: a phase II study of sorafenib in patients with unresectable or metastatic gallbladder carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma

  • PHASE II STUDIES
  • Published:
Investigational New Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Objectives Gallbladder and cholangiocarcinomas represent a heterogeneous group of malignant diseases that commonly present at an advanced stage and have limited therapeutic options. Based on the role of the Ras-Raf-Mek-Erk pathway and the VEGF axis in biliary carcinomas, we conducted a phase II study of sorafenib in patients with advanced biliary cancers. Methods Eligible patients had no prior therapy for metastatic or unresectable disease. Sorafenib was administered at 400 mg po twice daily continuously. Results The study was terminated after the first stage of accrual due to failure to meet the primary objective. A confirmed response rate of 0% (0%–11%) was observed. Thirty-nine percent of patients demonstrated stable disease (including 2 with unconfirmed PR). PFS was 3 months (95% CI: 2–4 months) and OS 9 months (95% CI: 4–12 months). The most common grade 3 and 4 toxicities included hand-foot skin reaction (13%), bilirubin elevation (13%), venous thromboembolism (10%), AST/ALT elevation (10%) and elevated alkaline phosphatase (10%). Conclusion While treatment with sorafenib did not result in objective responses, patients with biliary cancers receiving this drug had some therapeutic benefit. Additional studies with sorafenib in combination with chemotherapy or other targeted agents may be warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cardinale V et al (2010) Intra-hepatic and extra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma: new insight into epidemiology and risk factors. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2(11):407–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. McGlynn KA, Tarone RE, El-Serag HB (2006) A comparison of trends in the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15(6):1198–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hezel AF, Zhu AX (2008) Systemic therapy for biliary tract cancers. Oncologist 13(4):415–23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Choi CW et al (2000) Effects of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in the treatment of pancreatic-biliary tract adenocarcinomas. Am J Clin Oncol 23(4):425–8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ducreux M et al (2005) A randomised phase II trial of weekly high-dose 5-fluorouracil with and without folinic acid and cisplatin in patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma: results of the 40955 EORTC trial. Eur J Cancer 41(3):398–403

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Eckel F, Schmid RM (2007) Chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract carcinoma: a pooled analysis of clinical trials. Br J Cancer 96(6):896–902

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Valle J et al (2010) Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. N Engl J Med 362(14):1273–81

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tannapfel A et al (2003) Mutations of the BRAF gene in cholangiocarcinoma but not in hepatocellular carcinoma. Gut 52(5):706–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yoon JH et al (2002) Bile acids inhibit Mcl-1 protein turnover via an epidermal growth factor receptor/Raf-1-dependent mechanism. Cancer Res 62(22):6500–5

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Benckert C et al (2003) Transforming growth factor beta 1 stimulates vascular endothelial growth factor gene transcription in human cholangiocellular carcinoma cells. Cancer Res 63(5):1083–92

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yoshikawa D et al (2008) Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of EGFR, VEGF, and HER2 expression in cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Cancer 98(2):418–25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wilhelm SM et al (2004) BAY 43–9006 exhibits broad spectrum oral antitumor activity and targets the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway and receptor tyrosine kinases involved in tumor progression and angiogenesis. Cancer Res 64(19):7099–109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Green SJ, Dahlberg S (1992) Planned versus attained design in phase II clinical trials. Stat Med 11(7):853–62

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Blechacz BR et al (2009) Sorafenib inhibits signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 signaling in cholangiocarcinoma cells by activating the phosphatase shatterproof 2. Hepatology 50(6):1861–70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sugiyama H et al (2011) Potent in vitro and in vivo antitumor activity of sorafenib against human intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma cells. J Gastroenterol

  16. Llovet JM et al (2008) Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 359(4):378–90

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Iqbal S, Blanke C, Lenz HJ (2006) SWOG S0202: A phase II trial of gemcitabine and capecitabine in patients (pts) with unresectable or metastatic gallbladder cancer or cholangiocarcinoma. Abstract # 4131. in Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology

  18. Bengala C et al (2010) Sorafenib in patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma: a phase II trial. Br J Cancer 102(1):68–72

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yonemoto N et al (2007) A multi-center retrospective analysis of survival benefits of chemotherapy for unresectable biliary tract cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 37(11):843–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nehls O et al (2008) Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in patients with advanced biliary system adenocarcinoma: a prospective multicentre phase II trial. Br J Cancer 98(2):309–15

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Harder J et al (2006) Outpatient chemotherapy with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in patients with biliary tract cancer. Br J Cancer 95(7):848–52

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jarnagin WR et al (2006) Differential cell cycle-regulatory protein expression in biliary tract adenocarcinoma: correlation with anatomic site, pathologic variables, and clinical outcome. J Clin Oncol 24(7):1152–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This investigation was supported in part by the following PHS Cooperative Agreement grant numbers awarded by the National Cancer Institute, NIH, DHHS: CA32102, CA38926, CA20319, CA105409, CA37981, CA16385, CA46441, CA35090, CA35431, CA46282, CA58882, CA45807, CA35176, CA67575, CA45560, CA45808, CA63844, CA12644, CA11083

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony B. El-Khoueiry.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

El-Khoueiry, A.B., Rankin, C.J., Ben-Josef, E. et al. SWOG 0514: a phase II study of sorafenib in patients with unresectable or metastatic gallbladder carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma. Invest New Drugs 30, 1646–1651 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-011-9719-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-011-9719-0

Keywords

Navigation