Skip to main content
Log in

Aggregation Biases in Estimates of the Value per Statistical Life: Evidence from Longitudinal Matched Worker-Firm Data in Taiwan

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study uses a unique longitudinally-linked employer–employee dataset to estimate the magnitude of bias in estimating the value per statistical life (VSL) that arises from the conventional use of industry-average occupational risk. This unique dataset, covering workers in Taiwan over the period 1998–2002, allows us to distinguish among potential sources of bias including omitted variables and to control for the potential endogeneity of firm-specific job risk with respect to unobserved worker and firm characteristics. We find that VSL estimates based on risk data aggregated by three-digit manufacturing SIC codes are biased downward by an order of magnitude compared with estimates using firm-specific risk that control for endogeneity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bergstrom T (1982) When is a man’s life worth more than his human capital? In: Jones-Lee (ed) The value of life and safety. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Black DA, Kniesner TJ (2003) On the measurement of job risk in hedonic wage models. J Risk Uncertain 27(3): 205–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bound J, Jaeger DA, Baker RM (1995) Problems with instrumental variables estimation when the correlation between the instruments and the endogenous explanatory variable is weak. J Am Stat Assoc 90(430): 443–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown C (1980) Equalizing differences in the labor market. Q J Econ 94(1): 113–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burtraw D, Krupnick A, Mansur E, Austin D, Farrell D (1998) Costs and benefits of reducing air pollutants related to acid rain. Contemp Econ Policy 16(4): 379–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell C, Schmidt P, Wyhowski D (1992) Simultaneous equations and panel data. J Econom 51(1–2): 151–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cousineau J-M, Lacroix R, Girard A-M (1992) Occupational hazard and wage compensating differentials. Rev Econ Stat 74(1): 166–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale-Olsen H (2006) Estimating workers’ marginal willingness to pay for safety using linked employer–employee data. Economica 73(289): 99–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank RH, Sunstein CR (2001) Cost-benefit analysis and relative position. Univ Chic Law Rev 68(2): 323–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garen J (1988) Compensating wage differentials and the endogeneity of job riskiness. Rev Econ Stat 70(1): 9–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gegax D, Gerking S, Schulze W (1991) Perceived risk and the marginal value of safety. Rev Econ Stat 73: 589–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getzner M (2008) Uncertainties and the precautionary principle in cost-benefit environmental policies. J Policy Model 30(1): 1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamermesh DS (1999) LEEping into the future of labor economics: the research potential of linking employer and employee data. Labour Economics 6(1): 25–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammitt JK, Robinson LA (in press) The income elasticity of the value per statistical life: transferring estimates between high and low income populations. J Benefit-Cost Anal

  • Hanushek EA, Rivkin SG, Taylor LL (1996) Aggregation and the estimated effects of school resources. Rev Econ Stat 78(4): 611–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hersch J (1998) Compensating differentials for gender-specific job injury risks. Am Econ Rev 88(3): 598–607

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintermann B, Alberini A, Markandya A (2010) Estimating the value of safety with labor market data: are the results trustworthy. Appl Econ 42(9): 1085–1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kniesner TJ, Viscusi WK (2005) Value of a statistical life: relative position vs. relative age. Am Econ Rev 95(2): 142–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kniesner TJ, Viscusi WK, Woock C, Ziliak JP (October 2007) Pinning down the value of statistical life. IZA Discussion Paper No. 3107

  • Lalive R (2003) Did we overestimate the value of health?. J Risk Uncertain 27(2): 171–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J-T, Hammitt JK (1999) Perceived risk and value of workplace safety in a developing country. J Risk Res 2(3): 263–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J-T, Hammitt JK, Liu J-L (1997) Estimated hedonic wage function and value of life in a developing country. Econ Lett 57(3): 353–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raucher RS (2003) Benefit-cost analysis and drinking water regulation. In: Pontius FW (ed) Drinking water regulation and health. Wiley, New York, pp 225–250

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen S (1986) The theory of equalizing differences. In: Ashenfelter O, Layard R (eds) Handbook of labor economics. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 641–692

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shogren JF, Stamland T (2002) Skill and the value of life. J Polit Econ 110(5): 1168–1173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staiger D, Stock JH (1997) Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments. Econometrica 65(3): 557–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi WK (2004) The value of life: estimates with risks by occupation and industry. Econ Inq 42(1): 29–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi WK, O’Connor CJ (1984) Adaptive responses to chemical labeling: are workers Bayesian decision makers. Am Econ Rev 74(5): 942–956

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi WK, Hersch J (2001) Cigarette smokers as job risk takers. Rev Econ Stat 83(2): 269–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi WK, Aldy JE (2003) The value of a statistical life: a critical review of market estimates throughout the world. J Risk Uncertain 27(1): 5–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei X (2007) Wage compensation for job-related illness: evidence from a matched employer and employee survey in the UK. J Risk Uncertain 34(1): 85–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James K. Hammitt.

Additional information

Financial support from the Taiwan National Health Research Institutes (NHRI-EX98-9622PI), INRA, and the European Research Council (FP7/2007-2013 Grant Agreement no. 230589) are gratefully acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tsai, WJ., Liu, JT. & Hammitt, J.K. Aggregation Biases in Estimates of the Value per Statistical Life: Evidence from Longitudinal Matched Worker-Firm Data in Taiwan. Environ Resource Econ 49, 425–443 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-010-9440-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-010-9440-z

Keywords

Navigation