Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Explaining differences in access to home computers and the Internet: A comparison of Latino groups to other ethnic and racial groups

  • Published:
Electronic Commerce Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A report by the U.S. Department of Commerce notes that Internet use among African-Americans and Latinos is growing at a substantially faster rate than Internet use among whites or Asians suggesting that the so-called “Digital Divide” may be disappearing. Using data from the Computer and Internet Use Supplement to the October 2003 Current Population Survey (CPS), I explore this hypothesis. I find large disparities in home computer and Internet access across major racial and detailed Latino groups that do not appear as though they will disappear soon. I also find that ethnic and racial disparities in home computer and Internet access rates are larger for children than for adults. The results are mixed for other measurable dimensions of the digital divide. Using regression models and special decomposition techniques, I find that differences in income and education explain part, but not all, of the ethnic and racial disparities in home computer and Internet access. Language is also found to be an important determinant of home computer and Internet access even after controlling for education, family income and immigrant status. Spanish-speaking Latinos have strikingly low rates of computer ownership and home Internet access. In contrast, concerns over privacy on the Internet do not appear to contribute substantially to racial disparities in home Internet access.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Attewell, P., & Battle, J. (1999). Home computers and school performance. The Information Society, 15, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bakos, Y. (2001). The emerging landscape for retail e-commerce. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(1), 69–80.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beltran, D. O., Das, K. K., & Fairlie, R. W. (2005). The effects of home computers on educational outcomes: Evidence from the current population survey and national longitudinal survey of youth 1997. University of California, Santa Cruz Working Paper.

  4. Borenstein, S., & Saloner, G. (2001). Economics and electronic commerce. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(1), 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Blinder, A. S. (1973). Wage discrimination: Reduced form and structural variables. Journal of Human Resources, 8, 436–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Crandall, R. W. (2000). Bridging the digital divide: Universal service, equal access, and the digital divide. Paper presented at Bridging the Digital Divide: California Public Affairs Forum, Stanford University.

  7. DiMaggio, P. J., & Hargittai, E. (2001). From digital divide to digital inequality: Studying Internet use as penetration increases. Princeton University: Sociology Department.

  8. Earp, J. B., Antón, A. I., Aiman-Smith, L., & Stufflebeam, W. H. (2005). Examining Internet privacy policies within the context of user privacy values. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 52(2), 227–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fairlie, R. W. (1999). The absence of the African-American owned business: An analysis of the dynamics of self-employment. Journal of Labor Economics, 17(1), 80–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fairlie, R. W. (2002). Race and the digital divide. Joint Center for Poverty Research Working Paper 307.

  11. Fairlie, R. W. (2004). Race and the digital divide. Berkeley Electronic Journals, Contributions to Economic Analysis & Policy, 3(1), 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fairlie, R. W. (2005). The effects of home computers on school enrollment. Economics of Education Review, 24(5), 533–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fairlie, R. W. (2006, forthcoming). An extension of the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition technique to logit and probit models. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement.

  14. Fox, S., Rainie, L., Horrigan, J., Lenhart, A., Spooner, T., & Carter, C. (2000). Trust and privacy online: Why Americans want to rewrite the rules. Washington: The Pew Internet & American Life Project.

  15. Freeman, R. B. (2002). The labour market in the new information economy. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 9254.

  16. Goolsbee, A., & Guryan, J. (2006, forthcoming). The impact of Internet subsidies in public schools. Review of Economics and Statistics.

  17. International Telecommunications Union (2005). World telecommunication indicators database.

  18. Jung, J., Qiu, J., & Kim, Y. (2001). Internet connectedness and inequality: Beyond the divide. Communication Research, 28(4), 507–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kvasny, L. (2005). The role of the habitus in shaping discourses about the digital divide. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 10(2).

  20. Kvasny, L., & Keil, M. (2006). The challenges of redressing the digital divide: A tale of two U.S. cities. Information Systems Journal, 16(1), 23–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lenhart, A. (2003). The ever-shifting Internet population: A new look at Internet access and the digital divide. Pew Internet & American Life Project.

  22. London, R. A., Pastor, M. Jr., Servon, L. J., Rosner, R., & Wallace, A. (2006). The role of community technology centers in youth skill-building and empowerment. University of California, Santa Cruz, Center for Justice, Tolerance and Community Working Paper.

  23. Morton, F. S., Zettelmeyer, F., & Siva Risso, J. (2000). Internet car retailing. Yale University Working Paper.

  24. Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C., & Stansbury, M. (2003). Virtual inequality: Beyond the digital divide. Washington: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Noll, R. G., Older-Aguilar, D., Rosston, G. L., & Ross, R. R. (2000). The digital divide: Definitions, measurement, and policy issues. Paper presented at Bridging the Digital Divide: California Public Affairs Forum, Stanford University.

  26. Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Oaxaca, R. (1973). Male–female wage differentials in urban labor markets. International Economic Review, 14(October), 693–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. O’Neill, E. T., Lavoie, B. F., & Bennett, R. (2003). Trends in the evolution of the public web. D-Lib Magazine, 9(4).

  29. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2001). Understanding the digital divide.

  30. Patterson, R., & Wilson, E. (2002). New IT and social inequality: Resetting the research and policy agenda. The Information Society, 16, 77–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pew Internet & American Life Project (2005). Usage over time. http://www.pewInternet.org/trends/UsageOverTime.xls.

  32. Puma, M. J., Chaplin, D. D., & Pape, A. D. (2000). E-rate and the digital divide: A preliminary analysis from the integrated studies of educational technology. Urban Institute.

  33. Prieger, J. E. (2003). The supply side of the digital divide: Is there equal availability in the broadband Internet access market? Economic Inquiry, 41(2), 346–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ratchford, B. T., Talukdar, D., & Lee, M.-S. (2001). A model of consumer choice of the Internet as an information source. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 5(3), 7–21.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Schement, J. R. (1998). Thorough Americans: Minorities and the new media. In A. K. Garner (Ed.), Investing in diversity. Washington: Aspen Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Schement, J. R., & Forbes, S. C. (2000). Identifying temporary and permanent gaps in universal service. The Information Society, 16, 117–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Schmitt, J., & Wadsworth, J. (2004). Is there an impact of household computer ownership on children’s educational attainment in Britain? Centre for Economic Performance Discussion Paper No. 625.

  38. Servon, L. (2002). Bridging the digital divide: Community, technology and policy. Blackwell.

  39. Spooner, T., & Rainie, L. (2001). Hispanics and the Internet. Pew Internet & American Life Project.

  40. Thomas Rivera Policy Institute (2002).Latinos and information technology: The promise and the challenge. Prepared for the IBM Hispanic Digital Divide Task Force.

  41. Trejo, S. J. (1997). Why do Mexican Americans earn low wages? Journal of Political Economy, 105(6), 1235–1268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1984). Computer use in the United States: 1984, current population reports P23-155. Washington: U.S.G.P.O.

  43. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1989). Computer use in the United States: 1989, current population reports P23-171. Washington: U.S.G.P.O.

  44. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1993). 1990 census of population: Persons of hispanic origin in the United States, 1990 CP-3-3. Washington: U.S.G.P.O.

  45. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1993). Computer use in the United States: 1993, detailed tables. http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/computer/computer93.html.

  46. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1997). Computer use in the United States: October 1997, current population reports P20-522. Washington: U.S.G.P.O.

  47. U.S. Census Bureau. (2004). America’s families and living arrangements: 2004, families and living arrangements, current population survey (CPS) reports. http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/hh-fam.html.

  48. U.S. Department of Commerce. (2000). Falling through the net: Toward digital inclusion. Washington: U.S.G.P.O.

  49. U.S. Department of Commerce. (2002). A nation online: How Americans are expanding their use of the Internet. Washington: U.S.G.P.O.

  50. U.S. Department of Commerce. (2004). A nation online: Entering the broadband age. Washington: U.S.G.P.O.

  51. U.S. Department of Education. (2005). Youth indicators, 2005: Trends in the well-being of American youth. Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. http://nces.ed.gov/programs/youthindicators/.

  52. U.S. Department of Labor. (2005). Occupational outlook handbook. Washington: U.S.G.P.O.

  53. U.S. General Accounting Office. (2001). Telecommunications: Characteristics and choices of Internet users. Washington: U.S.G.P.O.

  54. Universal Services Administration Company. (2003). Annual report. http://www.universalservice.org/download/pdf/2003AnnualReport.pdf.

  55. Van Dijk, J., & Hacker, L. (2003). Digital divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon. The Information Society, 19(4), 315–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Warschauer, M. (2002). Reconceptualizing the digital divide. First Monday, 7, 7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA

    Robert W. Fairlie

Authors
  1. Robert W. Fairlie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert W. Fairlie.

Additional information

This research was funded by the UC Latino Policy Institute, the William T. Grant Foundation and the Community Technology Foundation of California. The views expressed here are those of the author and not necessarily those of the UC Latino Policy Institute, Community Technology Foundation of California or William T. Grant Foundation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fairlie, R.W. Explaining differences in access to home computers and the Internet: A comparison of Latino groups to other ethnic and racial groups. Electron Commerce Res 7, 265–291 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-007-9006-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-007-9006-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation