Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of the KiVa Anti-bullying Program on Adolescents’ Depression, Anxiety, and Perception of Peers

  • Published:
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 08 September 2011

Abstract

The present study investigated the effects of the KiVa antibullying program on students’ anxiety, depression, and perception of peers in Grades 4–6. Furthermore, it was investigated whether reductions in peer-reported victimization predicted changes in these outcome variables. The study participants included 7,741 students from 78 schools who were randomly assigned to either intervention or control condition, and the program effects were tested with structural equation modeling. A cross-lagged panel model suggested that the KiVa program is effective for reducing students’ internalizing problems and improving their peer-group perceptions. Finally, changes in anxiety, depression, and positive peer perceptions were found to be predicted by reductions in victimization. Implications of the findings and future directions for research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baldry, A., & Farrington, D. (2004). Evaluation of an intervention program for the reduction of bullying and victimization in schools. Aggressive Behavior, 30, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A., Steer, R., & Brown, G. (1996). Beck depression inventory. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino: Multivariate Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulton, M. J., Bucci, E., & Hawker, D. D. S. (1999). Swedish and English secondary school pupils' attitudes towards, and conceptions of, bullying: concurrent links with bully/victim involvement. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 40, 277–284.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brock, S. E., Nickerson, A. B., O’Malley, M. D., & Chang, Y. (2006). Understanding children victimized by their peers. Journal of School Violence, 5, 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. (2004). Adolescents’ relationships with peers. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (2nd ed., pp. 363–394). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Card, N. A. (2003). Victims of peer aggression: A meta-analytic review. In N. A. Card & A. Nishina (Eds.), Whipping boys and other victims of peer aggression: 25 years of research, now where do we go? Tampa: Poster symposium presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Card, N. A., Isaacs, J., & Hodges, E. V. E. (2007). Correlates of school victimization: recommendations for prevention and intervention. In J. E. Zins, M. J. Elias, & C. A. Maher (Eds.), Bullying, victimization, and peer harassment: A handbook of prevention (pp. 339–366). New York: Haworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Card, N. A., Stucky, B. D., Sawalani, G. M., & Little, T. D. (2008). Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: a meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Development, 791, 1185–1229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cillessen, A. H. N., & Borch, C. (2006). Developmental trajectories of adolescent popularity: a growth curve modelling analysis. Journal of Adolescence, 29, 935–959.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coie, J. D., & Dodge, K. A. (1998). Aggression and antisocial behavior. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 779–862). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, W. M., Pepler, D. J., & Atlas, R. (2000). Observations of bullying on the playground and in the classroom. International Journal of School Psychology, 21, 22–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, D., Hall, M., Hamilton, G., Pintabona, Y., & Erceg, E. (2004). Australia: The friendly schools project. In P. K. Smith, D. Pepler, & K. Rigby (Eds.), Bullying in schools: How successful can interventions be? (pp. 187–210). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York: Guildford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Essau, C. A., Lewinsohn, P. M., Seeley, J. R., & Sasagawa, S. (2010). Gender differences in the developmental course of depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 127, 185–190.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P., &Ttofi, M. M. (2009). School-based programs to reduce bullying and victimization. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 6.

  • Feshbach, S. (1970). Aggression. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael’s manual of child psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 159–259). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, K. S., Hirschstein, M. K., Snell, J. L., Edstrom, L. V., MacKenzie, E. P., & Broderick, C. J. (2005). Reducing playground bullying and supporting beliefs: an experimental trial of the Steps to Respect program. Developmental Psychology, 41, 479–491.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • García-López, L., Olivares, J., Hidalgo, M., Beidel, D., & Turner, S. (2001). Psychometric properties of the social phobia and anxiety inventory, the social anxiety scale for adolescents, the fear of negative evaluation scale, and the social avoidance and distress scale in an adolescent Spanish-speaking sample. Journal of Psychopathology and behavioral assessment, 23, 51–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, R., Fuqua-Whitley, D., Wethington, H., Lowy, J., Crosby, A., Fullilove, M., et al. (2007). Effectiveness of universal school-based programs to prevent violent and aggressive behavior. American Journal Preventive Medicine, 33, S114–S129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, G. R. (1997). Structural equation modeling methods of hypothesis testing of latent variable means. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 30, 91–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, G. R. (2001). Effect size, power, and sample size determination for structured means modeling and MIMIC approaches to between-groups hypothesis testing of means on a single latent construct. Psychometrika, 66, 373–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, D. L., Pepler, D. J., & Craig, W. M. (2001). Naturalistic observations of peer interventions in bullying. Social Development, 10, 512–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, P. H., Little, T. D., & Rodkin, P. C. (Eds.). (2007). Aggression and adaptation. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynie, D. L., Nansel, T., Eitel, P., Crump, A. D., Saylor, K., Yu, K., et al. (2001). Bullies, victims, and bully/victims: distinct groups of at-risk youth. Journal of Early Adolescence, 21, 29–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Julian, M. W. (2001). The consequences of ignoring multilevel data structures in nonhierarchical covariance modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 325–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juvonen, J., Graham, S., & Shuster, M. A. (2003). Bullying among young adolescents: the strong, the weak, and the troubled. Pediatrics, 112, 1231–1237.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kärnä, A., Voeten, M., Little, T. D., Poskiparta, E., Kaljonen, A., & Salmivalli, C. (2011). A large-scale evaluation of the KiVa antibullying program: grades 4–6. Child Development, 82, 311–330.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kärnä, A., Voeten, M., Poskiparta, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2010). Vulnerable children in varying classroom contexts: bystanders’ behaviors moderate the effects of risk factors on victimization. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 56, 261–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kochenderfer-Ladd, B., & Ladd, G. W. (2001). Variations in peer victimization: Relations to children’s maladjustment. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 25–48). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, G. W. (2005). Children’s peer relations and social competence: A century of progress. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, T. (1997). Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analyses of cross-cultural data: Practical and theoretical issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 53–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, T., Cunningham, W., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, T. D., Preacher, K. J., Selig, J. P., & Card, N. A. (2007). New developments in latent variable panel analysis of longitudinal data. International Journal of Behavior Development, 31, 357–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLean, C. P., Asnaani, A., Litz, B. T., & Hofmann, S. G. (in press). Gender differences in anxiety disorders: prevalence, course of illness, comorbidity, and burden of illness. Journal of Psychiatric Research, XX, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menesini, E., & Eslea, M. (1997). Cross-national comparison of children's attitudes towards bully/victim problems in school. Aggressive Behavior, 23, 245–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merrell, K., Gueldner, B., Ross, S., & Isava, D. (2008). How effective are school bullying intervention programs? A meta-analysis of intervention research. School Psychology Quarterly, 23, 26–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (2007). Mplus version 5. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell, P., Pepler, D. J., & Craig, W. (1999). Understanding bullying from a dynamic systems perspective. In A. Slater & D. Muir (Eds.), The Blackwell reader in developmental psychology (pp. 440–451). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Moore, A., & Minton, S. (2004). Ireland: The Donegal primary schools anti-bullying project. In P. K. Smith, D. Pepler, & K. Rigby (Eds.), Bullying in schools: How successful can interventions be (pp. 275–287). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Olweus, D. (1978). Aggression in the schools: Bullies and whipping boys. New York: Hemisphere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olweus, D. (1991). Bully/victim problems among school children: Basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program. In D. J. Pepler & K. H. Rubin (Eds.), The development and treatment of childhood aggression (pp. 411–448). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school. Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olweus, D. (2001). Peer harassment: A critical analysis and some important issues. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 5–20). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olweus, D. (1996). The revised Olweus bully/victim questionnaire for students. Bergen: University of Bergen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parke, R., & Slaby, R. (1983). The development of aggression. In P. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. IV, pp. 547–621). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, & Cillessen. (2003). Dynamics of peer victimization in early adolescence: results from a four-year longitudinal study. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19, 25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepler, D., Craig, W., Ziegler, S., & Charach, A. (1994). An evaluation of an anti-bullying intervention in Toronto schools. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health, 13, 95–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raitasalo, R. (1977). Depressiojasenyhteyspsykoterapiantarpeeseen. Helsinki: Kansaneläkelaitoksenjulkaisuja A: 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raitasalo, R. (2007). Mood questionnaire. Finnish modification of the short form of the Beck Depression Inventory measuring depression symptoms and self-esteem (p. 86). Helsinki: The Social Insurance Institution, Finland, Studies in Social Security and Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, P. (1995). A factor study on the attitudes of children to bullying. Association of Educational Psychologists Journal, 11, 22–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, K., & Slee, P. (1991). Bullying among Australian school children: reported behavior and attitudes toward victims. Journal of Social Psychology, 131, 615–627.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salmivalli, C. (1992). Bullying as a group process. Unpublished master's thesis, Department of Psychology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

  • Salmivalli, C. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: a review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15, 112–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmivalli, C., & Isaacs, J. (2005). Prospective relations among victimization, rejection, friendlessness, and children’s self- and peer-perceptions. Child Development, 76, 1161–1171.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salmivalli, C., Kärnä, A., & Poskiparta, E. (2010). From peer putdowns to peer support: A theoretical model and how it translated into a national anti-bullying program. In S. Jimerson, S. Swearer, & D. Espelage (Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective (pp. 441–454). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmivalli, C., Lappalainen, M., & Lagerspetz, K. M. J. (1998). Stability and change of behavior in connection with bullying in schools: a two-year follow-up. Aggressive Behavior, 24, 205–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmivalli, C., Ojanen, T., Haanpää, J., & Peets, K. (2005). ‘I'm OK but You’re Not’ and other peer-relational schemas: explaining individual differences in children’s social goals. Developmental Psychology, 41, 363–375.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salmivalli, C., & Voeten, M. (2004). Connections between attitudes, group norms, and behaviour in bullying situations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 246–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. K., & Brain, P. F. (2000). Bullying in the schools. Aggressive Behavior, 26, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. K., & Shu, S. (2000). What good schools can do about bullying. Childhood, 7, 193–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J., Schneider, B., Smith, P., & Ananiadou, K. (2004). The effectiveness of whole-school antibullying programs: a synthesis of evaluation research. School Psychology Review, 33, 547–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiger, J., & Lind, J. (1980). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Iowa City: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ttofi, M. M., Farrington, D. P., & Baldry, C. A. (2008). Effectiveness of programs to reduce school bullying: A systematic review. Stockholm: Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, L., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vernberg, E. M., Ewell, K. K., Beery, S. H., Freeman, C. M., & Abwender, D. A. (1995). Aversive exchanges with peers and adjustment during early adolescence: is disclosure helpful? Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 26, 43–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vuijk, P., van Lier, P. A. C., Crijnen, A. A. M., & Huizink, A. C. (2007). Testing sex-specific pathways from peer victimization to anxiety and depression in early adolescents through a randomized intervention trial. Journal of Affective Disorders, 100, 221–226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whitney, I., & Smith, P. K. (1993). A survey of the nature and extent of bullying in junior/middle and secondary schools. Educational Research, 35, 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S. J., & Lipsey, M. W. (2007). School-based interventions for aggressive and disruptive behavior: update of a meta-analysis. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 33, S130–S143.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S. J., Lipsey, M. W., & Derzon, J. H. (2003). The effects of school-based intervention programs on aggressive behavior: a meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 136–149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Williford.

Additional information

This project was supported by the Ministry of Education, Finland.

Parts of this work are based on the dissertation at the University of Kansas of the third author. The production of this manuscript was supported by the Center for Research Methods and Data Analysis at the University of Kansas.

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10802-011-9562-y.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Williford, A., Boulton, A., Noland, B. et al. Effects of the KiVa Anti-bullying Program on Adolescents’ Depression, Anxiety, and Perception of Peers. J Abnorm Child Psychol 40, 289–300 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-011-9551-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-011-9551-1

Keywords

Navigation