Skip to main content
Log in

Tracking the Sensory Environment: An ERP Study of Probability and Context Updating in ASD

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We recorded visual event-related brain potentials from 32 adult male participants (16 high-functioning participants diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and 16 control participants, ranging in age from 18 to 53 years) during a three-stimulus oddball paradigm. Target and non-target stimulus probability was varied across three probability conditions, whereas the probability of a third non-target stimulus was held constant in all conditions. P3 amplitude to target stimuli was more sensitive to probability in ASD than in typically developing participants, whereas P3 amplitude to non-target stimuli was less responsive to probability in ASD participants. This suggests that neural responses to changes in event probability are attention-dependant in high-functioning ASD. The implications of these findings for higher-level behaviors such as prediction and planning are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fourth edition, text revision. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bar, M. (2009). The proactive brain: Memory for predictions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 364(1521), 1235–1243. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0310.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ceponiene, R., Lepisto, T., Shestakova, A., Vanhala, R., Alku, P., Näätänen, R., et al. (2003). Speech-sound-selective auditory impairment in children with infantile autism: They can perceive but do not attend. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 5567–5572. doi:10.1073/pnas.0835631100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comerchero, M. D., & Polich, J. (1999). P3a and P3b from typical auditory and visual stimuli. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110(1), 24–30. doi:10.1016/S0168-5597(98)00033-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Courchesne, E. (1978). Changes in P3 waves with event repetition: Long-term effects on scalp distribution and amplitude. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 45(6), 754–766. doi:10.1016/0013-4694(78)90143-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Courchesne, E., Akshoomoff, N., & Townsend, J. (1990). Recent advances in autism. Current Opinion in Pediatrics, 2, 685–693, Retrieved from http://journals.lww.com/co-pediatrics/.

  • Courchesne, E., Courchesne, R. Y., & Hillyard, S. A. (1978). The effect of stimulus deviation on P3 waves to easily recognized stimuli. Neuropsychologia, 16(2), 189–199. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(78)90106-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Courchesne, E., Hillyard, S. A., & Galambos, R. (1975). Stimulus novelty, task relevance and the visual evoked potential in man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 39(2), 131–143. doi:10.1016/0013-4694(75)90003-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Courchesne, E., Lincoln, A. J., Kilman, B. A., & Galambos, R. (1985). Event-related brain potential correlates of the processing of novel visual and auditory information in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 15(1), 55–76. doi:10.1007/BF01837899.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134, 9–21. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Donchin, E., Ritter, W., & McCallum, W. C. (Eds.). (1978). Cognitive psychophysiology: The endogenous components of the ERP (Event-related brain potentials in man). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dustman, R. E., Emmerson, R. Y., & Shearer, D. E. (1996). Life span changes in electrophysiological measures of inhibition. Brain and Cognition, 30(1), 109–126. doi:10.1006/brcg.1996.0007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gomot, M., & Wicker, B. (2012). A challenging, unpredictable world for people with autism spectrum disorder. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83(2), 240–247. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.09.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Green, D., Charman, T., Pickles, A., Chandler, S., Loucas, T., Simonoff, E., et al. (2009). Impairment in movement skills of children with autistic spectrum disorders. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurolology,. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.03242.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, N., Courchesne, E., Townsend, J., Carper, R. A., & Lord, C. (1999). Neuroanatomic contributions to slowed orienting of attention in children with autism. Cognitive Brain Research, 8, 61–71. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(99)00006-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, E. L. (2004). Executive dysfunction in autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(1), 26–32. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.11.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoeksma, M. R., Kemner, C., Kenemans, J. L., & van Engeland, H. (2006). Abnormal selective attention normalizes P3 amplitudes in PDD. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(5), 643–654. doi:10.1007/s10803-006-0102-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoeksma, M. R., Kemner, C., Verbaten, M. N., & van Engeland, H. (2004). Processing capacity in children and adolescents with pervasive developmental disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(3), 341–354, Retrieved from http://www.springer.com/psychology/child+%26+school+psychology/journal/10803.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R, Jr, & Donchin, E. (1980). P300 and stimulus categorization: Two plus one is not so different from one plus one. Psychophysiology, 17(2), 167–178. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1980.tb00131.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, T.-P., Makeig, S., Humphries, C., Lee, T. W., McKeown, M. J., Iragui, V., et al. (2000a). Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation. Psychophysiology, 37, 163–178. doi:10.1111/1469-8986.3720163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, T.-P., Makeig, S., Westerfield, M., Townsend, J., Courchesne, E., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2000b). Removal of eye activity artifacts from visual event-related potentials in normal and clinical subjects. Clinical Neurophysiology, 111(10), 1745–1758. doi:10.1016/S1388-2457(00)00386-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Katayama, J., & Polich, J. (1996). P300, probability, and the three-tone paradigm. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 100(6), 555–562. doi:10.1016/S0168-5597(96)95171-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kemner, C., Verbaten, M. N., Cuperus, J. M., Camfferman, G., & van Engeland, H. (1995). Auditory event-related brain potentials in autistic children and three different control groups. Biological Psychiatry, 38(3), 150–165. doi:10.1016/0006-3223(94)00247-Z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, M. J., South, M., Krauskopf, E., Clawson, A., & Crowley, M. J. (2011). Feedback and reward processing in high-functioning autism. Psychiatry Research, 187(1–2), 198–203. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2010.11.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, A. J., Courchesne, E., Harms, L., & Allen, M. (1993). Contextual probability evaluation in autistic, receptive developmental language disorder, and control children: Event-related brain potential evidence. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 23(1), 37–58. doi:10.1007/BF01066417.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, C., Rutter, M., DiLavore, P. C., & Risi, S. (2001). Autism diagnostic observation schedule. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, C., Rutter, M., & Le Couteur, A. (1994). Autism diagnostic interview-revised: A revised version of a diagnostic interview for caregivers of individuals with possible pervasive developmental disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24(5), 659–685, Retrieved from http://www.springer.com/psychology/child+%26+school+psychology/journal/10803.

  • Luck, S. J. (2005). An introduction to the event-related potential technique (cognitive neuroscience). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ming, X., Brimacombe, M., & Wagner, G. C. (2007). Prevalence of motor impairment in autism spectrum disorders. Brain Development, 29(9), 565–570. doi:10.1016/j.braindev.2007.03.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Novick, B., Kurtzberg, D., & Vaughn, H. G, Jr. (1979). An electrophysiological indication of defective information storage in childhood autism. Psychiatry Research, 1, 101–108. doi:10.1016/0165-1781(79)90034-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oades, R. D., Walker, M. K., Geffen, L. B., & Stern, L. M. (1988). Event-related potentials in autistic and healthy children on an auditory choice reaction time task. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 6, 25–37. doi:10.1016/0167-8760(88)90032-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pasupathy, A., & Miller, E. K. (2005). Different time courses of learning-related activity in the prefrontal cortex and striatum. Nature, 433(7028), 873–876. doi:10.1038/nature03287.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Polich, J. (2007). Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118(10), 2128–2148. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.019.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Polich, J., & Comerchero, M. D. (2003). P3a from visual stimuli: Typicality, task, and topography. Brain Topography, 15(3), 141–152. doi:10.1023/A:1022637732495.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, W. S., Raz, N., & August, G. J. (1987). Visual augmenting/reducing and P300 in autistic children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 17(2), 231–242. doi:10.1007/BF01495058.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, S. J., & Ozonoff, S. (2005). Annotation: What do we know about sensory dysfunction in autism? A critical review of the empirical evidence. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46(12), 1255–1268. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01431.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sokhadze, E. M., Baruth, J. M., Sears, L., Sokhadze, G. E., El-Baz, A. S., Williams, E., et al. (2012). Event-related potential study of attention regulation during illusory figure categorization task in Adhd, autism spectrum disorder, and typical children. Journal of Neurotherapy, 16(1), 12–31. doi:10.1080/10874208.2012.650119.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sokhadze, E. M., Baruth, J., Tasman, A., Sears, L., Mathai, G., El-Baz, A., et al. (2009). Event-related potential study of novelty processing abnormalities in autism. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 34(1), 37–51. doi:10.1007/s10484-009-9074-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Squires, K. C., Donchin, E., Herning, R. I., & McCarthy, G. (1977). On the influence of task relevance and stimulus probability on event-related-potential components. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 42(1), 1–14. doi:10.1016/0013-4694(77)90146-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. G., Grice, J. W., Najm-Briscoe, R. G., & Miller, J. W. (2004). The influence of unequal numbers of trials on comparisons of average event-related potentials. Developmental Neuropsychology, 26(3), 753–774. doi:10.1207/s15326942dn2603_6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, J., Courchesne, E., Covington, J., Westerfield, M., Harris, N. S., Lyden, P., et al. (1999). Spatial attention deficits in patients with acquired or developmental cerebellar abnormality. Journal of Neuroscience, 19(13), 5632–5643, Retrieved from http://www.jneurosci.org/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, J., Courchesne, E., & Egaas, B. (1996). Slowed orienting of covert visual-spatial attention in autism: Specific deficits associated with cerebellar and parietal abnormality. Development and Psychopathology, 8(3), 503–584. doi:10.1017/S0954579400007276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, J., Keehn, B., & Westerfield, M. (2011). Abstraction of mind: Attention in autism. In M. Posner (Ed.), Cognitive neuroscience of attention (pp. 357–373). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, J., Westerfield, M., Leaver, E., Makeig, S., Jung, T.-P., Pierce, K., et al. (2001). Event-related brain response abnormalities in autism: Evidence for impaired cerebello-frontal spatial attention networks. Cognitive Brain Research, 11(1), 127–145. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(00)00072-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verbaten, M. N., Roelofs, J. W., Van Engeland, H., & Kenemans, J. K. (1991). Abnormal visual event-related potentials of autistic children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 21(4), 449–470. doi:10.1007/BF02206870.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marissa A. Westerfield.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Westerfield, M.A., Zinni, M., Vo, K. et al. Tracking the Sensory Environment: An ERP Study of Probability and Context Updating in ASD. J Autism Dev Disord 45, 600–611 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2045-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2045-6

Keywords

Navigation