Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 4/2015

01.04.2015 | Fertility Preservation

Ovarian stimulation and in-vitro fertilization outcomes of cancer patients undergoing fertility preservation compared to age matched controls: a 17-year experience

verfasst von: Eden R. Cardozo, Alexcis P. Thomson, Anatte E. Karmon, Kristy A. Dickinson, Diane L. Wright, Mary E. Sabatini

Erschienen in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Ausgabe 4/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the in-vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes of cancer patients who underwent oocyte retrieval and embryo/oocyte cryopreservation prior to gonadotoxic therapy to those of age and time-matched controls with tubal factor infertility.

Methods

All cancer patients who underwent embryo/oocyte cryopreservation at our institution from 1997 to 2014 were reviewed. Primary outcomes were total dose of gonadotropins used, number of oocytes retrieved, and number of 2pn embryos obtained. Outcomes were compared to age-matched controls with tubal-factor infertility who underwent a fresh embryo transfer within the same relative time period as the IVF cycle of the cancer patient.

Results

Sixty-three cancer patients underwent 65 IVF cycles, and 21 returned for frozen embryo transfer. One hundred twenty-two age-matched controls underwent IVF cycles with fresh transfer, and 23 returned for frozen embryo transfer. No difference was seen between cancer patients and controls with respect to total ampules of gonadotropin used (38.0 vs. 35.6 respectively; p = 0.28), number of oocytes retrieved (12.4 vs. 10.9 respectively; p = 0.36) and number of 2pn embryos obtained (6.6 vs. 7.1 respectively; p = 0.11). Cumulative pregnancy rate per transfer for cancer patients compared to controls was 37 vs. 43 % respectively (p = 0.49) and cumulative live birth rate per transfer was 30 vs. 32 % respectively (p = 0.85). Cancer patients had a higher likelihood of live birth resulting in twins (44 vs. 14 %; p = 0.035).

Conclusions

Most IVF outcomes appear comparable for cancer patients and age-matched controls. Higher twin pregnancy rates in cancer patients may reflect lack of underlying infertility or need for cancer-specific transfer guidelines.
Literatur
6.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Reh AE, Lu L, Weinerman R, Grifo J, Krey L, Noyes N. Treatment outcomes and quality-of-life assessment in a university-based fertility preservation program: results of a registry of female cancer patients at 2 years. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28(7):635–41. doi:10.1007/s10815-011-9559-z.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Reh AE, Lu L, Weinerman R, Grifo J, Krey L, Noyes N. Treatment outcomes and quality-of-life assessment in a university-based fertility preservation program: results of a registry of female cancer patients at 2 years. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28(7):635–41. doi:10.​1007/​s10815-011-9559-z.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Loren AW, Mangu PB, Beck LN, Brennan L, Magdalinski AJ, Partridge AH, et al. Fertility preservation for patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol: Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2013;31(19):2500–10. doi:10.1200/JCO.2013.49.2678.CrossRef Loren AW, Mangu PB, Beck LN, Brennan L, Magdalinski AJ, Partridge AH, et al. Fertility preservation for patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol: Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2013;31(19):2500–10. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2013.​49.​2678.CrossRef
10.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Rienzi L, Cobo A, Paffoni A, Scarduelli C, Capalbo A, Vajta G, et al. Consistent and predictable delivery rates after oocyte vitrification: an observational longitudinal cohort multicentric study. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(6):1606–12. doi:10.1093/humrep/des088.CrossRefPubMed Rienzi L, Cobo A, Paffoni A, Scarduelli C, Capalbo A, Vajta G, et al. Consistent and predictable delivery rates after oocyte vitrification: an observational longitudinal cohort multicentric study. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(6):1606–12. doi:10.​1093/​humrep/​des088.CrossRefPubMed
13.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Testart J, Lassalle B, Belaisch-Allart J, Hazout A, Forman R, Rainhorn JD, et al. High pregnancy rate after early human embryo freezing. Fertil Steril. 1986;46(2):268–72.PubMed Testart J, Lassalle B, Belaisch-Allart J, Hazout A, Forman R, Rainhorn JD, et al. High pregnancy rate after early human embryo freezing. Fertil Steril. 1986;46(2):268–72.PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Frattarelli JL, Miller BT, Scott Jr RT. Adjuvant therapy enhances endometrial receptivity in patients undergoing assisted reproduction. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;12(6):722–9.CrossRefPubMed Frattarelli JL, Miller BT, Scott Jr RT. Adjuvant therapy enhances endometrial receptivity in patients undergoing assisted reproduction. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;12(6):722–9.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Rubinstein M, Marazzi A, Polak de Fried E. Low-dose aspirin treatment improves ovarian responsiveness, uterine and ovarian blood flow velocity, implantation, and pregnancy rates in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization: a prospective, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled assay. Fertil Steril. 1999;71(5):825–9.CrossRefPubMed Rubinstein M, Marazzi A, Polak de Fried E. Low-dose aspirin treatment improves ovarian responsiveness, uterine and ovarian blood flow velocity, implantation, and pregnancy rates in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization: a prospective, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled assay. Fertil Steril. 1999;71(5):825–9.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Keskin U, Ercan CM, Yilmaz A, Babacan A, Korkmaz C, Duru NK, et al. Random-start controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with letrozole for fertility preservation in cancer patients: case series and review of literature. JPMA J Pak Med Assoc. 2014;64(7):830–2.PubMed Keskin U, Ercan CM, Yilmaz A, Babacan A, Korkmaz C, Duru NK, et al. Random-start controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with letrozole for fertility preservation in cancer patients: case series and review of literature. JPMA J Pak Med Assoc. 2014;64(7):830–2.PubMed
26.
27.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Devesa M, Martinez F, Coroleu B, Rodriguez I, Gonzalez C, Barri PN. Ovarian response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in women with cancer is as expected according to an age-specific nomogram. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014;31(5):583–8. doi:10.1007/s10815-014-0183-6.CrossRefPubMed Devesa M, Martinez F, Coroleu B, Rodriguez I, Gonzalez C, Barri PN. Ovarian response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in women with cancer is as expected according to an age-specific nomogram. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014;31(5):583–8. doi:10.​1007/​s10815-014-0183-6.CrossRefPubMed
31.
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Agarwal A, Said TM. Implications of systemic malignancies on human fertility. Reprod Biomed Online. 2004;9(6):673–9.CrossRefPubMed Agarwal A, Said TM. Implications of systemic malignancies on human fertility. Reprod Biomed Online. 2004;9(6):673–9.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Oktay K, Moy F, Titus S, Stobezki R, Turan V, Dickler M, et al. Age-related decline in DNA repair function explains diminished ovarian reserve, earlier menopause, and possible oocyte vulnerability to chemotherapy in women with BRCA mutations. J Clin Oncol: Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2014;32(10):1093–4. doi:10.1200/JCO.2013.53.5369.CrossRef Oktay K, Moy F, Titus S, Stobezki R, Turan V, Dickler M, et al. Age-related decline in DNA repair function explains diminished ovarian reserve, earlier menopause, and possible oocyte vulnerability to chemotherapy in women with BRCA mutations. J Clin Oncol: Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2014;32(10):1093–4. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2013.​53.​5369.CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Oktay K, Kim JY, Barad D, Babayev SN. Association of BRCA1 mutations with occult primary ovarian insufficiency: a possible explanation for the link between infertility and breast/ovarian cancer risks. J Clin Oncol: Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2010;28(2):240–4. doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.24.2057.CrossRef Oktay K, Kim JY, Barad D, Babayev SN. Association of BRCA1 mutations with occult primary ovarian insufficiency: a possible explanation for the link between infertility and breast/ovarian cancer risks. J Clin Oncol: Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2010;28(2):240–4. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2009.​24.​2057.CrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Sabatini ME, Wolkovich AM, Macklin EA, Wright DL, Souter I, Toth TL. Pronuclear embryo cryopreservation experience: outcomes for reducing the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and for fertility preservation in cancer patients. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28(3):279–84. doi:10.1007/s10815-010-9515-3.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Sabatini ME, Wolkovich AM, Macklin EA, Wright DL, Souter I, Toth TL. Pronuclear embryo cryopreservation experience: outcomes for reducing the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and for fertility preservation in cancer patients. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28(3):279–84. doi:10.​1007/​s10815-010-9515-3.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Ovarian stimulation and in-vitro fertilization outcomes of cancer patients undergoing fertility preservation compared to age matched controls: a 17-year experience
verfasst von
Eden R. Cardozo
Alexcis P. Thomson
Anatte E. Karmon
Kristy A. Dickinson
Diane L. Wright
Mary E. Sabatini
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Ausgabe 4/2015
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-015-0428-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2015

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 4/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.