nach oben

Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology

Erschienen in:

01.09.2010 | Case Report

“Pseudo” Faraday cage: a solution for telemetry link interaction between a left ventricular assist device and an implantable cardioverter defibrillator

verfasst von: Sony Jacob, Prasad K. Cherian, Waqas S. Ghumman, Mithilesh K. Das

Erschienen in: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology | Ausgabe 3/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Patients implanted with left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) may have implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) implanted for sudden cardiac death prevention. This opens the possibility of device–device communication interactions and thus interferences. We present a case of such interaction that led to ICD communication failure following the activation of an LVAD. In this paper, we describe a practical solution to circumvent the communication interference and review the communication links of ICDs and possible mechanisms of ICD–LVAD interactions.

Moss, A., Zareba, W., Hall, W., Klein, H., Wilber, D., Cannom, D., et al. (2002). Multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial (MADIT) II investigators: Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction. New England Journal of Medicine, 346, 877–883.CrossRefPubMed

Bardy, G., Lee, K., Mark, D., Poole, J., Packer, D., Boineau, R., et al. (2005). Sudden cardiac death in heart failure trial (SCD-HeFT) investigators: Amiodarone or an implantable-cardioverter defibrillator for congestive heart failure. New England Journal of Medicine, 352, 225–237.CrossRefPubMed

Bedi, M., Kormos, R., Winowich, S., McNamara, D., Mathier, M., & Murali, S. (2007). Ventricular arrhythmias during left ventricular assist device support. American Journal of Cardiology, 99, 1151–1153.CrossRefPubMed

Ziv, O., Dizon, J., Thosani, A., Naka, Y., Magnano, A., & Garan, H. (1994). Effects of left ventricular assist device therapy on ventricular arrhythmias. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 24, 1688–1691.CrossRef

Refaat, M., Chemaly, E., Lebeche, D., Gwathmey, J., & Hajjar, R. (2008). Ventricular Arrhthymias after left ventricular assist device implantation. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 31(10), 1246–1252.CrossRefPubMed

Bakhtiary, F., Therapidis, P., Scherer, M., Dzemali, O., Moritz, A., & Kleine, P. (2008). Electromagnetic interaction between an axial left ventricular assist device and an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 136(5), 1380–1381.CrossRefPubMed

Oswald, H., Klein, G., Struber, M., & Gardiwal, A. (2009). Implantable defibrillator with left ventricular assist device compatibility. Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, 2009(8), 579–580.CrossRef

Matthews, J., Betley, D., Morady, F., & Pelosi, F. (2007). Adverse interaction between left ventricular assist device and an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 18, 1107–1108.CrossRefPubMed

Mehta, R., Doshi, A., Hasan, A., Love, C., Pizzuto, M., Sai-Sudhakar, C., et al. (2008). Device interactions in patients with advanced cardiomyopathy. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 51(16), 1613–1614.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Medtronic Technical Services Communication. Radiofrequency Considerations for the Use of Wireless Telemetry with the Medtronic CareLink Programmer and Implanted Medical Devices.

11.

Von Arx, J., Gaskill, R., Mass, W., Rawat, P., & Yates, S.(2006). Band selection for a radio frequency telemetry system for implantable cardiac rhythm devices. Boston Scientific Cardiac Rhythm Management White Paper, Order number C3-277-0806.

12.

Mehta, R., Doshi, A., Pizzuto, M., Sai-Sudhakar, C., Hasan, A., & Chan, D. (2008). Reply to letter to the editor. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 52, 1887–1888.CrossRef

13.

FCC (2008) http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/index.htm?job=service_home&id=medical_implant. Accessed 20 December 2008.

14.

Sutton, B., Stadnik, P., Nelson, J., & Stotts, L. (2007). Probability of interference between LP-LDC and LBT MICS implants in a Medical Care Facility. Engineering in Medicine and Biology, 22–26, 6721–6725.

Titel: “Pseudo” Faraday cage: a solution for telemetry link interaction between a left ventricular assist device and an implantable cardioverter defibrillator
verfasst von: Sony Jacob
Prasad K. Cherian
Waqas S. Ghumman
Mithilesh K. Das
Publikationsdatum: 01.09.2010
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology / Ausgabe 3/2010
Print ISSN: 1383-875X
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-8595
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-009-9415-6

Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie

19.04.2024 | Vorhofflimmern | Nachrichten

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

“Pseudo” Faraday cage: a solution for telemetry link interaction between a left ventricular assist device and an implantable cardioverter defibrillator

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Antihypertensiva schützen auch alte Menschen noch vor Demenz

Sind Betablocker auch für ältere herzschwache Personen nützlich?

Stillende Frauen haben geringeres kardiovaskuläres Risiko

Update Kardiologie

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2010

Ablation of atrial fibrillation after the retirement age: considerations on safety and outcome

Knowledge, attitude, and behavior in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation

An observational registry on efficacy and safety of the right ventricular outflow tract as a site for ICD leads: results of the EFFORT (EFFicacy Of Right ventricular outflow Tract as site for ICD leads) registry

The impact of stored atrial rhythm diagnostics in permanent pacemakers and the management of atrial fibrillation: the Vitatron Selection AFm Registry study

Do endothelin receptor antagonists have an antiarrhythmic potential during acute myocardial infarction? Evidence from experimental studies

Responsiveness of AF6, a new, short, validated, atrial fibrillation-specific questionnaire—symptomatic benefit of direct current cardioversion

Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Antihypertensiva schützen auch alte Menschen noch vor Demenz

Sind Betablocker auch für ältere herzschwache Personen nützlich?

Stillende Frauen haben geringeres kardiovaskuläres Risiko

Update Kardiologie