Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 3/2016

19.06.2015 | Original Research

Clinical practice in perioperative monitoring in adult cardiac surgery: is there a standard of care? Results from an national survey

verfasst von: Elena Bignami, Alessandro Belletti, Paola Moliterni, Elena Frati, Marcello Guarnieri, Luigi Tritapepe

Erschienen in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing | Ausgabe 3/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

This study was to investigate and define what is considered as a current clinical practice in hemodynamic monitoring and vasoactive medication use after cardiac surgery in Italy. A 33-item questionnaire was sent to all intensive care units (ICUs) admitting patients after cardiac surgery. 71 out of 92 identified centers (77.2 %) returned a completed questionnaire. Electrocardiogram, invasive blood pressure, central venous pressure, pulse oximetry, diuresis, body temperature and blood gas analysis were identified as routinely used hemodynamic monitoring, whereas advanced monitoring was performed with pulmonary artery catheter or echocardiography. Crystalloids were the fluids of choice for volume replacement (86.8 % of Centers). To guide volume management, central venous pressure (26.7 %) and invasive blood pressure (19.7 %) were the most frequently used parameters. Dobutamine was the first choice for treatment of left heart dysfunction (40 %) and epinephrine was the first choice for right heart dysfunction (26.8 %). Half of the Centers had an internal protocol for vasoactive drugs administration. Intra-aortic balloon pump and extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation were widely available among Cardiothoracic ICUs. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were suspended in 28 % of the Centers. The survey shows what is considered as standard monitoring in Italian Cardiac ICUs. Standard, routinely used monitoring consists of ECG, SpO2, etCO2, invasive BP, CVP, diuresis, body temperature, and BGA. It also shows that there is large variability among the various Centers regarding hemodynamic monitoring of fluid therapy and inotropes administration. Further research is required to better standardize and define the indicators to improve the standards of intensive care after cardiac surgery among Italian cardiac ICUs.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Müller M, Junger A, Bräu M, et al. Incidence and risk calculation of inotropic support in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass using an automated anaesthesia record-keeping system. Br J Anaesth. 2002;89:398–404. doi:10.1093/bja/89.3.398.CrossRefPubMed Müller M, Junger A, Bräu M, et al. Incidence and risk calculation of inotropic support in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass using an automated anaesthesia record-keeping system. Br J Anaesth. 2002;89:398–404. doi:10.​1093/​bja/​89.​3.​398.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahmed I, House CM, Nelson WB. Predictors of inotrope use in patients undergoing concomitant coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and aortic valve replacement (AVR) surgeries at separation from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;4:24. doi:10.1186/1749-8090-4-24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ahmed I, House CM, Nelson WB. Predictors of inotrope use in patients undergoing concomitant coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and aortic valve replacement (AVR) surgeries at separation from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;4:24. doi:10.​1186/​1749-8090-4-24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Nielsen DV, Hansen MK, Johnsen SP, Hansen M, Hindsholm K, Jakobsen CJ. Health outcomes with and without use of inotropic therapy in cardiac surgery: results of a propensity score-matched analysis. Anesthesiology. 2014;120:1098–108. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000000224.CrossRefPubMed Nielsen DV, Hansen MK, Johnsen SP, Hansen M, Hindsholm K, Jakobsen CJ. Health outcomes with and without use of inotropic therapy in cardiac surgery: results of a propensity score-matched analysis. Anesthesiology. 2014;120:1098–108. doi:10.​1097/​ALN.​0000000000000224​.CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kastrup M, Carl M, Spies C, Sander M, Markewitz A, Schirmer U. Clinical impact of the publication of S3 guidelines for intensive care in cardiac surgery patients in Germany: results from a postal survey. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013;57:206–13. doi:10.1111/aas.12009.CrossRefPubMed Kastrup M, Carl M, Spies C, Sander M, Markewitz A, Schirmer U. Clinical impact of the publication of S3 guidelines for intensive care in cardiac surgery patients in Germany: results from a postal survey. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013;57:206–13. doi:10.​1111/​aas.​12009.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Cowie B. Does the pulmonary artery catheter still have a role in the perioperative period? Anaesth Intensive Care. 2011;39:345–55.PubMed Cowie B. Does the pulmonary artery catheter still have a role in the perioperative period? Anaesth Intensive Care. 2011;39:345–55.PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Reeves ST, Finley AC, Skubas NJ, et al. Basic perioperative transesophageal echocardiography examination: a consensus statement of the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. Anesth Analg. 2013;117:543–58. doi:10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182a00616.CrossRefPubMed Reeves ST, Finley AC, Skubas NJ, et al. Basic perioperative transesophageal echocardiography examination: a consensus statement of the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. Anesth Analg. 2013;117:543–58. doi:10.​1213/​ANE.​0b013e3182a00616​.CrossRefPubMed
20.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Guidet B, Martinet O, Boulain T, et al. Assessment of hemodynamic efficacy and safety of 6 % hydroxyethylstarch 130/0.4 vs. 0.9 % NaCl fluid replacement in patients with severe sepsis: the CRYSTMAS study. Crit Care. 2012;16:R94. doi:10.1186/cc11358.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Guidet B, Martinet O, Boulain T, et al. Assessment of hemodynamic efficacy and safety of 6 % hydroxyethylstarch 130/0.4 vs. 0.9 % NaCl fluid replacement in patients with severe sepsis: the CRYSTMAS study. Crit Care. 2012;16:R94. doi:10.​1186/​cc11358.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Annane D, Siami S, Jaber S, et al. Effects of fluid resuscitation with colloids vs crystalloids on mortality in critically ill patients presenting with hypovolemic shock: the CRISTAL randomized trial. JAMA. 2013;310:1809–17. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.280502.CrossRefPubMed Annane D, Siami S, Jaber S, et al. Effects of fluid resuscitation with colloids vs crystalloids on mortality in critically ill patients presenting with hypovolemic shock: the CRISTAL randomized trial. JAMA. 2013;310:1809–17. doi:10.​1001/​jama.​2013.​280502.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Meybohm P, Van Aken H, De Gasperi A, et al. Re-evaluating currently available data and suggestions for planning randomised controlled studies regarding the use of hydroxyethyl starch in critically ill patients—a multidisciplinary statement. Crit Care. 2013;17:R166. doi:10.1186/cc12845.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Meybohm P, Van Aken H, De Gasperi A, et al. Re-evaluating currently available data and suggestions for planning randomised controlled studies regarding the use of hydroxyethyl starch in critically ill patients—a multidisciplinary statement. Crit Care. 2013;17:R166. doi:10.​1186/​cc12845.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Cavallaro F, Sandroni C, Antonelli M. Functional hemodynamic monitoring and dynamic indices of fluid responsiveness. Minerva Anestesiol. 2008;74:123–35.PubMed Cavallaro F, Sandroni C, Antonelli M. Functional hemodynamic monitoring and dynamic indices of fluid responsiveness. Minerva Anestesiol. 2008;74:123–35.PubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Lansdorp B, Lemson J, van Putten MJ, de Keijzer A, van der Hoeven JG, Pickkers P. Dynamic indices do not predict volume responsiveness in routine clinical practice. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108:395–401. doi:10.1093/bja/aer411.CrossRefPubMed Lansdorp B, Lemson J, van Putten MJ, de Keijzer A, van der Hoeven JG, Pickkers P. Dynamic indices do not predict volume responsiveness in routine clinical practice. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108:395–401. doi:10.​1093/​bja/​aer411.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Clinical practice in perioperative monitoring in adult cardiac surgery: is there a standard of care? Results from an national survey
verfasst von
Elena Bignami
Alessandro Belletti
Paola Moliterni
Elena Frati
Marcello Guarnieri
Luigi Tritapepe
Publikationsdatum
19.06.2015
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing / Ausgabe 3/2016
Print ISSN: 1387-1307
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2614
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-015-9725-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2016

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 3/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.