nach oben

Journal of Genetic Counseling

Erschienen in:

01.10.2008 | Original Research

Assessment of the Content and Process of Genetic Counseling: A Critical Review of Empirical Studies

verfasst von: Bettina Meiser, Jennifer Irle, Elizabeth Lobb, Kristine Barlow-Stewart

Erschienen in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Ausgabe 5/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

This article reviews studies that assessed the process and content of genetic counseling communication. A systematic search of the literature was undertaken of studies that audio- or videotaped genetic counseling sessions conducted by genetics health care providers and subjected them to communication analyses. A total of 18 studies (published in 34 articles) were identified that met the eligibility criteria. Studies show that providers speak more than clients, that a large proportion of communication is biomedical rather than psychosocial and that the teaching model of genetic counseling is widely implemented. Higher levels of counselor facilitation of understanding and empathic responses, lower levels of verbal dominance (ratio of counselor to client talk) and the provision of a summary letter of the consultation are associated with more positive client outcomes. Findings from these studies should be used as an evidence base for teaching and continuing education of genetic counseling providers.

Aalfs, C., Oort, F., de Haes, H., Leschot, N., & Smets, E. (2006). Counselor–counselee interaction in reproductive genetic counseling: Does a pregnancy in the counselee make a difference? Patient Education and Counseling, 60, 80–90. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2005.03.007.PubMedCrossRef

American Board of Genetic Counseling. (2008). www.abgc.net. Accessed on February 27, 2008.

Armstrong, D., Michie, S., & Marteau, T. M. (1998). Revealed identity: A study of the process of genetic counselling. Social Science in Medicine, 47, 1653–1658. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00241-X.CrossRef

Benkendorf, J., Prince, M., Rose, M., De Fina, A., & Hamilton, H. (2001). Does indirect speech promote nondirective genetic counseling? Results of a sociolinguistic investigation. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 106, 199–207. doi:10.1002/ajmg.10012.PubMedCrossRef

Bernhardt, B. A., Geller, G. A., Doksum, T., Larson, S. M., Roter, D. A., & Holtzman, N. A. (1998). Prenatal genetic testing: Content of discussions between obstetric providers and pregnant women. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 91, 648–655. doi:10.1016/S0029-7844(98)00011-8.PubMedCrossRef

Biesecker, B. (2001). Goals of genetic counselling. Clinical Genetics, 60, 323–330. doi:10.1034/j.1399-0004.2001.600501.x.PubMedCrossRef

Biesecker, B., & Marteau, T. M. (1999). The future of genetic counselling: An international perspective. Nature Genetics, 22, 133–137. doi:10.1038/9641.CrossRef

Biesecker, B., & Peters, K. (2001). Process studies in genetic counseling: Peering into the Black Box. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 106, 191–198. doi:10.1002/ajmg.10004.PubMedCrossRef

Braithwaite, D., Emery, J., Walter, F., Prevost, A., & Sutton, S. (2004). Psychological impact of genetic counselling for familial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 96, 122–133.PubMed

Brookes-Howell, L. (2006). Living without labels: The interactional management of diagnostic uncertainty in the genetic counseling clinic. Social Science & Medicine, 63, 3080–3091. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.08.008.CrossRef

Butow, P., Dunn, S., Tattersall, M., & Jones, Q. (1995). Computer based interaction analysis of the cancer consultation. British Journal of Cancer, 71, 1115.PubMed

Butow, P., & Lobb, E. (2004). Analyzing the process and content of genetic counseling in familial breast cancer consultations. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 13, 403–424. doi:10.1023/B:JOGC.0000044201.73103.4f.PubMedCrossRef

Chapple, A., Campion, P., & May, C. (1997). Clinical terminology: Anxiety and confusion amongst families undergoing genetic counseling. Patient Education and Counseling, 32, 81–91. doi:10.1016/S0738-3991(97)00065-7.PubMedCrossRef

Chapple, A., & May, C. (1996). Genetic knowledge and family relationships: Two case studies. Health & Social Care in the Community, 4, 166–171.

Chapple, A., May, C., & Campion, P. (1995). Parental guilt: The part played by the clinical geneticist. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 4, 179–191. doi:10.1007/BF01408408.CrossRef

Clarke, A., Parsons, E., & Williams, A. (1996). Outcomes and process in genetic counselling. Clinical Genetics, 50, 462–469.PubMedCrossRef

Duric, V., Butow, P., Sharpe, L., Lobb, E., Meiser, B., Barratt, A., et al. (2003). Reducing psychological distress in a genetic counseling consultation for breast cancer. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 12, 243–264. doi:10.1023/A:1023284219871.CrossRef

Ellington, L., Baty, B., McDonald, J., Venne, V., Musters, A., Roter, D., et al. (2006). Exploring genetic counseling communication patterns: The role of teaching and counseling approaches. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15, 179–189. doi:10.1007/s10897-005-9011-6.PubMedCrossRef

Ellington, L., Maxwel, A., Baty, B., Roter, D., Dudley, W., & Kinney, A. (2007). Genetic counselling communication with an African American BRCA1 kindred. Social Science and Medicine, 64, 724–734. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.09.017.PubMedCrossRef

Ellington, L., Roter, D., Dudley, W., Baty, B., Upruch, R., Larson, S., et al. (2005). Communication analysis of BRCA1 genetic counselling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14, 377–386. doi:10.1007/s10897-005-3660-3.PubMedCrossRef

Ford, S., Fallowfield, L., & Lewis, S. (1996). Doctor–patient interactions in oncology. Social Science and Medicine, 42, 1511–1519. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(95)00265-0.PubMedCrossRef

Hall, J. (2003). Some observations on provider–patient communication research. Patient Education and Counseling, 50, 9–12.PubMed

Hall, J., & Dornan, M. (1988). Meta-analysis of satisfaction with medical care: Description of research domain and analysis of overall satisfaction. Social Science and Medicine, 27, 637–644. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(88)90012-3.PubMedCrossRef

Hall, J., Roter, D., & Katz, R. (1988). Meta-analysis of correlates of provider behaviour in medical encounters. Medical Care, 26, 657–675. doi:10.1097/00005650-198807000-00002.PubMedCrossRef

Hallowell, N., Green, J. M., Statham, H., Murton, F., & Richards, M. P. H. (1997a). Recall of numerical risk estimates and counselees’ perceptions of the importance of risk information following genetic counselling for breast and ovarian cancer. Psychology & Health, 2, 149–159.

Hallowell, N., & Murton, F. (1998). The value of written summaries of genetic consultations. Patient Education and Counseling, 35, 27–34. doi:10.1016/S0738-3991(98)00080-9.PubMedCrossRef

Hallowell, N., Murton, F., Statham, H., Green, J. M., & Richards, M. P. M. (1997b). Women's need for information before attending genetic counselling for familial breast or ovarian cancer: A questionnaire, interview and observational study. British Medical Journal, 314, 281–283.PubMed

Hamby Erby, L. (2005). Understanding the genetic counselling process: The use of simulated clients in examining the genetic counseling interaction. Baltimore: The John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

Hamby, L. (2001). Discussions of personal meaning in pre-amniocentesis genetic counseling. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University.

Heimler, A. (1997). An oral history of the National Society of Genetic Counselors. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 6, 315–336. doi:10.1023/A:1025680306348.CrossRef

Hsia, Y. E. (1979). The genetic counselor as information giver. In A. M. Capron, M. R. F. Lappé, T. M. Powledge, S. B. Twiss, & D. Bergsma (Eds.), Genetic counseling: Facts, values and norms, Vol. XV, No. 2 (pp. 169–186). New York: Alan R. Liss Vol. Birth Defects: Original Article Series.

Human Genetics Society of Australasia. (2008). http://www.hgsa.com.au. Accessed on February 27, 2008).

Hunfeld, J. A. M., Leurs, A., de Jong, M., Oberstein, M. L., Tibben, A., Wladimiroff, J. W., et al. (1999). Prenatal consultation after a fetal anomaly scan: Videotaped exploration of physician's attitude and patients’ satisfaction. Prenatal Diagnosis, 19, 1043–1047. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199911)19:11<1043::AID-PD697>3.0.CO;2-T.PubMedCrossRef

Kasparian, N., Wakefield, C., & Meiser, B. (2007). The assessment of outcomes in genetic counseling research: A review of the measurement scales used. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16, 693–712. doi:10.1007/s10897-007-9111-6.PubMedCrossRef

Kelly, P. (1977). Dealing with dilemma. Springer: New York.

Kemel, Y. (2000). What happens during the prenatal genetic counseling session: exploratory study of genetic counseling. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University.

Kessler, S. (1979a). The genetic counseling session. In S. Kessler (Ed.), Genetic counseling: Psychological dimensions (pp. 1–3). New York: Academic.

Kessler, S. (1979b). The genetic counselor as psychotherapist. In A. M. Capron, M. Lappé, R. F. Murray, T. M. Powledge, S. B. Twiss, & D. Bergsma (Eds.), Genetic counseling: Facts, values and norms, Vol. Vol. XV, No. 2 (pp. 187–200). New York: Alan R. Liss Birth Defects: Original Article Series.

Kessler, S. (1981). Psychological aspects of genetic counseling: Analysis of a transcript. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 8, 137–153. doi:10.1002/ajmg.1320080204.PubMedCrossRef

Kessler, S. (1992). Process issues in genetic counseling. In G. Evers-Kiebooms, J. P. Fryns, & J. J. Cassiman (Eds.), Psychosocial aspects of genetic counseling (pp. 1–10). New York: Wiley–Liss.

Kessler, S. (1999). Psychological aspects of genetic counseling. XI. Teaching and counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 6, 287–295. doi:10.1023/A:1025676205440.CrossRef

Kessler, S., & Jacopini, A. G. (1982a). Psychological aspects of genetic counseling. I. Qualitative analysis of a transcript of a genetic counseling session. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 39, 253–264.

Kessler, S., & Jacopini, A. G. (1982b). Psychological aspects of genetic counseling. II. Quantitative analysis of a transcript of a genetic counseling session. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 12, 421–435. doi:10.1002/ajmg.1320120406.PubMedCrossRef

Korf, B. (2005). Genetics in medical practice: the need for ultimate makeover. Genetics in Medicine, 7, 293–294. doi:10.1097/01.GIM.0000164551.44846.F6.PubMedCrossRef

Lehtinen, E. (2005). Information, understanding and the benign order of everyday life in genetic counseling. Sociology of Health & Illness, 27, 575–601. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2005.00457.x.CrossRef

Lehtinen, E., & Kaariainen, H. (2005). Doctor's expertise and managing discrepant information from other sources in genetic counseling: A conversation analytic perspective. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14, 435–451. doi:10.1007/s10897-005-6453-9.PubMedCrossRef

Ley, P. (1988). Communicating with patients: Improving communication satisfaction and compliance. Croom Helm: London.

Liede, A., Kerzin-Storrar, L., & Craufurd, D. (2000). A method for analysing videotaped genetic counseling sessions. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 9, 117–136. doi:10.1023/A:1009459908884.CrossRef

Lippman-Hand, A., & Fraser, F. C. (1979a). Genetic counseling: Parents’ responses to uncertainty. In C. Epstein, C. J. R. Curry, S. Packman, & S. Sherman (Eds.), Risk, communication, and decision making in genetic counseling, Vol. Vol. XV, No. 5C (pp. 325–339). New York: Alan R. Liss Birth defects: Original Article Series.

Lippman-Hand, A., & Fraser, F. C. (1979b). Genetic counseling: Provision and reception of information. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 9, 117–136.

Lobb, E., & Meiser, B. (2004). Genetic counselling and prophylactic surgery in women from families with hereditary breast or ovarian cancer. Lancet, 363, 1841–1842. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16393-9.PubMedCrossRef

Lobb, E., Butow, P., Barratt, A., Meiser, B., & Tucker, K. (2005). Differences in individual approaches: Communication in the familial breast cancer consultation and the effect on patient outcomes. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14, 43–53. doi:10.1007/s10897-005-1499-2.PubMedCrossRef

Lobb, E., Butow, P., Meiser, B., Barratt, A., Gaff, C., Young, M., et al. (2004). Communication and information-giving in high-risk breast cancer consultations: Influence on patient outcomes. British Journal of Cancer, 90(2), 321–327., 90, 321–327.PubMedCrossRef

Lobb, E., Butow, P., Meiser, B., Barratt, A., Gaff, C., Young, M., et al. (2003). Women's preferences and consultants’ communication of risk in consultations about familial breast cancer: Impact on patient outcomes. Journal of Medical Genetics, 40, e56. doi:10.1136/jmg.40.5.e56.PubMedCrossRef

Lobb, E., Butow, P., Meiser, B., Barratt, A., Tucker, K., Gaff, C., et al. (2002a). Tailoring communication in consultations with women from high-risk breast cancer families. British Journal of Cancer, 87, 502–508. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6600484.PubMedCrossRef

Lobb, E. A., Butow, P. N., Meiser, B., Barratt, A., Gaff, C., Young, M. A., et al. (2002b). The influence of consultants' communication and information-giving behaviours on patient outcomes: A multi centre study of genetic counselling with women from high risk breast cancer families. European Journal of Human Genetics, 10, 312–313.

Luborsky, L., Crits-Christoph, P., McLellan, A., Woody, G., Piper, W., Liberman, B., et al. (1986). Do therapists vary much in their success? Findings from four outcome studies. The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 56, 501–512.PubMed

Luborsky, L., McLellan, T., Woody, G., O'Brien, C., & Auerbach, A. (1985). Therapist success and its determinants. Archives of General Psychiatry, 42, 602–611.PubMed

Marteau, T. M., Plenicar, M., & Kidd, J. (1993). Obstetricians presenting amniocentesis to pregnant women: Practice observed. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 11, 3–10. doi:10.1080/02646839308403189.CrossRef

Marteau, T. M., Slack, J., Kidd, J., & Shaw, R. W. (1992). Presenting a routine screening test in antenatal care: Practice observed. Public Health, 106, 131–141. doi:10.1016/S0033-3506(05)80390-7.PubMedCrossRef

McCarthy Veach, P., Bartels, D., & LeRoy, B. (2007). Coming full circle: A reciprocal-engagement model of genetic counseling practice. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16, 713–728. doi:10.1007/s10897-007-9113-4.CrossRef

Meiser, B., & Halliday, J. (2002). What is the impact of genetic counseling in women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast cancer: A meta-analytic review. Social Science and Medicine, 54, 1463–1470. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00133-2.PubMedCrossRef

Mendez, A., & Shymansky, J. (1984). Verbal behaviours and patterns exhibited by physicians during genetic counseling sessions. Patient Education and Counseling, 6, 165–168. doi:10.1016/0738-3991(84)90052-1.PubMedCrossRef

Michie, S., Axworthy, D., Weinmann, J., & Marteau, T. (1996). Genetic counselling: Predicting patient outcomes. Psychology & Health, 11, 797–809. doi:10.1080/08870449608400276.CrossRef

Michie, S., Bron, F., & Bobrow, M. (1997a). Nondirectiveness in genetic counselling: An empirical study. American Journal of Human Genetics, 60, 40–47.PubMed

Michie, S., French, D., Allanson, A., Bobrow, M., & Marteau, T. M. (1997b). Information recall in genetic counselling: A pilot study of its assessment. Patient Education and Counseling, 32, 93–100. doi:10.1016/S0738-3991(97)00068-2.PubMedCrossRef

Michie, S., Lester, K., Pinto, J., & Marteau, T. (2005). Communicating risk information in genetic counseling: An observational study. Health Education & Behavior, 32, 589–598. doi:10.1177/1090198105278562.CrossRef

Michie, S., & Marteau, T. (1996). Genetic counselling: Some issues of theory and practice. In T. Marteau, & M. Richards (Eds.), The troubled helix: Social and psychological implications of the new human genetics (pp. 104–122). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Michie, S., McDonald, V., & Marteau, T. M. (1997c). Genetic counselling: Information given, recall and satisfaction. Patient Education and Counseling, 32, 101–106. doi:10.1016/S0738-3991(97)00050-5.PubMedCrossRef

O’Doherty, K. (2006). Risk communication in genetic counseling: A discursive approach to probability. Theory & Psychology, 16, 225–256. doi:10.1177/0959354306062537.CrossRef

Peters, J. A., McAllister, C. L., & Rubinstein, W. S. (2001a). Qualitative cancer genetic counseling research, Part I: Ethnography in a cancer clinic. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 10, 133–150. doi:10.1023/A:1009491714527.CrossRef

Peters, J. A., McAllister, C. L., & Rubinstein, W. S. (2001b). Qualitative cancer genetic counseling research, Part II: Findings from a exploratory ethnographic study in a cancer clinic. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 10, 151–168. doi:10.1023/A:1009443831365.CrossRef

Pieterse, A., van Dulmen, S., Ausems, M., & Bensing, J. (2006). Tailoring communication in cancer genetic counseling through individual video-supported feedback: A controlled pretest–post-test design. Patient Education and Counseling, 60, 326–335. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2005.06.009.PubMedCrossRef

Pieterse, A., van Dulmen, S., Ausems, M., Schoemaker, A., Beemer, F., & Bensing, J. (2005). Communication in cancer genetic counselling: Does it reflect counselees’ previsit needs and preferences? British Journal of Cancer, 92, 1671–1678. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6602570.PubMedCrossRef

Pieterse, A., van Dulmen, S., Beemer, F., Bensing, J., & Ausems, M. (2007). Cancer genetic counseling: Communucations and counselees' post-visit satisfaction, cognitions, anxiety and needs fulfillment. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16, 85–96. doi:10.1007/s10897-006-9048-1.PubMedCrossRef

Pilnick, A., & Dingwall, R. (2001). Research directions in genetic counselling: A review of the literature. Patient Education and Counseling, 44, 95–105. doi:10.1016/S0738-3991(00)00181-6.PubMedCrossRef

Rapp, R. (1999). Testing women: Testing the Fetus: The social impact of amniocentesis in America. Routledge: New York.

Resta, R., Biesecker, B., Bennett, R., Blum, S., Estabrooks Hahn, S., Strecker, M., et al. (2006). A new definition of genetic counseling: National Society of Genetic Counselors’ Task Force Report. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15, 77–83. doi:10.1007/s10897-005-9014-3.PubMedCrossRef

Roter, D. (2003). Observations on methodological and measurement challenges in the assessment of communication during medical exchanges. Patient Education and Counseling, 50, 17–21.PubMed

Roter, D., Ellington, L., Erby, L., Larson, S., & Dudley, W. (2006). The Genetic Counseling Video Project (GCVP): models of practice. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Seminars in Medical Genetics, 142, 209–220. doi:10.1002/ajmg.c.30094.CrossRef

Roter, D., & Hall, J. (1997). Patient–provider communication. In K. Glanz, F. Lewis, & B. Rimer (Eds.), Health behavior and health education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Roter, D., Hall, J., & Katz, N. (1988). Patient–physician communication: A descriptive summary of the literature. Patient Education and Counseling, 12, 99. doi:10.1016/0738-3991(88)90057-2.CrossRef

Roter, D. L., Geller, G., Bernhardt, B. A., Larson, S. M., & Doksum, T. (1999). Effects of obstetrician gender on communication and patient satisfaction. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 5, 635–641. doi:10.1016/S0029-7844(98)00542-0.CrossRef

Sarangi, S. (2002). The language of likelihood in genetic counseling discourse. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 21, 7–31. doi:10.1177/0261927X02021001002.CrossRef

Sarangi, S., Bennert, K., Howell, L., Clarke, A., Harper, P., & Gray, J. (2004). Initiation of reflective frames in counseling for Huntington disease predictive testing. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 13, 135–155. doi:10.1023/B:JOGC.0000018823.60761.e0.PubMedCrossRef

Sarangi, S., & Clarke, A. (2002a). Constructing an account by contrasting in counseling for childhood genetic testing. Social Science & Medicine, 54, 295–308. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00029-6.CrossRef

Sarangi, S., & Clarke, A. (2002b). Zones of expertise and the management of uncertainty in genetics risk communication. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 35, 139–171. doi:10.1207/S15327973RLSI3502_2.CrossRef

Shiloh, S., Avdor, O., & Goodman, R. M. (1990). Satisfaction with genetic counselling: Dimensions and measurement. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 37, 522–529. doi:10.1002/ajmg.1320370419.PubMedCrossRef

Smith, J. A., Michie, S., Allanson, A., & Elwy, R. (2000). Certainty and uncertainty in genetic counselling: A qualitative case study. Psychology & Health, 15, 1–12.CrossRef

Teyber, E. (2000). Therapist variables. In C. Snyder, & R. Ingram (Eds.), Handbook of psychological change: Psychotherapy processes and practices for the 21st century. New York: Wiley.

Van Zuuren, F. (1997). The standard of neutrality during genetic counselling: An empirical investigation. Patient Education and Counseling, 32, 69–79. doi:10.1016/S0738-3991(97)00051-7.PubMedCrossRef

Van Zuuren, F. J., Van Schie, E. C. M., & Van Baaren, N. K. (1997). Uncertainty in the information provided during genetic counselling. Patient Education and Counseling, 32, 129–139. doi:10.1016/S0738-3991(97)00052-9.PubMedCrossRef

van Zwieten, M., Willems, D., Knegt, L., & Leschot, N. (2006). Communication with patients during prenatal testing procedure: An explorative qualitative study. Patient Education and Counseling, 63, 161–168. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2005.09.013.PubMedCrossRef

Wang, C., Gonzalez, R., & Merajverc, S. (2004). Assessment of genetic testing and related counseling services: current research and future directions. Social Science and Medicine, 58, 1427–1442. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00337-X.PubMedCrossRef

Weil, J. (2003). Psychosocial genetic counseling in the post-nondirective era: A point of view. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 12, 199–211. doi:10.1023/A:1023234802124.PubMedCrossRef

Whitten, C., Thomas, J., & Nishiura, E. (1981). Sickle cell trait counseling—Evaluation of counselors and counselees. American Journal of Human Genetics, 33, 802–816.PubMed

Titel: Assessment of the Content and Process of Genetic Counseling: A Critical Review of Empirical Studies
verfasst von: Bettina Meiser
Jennifer Irle
Elizabeth Lobb
Kristine Barlow-Stewart
Publikationsdatum: 01.10.2008
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Genetic Counseling / Ausgabe 5/2008
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-008-9173-0

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

23.04.2024 | Medikamente in Schwangerschaft und Stillzeit | Nachrichten

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Assessment of the Content and Process of Genetic Counseling: A Critical Review of Empirical Studies

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Weniger postpartale Depressionen nach Esketamin-Einmalgabe

Bei RSV-Impfung vor 60. Lebensjahr über Off-Label-Gebrauch aufklären!

Harnwegsinfektprophylaxe: Es geht auch ohne Antibiotika

Update Gynäkologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2008

What Patients and Their Relatives Think About Testing for BMPR2

Commentary on “My Story: A Genetic Counselor’s Journey from Provider to Patient”

Genetic Counseling in Southern Iran: Consanguinity and Reason for Referral

Standardized Human Pedigree Nomenclature: Update and Assessment of the Recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors

Reflections About My Story and the Accompanying Commentary

The Psychic Costs of Empathic Engagement: Personal and Demographic Predictors of Genetic Counselor Compassion Fatigue

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Weniger postpartale Depressionen nach Esketamin-Einmalgabe

Bei RSV-Impfung vor 60. Lebensjahr über Off-Label-Gebrauch aufklären!

Harnwegsinfektprophylaxe: Es geht auch ohne Antibiotika

Update Gynäkologie