Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Genetic Counseling 2/2016

01.04.2016 | Original Research

Defining Our Clinical Practice: The Identification of Genetic Counseling Outcomes Utilizing the Reciprocal Engagement Model

verfasst von: Krista Redlinger-Grosse, Patricia McCarthy Veach, Stephanie Cohen, Bonnie S. LeRoy, Ian M. MacFarlane, Heather Zierhut

Erschienen in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Ausgabe 2/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The need for evidence-based medicine, including comparative effectiveness studies and patient-centered outcomes research, has become a major healthcare focus. To date, a comprehensive list of genetic counseling outcomes, as espoused by genetic counselors, has not been established and thus, identification of outcomes unique to genetic counseling services has become a priority for the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC). The purpose of this study was to take a critical first step at identifying a more comprehensive list of genetic counseling outcomes. This paper describes the results of a focus group study using the Reciprocal-Engagement Model (REM) as a framework to characterize patient-centered outcomes of genetic counseling clinical practice. Five focus groups were conducted with 27 peer nominated participants who were clinical genetic counselors, genetic counseling program directors, and/or outcomes researchers in genetic counseling. Members of each focus group were asked to identify genetic counseling outcomes for four to five of the 17 goals of the REM. A theory-driven, thematic analysis of focus group data yielded 194 genetic counseling outcomes across the 17 goals. Participants noted some concerns about how genetic counseling outcomes will be measured and evaluated given varying stakeholders and the long-term nature of genetic concerns. The present results provide a list of outcomes for use in future genetic counseling outcomes research and for empirically-supported clinical interventions.
Fußnoten
1
Throughout this paper, genetic counseling outcomes refer to outcomes espoused by genetic counselors providing genetic counseling, in other words, genetic counselor-defined outcomes.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Armeli, C., Robbins, S. J., & Eunpu, D. (2005). Comparing knowledge of β-Thalassemia in samples of Italians, Italian-Americans, and Non-Italian-Americans. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14, 365–376.CrossRef Armeli, C., Robbins, S. J., & Eunpu, D. (2005). Comparing knowledge of β-Thalassemia in samples of Italians, Italian-Americans, and Non-Italian-Americans. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14, 365–376.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Baldwin, E. E., Boudreault, P., Fox, M., Sinsheimer, J. S., & Palmer, C. G. S. (2011). Effect of pre-test genetic counseling for deaf adults on knowledge of genetic testing. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 21, 256–272.CrossRef Baldwin, E. E., Boudreault, P., Fox, M., Sinsheimer, J. S., & Palmer, C. G. S. (2011). Effect of pre-test genetic counseling for deaf adults on knowledge of genetic testing. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 21, 256–272.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Berkenstadt, M., Shiloh, S., Barkai, G., Katznelson, M., & Goldman, B. (1999). Perceived personal control: a new concept in measuring outcome of genetic counseling. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 82, 53–59.CrossRef Berkenstadt, M., Shiloh, S., Barkai, G., Katznelson, M., & Goldman, B. (1999). Perceived personal control: a new concept in measuring outcome of genetic counseling. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 82, 53–59.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bernhardt, B. A., Biesecker, B. B., & Mastromarino, C. L. (2000). Goals, benefits, and outcomes of genetic counseling: client and genetic counselor assessment. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 94, 189–197.CrossRef Bernhardt, B. A., Biesecker, B. B., & Mastromarino, C. L. (2000). Goals, benefits, and outcomes of genetic counseling: client and genetic counselor assessment. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 94, 189–197.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Biesecker, B. B., & Peters, K. F. (2001). Process studies in genetic counseling: peering into the black box. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 106, 191–198.CrossRef Biesecker, B. B., & Peters, K. F. (2001). Process studies in genetic counseling: peering into the black box. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 106, 191–198.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bjorvatn, C., Eide, G. E., Hanestad, B. R., Øyen, N., Havik, O. E., Carlsson, A., & Berglund, G. (2007). Risk perception, worry and satisfaction related to genetic counseling for hereditary cancer. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16, 211–222.CrossRef Bjorvatn, C., Eide, G. E., Hanestad, B. R., Øyen, N., Havik, O. E., Carlsson, A., & Berglund, G. (2007). Risk perception, worry and satisfaction related to genetic counseling for hereditary cancer. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16, 211–222.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Clarke, A., Parsons, E., & Williams, A. (1996). Outcomes and process in genetic counselling. Clinical Genetics, 50, 462–469.CrossRef Clarke, A., Parsons, E., & Williams, A. (1996). Outcomes and process in genetic counselling. Clinical Genetics, 50, 462–469.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Codori, A.-M., Waldeck, T., Petersen, G. M., Miglioretti, D., Trimbath, J. D., & Tillery, M. A. (2005). Genetic counseling outcomes: perceived risk and distress after counseling for hereditary colorectal cancer. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14, 119–132.CrossRef Codori, A.-M., Waldeck, T., Petersen, G. M., Miglioretti, D., Trimbath, J. D., & Tillery, M. A. (2005). Genetic counseling outcomes: perceived risk and distress after counseling for hereditary colorectal cancer. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14, 119–132.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Davey, A., Rostant, K., Harrop, K., Goldblatt, J., & O’Leary, P. (2005). Evaluating genetic counseling: client expectations, psychological adjustment and satisfaction with service. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14, 197–206.CrossRef Davey, A., Rostant, K., Harrop, K., Goldblatt, J., & O’Leary, P. (2005). Evaluating genetic counseling: client expectations, psychological adjustment and satisfaction with service. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14, 197–206.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fox, M., Weil, J., & Resta, R. (2007). Why we do what we do: commentary on a reciprocal-engagement model of genetic counseling practice. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16, 729–730.CrossRef Fox, M., Weil, J., & Resta, R. (2007). Why we do what we do: commentary on a reciprocal-engagement model of genetic counseling practice. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16, 729–730.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gaff, C. L., Collins, V., Symes, T., & Halliday, J. (2005). Facilitating family communication about predictive genetic testing: probands’ perceptions. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14, 133–140.CrossRef Gaff, C. L., Collins, V., Symes, T., & Halliday, J. (2005). Facilitating family communication about predictive genetic testing: probands’ perceptions. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14, 133–140.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hallowell, N., Ardern-Jones, A., Eeles, R., Foster, C., Lucassen, A., Moynihan, C., & Watson, M. (2005). Communication about genetic testing in families of male BRCA1/2 carriers and non-carriers: patterns, priorities and problems: communication about BRCA1/2 testing. Clinical Genetics, 67, 492–502.CrossRef Hallowell, N., Ardern-Jones, A., Eeles, R., Foster, C., Lucassen, A., Moynihan, C., & Watson, M. (2005). Communication about genetic testing in families of male BRCA1/2 carriers and non-carriers: patterns, priorities and problems: communication about BRCA1/2 testing. Clinical Genetics, 67, 492–502.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hamilton, R. J., Bowers, B. J., & Williams, J. K. (2005). Disclosing genetic test results to family members. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 37, 18–24.CrossRef Hamilton, R. J., Bowers, B. J., & Williams, J. K. (2005). Disclosing genetic test results to family members. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 37, 18–24.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hartmann, J. E., Veach, P. M., MacFarlane, I. M., & LeRoy, B. S. (2015). Genetic counselor perceptions of genetic counseling session goals: a validation study of the reciprocal-engagement model. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 24, 225–237.CrossRef Hartmann, J. E., Veach, P. M., MacFarlane, I. M., & LeRoy, B. S. (2015). Genetic counselor perceptions of genetic counseling session goals: a validation study of the reciprocal-engagement model. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 24, 225–237.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hippman, C., Lohn, Z., Ringrose, A., Inglis, A., Cheek, J., & Austin, J. C. (2013). Nothing is absolute in life: Understanding uncertainty in the context of psychiatric genetic counseling from the perspective of those with serious mental illness. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 94–2. Hippman, C., Lohn, Z., Ringrose, A., Inglis, A., Cheek, J., & Austin, J. C. (2013). Nothing is absolute in life: Understanding uncertainty in the context of psychiatric genetic counseling from the perspective of those with serious mental illness. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 94–2.
Zurück zum Zitat Horvath, A. O., & Greenberg, L. S. (1989). Development and validation of the working alliance inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36, 223–233.CrossRef Horvath, A. O., & Greenberg, L. S. (1989). Development and validation of the working alliance inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36, 223–233.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hunter, A., Cappelli, M., Humphreys, L., Allanson, J., Chiu, T., Peeters, C., & Zimak, A. (2005). A randomized trial comparing alternative approaches to prenatal diagnosis counseling in advanced maternal age patients: comparison of PND counseling approaches. Clinical Genetics, 67, 303–313.CrossRef Hunter, A., Cappelli, M., Humphreys, L., Allanson, J., Chiu, T., Peeters, C., & Zimak, A. (2005). A randomized trial comparing alternative approaches to prenatal diagnosis counseling in advanced maternal age patients: comparison of PND counseling approaches. Clinical Genetics, 67, 303–313.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kasparian, N. A., Wakefield, C. E., & Meiser, B. (2007). Assessment of psychosocial outcomes in genetic counseling research: an overview of available measurement scales. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16, 693–712.CrossRef Kasparian, N. A., Wakefield, C. E., & Meiser, B. (2007). Assessment of psychosocial outcomes in genetic counseling research: an overview of available measurement scales. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16, 693–712.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Krousel-Wood, M. A. (2000). Outcomes assessment and performance improvement: Measurements and methodologies that matter in mental healthcare. In Mental health care administration: A guide for practitioners (pp. 233–254). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Krousel-Wood, M. A. (2000). Outcomes assessment and performance improvement: Measurements and methodologies that matter in mental healthcare. In Mental health care administration: A guide for practitioners (pp. 233–254). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2008). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publichation. Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2008). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publichation.
Zurück zum Zitat MacFarlane, A., & O’Reilly-de Brun, M. (2012). Using a theory-driven conceptual framework in qualitative health research. Qualitative Health Research, 22, 607–618.CrossRef MacFarlane, A., & O’Reilly-de Brun, M. (2012). Using a theory-driven conceptual framework in qualitative health research. Qualitative Health Research, 22, 607–618.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Matloff, E. T., Moyer, A., Shannon, K. M., Niendorf, K. B., & Col, N. F. (2006). Healthy women with a family history of breast cancer: impact of a tailored genetic counseling intervention on risk perception, knowledge, and menopausal therapy decision making. Journal of Women’s Health, 15, 843–856.CrossRef Matloff, E. T., Moyer, A., Shannon, K. M., Niendorf, K. B., & Col, N. F. (2006). Healthy women with a family history of breast cancer: impact of a tailored genetic counseling intervention on risk perception, knowledge, and menopausal therapy decision making. Journal of Women’s Health, 15, 843–856.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McAllister, M., Payne, K., MacLeod, R., Nicholls, S., Donnai, D., & Davies, L. (2008). Patient empowerment in clinical genetics services. Journal of Health Psychology, 13, 895–905.CrossRef McAllister, M., Payne, K., MacLeod, R., Nicholls, S., Donnai, D., & Davies, L. (2008). Patient empowerment in clinical genetics services. Journal of Health Psychology, 13, 895–905.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McAllister, M., Dunn, G., & Todd, C. (2010). Empowerment: qualitative underpinning of a new clinical genetics-specific patient-reported outcome. European Journal of Human Genetics, 19, 125–130.CrossRef McAllister, M., Dunn, G., & Todd, C. (2010). Empowerment: qualitative underpinning of a new clinical genetics-specific patient-reported outcome. European Journal of Human Genetics, 19, 125–130.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McAllister, M., Wood, A., Dunn, G., Shiloh, S., & Todd, C. (2011). The genetic counseling outcome scale: a new patient-reported outcome measure for clinical genetics services. Clinical Genetics, 79, 413–424.CrossRef McAllister, M., Wood, A., Dunn, G., Shiloh, S., & Todd, C. (2011). The genetic counseling outcome scale: a new patient-reported outcome measure for clinical genetics services. Clinical Genetics, 79, 413–424.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McCarthy Veach, P., Bartels, D. M., & LeRoy, B. S. (2007). Coming full circle: a reciprocal-engagement model of genetic counseling practice. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16, 713–728. McCarthy Veach, P., Bartels, D. M., & LeRoy, B. S. (2007). Coming full circle: a reciprocal-engagement model of genetic counseling practice. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16, 713–728.
Zurück zum Zitat McCarthy Veach, P., LeRoy, B., & Bartels, D. M. (2010). Genetic counseling practice: Advanced concepts and skills. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. McCarthy Veach, P., LeRoy, B., & Bartels, D. M. (2010). Genetic counseling practice: Advanced concepts and skills. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.
Zurück zum Zitat Meiser, B., Dunn, S., Dixon, J., & Powell, L. W. (2005). Psychological adjustment and knowledge About hereditary hemochromatosis in a clinic-based sample: a prospective study. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14, 453–463.CrossRef Meiser, B., Dunn, S., Dixon, J., & Powell, L. W. (2005). Psychological adjustment and knowledge About hereditary hemochromatosis in a clinic-based sample: a prospective study. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14, 453–463.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Meiser, B., Irle, J., Lobb, E., & Barlow-Stewart, K. (2008). Assessment of the content and process of genetic counseling: a critical review of empirical studies. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 17, 434–451.CrossRef Meiser, B., Irle, J., Lobb, E., & Barlow-Stewart, K. (2008). Assessment of the content and process of genetic counseling: a critical review of empirical studies. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 17, 434–451.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nagle, C., Lewis, S., Meiser, B., Metcalfe, S., Carlin, J. B., Bell, R., & Halliday, J. (2006). Evaluation of a decision aid for prenatal testing of fetal abnormalities: a cluster randomised trial. BMC Public Health, 6, 96.CrossRef Nagle, C., Lewis, S., Meiser, B., Metcalfe, S., Carlin, J. B., Bell, R., & Halliday, J. (2006). Evaluation of a decision aid for prenatal testing of fetal abnormalities: a cluster randomised trial. BMC Public Health, 6, 96.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Payne, K., Nicholls, S., McAllister, M., MacLeod, R., Donnai, D., & Davies, L. M. (2008). Outcome measurement in clinical genetics services: a systematic review of validated measures. Value in Health, 11, 497–508.CrossRef Payne, K., Nicholls, S., McAllister, M., MacLeod, R., Donnai, D., & Davies, L. M. (2008). Outcome measurement in clinical genetics services: a systematic review of validated measures. Value in Health, 11, 497–508.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Peterson, S. K., Pentz, R. D., Blanco, A. M., Ward, P. A., Watts, B. G., Marani, S. K., & Strong, L. C. (2006). Evaluation of a decision aid for families considering p53 genetic counseling and testing. Genetics in Medicine, 8, 226–233.CrossRef Peterson, S. K., Pentz, R. D., Blanco, A. M., Ward, P. A., Watts, B. G., Marani, S. K., & Strong, L. C. (2006). Evaluation of a decision aid for families considering p53 genetic counseling and testing. Genetics in Medicine, 8, 226–233.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pieterse, A. H., van Dulmen, A. M., Beemer, F. A., Bensing, J. M., & Ausems, M. G. E. M. (2007). Cancer genetic counseling: communication and counselees’ post-visit satisfaction, cognitions, anxiety, and needs fulfillment. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16, 85–96.CrossRef Pieterse, A. H., van Dulmen, A. M., Beemer, F. A., Bensing, J. M., & Ausems, M. G. E. M. (2007). Cancer genetic counseling: communication and counselees’ post-visit satisfaction, cognitions, anxiety, and needs fulfillment. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16, 85–96.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pithara, C. (2014). Identifying outcomes of clinical genetic services: qualitative evidence and methodological considerations. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23, 229–238.CrossRef Pithara, C. (2014). Identifying outcomes of clinical genetic services: qualitative evidence and methodological considerations. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23, 229–238.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Proctor, E., Silmere, H., Raghavan, R., Hovmand, P., Aarons, G., Bunger, A., & Hensley, M. (2011). Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38, 65–76.CrossRef Proctor, E., Silmere, H., Raghavan, R., Hovmand, P., Aarons, G., Bunger, A., & Hensley, M. (2011). Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38, 65–76.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Read, C. Y., Perry, D. J., & Duffy, M. E. (2005). Design and psychometric evaluation of the psychological adaptation to genetic information scale. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 37, 203–208.CrossRef Read, C. Y., Perry, D. J., & Duffy, M. E. (2005). Design and psychometric evaluation of the psychological adaptation to genetic information scale. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 37, 203–208.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Resta, R., Biesecker, B. B., Bennett, R. L., Blum, S., Estabrooks Hahn, S., Strecker, M. N., & Williams, J. L. (2006). A new definition of genetic counseling: national society of genetic counselors’ task force report. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15, 77–83.CrossRef Resta, R., Biesecker, B. B., Bennett, R. L., Blum, S., Estabrooks Hahn, S., Strecker, M. N., & Williams, J. L. (2006). A new definition of genetic counseling: national society of genetic counselors’ task force report. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15, 77–83.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rieh, J. P., & Ray, C. (1974). Conceptual models for nursing practice. New York: Appleton. Rieh, J. P., & Ray, C. (1974). Conceptual models for nursing practice. New York: Appleton.
Zurück zum Zitat Rowe, H. J., Fisher, J. R. W., & Quinlivan, J. A. (2006). Are pregnant Australian women well informed about prenatal genetic screening? A systematic investigation using the multidimensional measure of informed choice. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 46, 433–439.CrossRef Rowe, H. J., Fisher, J. R. W., & Quinlivan, J. A. (2006). Are pregnant Australian women well informed about prenatal genetic screening? A systematic investigation using the multidimensional measure of informed choice. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 46, 433–439.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Skirton, H., Parsons, E., & Ewings, P. (2005). Development of an audit tool for genetic services. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 136A, 122–127.CrossRef Skirton, H., Parsons, E., & Ewings, P. (2005). Development of an audit tool for genetic services. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 136A, 122–127.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Van Oostrom, I., Meijers-Heijboer, H., Duivenvoorden, H., Bröcker-Vriends, A., Van Asperen, C., Sijmons, R., & Tibben, A. (2006). Family system characteristics and psychological adjustment to cancer susceptibility genetic testing: a prospective study. Clinical Genetics, 71, 35–42.CrossRef Van Oostrom, I., Meijers-Heijboer, H., Duivenvoorden, H., Bröcker-Vriends, A., Van Asperen, C., Sijmons, R., & Tibben, A. (2006). Family system characteristics and psychological adjustment to cancer susceptibility genetic testing: a prospective study. Clinical Genetics, 71, 35–42.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wakefield, C. E., Meiser, B., Homewood, J., Peate, M., Taylor, A., Lobb, E., & the AGenDA Collaborative Group. (2007). A randomized controlled trial of a decision aid for women considering genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer risk. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 107, 289–301.CrossRef Wakefield, C. E., Meiser, B., Homewood, J., Peate, M., Taylor, A., Lobb, E., & the AGenDA Collaborative Group. (2007). A randomized controlled trial of a decision aid for women considering genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer risk. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 107, 289–301.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zierhut, H., & Cohen, S. (2013). Identification of patient-centered outcome measures in genetic counseling (Audrey Heimler Special Projects Award Proposal) (pp. 1–6). National Society of Genetic Counselors. Zierhut, H., & Cohen, S. (2013). Identification of patient-centered outcome measures in genetic counseling (Audrey Heimler Special Projects Award Proposal) (pp. 1–6). National Society of Genetic Counselors.
Metadaten
Titel
Defining Our Clinical Practice: The Identification of Genetic Counseling Outcomes Utilizing the Reciprocal Engagement Model
verfasst von
Krista Redlinger-Grosse
Patricia McCarthy Veach
Stephanie Cohen
Bonnie S. LeRoy
Ian M. MacFarlane
Heather Zierhut
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Genetic Counseling / Ausgabe 2/2016
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-015-9864-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2016

Journal of Genetic Counseling 2/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.