nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.04.2016 | Original Research

Genetic Knowledge Among Participants in the Coriell Personalized Medicine Collaborative

verfasst von: Tara J. Schmidlen, Laura Scheinfeldt, Ruixue Zhaoyang, Rachel Kasper, Kevin Sweet, Erynn S. Gordon, Margaret Keller, Cathy Stack, Neda Gharani, Mary B. Daly, Joseph Jarvis, Michael F. Christman

Erschienen in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Ausgabe 2/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Genetic literacy is essential for the effective integration of genomic information into healthcare; yet few recent studies have been conducted to assess the current state of this knowledge base. Participants in the Coriell Personalized Medicine Collaborative (CPMC), a prospective study assessing the impact of personalized genetic risk reports for complex diseases and drug response on behavior and health outcomes, completed genetic knowledge questionnaires and other surveys through an online portal. To assess the association between genetic knowledge and genetic education background, multivariate linear regression was performed. 4 062 participants completed a genetic knowledge and genetic education background questionnaire. Most were older (mean age: 50), Caucasian (90 %), female (59 %), highly educated (69 % bachelor’s or higher), with annual household income over $100 000 (49 %). Mean percent correct was 76 %. Controlling for demographics revealed that health care providers, participants previously exposed to genetics, and participants with ‘better than most’ self-rated knowledge were significantly more likely to have a higher knowledge score (p < 0.001). Overall, genetic knowledge was high with previous genetic education experience predictive of higher genetic knowledge score. Education is likely to improve genetic literacy, an important component to expanded use of genomics in personalized medicine.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Alliance, G. (2010). Trust it or trash it? A tool to help evaluate and create genetics health information. Retrieved October 1, 2014, from https://doi.org/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK115530/.

Bates, B. R. (2005). Public culture and public understanding of genetics: a focus group study. Public Understanding of Science, 14(1), 47–65.PubMedCrossRef

Brechman, J. M., Lee, C., & Cappella, J. N. (2011). Distorting genetic research about cancer: from bench science to press release to published news. Journal of Communication, 61, 496–513.PubMedCrossRef

Calsbeek, H., Morren, M., Bensing, J., & Rijken, M. (2007). Knowledge and attitudes towards genetic testing: a 2 years follow-up study in patients with asthma, diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16(4), 493–504. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-006-9085-9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Catz, D. S., Green, N. S., Tobin, J. N., Lloyd-Puryear, M. A., Kyler, P., Umemoto, A., & Wolman, F. (2005). Attitudes about genetics in underserved, culturally diverse populations. Community Genetics, 8(3), 161–172. doi:https://doi.org/10.1159/000086759.PubMed

Center, P. R. (2002). Vital decisions: a pew internet health report. Retrieved October 1, 2014, from https://doi.org/www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2002/PIP_Vital_Decisions_May2002.pdf.pdf.

Christensen, K. D., Jayaratne, T. E., Roberts, J. S., Kardia, S. L., & Petty, E. M. (2010). Understandings of basic genetics in the United States: results from a national survey of black and white men and women. Public Health Genomics, 13(7–8), 467–476. doi:https://doi.org/10.1159/000293287.PubMedPubMedCentral

Christianson, C. A., Powell, K. P., Hahn, S. E., Bartz, D., Roxbury, T., Blanton, S. H., & Genomedical, C. (2010). Findings from a community education needs assessment to facilitate the integration of genomic medicine into primary care. Genetics in Medicine, 12(9), 587–593. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181ed3f97.PubMedCrossRef

Condit, C. M. (2010). Public understandings of genetics and health. Clinical Genetics, 77(1), 1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0004.2009.01316.x.PubMedCrossRef

Dougherty, M. J., Pleasants, C., Solow, L., Wong, A., & Zhang, H. (2011). A comprehensive analysis of high school genetics standards: are states keeping pace with modern genetics? CBE Life Sciences Education, 10(3), 318–327. doi:https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-09-0122.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Dougherty, M. J., Lontok, K. S., Donigan, K., & McInerney, J. D. (2014). The critical challenge of educating the public about genetics. Current Genetic Medicine Reports, 2(2), 48–55.CrossRef

Fitzgerald-Butt, S. M., Klima, J., Kelleher, K., Chisolm, D., & McBride, K. L. (2014). Genetic knowledge and attitudes of parents of children with congenital heart defects. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.36763.PubMedCentralCrossRef

Fox, S., and Duggan, M. (2013). Pew Research Center. Retrieved October 1, 2014, from https://doi.org/www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Health-online.aspx.

Genetics., N.-N. C. f. H. P. E. i. (2007). Core competencies for all health professionals. Retrieved October 1, 2014, from https://doi.org/www.nchpeg.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=237&Itemid=84.

Green, E. D., Guyer, M. S., & National Human Genome Research, I. (2011). Charting a course for genomic medicine from base pairs to bedside. Nature, 470(7333), 204–213. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09764.PubMedCrossRef

Haga, S. B., Barry, W. T., Mills, R., Ginsburg, G. S., Svetkey, L., Sullivan, J., & Willard, H. F. (2013). Public knowledge of and attitudes toward genetics and genetic testing. Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers, 17(4), 327–335. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/gtmb.2012.0350.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Henneman, L., Timmermans, D. R., & van der Wal, G. (2004). Public experiences, knowledge and expectations about medical genetics and the use of genetic information. Community Genetics, 7(1), 33–43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1159/000080302.PubMed

Hott, A. M., Huether, C. A., McInerney, J. D., Christianson, C. A., Fowler, R., Bender, H., et al. (2002). Genetics content in introductory biology courses for non-science majors: theory and practice. Bioscience, 52, 1024–1035.CrossRef

Human Genetics, C. (2001). Human genetics commission launches consultation on the future of genetic information. Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics, 7(2), 25–26.CrossRef

Hurle, B., Citrin, T., Jenkins, J. F., Kaphingst, K. A., Lamb, N., Roseman, J. E., & Bonham, V. L. (2013). What does it mean to be genomically literate? National human genome research institute meeting report. Genetics in Medicine, 15(8), 658–663. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2013.14.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Jallinoja, P., & Aro, A. R. (1999). Knowledge about genes and heredity among Finns. New Genetics and Society, 18(1), 101–110.CrossRef

Jallinoja, P., & Aro, A. R. (2000). Does knowledge make a difference? The association between knowledge about genes and attitudes toward gene tests. Journal of Health Communication, 5(1), 29–39.PubMedCrossRef

Keller, M., Gordon, E. S., Stack, C. B., Gharani, N., Schmidlen, T. J., Mintzer, J., Pallies, J., Gerry, N., & Christman, M. F. (2010). The coriell personalized medicine collaborative: a prospective study of the utility of personalized medicine. Personalized Medicine, 7, 301–317.PubMedCrossRef

Kessler, L., Collier, A., & Halbert, C. H. (2007). Knowledge about genetics among African Americans. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16(2), 191–200. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-006-9054-3.CrossRefPubMed

Lanie, A. D., Jayaratne, T. E., Sheldon, J. P., Kardia, S. L., Anderson, E. S., Feldbaum, M., & Petty, E. M. (2004). Exploring the public understanding of basic genetic concepts. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 13(4), 305–320.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

McInerney, J. (2002). Education in a genomic world. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 27(3), 369–390. doi:https://doi.org/10.1076/jmep.27.3.369.2977.PubMedCrossRef

McInerney, J., Edelman, E., Nissen, T., Reed, E., & Scott, J. (2012). Perspectives: preparing health professionals for individualized medicine. Personalized Medicine, 9, 529–537.PubMedCrossRef

Molster, C., Charles, T., Samanek, A., & O’Leary, P. (2009). Australian study on public knowledge of human genetics and health. Public Health Genomics, 12(2), 84–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1159/000164684.CrossRefPubMed

Ratzan, S., and Parker, R. (2000). Introduction. In: National library of medicine current bibliographies in medicine: health literacy. NLM Pub. No. CBM 2000–1. In Selden CR, Zorn M, Ratzan SC, Parker RM (eds), Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Roberts, J. S., Dolinoy, D. C., & Tarini, B. A. (2014). Emerging issues in public health genomics. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 15, 461–480. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genom-090413-025514.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Scheuner, M. T., Sieverding, P., & Shekelle, P. G. (2008). Delivery of genomic medicine for common chronic adult diseases: a systematic review. JAMA, 299(11), 1320–1334. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.299.11.1320.PubMedCrossRef

Schmidlen, T. J., Wawak, L., Kasper, R., Garcia-Espana, J. F., Christman, M. F., & Gordon, E. S. (2014). Personalized genomic results: analysis of informational needs. Journal of Genetic Counseling. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-014-9693-8.PubMedCrossRef

Stack, C. B., Gharani, N., Gordon, E. S., Schmidlen, T., Christman, M. F., & Keller, M. A. (2011). Genetic risk estimation in the coriell personalized medicine collaborative. Genetics in Medicine, 13(2), 131–139. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/GIM.0b013e318201164c.PubMedCrossRef

Team, R. C. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://doi.org/www.R-project.org/.

Walter, F. M., Emery, J., Braithwaite, D., & Marteau, T. M. (2004). Lay understanding of familial risk of common chronic diseases: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research. Annals of Family Medicine, 2(6), 583–594. doi:https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.242.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Wathen, C. N., & Burkell, J. (2002). Believe it or not: factors influencing credibility on the web. Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology, 53, 134–144.CrossRef

Titel: Genetic Knowledge Among Participants in the Coriell Personalized Medicine Collaborative
verfasst von: Tara J. Schmidlen
Laura Scheinfeldt
Ruixue Zhaoyang
Rachel Kasper
Kevin Sweet
Erynn S. Gordon
Margaret Keller
Cathy Stack
Neda Gharani
Mary B. Daly
Joseph Jarvis
Michael F. Christman
Publikationsdatum: 01.04.2016
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Genetic Counseling / Ausgabe 2/2016
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-015-9883-z

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

23.04.2024 | Medikamente in Schwangerschaft und Stillzeit | Nachrichten

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Genetic Knowledge Among Participants in the Coriell Personalized Medicine Collaborative

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Weniger postpartale Depressionen nach Esketamin-Einmalgabe

Bei RSV-Impfung vor 60. Lebensjahr über Off-Label-Gebrauch aufklären!

Harnwegsinfektprophylaxe: Es geht auch ohne Antibiotika

Update Gynäkologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2016

Impact of Genetic Counseling in Women with a Family History of Breast Cancer in Italy

Genetic Counselors’ Experiences Regarding Communication of Reproductive Risks with Autosomal Recessive Conditions found on Cancer Panels

Parents’ Experience with Pediatric Microarray: Transferrable Lessons in the Era of Genomic Counseling

Genetic Counselors’ Perspectives and Practices Regarding Expanded Carrier Screening after Initial Clinical Availability

Patients’ Attitudes Towards Disclosure of Genetic Test Results to Family Members: The Impact of Patients’ Sociodemographic Background and Counseling Experience

Acceptability of, and Information Needs Regarding, Next-Generation Sequencing in People Tested for Hereditary Cancer: A Qualitative Study

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Weniger postpartale Depressionen nach Esketamin-Einmalgabe

Bei RSV-Impfung vor 60. Lebensjahr über Off-Label-Gebrauch aufklären!

Harnwegsinfektprophylaxe: Es geht auch ohne Antibiotika

Update Gynäkologie