Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Genetic Counseling 5/2017

17.03.2017 | Original Research

Reasons for Declining Preconception Expanded Carrier Screening Using Genome Sequencing

verfasst von: Marian J. Gilmore, Jennifer Schneider, James V. Davis, Tia L. Kauffman, Michael C. Leo, Kellene Bergen, Jacob A. Reiss, Patricia Himes, Elissa Morris, Carol Young, Carmit McMullen, Benjamin S. Wilfond, Katrina A.B. Goddard

Erschienen in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Ausgabe 5/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Genomic carrier screening can identify more disease-associated variants than existing carrier screening methodologies, but its utility from patients’ perspective is not yet established. A randomized controlled trial for preconception genomic carrier screening provided an opportunity to understand patients’ decisions about whether to accept or decline testing. We administered a survey to potential genomic carrier screening recipients who declined participation (N = 240) to evaluate their reasons for doing so. Two thirds of women declined participation. We identified major themes describing reasons these individuals declined to participate; the most common were time limitation, lack of interest, not wanting to know the information, and potential cause of worry or anxiety. Most women eligible for genomic carrier screening indicated that their reasons for opting out were due to logistical issues rather than opposing the rationale for testing. As expanded carrier screening and genomic sequencing become a more routine part of clinical care, it is anticipated there will be variable uptake from individuals for this testing. Thus, the advancement of clinical carrier screening from single genes, to expanded screening panels, to an exome- or genome-wide platform, will require approaches that respect individual choice to receive genetic testing for reproductive risk assessment.
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat ACOG Committee on Genetics. (2005). ACOG committee opinion. Number 318, October 2005. Screening for Tay-Sachs disease. Washington: ACOG. ACOG Committee on Genetics. (2005). ACOG committee opinion. Number 318, October 2005. Screening for Tay-Sachs disease. Washington: ACOG.
Zurück zum Zitat ACOG Committee on Genetics. (2007). ACOG practice bulletin no. 78: hemoglobinopathies in pregnancy. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 109(1), 229–237.CrossRef ACOG Committee on Genetics. (2007). ACOG practice bulletin no. 78: hemoglobinopathies in pregnancy. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 109(1), 229–237.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ACOG Committee on Genetics. (2009b). ACOG Committee opinion no. 442: preconception and prenatal carrier screening for genetic diseases in individuals of eastern European Jewish descent. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 114(4), 950–953. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181bd12f4.CrossRef ACOG Committee on Genetics. (2009b). ACOG Committee opinion no. 442: preconception and prenatal carrier screening for genetic diseases in individuals of eastern European Jewish descent. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 114(4), 950–953. doi:10.​1097/​AOG.​0b013e3181bd12f4​.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat American College of Medical Genetics and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2001). Preconception and prenatal carrier screening for cystic fibrosis: clinical and laboratory guidelines. In Washington, DC: ACOG. Bethesda: ACMG. American College of Medical Genetics and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2001). Preconception and prenatal carrier screening for cystic fibrosis: clinical and laboratory guidelines. In Washington, DC: ACOG. Bethesda: ACMG.
Zurück zum Zitat American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Genetics. (2011). ACOG Committee opinion no. 486: update on carrier screening for cystic fibrosis. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 117(4), 1028–1031. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821922c2.CrossRef American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Genetics. (2011). ACOG Committee opinion no. 486: update on carrier screening for cystic fibrosis. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 117(4), 1028–1031. doi:10.​1097/​AOG.​0b013e31821922c2​.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bell, C. J., Dinwiddie, D. L., Miller, N. A., Hateley, S. L., Ganusova, E. E., Mudge, J., et al. (2011). Carrier testing for severe childhood recessive diseases by next-generation sequencing. Sci Transl Med, 3(65), 65ra64. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3001756.CrossRef Bell, C. J., Dinwiddie, D. L., Miller, N. A., Hateley, S. L., Ganusova, E. E., Mudge, J., et al. (2011). Carrier testing for severe childhood recessive diseases by next-generation sequencing. Sci Transl Med, 3(65), 65ra64. doi:10.​1126/​scitranslmed.​3001756.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bernard, H., & Ryan, G. (2010). Analyzing qualitative data: systematic approaches. Los Angeles: Sage Publications. Bernard, H., & Ryan, G. (2010). Analyzing qualitative data: systematic approaches. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen, L. S., & Goodson, P. (2007). Factors affecting decisions to accept or decline cystic fibrosis carrier testing/screening: a theory-guided systematic review. Genetics in Medicine, 9(7), 442–450.CrossRefPubMed Chen, L. S., & Goodson, P. (2007). Factors affecting decisions to accept or decline cystic fibrosis carrier testing/screening: a theory-guided systematic review. Genetics in Medicine, 9(7), 442–450.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (2011). The sage handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (2011). The sage handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Zurück zum Zitat Edwards, J. G., Feldman, G., Goldberg, J., Gregg, A. R., Norton, M. E., Rose, N. C., et al. (2015). Expanded carrier screening in reproductive medicine-points to consider: a joint statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, National Society of genetic counselors, perinatal quality foundation, and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 125(3), 653–662. doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000000666.CrossRefPubMed Edwards, J. G., Feldman, G., Goldberg, J., Gregg, A. R., Norton, M. E., Rose, N. C., et al. (2015). Expanded carrier screening in reproductive medicine-points to consider: a joint statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, National Society of genetic counselors, perinatal quality foundation, and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 125(3), 653–662. doi:10.​1097/​aog.​0000000000000666​.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Grody, W. W., Thompson, B. H., Gregg, A. R., Bean, L. H., Monaghan, K. G., Schneider, A., et al. (2013). ACMG position statement on prenatal/preconception expanded carrier screening. Genetics in Medicine, 15(6), 482–483. doi:10.1038/gim.2013.47.CrossRefPubMed Grody, W. W., Thompson, B. H., Gregg, A. R., Bean, L. H., Monaghan, K. G., Schneider, A., et al. (2013). ACMG position statement on prenatal/preconception expanded carrier screening. Genetics in Medicine, 15(6), 482–483. doi:10.​1038/​gim.​2013.​47.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Ioannou, L., McClaren, B. J., Massie, J., Lewis, S., Metcalfe, S. A., Forrest, L., et al. (2014). Population-based carrier screening for cystic fibrosis: a systematic review of 23 years of research. Genetics in Medicine, 16(3), 207–216. doi:10.1038/gim.2013.125.CrossRefPubMed Ioannou, L., McClaren, B. J., Massie, J., Lewis, S., Metcalfe, S. A., Forrest, L., et al. (2014). Population-based carrier screening for cystic fibrosis: a systematic review of 23 years of research. Genetics in Medicine, 16(3), 207–216. doi:10.​1038/​gim.​2013.​125.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Lazarin, G. A., Haque, I. S., Nazareth, S., Iori, K., Patterson, A. S., Jacobson, J. L., et al. (2013). An empirical estimate of carrier frequencies for 400+ causal Mendelian variants: results from an ethnically diverse clinical sample of 23, 453 individuals. Genetics in Medicine, 15(3), 178–186. doi:10.1038/gim.2012.114.CrossRefPubMed Lazarin, G. A., Haque, I. S., Nazareth, S., Iori, K., Patterson, A. S., Jacobson, J. L., et al. (2013). An empirical estimate of carrier frequencies for 400+ causal Mendelian variants: results from an ethnically diverse clinical sample of 23, 453 individuals. Genetics in Medicine, 15(3), 178–186. doi:10.​1038/​gim.​2012.​114.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Leo, M. C., McMullen, C., Wilfond, B. S., Lynch, F. L., Reiss, J. A., Gilmore, M. J., et al. (2016). Patients' ratings of genetic conditions validate a taxonomy to simplify decisions about preconception carrier screening via genome sequencing. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 170(3), 574–582. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.37477.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Leo, M. C., McMullen, C., Wilfond, B. S., Lynch, F. L., Reiss, J. A., Gilmore, M. J., et al. (2016). Patients' ratings of genetic conditions validate a taxonomy to simplify decisions about preconception carrier screening via genome sequencing. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 170(3), 574–582. doi:10.​1002/​ajmg.​a.​37477.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Robinson, J. O., Carroll, T. M., Feuerman, L. Z., Perry, D. L., Hoffman-Andrews, L., Walsh, R. C., et al. (2016). Participants and study Decliners' perspectives about the risks of participating in a clinical trial of whole genome sequencing. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 11(1), 21–30. doi:10.1177/1556264615624078.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Robinson, J. O., Carroll, T. M., Feuerman, L. Z., Perry, D. L., Hoffman-Andrews, L., Walsh, R. C., et al. (2016). Participants and study Decliners' perspectives about the risks of participating in a clinical trial of whole genome sequencing. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 11(1), 21–30. doi:10.​1177/​1556264615624078​.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Schneider, J. L., Goddard, K. A., Davis, J., Wilfond, B., Kauffman, T. L., Reiss, J. A., et al. (2016). "is it worth knowing?" focus group Participants' perceived utility of genomic preconception carrier screening. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 25(1), 135–145. doi:10.1007/s10897-015-9851-7.CrossRefPubMed Schneider, J. L., Goddard, K. A., Davis, J., Wilfond, B., Kauffman, T. L., Reiss, J. A., et al. (2016). "is it worth knowing?" focus group Participants' perceived utility of genomic preconception carrier screening. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 25(1), 135–145. doi:10.​1007/​s10897-015-9851-7.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Scollon, S., Bergstrom, K., Kerstein, R. A., Wang, T., Hilsenbeck, S. G., Ramamurthy, U., et al. (2014). Obtaining informed consent for clinical tumor and germline exome sequencing of newly diagnosed childhood cancer patients. Genome Medicine, 6(9), 69. doi:10.1186/s13073-014-0069-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Scollon, S., Bergstrom, K., Kerstein, R. A., Wang, T., Hilsenbeck, S. G., Ramamurthy, U., et al. (2014). Obtaining informed consent for clinical tumor and germline exome sequencing of newly diagnosed childhood cancer patients. Genome Medicine, 6(9), 69. doi:10.​1186/​s13073-014-0069-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Silverman, D. (2009). Doing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Silverman, D. (2009). Doing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilfond, B., & Goddard, K. A. B. (2015). It's complicated: criteria for policy decisions for the clinical integration of genome scale sequencing for reproductive decision-making. Molecular Genetics and Genomic Medicine, 3(4), 239–242.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wilfond, B., & Goddard, K. A. B. (2015). It's complicated: criteria for policy decisions for the clinical integration of genome scale sequencing for reproductive decision-making. Molecular Genetics and Genomic Medicine, 3(4), 239–242.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Reasons for Declining Preconception Expanded Carrier Screening Using Genome Sequencing
verfasst von
Marian J. Gilmore
Jennifer Schneider
James V. Davis
Tia L. Kauffman
Michael C. Leo
Kellene Bergen
Jacob A. Reiss
Patricia Himes
Elissa Morris
Carol Young
Carmit McMullen
Benjamin S. Wilfond
Katrina A.B. Goddard
Publikationsdatum
17.03.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Genetic Counseling / Ausgabe 5/2017
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-017-0074-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2017

Journal of Genetic Counseling 5/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.