Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring Lay Conceptions of Well-Being: The Beliefs About Well-Being Scale

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Happiness Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A number of explicit conceptions of well-being have been provided by philosophers and psychologists, but little is known about laypersons’ conceptions of well-being. Two studies investigating the content and measurement of lay conceptions of well-being are presented. Using exploratory and confirmatory factor analytic procedures, the 16-item Beliefs about Well-Being Scale (BWBS) was developed to measure lay conceptions of well-being along four theoretically-meaningful dimensions: (1) the Experience of Pleasure, (2) Avoidance of Negative Experience, (3) Self-Development, and (4) Contribution to Others. Initial evidence concerning the reliability and validity of the BWBS indicated that this new scale has acceptable psychometric properties. In both studies, associations between each subscale, representing the above four dimensions, and multiple self-report measures of experienced well-being were also examined. Each subscale was significantly associated with well-being, with Self-Development and Contribution to Others indicating stronger associations with measures of well-being than either Experience of Pleasure or Avoidance of Negative Experience. Implications for future research using this economical new scale are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We define happiness narrowly to reflect a subjectively-determined positive mental state. This state could be cognitive (e.g., life satisfaction), affective (e.g., positive mood), or a mix of the two (Brulde 2007). The concept of well-being is considered here to be more general than happiness (see also Ryff 1989), reflecting both subjectively-determined positive mental states and experiences that are objectively good for the person (e.g., Kagan 1992). Happiness is thus considered here to be an important component of well-being, but is not synonymous with well-being.

  2. Given the exploratory nature of the current study, PCA with varimax rotation was used. However, this type of analysis assumes that factors are uncorrelated, and there exists theoretical rationale suggesting the emerged factors of the BWBS may be related. Accordingly, we reexamined the data using principle-axis factor analysis with oblique, direct oblimin rotation (deltas = 0). These analyses produced results that were virtually identical to those found above.

  3. The lack of evidence supporting the convergent validity of the Avoidance of Negative Experience subscale puts the overall validity of this subscale into question. As indicated by the descriptive statistics of the BWBS (see Table 4), a different pattern of responses are observed for this subscale when compared to the other BWBS subscales, raising further questions concerning the appropriateness of including it in the BWBS. However, the current studies represent only the early phases of psychometric evaluation of the BWBS, and there exist theoretical reasons for retaining the Avoidance of Negative Experience dimension. Accordingly, this subscale is at this point included in the BWBS, but additional research will be conducted to address the above concerns.

References

  • Allport, G. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (2000). Nicomachean ethics (R. Crisp, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Baggini, J. (2004). What’s it all about? Philosophy and the meaning of life. New York: Granta Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, L. (1992). Good lives: Prolegomena. Social Philosophy and Policy, 9, 15–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, A. (1991). The republic of Plato. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brulde, B. (2007). Happiness and the good life: Introduction and conceptual framework. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carstensen, L. L. (2006). The influence of a sense of time on human development. Science, 312, 1913–1915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54, 165–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., Miller, C. J., & Fulford, D. (2009). Optimism. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (2nd ed., pp. 679–687). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coan, R. W. (1977). Hero, artist, sage, or saint? New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A., Gomez, R., & Aucote, H. (2007). The behavioral inhibition system and behavioral approach system (BIS/BAS) scales: Measurement and structural invariance across adults and adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 295–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, J. R., & Henry, J. D. (2004). The positive and negative affective schedule (PANAS): Construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 245–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalbert, C. (2001). The justice motive as a personal resource: Dealing with challenges and critical life events. New York: Kluwer/Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: An introduction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larson, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (1999). Personality and subjective well-being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 213–229). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Smith, H., & Fujita, F. (1995). The personality structure of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 130–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. H. (1959). Identity and the life cycle: Selected papers. Oxford: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fava, J. L., & Velicer, W. F. (1992). The effects of overextraction on factor and component analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 27, 387–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finch, J. F., & West, S. G. (1997). The investigation of personality structure: Statistical models. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 439–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K. F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7, 286–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A. (2003). Belief in a just world: Research progress over the past decade. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 795–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grouzet, F. M. E., Kasser, T., Ahuvia, A., Fernandez Dols, J. M., Kim, Y., Lau, S., et al. (2005). The structure of goal contents across 15 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 800–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guadagnoli, E., & Velicer, W. F. (1988). Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 265–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, O. P., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2000). Measurement: Reliability, construct validation, and scale construction. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 339–369). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modelling with the SIMPLIS command language. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, S. (1992). The limits of well-being. In E. F. Paul, F. D. Miller Jr., & J. Paul (Eds.), The good life and the human good (pp. 169–189). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwarz, N. (1999). Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1996). Further examining the American dream: Differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 280–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, L. A., & Napa, C. K. (1998). What makes life good? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 156–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koltko-Rivera, M. E. (2004). The psychology of worldviews. Review of General Psychology, 8, 3–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubovy, M. (1999). On the pleasures of the mind. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 134–154). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R. J., Diener, E., & Emmons, R. A. (1985). An evaluation of subjective well-being measures. Social Indicators Research, 17, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., & Larson, R. J. (2003). Measuring positive emotions. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Positive psychological assessment: A handbook of models and measures (pp. 201–218). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M. W. (2008). Paradoxes of happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 171–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. (1971). The farther reaches of human nature. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, D. G., & Diener, E. (1995). Who is happy? Psychological Science, 6, 10–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, A. K., Ho, D. Y. F., Wong, S. S., & Smith, I. (2003). In search of the good life: A cultural odyssey in the East and West. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 129, 317–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pargament, K. I. (1997). The psychology of religion and coping: Theory, research, practice. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Orientations to happiness and life satisfaction: The full life versus the empty life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C., Ruch, W., Beerman, U., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2007). Strengths of character, orientations to happiness, and life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2, 149–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poulin, M., & Silver, R. C. (2008). World benevolence beliefs and well-being across the life span. Psychology and Aging, 23, 13–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reise, S. P., Waller, N. G., & Comrey, A. L. (2000). Factor analysis and scale revision. Psychological Assessment, 12, 287–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1946). A history of western philosophy. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1958). The conquest of happiness. New York: Liveright.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Frederick, C. M. (1997). On energy, personality, and health: Subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being. Journal of Personality, 65, 529–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. (1998). The contours of positive human health. Psychological Inquiry, 9, 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 13–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., & Kasser, T. (2004). The independent effects of goal contents and motives on well-being: It’s both what you pursue and why you pursue it. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 475–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shweder, R. A. (1998). Welcome to middle age! (and other cultural fictions). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. R. (1994). The psychology of hope: You can get there from here. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, A., Locke, E. A., & Bartol, K. M. (2001). Money and subjective well-being: It’s not the money, it’s the motives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 959–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S., & Kaler, M. (2006). The meaning in life questionnaire: Assessing the presence and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 80–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (2003). Hedonism and happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4, 437–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 678–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, A. S., Schwartz, S. S., & Conti, R. (2008). The implications of two conceptions of happiness (hedonic enjoyment and eudaimonia) for the understanding of intrinsic motivation. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 41–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. M., Tataryn, D. J., & Gorsuch, R. L. (1996). Effects of under- and overextraction on principle axis factor analysis with varimax rotation. Psychological Methods, 1, 354–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ethan A. McMahan.

Appendix: Beliefs About Well-Being Scale

Appendix: Beliefs About Well-Being Scale

1.1 BWBS

Instructions: Different people have different beliefs about what factors are involved in the experience of high well-being and ‘the good life’. Please indicate the degree to which you believe that each of the items is a necessary and required aspect of the experience of high well-being and living the good life by circling the appropriate number.

The experience of well-being and the good life necessarily involves:

1. A great amount of pleasure

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Strongly Disagree

Neutral

Strongly Agree

2. Experiencing a great deal of sensual pleasure

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Strongly Disagree

Neutral

Strongly Agree

3. Living in ways that benefit others

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Strongly Disagree

Neutral

Strongly Agree

4. Not experiencing hassles

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Strongly Disagree

Neutral

Strongly Agree

5. Making the world a better place

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Strongly Disagree

Neutral

Strongly Agree

6. Working to achieve one’s true potential

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Strongly Disagree

Neutral

Strongly Agree

7. Not experiencing negative emotions

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Strongly Disagree

Neutral

Strongly Agree

8. The identification and cultivation of one’s strengths

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Strongly Disagree

Neutral

Strongly Agree

9. Experiencing euphoria and pleasure

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Strongly Disagree

Neutral

Strongly Agree

10. Being a positive influence within the community

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Strongly Disagree

Neutral

Strongly Agree

11. The exertion of effort to meet life’s challenges

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Strongly Disagree

Neutral

Strongly Agree

12. Pleasurable experiences

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Strongly Disagree

Neutral

Strongly Agree

13. Contribution to society

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Strongly Disagree

Neutral

Strongly Agree

14. A lack of unpleasant experiences

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Strongly Disagree

Neutral

Strongly Agree

15. A high degree of self-knowledge

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Strongly Disagree

Neutral

Strongly Agree

16. A lack of painful experiences

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Strongly Disagree

Neutral

Strongly Agree

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McMahan, E.A., Estes, D. Measuring Lay Conceptions of Well-Being: The Beliefs About Well-Being Scale. J Happiness Stud 12, 267–287 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-010-9194-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-010-9194-x

Keywords

Navigation