nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.02.2012 | Original Paper

Systematic Review of Factors Influencing the Adoption of Information and Communication Technologies by Healthcare Professionals

verfasst von: Marie-Pierre Gagnon, Marie Desmartis, Michel Labrecque, Josip Car, Claudia Pagliari, Pierre Pluye, Pierre Frémont, Johanne Gagnon, Nadine Tremblay, France Légaré

Erschienen in: Journal of Medical Systems | Ausgabe 1/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

This systematic review of mixed methods studies focuses on factors that can facilitate or limit the implementation of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in clinical settings. Systematic searches of relevant bibliographic databases identified studies about interventions promoting ICT adoption by healthcare professionals. Content analysis was performed by two reviewers using a specific grid. One hundred and one (101) studies were included in the review. Perception of the benefits of the innovation (system usefulness) was the most common facilitating factor, followed by ease of use. Issues regarding design, technical concerns, familiarity with ICT, and time were the most frequent limiting factors identified. Our results suggest strategies that could effectively promote the successful adoption of ICT in healthcare professional practices.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Health Canada, Towards a healthy future: Second report on the health of Canadians. Federal. Provincial and Territorial Advisory Committee on Population Health, Ottawa, 1999.

Car, J., and Sheikh, A., Email consultations in health care: 2–acceptability and safe application. BMJ 329:439–442, 2004.CrossRef

Berner, E. S., Detmer, D. E., and Simborg, D., Will the wave finally break? A brief view of the adoption of electronic medical records in the United States. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 12:3–7, 2005.CrossRef

Brooks, R. G., and Menachemi, N., Physicians’ use of email with patients: factors influencing electronic communication and adherence to best practices. J. Med. Internet Res. 8:e2, 2006.CrossRef

Yarbrough, A. K., and Smith, T. B., Technology acceptance among physicians: a new take on TAM. Med. Care Res. Rev. 64:650–672, 2007.CrossRef

Aarts, J., Doorewaard, H., and Berg, M., Understanding implementation: the case of a computerized physician order entry system in a large Dutch university medical center. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 11:207–216, 2004.CrossRef

Lorenzi, N. M., Riley, R. T., Blyth, A. J., Southon, G., and Dixon, B. J., Antecedents of the people and organizational aspects of medical informatics: review of the literature. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 4:79–93, 1997.CrossRef

Pagliari, C., Implementing the National Programme for IT: what can we learn from the Scottish experience? Inform. Prim. Care. 13:105–111, 2005.

Anderson, J. G., Social, ethical and legal barriers to E-health. Int. J. Med. Inform. 76:480–483, 2007.CrossRef

10.

Johnson, K. B., Barriers that impede the adoption of pediatric information technology. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 155:1374–1379, 2001.

11.

Kukafka, R., Johnson, S. B., Linfante, A., and Allegrante, J. P., Grounding a new information technology implementation framework in behavioral science: a systematic analysis of the literature on IT use. J. Biomed. Inform. 36:218–227, 2003.CrossRef

12.

Yusof, M. M., Stergioulas, L., and Zugic, J., Health information systems adoption: findings from a systematic review. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 129:262–266, 2007.

13.

Gagnon, M. P., Legare, F., Labrecque, M., Fremont, P., Pluye, P., Gagnon, J., Car, J., Pagliari, C., Desmartis, M., Turcot, L., and Gravel, K., Interventions for promoting information and communication technologies adoption in healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. CD006093, 2009.

14.

Pluye, P., Gagnon, M. P., Griffiths, F., and Johnson-Lafleur, J., A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in Mixed Studies Reviews. Int. J. Nursing Stud. 46:529–546, 2009.CrossRef

15.

Cabana, M. D., Rand, C. S., Powe, N. R., Wu, A. W., Wilson, M. H., Abboud, P. A., and Rubin, H. R., Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 282:1458–1465, 1999.CrossRef

16.

Davis, F. D., Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13:319–340, 1989.CrossRef

17.

Rogers, E. M., The diffusion of innovations, 4th edition. The Free Press, New York, 1995.

18.

Saillour-Glenisson, F., and Michel, P., Facteurs individuels et collectifs associés à l’application des recommandations de pratique clinique par le corps médical. Revue de la littérature. Rev. Epidemiol. Sante Publ. 51:65–80, 2003.

19.

Gravel, K., Légaré, F., and Graham, I. D., Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: A systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions. Implement. Sci. 1:16, 2006.CrossRef

20.

Légaré, F., O’Connor, A. M., Graham, I. D., Saucier, D., Côté, L., Blais, J., Cauchon, M., and Paré, L., Primary health care professionals’ views on barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the Ottawa Decision Support Framework in practice. Patient Educ. Counsel. 63:380–390, 2006.CrossRef

21.

Légaré, F., Ratté, S., Gravel, K., and Graham, I. D., Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions. Patient Educ. Counsel. 73:526–535, 2008.CrossRef

22.

Mays, N., Pope, C., and Popay, J., Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy 10(suppl. 1):S1:6–S1:20, 2005.

23.

Popay, J., Arai, L., Petticrew, M., Roen, K., and Duffy, S., Narrative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews. In Methods Briefing 22. http://www.ccsr.ac.uk/methods/publications/documents/Popay.pdf. 2007.

24.

Abate, M. A., Shumway, J. M., and Jacknowitz, A. I., Use of two online services as drug information sources for health professionals. Methods Inf. Med. 31:153–158, 1992.

25.

Abdolrasulnia, M., Collins, B. C., Casebeer, L., Wall, T., Spettell, C., Ray, M. N., Weissman, N. W., and Allison, J. J., Using email reminders to engage physicians in an Internet-based CME intervention. BMC Med. Educ. 4:17, 2004.CrossRef

26.

Abubakar, I., Williams, C. J., and McEvoy, M., Development and evaluation of a hand held computer based on-call pack for health protection out of hours duty: a pilot study. BMC Public Health 5:35, 2005.CrossRef

27.

Adaskin, E. J., Hughes, L., McMullan, P., McLean, M., and McMorris, D., The impact of computerization on nursing - an interview study of users and facilitators. Comput. Nurs. 12:141–148, 1994.

28.

Adler, M. D., Duggan, A., Ogborn, C. J., and Johnson, K. B., Assessment of a computer-aided instructional program for the pediatric emergency department. AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc. 6–10, 2003.

29.

af Klercker, T., and Zetraeus, S., Dilemmas in introducing World Wide Web-based information technology in primary care: a focus group study. Fam. Pract. 15:205–210, 1998.CrossRef

30.

Al Farsi, M., and West, D. J., Jr., Use of electronic medical records in Oman and physician satisfaction. J. Med. Syst. 30:17–22, 2006.CrossRef

31.

Allen, M. J., Kaufman, D. M., Barrett, A., Paterson, G., Sargeant, J., and McLeod, R., Self-reported effects of computer workshops on physicians’ computer use. J. Contin. Educ. Health Prof. 20:20–26, 2000.CrossRef

32.

Al-Qirim, N. A. Y., Teledermatology: the case of adoption and diffusion of telemedicine health Waikato in New Zealand. Telemed. J. e-Health. 9:167–177, 2003.CrossRef

33.

Andre, B., Ringdal, G. I., Loge, J. H., Rannestad, T., and Kaasa, S., The importance of key personnel and active management for successful implementation of computer-based technology in palliative care: results from a qualitative study. Comput. Inform. Nurs. 26:183–189, 2008.CrossRef

34.

Angier, J. J., Beck, S. L., and Eyre, H. J., Use of the PDQ system in a clinical setting. Bull. Med. Libr. Assoc. 78:15–22, 1990.

35.

Bailey, D. W. Nurse work and the computerized patient record. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2000.

36.

Barrett, M., Larson, A., Carville, K., and Ellis, I., Challenges faced in implementation of a telehealth enabled chronic wound care system. Rural Remote Health 9:1154, 2009.

37.

Barsukiewicz, C. K., Computerized medical records: physician response to new technology. The Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, 1998.

38.

Bartlett, E. S., Maley, J. E., and Fajardo, L. L., Radiology residency eCurriculum developed in-house: evaluation of benefits and weaknesses. Acad. Radiol. 10:657–663, 2003.CrossRef

39.

Bossen, C., Evaluation of a computerized problem-oriented medical record in a hospital department: does it support daily clinical practice? Int. J. Med. Inform. 76:592–600, 2007.CrossRef

40.

Bossen, C., Test the artefact-Develop the organization. The implementation of an electronic medication plan. Int. J. Med. Inform. 76:13–21, 2007.CrossRef

41.

Cabell, C. H., Schardt, C., Sanders, L., Corey, G. R., and Keitz, S. A., Resident utilization of information technology: a randomized trial of clinical question formation. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 16:838–844, 2001.CrossRef

42.

Cheng, G. Y., Educational workshop improved information-seeking skills, knowledge, attitudes and the search outcome of hospital clinicians: a randomised controlled trial. Health Info. Libr. J. 20(Suppl 1):22–33, 2003.CrossRef

43.

Chisolm, D. J., McAlearney, A. S., Veneris, S., Fisher, D., Holtzlander, M., and McCoy, K. S., The role of computerized order sets in pediatric inpatient asthma treatment. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 17:199–206, 2006.CrossRef

44.

Connelly, D. P., Werth, G. R., Dean, D. W., Hultman, B. K., and Thompson, T. R., Physician use of an NICU laboratory reporting system. Proc. Annu. Symp. Comput. Appl. Med. Care. 8–12, 1992.

45.

Crosson, J. C., Isaacson, N., Lancaster, D., McDonald, E. A., Schueth, A. J., DiCicco-Bloom, B., Newman, J. L., Wang, C. J., and Bell, D. S., Variation in electronic prescribing implementation among twelve ambulatory practices. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 23:364–371, 2008.CrossRef

46.

Crowe, B., and Sim, L., Implementation of a radiology information system/picture archiving and communication system and an image transfer system at a large public teaching hospital - Assessment of success of adoption by clinicians. J. Telemed. Telecare 10:25–27, 2004.CrossRef

47.

Cumbers, B. J., and Donald, A., Using biomedical databases in everyday clinical practice: the Front-Line Evidence-Based Medicine project in North Thames. Health Libr. Rev. 15:255–265, 1998.CrossRef

48.

D’Alessandro, D. M., D’Alessandro, M. P., Galvin, J. R., Kash, J. B., Wakefield, D. S., and Erkonen, W. E., Barriers to rural physician use of a digital health sciences library. Bull. Med. Libr. Assoc. 86:583–593, 1998.

49.

D’Alessandro, D. M., Kreiter, C. D., and Peterson, M. W., An evaluation of information-seeking behaviors of general pediatricians. Pediatrics 113:64–69, 2004.CrossRef

50.

Di Pietro, T., Coburn, G., Dharamshi, N., Doran, D., Mylopoulos, J., Kushniruk, A., Nagle, L., Sidani, S., Tourangeau, A., Laurie-Shaw, B., Lefebre, N., Reid-Haughian, C., Carryer, J., and McArthur, G., What nurses want: diffusion of an innovation. J. Nurs. Care Qual. 23:140–146, 2008.CrossRef

51.

Doolin, B., Power and resistance in the implementation of a medical management information system. Inf. Syst. J. 14:343–362, 2004.CrossRef

52.

Dornan, T., Carroll, C., and Parboosingh, J., An electronic learning portfolio for reflective continuing professional development. Med. Educ. 36:767–769, 2002.CrossRef

53.

Eley, D., Hegney, D., Wollaston, A., Fahey, P., Miller, P., McKay, M., and Wollaston, J., Triage nurse perceptions of the use, reliability and acceptability of the Toowoomba Adult Triage Trauma Tool (TATTT). Accident Emerg. Nurs. 13:54–60, 2005.CrossRef

54.

Firby, P. A., Luker, K. A., and Caress, A. L., Nurses’ opinions of the introduction of computer-assisted learning for use in patient education. J. Adv. Nurs. 16:987–995, 1991.CrossRef

55.

Galligioni, E., Berloffa, F., Caffo, O., Tonazzolli, G., Ambrosini, G., Valduga, F., Eccher, C., Ferro, A., and Forti, S., Development and daily use of an electronic oncological patient record for the total management of cancer patients: 7 years’ experience. Ann. Oncol. 20:349–352, 2009.CrossRef

56.

Granlien, M. F., Hertzum, M., and Gudmundsen, J., The gap between actual and mandated use of an electronic medication record three years after deployment. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 136:419–424, 2008.

57.

Guan, J., Tregonning, S., and Keenan, L., Social interaction and participation: formative evaluation of online CME modules. J. Contin. Educ. Health Prof. 28:172–179, 2008.CrossRef

58.

Hains, I. M., Fuller, J. M., Ward, R. L., and Pearson, S. A., Standardizing care in medical oncology: are Web-based systems the answer? Cancer 115:5579–5588, 2009.CrossRef

59.

Halamka, J., Aranow, M., Ascenzo, C., Bates, D. W., Berry, K., Debor, G., Fefferman, J., Glaser, J., Heinold, J., Stanley, J., Stone, D. L., Sullivan, T. E., Tripathi, M., and Wilkinson, B., E-Prescribing collaboration in Massachusetts: early experiences from regional prescribing projects. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 13:239–244, 2006.CrossRef

60.

Haynes, R. B., McKibbon, K. A., Walker, C. J., Ryan, N., Fitzgerald, D., and Ramsden, M. F., Online access to MEDLINE in clinical settings. A study of use and usefulness. Ann Intern Med. 112:78–84, 1990.

61.

Hibbert, D., Mair, F. S., May, C. R., Boland, A., O’Connor, J., Capewell, S., and Angus, R. M., Health professionals’ responses to the introduction of a home telehealth service. J. Telemed. Telecare 10:226–230, 2004.CrossRef

62.

Hier, D. B., Rothschild, A., LeMaistre, A., and Keeler, J., Differing faculty and housestaff acceptance of an electronic health record one year after implementation. Medinfo 11:1300–1303, 2004.

63.

Hou, I. C., Chang, P., and Wang, T. Y., Qualitative analysis of end user computing strategy and experiences in promoting nursing informatics in Taiwan. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 122:613–615, 2006.

64.

Jaques, E. D., The impact of selected factors in nurses’ attitudes toward bedside computers. Florida International University, 2002.

65.

Joos, D., Chen, Q., Jirjis, J., and Johnson, K. B., An electronic medical record in primary care: impact on satisfaction, work efficiency and clinic processes. AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc. 394–398, 2006.

66.

Jotkowitz, A., Oh, J., Tu, C., Elkin, D., Pollack, L. A., and Kerpen, H., The use of personal digital assistants among medical residents. Med. Teach. 28:382–384, 2006.CrossRef

67.

Jousimaa, J., Kunnamo, I., and Makela, M., An implementation study of the PDRD primary care computerized guidelines. Scand. J. Prim. Health Care 16:149–153, 1998.CrossRef

68.

Joy, S., and Benrubi, G., The personal digital assistant in an obstetrics and gynecology residency program. Prim. Care Update Ob/Gyns 9:238–242, 2002.CrossRef

69.

Kamadjeu, R. M., Tapang, E. M., and Moluh, R. N., Designing and implementing an electronic health record system in primary care practice in sub-Saharan Africa: a case study from Cameroon. Inform. Prim. Care. 13:179–186, 2005.

70.

Katz, S. J., Moyer, C. A., Cox, D. T., and Stern, D. T., Effect of a triage-based E-mail system on clinic resource use and patient and physician satisfaction in primary care - A randomized controlled trial. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 18:736–744, 2003.CrossRef

71.

Keshavjee, K., Troyan, S., Holbrook, A. M., and VanderMolen, D., Measuring the success of electronic medical record implementation using electronic and survey data. Proc. AMIA Symp. 309–313, 2001.

72.

Koivunen, M., Hatonen, H., and Valimaki, M., Barriers and facilitators influencing the implementation of an interactive Internet-portal application for patient education in psychiatric hospitals. Patient Educ. Counsel. 70:412–419, 2008.CrossRef

73.

Kouri, P., Turunen, H., and Palomaki, T., ‘Maternity clinic on the net service’ and its introduction into practice: experiences of maternity-care professionals. Midwifery 21:177–189, 2005.CrossRef

74.

Lai, F., Macmillan, J., Daudelin, D. H., and Kent, D. M., The potential of training to increase acceptance and use of computerized decision support systems for medical diagnosis. Hum. Fact. 48:95–108, 2006.CrossRef

75.

Lapinsky, S. E., Wax, R., Showalter, R., Martinez-Motta, J. C., Hallett, D., Mehta, S., Burry, L., and Stewart, T. E., Prospective evaluation of an internet-linked handheld computer critical care knowledge access system. Crit. Care 8:R414–R421, 2004.CrossRef

76.

Lapointe, L., and Rivard, S., Getting physicians to accept new information technology: insights from case studies. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 174:1573–1578, 2006.CrossRef

77.

Larcher, B., Arisi, E., Berloffa, F., Demichelis, F., Eccher, C., Galligioni, E., Galvagni, M., Martini, G., Sboner, A., Tomio, L., Zumiani, G., Graiff, A., and Forti, S., Analysis of user-satisfaction with the use of a teleconsultation system in oncology. Med. Inform. Internet Med. 28:73–84, 2003.CrossRef

78.

Lee, T. T., Mills, M. E., and Lu, M. H., The multimethod evaluation of a nursing information system in taiwan. Comput. Inform. Nurs. 27:245–253, 2009.CrossRef

79.

Lee, T. T., Nursing administrators’ experiences in managing PDA use for inpatient units. Comput. Inform. Nurs. 24:280–287, 2006.CrossRef

80.

Lee, T. T., Adopting a personal digital assistant system: application of Lewin’s change theory. J. Adv. Nurs. 55:487–496, 2006.CrossRef

81.

Leon, S. A., Fontelo, P., Green, L., Ackerman, M., and Liu, F., Evidence-based medicine among internal medicine residents in a community hospital program using smart phones. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 7:5, 2007.CrossRef

82.

Likourezos, A., Chalfin, D. B., Murphy, D. G., Sommer, B., Darcy, K., and Davidson, S. J., Physician and nurse satisfaction with an Electronic Medical Record system. J. Emerg. Med. 27:419–424, 2004.CrossRef

83.

Marcy, T. W., Kaplan, B., Connolly, S. W., Michel, G., Shiffman, R. N., and Flynn, B. S., Developing a decision support system for tobacco use counselling using primary care physicians. Inform. Prim. Care. 16:101–109, 2008.

84.

Magrabi, F., Westbrook, J. I., and Coiera, E. W., What factors are associated with the integration of evidence retrieval technology into routine general practice settings? Int. J. Med. Inform. 76:701–709, 2007.CrossRef

85.

Martinez, M. A., Kind, T., Pezo, E., and Pomerantz, K. L., An Evaluation of community health center adoption of online health information. Health Promot. Pract. 2007.

86.

May, C., Gask, L., Atkinson, T., Ellis, N., Mair, F., and Esmail, A., Resisting and promoting new technologies in clinical practice: the case of telepsychiatry. Soc Sci Med. 52:1889–1901, 2001.CrossRef

87.

McAlearney, A. S., Schweikhart, S. B., and Medow, M. A., Organizational and physician perspectives about facilitating handheld computer use in clinical practice: results of a cross-site qualitative study. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 12:568–575, 2005.CrossRef

88.

Newton, C. R. G. N. D. P. F., A study of nurses’ attitudes and quality of documents in computer care planning. Nurs. Standard 9:35–39, 1995.

89.

O’Connell, R. T., Cho, C., Shah, N., Brown, K., and Shiffman, R. N., Take note(s): differential EHR satisfaction with two implementations under one roof. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 11:43–49, 2004.CrossRef

90.

Ovretveit, J., Scott, T., Rundall, T. G., Shortell, S. M., and Brommels, M., Improving quality through effective implementation of information technology in healthcare. Int. J. Qual. Health Care 19:259–266, 2007.CrossRef

91.

Pagliari, C., Clark, D., Hunter, K., Boyle, D., Cunningham, S., Morris, A., and Sullivan, F., DARTS 2000 online diabetes management system: formative evaluation in clinical practice. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 9:391–400, 2003.CrossRef

92.

Pare, G., Sicotte, C., and Jacques, H., The effects of creating psychological ownership on physicians’ acceptance of clinical information systems. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 13:197–205, 2006.CrossRef

93.

Popernack, M. L., A critical change in a day in the life of intensive care nurses: rising to the e-challenge of an integrated clinical information system. Crit. Care Nurs. Q. 29:362–375, 2006.

94.

Pourasghar, F., Malekafzali, H., Koch, S., and Fors, U., Factors influencing the quality of medical documentation when a paper-based medical records system is replaced with an electronic medical records system: an Iranian case study. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 24:445–451, 2008.CrossRef

95.

Puffer, M. J., Ferguson, J. A., Wright, B. C., Osborn, J., Anshus, A. L., Cahill, B. P., Kamath, J., and Ryan, M. J., Partnering with clinical providers to enhance the efficiency of an EMR. J. Healthc. Inf. Manag. 21:24–32, 2007.

96.

Pugh, G. E., and Tan, J. K., Computerized databases for emergency care: what impact on patient care? Methods Inf. Med. 33:507–513, 1994.

97.

Rahimi, B., Timpka, T., Vimarlund, V., Uppugunduri, S., and Svensson, M., Organization-wide adoption of computerized provider order entry systems: a study based on diffusion of innovations theory. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 9:52, 2009.CrossRef

98.

Ranson, S. L., Boothby, J., Mazmanian, P. E., and Alvanzo, A., Use of personal digital assistants (PDAs) in reflection on learning and practice. J. Contin. Educ. Health Prof. 27:227–233, 2007.CrossRef

99.

Rousseau, N., McColl, E., Newton, J., Grimshaw, J., and Eccles, M., Practice based, longitudinal, qualitative interview study of computerised evidence based guidelines in primary care. Br. Med. J. 326:314, 2003.CrossRef

100.

Sicotte, C., Denis, J. L., Lehoux, P., and Champagne, F., The computer-based patient record challenges towards timeless and spaceless medical practice. J. Med. Syst. 22:237–256, 1998.CrossRef

101.

Smordal, O., and Gregory, J., Personal Digital Assistants in medical education and practice. J. Comput. Assist. Learning 19:320–329, 2003.CrossRef

102.

Soar, J., Ayres, D., and Van der Weegen, L., Achieving change and altering behaviour through direct doctor use of a hospital information system for order communications. Aust. Health Rev. 16:371–382, 1993.

103.

Terry, A. L., Giles, G., Brown, J. B., Thind, A., and Stewart, M., Adoption of electronic medical records in family practice: the providers’ perspective. Fam. Med. 41:508–512, 2009.

104.

Thoman, J., Struk, C., Spero, M. O., and Stricklin, M. L., Reflections from a point-of-care pilot nurse group experience. Home Healthc. Nurs. 19:779–784, 2001.CrossRef

105.

Topps, D., Thomas, R., and Crutcher, R., Introducing personal digital assistants to family physician teachers. Fam. Med. 35:55–59, 2003.

106.

Toth-Pal, E., Wardh, I., Strender, L. E., and Nilsson, G., Implementing a clinical decision-support system in practice: a qualitative analysis of influencing attitudes and characteristics among general practitioners. Inform. Health Soc. Care. 33:39–54, 2008.CrossRef

107.

Travers, D., and Parham, T., Improving information access with an emergency department system. Proc. AMIA Annu. Fall Symp. 121–125, 1997.

108.

Trivedi, M. H., Daly, E. J., Kern, J. K., Grannemann, B. D., Sunderajan, P., and Claassen, C. A., Barriers to implementation of a computerized decision support system for depression: an observational report on lessons learned in “real world” clinical settings. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 9:6, 2009.CrossRef

109.

Tuominen, K., and Crouse, B. J., Use of the World Wide Web by family practitioners. Minn. Med. 79:43–46, 1996.

110.

Vanmeerbeek, M., Exploitation of electronic medical records data in primary health care. Resistances and solutions. Study in eight Walloon health care centres. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 110:42–48, 2004.

111.

Verhoeven, F., Steehouder, M. F., Hendrix, R. M., and van Gemert-Pijnen, J. E., Factors affecting health care workers’ adoption of a website with infection control guidelines. Int. J. Med. Inform. 78:663–678, 2009.CrossRef

112.

Verwey, R., Claassen, R. A., Rutgers, M. J., and de Witte, L. P., The implementation of an Electronic Nursing Record in a general hospital in the Netherlands: lessons to learn. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 141:130–138, 2008.

113.

Vishwanath, A., Brodsky, L., Shaha, S., Leonard, M., and Cimino, M., Patterns and changes in prescriber attitudes toward PDA prescription-assistive technology. Int. J. Med. Inform. 78:330–339, 2009.CrossRef

114.

Walji, M. F., Taylor, D., Langabeer, J. R., 2nd, and Valenza, J. A., Factors influencing implementation and outcomes of a dental electronic patient record system. J. Dent. Educ. 73:589–600, 2009.

115.

Walter, G., Cleary, M., and Rey, J. M., Patterns of use, attitudes and expectations of mental health staff regarding computers. J. Qual. Clin. Pract. 20:20–23, 2000.CrossRef

116.

Watkins, J., A hospital-wide picture archiving and communication system (PACS): the views of users and providers of the radiology service at Hammersmith Hospital. Eur. J. Radiol. 32:106–112, 1999.CrossRef

117.

West, C., Farmer, J., and Whyte, B., Implementing computerised workload data collection in rural primary health care. Aust. J. Rural Health 12:11–16, 2004.CrossRef

118.

Whittaker, A. A., Aufdenkamp, M., and Tinley, S., Barriers and facilitators to electronic documentation in a rural hospital. J. Nurs. Scholarsh. 41:293–300, 2009.CrossRef

119.

Whitten, P., and Kuwahara, E., A multi-phase telepsychiatry programme in Michigan: organizational factors affecting utilization and user perceptions. J. Telemed. Telecare 10:254–261, 2004.CrossRef

120.

Wibe, T., Edwin, E., Husby, E. H., and Vedal, T., Implementation of nursing care plan in the Electronic Patient Record (EPR) findings and experiences. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 122:309–313, 2006.

121.

Wilson, R., and Fulmer, T., Home health nurses’ initial experiences with wireless. Pen-based computing. Public Health Nurs. 15:225–232, 1998.CrossRef

122.

Yeh, S. H., Jeng, B., Lin, L. W., Ho, T. H., Hsiao, C. Y., Lee, L. N., and Chen, S. L., Implementation and evaluation of a nursing process support system for long-term care: a Taiwanese study. J. Clin. Nurs. 18:3089–3097, 2009.CrossRef

123.

Zheng, K., Padman, R., Johnson, M. P., and Diamond, H. S., Understanding technology adoption in clinical care: clinician adoption behavior of a point-of-care reminder system. Int. J. Med. Inform. 74:535–543, 2005.CrossRef

124.

Ammenwerth, E., Iller, C., and Mahler, C., IT-adoption and the interaction of task, technology and individuals: a fit framework and a case study. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 6:3, 2006.CrossRef

125.

Yusof, M. M., Kuljis, J., Papazafeiropoulou, A., and Stergioulas, L. K., An evaluation framework for Health Information Systems: human, organization and technology-fit factors (HOT-fit). Int. J. Med. Inform. 77:386–398, 2008.CrossRef

126.

Callen, J. L., Braithwaite, J., and Westbrook, J. I., Contextual implementation model: a framework for assisting clinical information system implementations. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 15:255–262, 2008.CrossRef

127.

May, C., Finch, T., Mair, F., Ballini, L., Dowrick, C., Eccles, M., Gask, L., MacFarlane, A., Murray, E., Rapley, T., Rogers, A., Treweek, S., Wallace, P., Anderson, G., Burns, J., and Heaven, B., Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: the normalization process model. BMC Health Serv. Res. 7:148, 2007.CrossRef

128.

Lavis, J., Davies, H., Oxman, A., Denis, J. L., Golden-Biddle, K., and Ferlie, E., Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy 10(Suppl 1):35–48, 2005.CrossRef

129.

Menachemi, N., Burke, D. E., and Ayers, D. J., Factors affecting the adoption of telemedicine-a multiple adopter perspective. J. Med. Syst. 28:617–632, 2004.CrossRef

130.

Menachemi, N., Matthews, M., Ford, E. W., Hikmet, N., and Brooks, R. G., The relationship between local hospital IT capabilities and physician EMR adoption. J. Med. Syst. 33:329–335, 2009.CrossRef

131.

Chhanabhai, P., and Holt, A., Consumers are ready to accept the transition to online and electronic records if they can be assured of the security measures. MedGenMed 9:8, 2007.

132.

Gagnon, M. P., Shaw, N., Sicotte, C., Mathieu, L., Leduc, Y., Duplantie, J., Maclean, J., and Legare, F., Users’ perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing EHR in Canada: a study protocol. Implement Sci. 4:20, 2009.CrossRef

133.

Vishwanath, A., Brodsky, L., and Shaha, S., Physician adoption of personal digital assistants (PDA): testing its determinants within a structural equation model. J. Health Commun. 14:77–95, 2009.CrossRef

Titel: Systematic Review of Factors Influencing the Adoption of Information and Communication Technologies by Healthcare Professionals
verfasst von: Marie-Pierre Gagnon
Marie Desmartis
Michel Labrecque
Josip Car
Claudia Pagliari
Pierre Pluye
Pierre Frémont
Johanne Gagnon
Nadine Tremblay
France Légaré
Publikationsdatum: 01.02.2012
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Medical Systems / Ausgabe 1/2012
Print ISSN: 0148-5598
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-689X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-010-9473-4

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Systematic Review of Factors Influencing the Adoption of Information and Communication Technologies by Healthcare Professionals

Abstract

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2012

Employment and Comparison of Different Artificial Neural Networks for Epilepsy Diagnosis from EEG Signals

An Improved Medical Decision Support System to Identify the Breast Cancer Using Mammogram

Improved Fuzzy Clustering Algorithms in Segmentation of DC-enhanced breast MRI

Impact of Computerized Order Entry and Pre-mixed Dialysis Solutions for Continuous Veno-Venous Hemodiafiltration on Selection of Therapy for Acute Renal Failure

Design and Implementation of Web-based Discharge Summary Note Based on Service-Oriented Architecture

Adaptive Network-based Fuzzy Inference System for Assessment of Lower Limb Peripheral Vascular Occlusive Disease