Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 1/2007

01.03.2007 | Original Paper

Functional Self-Efficacy Beliefs Influence Functional Capacity Evaluation

verfasst von: Alexander K. Asante, E. Sharon Brintnell, Douglas P. Gross

Erschienen in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Ausgabe 1/2007

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives: The relationship between functional self-efficacy and Functional Capacity Evaluation (FCE) lift performance was examined in workers’ compensation claimants’ with low back pain. Methods: A cross-sectional design was used. Forty-two claimants with back pain and 38 subjects without back pain were enrolled. Subjects completed a measure of functional self-efficacy related specifically to lifting. Subjects also underwent FCE floor-to-waist, waist-to-overhead and horizontal lift testing. Potential confounders were also assessed including perceived disability, pain intensity, and self-rated health. Analysis included Pearson correlation and multivariable linear regression. Results: Higher functional self-efficacy beliefs were highly associated with better FCE performance on each of the lift items tested (r = 0.50–0.73). In multivariable analysis, the measure of functional self-efficacy remained independently associated with lift performance after controlling for potential confounders. Conclusion: Functional self-efficacy beliefs appear to influence FCE lift performance. Strategies for altering functional self-efficacy beliefs and their resulting impact on patient functional performance and outcomes should be examined.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Lechner D, Roth D, Straaton K. Functional capacity evaluation in work disability. Work 1991;1:37–47. Lechner D, Roth D, Straaton K. Functional capacity evaluation in work disability. Work 1991;1:37–47.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Schonstein E, Kenny DT. The value of functional and work place assessments in achieving a timely return to work for workers with back pain. Work 2001;16:31–8.PubMed Schonstein E, Kenny DT. The value of functional and work place assessments in achieving a timely return to work for workers with back pain. Work 2001;16:31–8.PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Geisser ME, Robinson ME, Miller QL, et al. Psychosocial factors and functional capacity evaluation among persons with chronic pain. J Occup Rehab 2003;13:259–76.CrossRef Geisser ME, Robinson ME, Miller QL, et al. Psychosocial factors and functional capacity evaluation among persons with chronic pain. J Occup Rehab 2003;13:259–76.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Gross DP, Battie MC. Factors influencing results of functional capacity evaluations in workers’ compensation claimants with low back pain. Phys Ther 2005;85:315–22.PubMed Gross DP, Battie MC. Factors influencing results of functional capacity evaluations in workers’ compensation claimants with low back pain. Phys Ther 2005;85:315–22.PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Rudy TE, Dieber SJ, Boston JR. Functional capacity assessment: Influence of behavioural and environmental factors. J Back Musculoskel Rehabil 1996;6:277–88.CrossRef Rudy TE, Dieber SJ, Boston JR. Functional capacity assessment: Influence of behavioural and environmental factors. J Back Musculoskel Rehabil 1996;6:277–88.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hildebrandt J, Pfingsten M, Saur P, et al. Prediction of success from a multidisciplinary treatment program for chronic low back pain. Spine 1997;22:990–1001.PubMedCrossRef Hildebrandt J, Pfingsten M, Saur P, et al. Prediction of success from a multidisciplinary treatment program for chronic low back pain. Spine 1997;22:990–1001.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Gibson L, Strong J. Assessment of psychosocial factors in functional capacity evaluation of clients with chronic back pain. Br J Occ Ther 1998;61:399–404. Gibson L, Strong J. Assessment of psychosocial factors in functional capacity evaluation of clients with chronic back pain. Br J Occ Ther 1998;61:399–404.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Lackner JM, Carosella AM, Feuerstein M. Pain expectancies, pain, and functional self-efficacy expectancies as determinants of disability in patients with chronic low back disorders. J Consult Clin Psychol 1996;64: 212–20.CrossRef Lackner JM, Carosella AM, Feuerstein M. Pain expectancies, pain, and functional self-efficacy expectancies as determinants of disability in patients with chronic low back disorders. J Consult Clin Psychol 1996;64: 212–20.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Lackner JM, Carosella AM. The relative influence of perceived pain control, anxiety, and functional self efficacy on spinal function among patients with chronic low back pain. Spine 1999;24:2254–60; discussion 60-1.PubMedCrossRef Lackner JM, Carosella AM. The relative influence of perceived pain control, anxiety, and functional self efficacy on spinal function among patients with chronic low back pain. Spine 1999;24:2254–60; discussion 60-1.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Pajares F, Johnson MJ. Self-efficacy beliefs and the writing performance of entering high school students. Psychol Schools 1996;33:163–75.CrossRef Pajares F, Johnson MJ. Self-efficacy beliefs and the writing performance of entering high school students. Psychol Schools 1996;33:163–75.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Tait RC, Pollard CA, Margolis RB, et al. The Pain Disability Index: psychometric and validity data. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1987;68:438–41.PubMed Tait RC, Pollard CA, Margolis RB, et al. The Pain Disability Index: psychometric and validity data. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1987;68:438–41.PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Estlander AM, Vanharanta H, Moneta GB, et al. Anthropometric variables, self-efficacy beliefs, and pain and disability ratings on the isokinetic performance of low back pain patients. Spine 1994;19:941–7.PubMedCrossRef Estlander AM, Vanharanta H, Moneta GB, et al. Anthropometric variables, self-efficacy beliefs, and pain and disability ratings on the isokinetic performance of low back pain patients. Spine 1994;19:941–7.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat National occupational classification: Occupational descriptionsed: Human Resources Development Canada, 2001. National occupational classification: Occupational descriptionsed: Human Resources Development Canada, 2001.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Thomas S, Reading J, Shephard RJ. Revision of the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q). Can J Sport Sci 1992;17:338–45.PubMed Thomas S, Reading J, Shephard RJ. Revision of the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q). Can J Sport Sci 1992;17:338–45.PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Isernhagen SJ. Functional capacity evaluation: rationale, procedure, utility of the kinesiophysical approach. J Occup Rehab 1992;2:157–68.CrossRef Isernhagen SJ. Functional capacity evaluation: rationale, procedure, utility of the kinesiophysical approach. J Occup Rehab 1992;2:157–68.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Isernhagen SJ, Hart DL, Matheson LM. Reliability of independent observer judgements of level of lift effort in a kinesiophysical Functional Capacity Evaluation. Work 1999;12:145–50.PubMed Isernhagen SJ, Hart DL, Matheson LM. Reliability of independent observer judgements of level of lift effort in a kinesiophysical Functional Capacity Evaluation. Work 1999;12:145–50.PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Gross DP, Battié MC. Reliability of safe maximum lifting determinations of a functional capacity evaluation. Phys Ther 2002;82:364–71.PubMed Gross DP, Battié MC. Reliability of safe maximum lifting determinations of a functional capacity evaluation. Phys Ther 2002;82:364–71.PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Reneman MF, Dijkstra PU, Westmaas M, et al. Test-retest reliability of lifting and carrying in a 2-day functional capacity evaluation. J Occup Rehab 2002;12:269–75.CrossRef Reneman MF, Dijkstra PU, Westmaas M, et al. Test-retest reliability of lifting and carrying in a 2-day functional capacity evaluation. J Occup Rehab 2002;12:269–75.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Brouwer S, Reneman MF, Dijkstra PU, et al. Test-retest reliability of the Isernhagen Work Systems Functional Capacity Evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain. J Occup Rehab 2003;13:207–18.CrossRef Brouwer S, Reneman MF, Dijkstra PU, et al. Test-retest reliability of the Isernhagen Work Systems Functional Capacity Evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain. J Occup Rehab 2003;13:207–18.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Gross DP, Battie MC. Construct validity of a kinesiophysical functional capacity evaluation administered within a worker’s compensation environment. J Occup Rehabil 2003;13:287–95.PubMedCrossRef Gross DP, Battie MC. Construct validity of a kinesiophysical functional capacity evaluation administered within a worker’s compensation environment. J Occup Rehabil 2003;13:287–95.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Reneman MF, Fokkens AS, Dijkstra PU, et al. Testing lifting capacity: validity of determining effort level by means of observation. Spine 2005;30:E40–6.PubMedCrossRef Reneman MF, Fokkens AS, Dijkstra PU, et al. Testing lifting capacity: validity of determining effort level by means of observation. Spine 2005;30:E40–6.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Pollard CA. Preliminary validity study of the pain disability index. Percept Mot Skills 1984;59:974.PubMed Pollard CA. Preliminary validity study of the pain disability index. Percept Mot Skills 1984;59:974.PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Ware JE, Gandek B. The SF-36 Health Survey: development and use in mental health research at the IQLOA project. Int J Mental Health 1994;23:73. Ware JE, Gandek B. The SF-36 Health Survey: development and use in mental health research at the IQLOA project. Int J Mental Health 1994;23:73.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 1993;31:247–63.PubMedCrossRef McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 1993;31:247–63.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Wittink H, Rogers W, Gascon C, et al. Relative contribution of mental health and exercise-related pain increment to treadmill test intolerance in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine 2001;26:2368–74.PubMedCrossRef Wittink H, Rogers W, Gascon C, et al. Relative contribution of mental health and exercise-related pain increment to treadmill test intolerance in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine 2001;26:2368–74.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Finch E, Brooks D, Stratford P, et al. Physical rehabilitation outcome measures: A guide to enhanced clinical decision making. 2nd ed. Toronto: Canadian Physiotherapy Association; 2002. Finch E, Brooks D, Stratford P, et al. Physical rehabilitation outcome measures: A guide to enhanced clinical decision making. 2nd ed. Toronto: Canadian Physiotherapy Association; 2002.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Gross DP, Battié MC. The construct validity of a functional capacity evaluation administered within a workers’ compensation environment. J Occup Rehab 2003;13:287–95.CrossRef Gross DP, Battié MC. The construct validity of a functional capacity evaluation administered within a workers’ compensation environment. J Occup Rehab 2003;13:287–95.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Cutler RB, Fishbain DA, Steele-Rosomoff R, et al. Relationships between functional capacity measures and baseline psychological measures in chronic pain patients. J Occup Rehab 2003;13:249–58.CrossRef Cutler RB, Fishbain DA, Steele-Rosomoff R, et al. Relationships between functional capacity measures and baseline psychological measures in chronic pain patients. J Occup Rehab 2003;13:249–58.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Glass GV, Hopkins KD. Statistical methods in education and psychology. 3rd ed. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon; 1996. Glass GV, Hopkins KD. Statistical methods in education and psychology. 3rd ed. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon; 1996.
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Kleinbaum DG. Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods. 3rd ed. Pacific Grove: Duxbury Press; 1998. Kleinbaum DG. Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods. 3rd ed. Pacific Grove: Duxbury Press; 1998.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Andresen EM. Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:S15–20.PubMedCrossRef Andresen EM. Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:S15–20.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Feuerstein M, Beattie P. Biobehavioral factors affecting pain and disability in low back pain: mechanisms and assessment. Phys Ther 1995;75:267–80.PubMed Feuerstein M, Beattie P. Biobehavioral factors affecting pain and disability in low back pain: mechanisms and assessment. Phys Ther 1995;75:267–80.PubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Piela CR, Hallenberg KK, Georghegan AE, et al. Prediction of functional capacity. Work 1996;6:107–13.CrossRef Piela CR, Hallenberg KK, Georghegan AE, et al. Prediction of functional capacity. Work 1996;6:107–13.CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Brouwer S, Dijkstra PU, Stewart RE, et al. Comparing self-report, clinical examination and functional testing in the assessment of work-related limitations in patients with chronic low back pain. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:999–1005.PubMedCrossRef Brouwer S, Dijkstra PU, Stewart RE, et al. Comparing self-report, clinical examination and functional testing in the assessment of work-related limitations in patients with chronic low back pain. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:999–1005.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Functional Self-Efficacy Beliefs Influence Functional Capacity Evaluation
verfasst von
Alexander K. Asante
E. Sharon Brintnell
Douglas P. Gross
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2007
Erschienen in
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Ausgabe 1/2007
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-007-9068-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2007

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 1/2007 Zur Ausgabe