nach oben

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

Erschienen in:

01.06.2011

A Systematic Review of Functioning in Vocational Rehabilitation Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health

verfasst von: Reuben Escorpizo, Monika E. Finger, Andrea Glässel, Felix Gradinger, Miriam Lückenkemper, Alarcos Cieza

Erschienen in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Ausgabe 2/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background: Vocational rehabilitation (VR) is aimed at engaging or re-engaging individuals with work participation and employment. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) by the World Health Organization can be operationalized in the context of VR. The objective of this study is to review the literature to identify outcomes or measures being used in VR using a systematic review methodology and link those measures to the ICF. Methods: We applied a structured search strategy using multiple databases. Items or constructs of the measures or outcomes identified were linked to the ICF by two trained individuals. Results: We have identified 648 measures which contained 10,582 concepts that were linked to the ICF which resulted in 87 second-level ICF categories. Out of the 87 categories, 31 (35.6%) were related to body functions, 43 (49.4%) were related to activities and participation, and 13 (14.9%) were related to environmental factors. No category was related to body structures. Conclusions: Our review found great diversity in the ICF contents of the measures used in different VR settings and study populations, which indicates the complexity of VR. This systematic review has provided a list of ICF categories which could be considered towards a successful VR.

Khan F, Ng L, Turner-Stokes L. Effectiveness of vocational rehabilitation intervention on the return to work and employment of persons with multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;1(1):CD007256.

Lysaker PH, Davis LW, Bryson GJ, Bell MD. Effects of cognitive behavioral therapy on work outcomes in vocational rehabilitation for participants with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Schizophr Res. 2009;107(2–3):186–91.PubMedCrossRef

Suoyrjo H, Oksanen T, Hinkka K, Kivimaki M, Klaukka T, Pentti J, et al. The effectiveness of vocationally oriented multidisciplinary intervention on sickness absence and early retirement among employees at risk: an observational study. Occup Environ Med. 2009;66(4):235–42.PubMedCrossRef

Marini I, Lee GK, Chan F, Chapin MH, Romero MG. Vocational rehabilitation service patterns related to successful competitive employment outcomes of persons with spinal cord injury. J Vocat Rehabil. 2008;28(1):1–13.

Dutta A, Gervey R, Chan F, Chou CC, Ditchman N. Vocational rehabilitation services and employment outcomes for people with disabilities: a United States study. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18(4):326–34.PubMedCrossRef

Crowther R, Marshall M, Bond G, Huxley P. Vocational rehabilitation for people with severe mental illness. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;2(2):CD003080.

World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health. 2001; WHO, Geneva.

Young AE. Return to work following disabling occupational injury—facilitators of employment continuation. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2010;36(6):473–83.PubMedCrossRef

Lagerveld SE, Bultmann U, Franche RL, van Dijk FJ, Vlasveld MC, van der Feltz-Cornelis CM, et al. Factors associated with work participation and work functioning in depressed workers: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(3):275–92.CrossRef

10.

Homa DB. Using the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) in job placement. Work. 2007;29(4):277–86.PubMed

11.

Gehanno JF, Rollin L, Le Jean T, Louvel A, Darmoni S, Shaw W. Precision and recall of search strategies for identifying studies on return-to-work in Medline. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19(3):223–30.PubMedCrossRef

12.

Marshall M, Bond GR, Huxley P. Vocational rehabilitation for people with severe mental illness. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2001(2. Art. No.: CD003080).

13.

Ware JE Jr., Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–83.

14.

Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Ustun B, Stucki G. ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37(4):212–8.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20:37–46.CrossRef

16.

Efron B. The jack nife, the bootstrap and other resampling plans. Philadelphia, PA: Society for industrial and applied mathematics; 1982.

17.

Vierkant RA. A SAS macro for calculating bootstrapped confidence intervals about a Kappa coefficient. Available from: http://www2.sas.com/proceedings/sugi22/STATS/PAPER295.PDF.2009.

18.

Stevens KR. Systematic reviews: the heart of evidence-based practice. AACN Clin Issues. 2001;12(4):529–38.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Mulrow CD. Rationale for systematic reviews. BMJ. 1994;309(6954):597–9.PubMed

20.

Stubbs J, Deaner G. When considering vocational rehabilitation: describing and comparing the Swedish and American systems and professions. Work. 2005;24(3):239–49.PubMed

21.

Muijzer A, Groothoff JW, de Boer WE, Geertzen JH, Brouwer S. The assessment of efforts to return to work in the European Union. Eur J Public Health. 2010.

22.

Lee R, Chan C. Factors affecting vocational outcomes of people with chronic illness participating in a supported competitive open employment program in Hong Kong. Work. 2005;25(4):359–68.PubMed

23.

Buijs PC, Lambeek LC, Koppenrade V, Hooftman WE, Anema JR. Can workers with chronic back pain shift from pain elimination to function restore at work? Qualitative evaluation of an innovative work related multidisciplinary programme. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2009;22(2):65–73.PubMed

24.

Dekkers-Sanchez PM, Wind H, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MH. A qualitative study of perpetuating factors for long term sick leave and promoting factors for return to work: chronic work disabled patients in their own words. J Rehabil Med. 2010;42(6):544–52.PubMedCrossRef

25.

Patten SB, Williams JV, Wang J. Mental disorders in a population sample with musculoskeletal disorders. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006;7:37.PubMedCrossRef

26.

Wang J, Adair CE, Patten SB. Mental health and related disability among workers: a population-based study. Am J Ind Med. 2006;49(7):514–22.PubMedCrossRef

27.

United States Joint and Bone Decade: The Burden of Musculoskeletal Diseases in the United States. Available from: http://www.boneandjointburden.org.2008/.

28.

World Health Organization. The burden of musculoskeletal conditions at the start of the new millenium. 2003;WHO Technical Report Series 919.

29.

Beck A, Steer R, Brown G. Manual for Beck Depression Inventory-II. 1996.

30.

Overall JEG. D.R. Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS): recent developments in ascertainment and scaling. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1988;24:97–9.

31.

Study protocol for the World Health Organization project to develop a Quality of Life assessment instrument (WHOQOL). Qual Life Res. 1993;2(2):153–9.

32.

Kori SH, Miller RP, Todd DD. Kinesiophobia: a new view of chronic pain behaviour. Pain Manage. 1990;3:35–43.

33.

Chibnall JT, Tait RC. The Pain Disability Index: factor structure and normative data. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75(10):1082–6.PubMedCrossRef

34.

Melzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain. 1975;1:277–99.PubMedCrossRef

35.

Michael JL, Sullivan SR, Bishop JP. The pain catastrophizing scale: development and validation. Psychol Assess. 1995;7(4):524–32.CrossRef

36.

Roland MO, Morris RW. A study of the natural history of back pain. Part 1: Development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low back pain. Spine. 1983;(8):141–4.

37.

Waddell G, Newton M, Henderson I, Somerville D, Main CJ. A Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability. Pain. 1993;52(2):157–68.PubMedCrossRef

38.

Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O’Brien JP. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy. 1980;66(8):271–3.PubMed

39.

Drews B, Nielsen CV, Rasmussen MS, Hjort J, Bonde JP. Improving motivation and goal setting for return to work in a population on sick leave: a controlled study. Scand J Public Health. 2007;35(1):86–94.PubMedCrossRef

40.

Sang LS, Ying Eria LP. Outcome evaluation of work hardening program for manual workers with work-related back injury. Work. 2005;25(4):297–305.PubMed

41.

Schonherr MC, Groothoff JW, Mulder GA, Schoppen T, Eisma WH. Vocational reintegration following spinal cord injury: expectations, participation and interventions. Spinal Cord. 2004;42(3):177–84.PubMedCrossRef

42.

Sanderson K, Nicholson J, Graves N, Tilse E, Oldenburg B. Mental health in the workplace: using the ICF to model the prospective associations between symptoms, activities, participation and environmental factors. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(17):1289–97.PubMedCrossRef

43.

Sandqvist JL, Henriksson CM. Work functioning: a conceptual framework. Work. 2004;23(2):147–57.PubMed

44.

Luk KD, Wan TW, Wong YW, Cheung KM, Chan KY, Cheng AC, et al. A multidisciplinary rehabilitation programme for patients with chronic low back pain: a prospective study. J Orthop Surg. 2010;18(2):131–8.

45.

Bultmann U, Sherson D, Olsen J, Hansen CL, Lund T, Kilsgaard J. Coordinated and tailored work rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial with economic evaluation undertaken with workers on sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19(1):81–93.PubMedCrossRef

46.

Brouwer S, Reneman MF, Bultmann U, van der Klink JJ, Groothoff JW. A prospective study of return to work across health conditions: perceived work attitude, self-efficacy and perceived social support. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(1):104–12.PubMedCrossRef

47.

Kirsh B, Krupa T, Cockburn L, Gewurtz R. A Canadian model of work integration for persons with mental illnesses. Disabil Rehabil. 2010.

48.

Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;455:3–5.PubMed

49.

Kay SR, Fiszbein A, Opler LA. The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 1987;13(2):261–76.PubMed

50.

Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67(6):361–70.PubMedCrossRef

51.

Berg EA. A simple objective technique for measuring flexibility in thinking. J Gen Psychol. 1948;(39):15–22.

52.

Reitan RM. Validity of the trail making test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Percept Mot Skills. 1958;8:271–6.CrossRef

53.

Gorham DR. Use of the proverbs test for differentiating schizophrenics from normals. J Consult Psychol. 1956;20(6):435–40.PubMedCrossRef

54.

American Psychiatric Association, editor. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.);2000.

Titel: A Systematic Review of Functioning in Vocational Rehabilitation Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health
verfasst von: Reuben Escorpizo
Monika E. Finger
Andrea Glässel
Felix Gradinger
Miriam Lückenkemper
Alarcos Cieza
Publikationsdatum: 01.06.2011
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Ausgabe 2/2011
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-011-9290-8

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2011

Vocational Rehabilitation From the Client’s Perspective Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a Reference

Evaluation of a Workplace Disability Prevention Intervention in Canada: Examining Differing Perceptions of Stakeholders

The Return-To-Work Coordinator Role: Qualitative Insights for Nursing

Identification of Relevant ICF Categories in Vocational Rehabilitation: A Cross Sectional Study Evaluating the Clinical Perspective

Responsiveness of the QuickDASH and SF-12 in Workers with Neck or Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders: One-Year Follow-Up

An International Expert Survey on Functioning in Vocational Rehabilitation Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health