Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 4/2014

01.12.2014

A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Functional Capacity Evaluation and Functional Interviewing as Components of Occupational Rehabilitation Programs

verfasst von: Douglas P. Gross, Alexander K. Asante, Maxi Miciak, Michele C. Battié, Linda J. Carroll, Ambrose Sun, Marti Mikalsky, Rene Huellstrung, Riikka Niemeläinen

Erschienen in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Ausgabe 4/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose Functional capacity evaluations (FCE) are used to identify work abilities and are commonly integrated into rehabilitation programs. We studied whether integrating FCE into rehabilitation leads to better outcomes for injured workers. Methods A cluster randomised controlled trial was conducted at a workers’ compensation rehabilitation facility (registration ISRCTN61284905). Clinicians were randomised into 2 groups: 1 group used FCE while another conducted semi-structured functional interviews. Outcomes included recommendations following assessment, rehabilitation program outcomes including functional work levels and pain intensity, as well as compensation outcomes at 1, 3, and 6 months after assessment. Analysis included Mann–Whitney U, Chi square and t tests. Results Subjects included 225 claimants of whom 105 were tested with FCE. Subjects were predominantly employed (84 %) males (63 %) with sub-acute musculoskeletal conditions (median duration 67 days). Claimants undergoing FCE had ~15 % higher average functional work levels recommended at time of assessment (Mann–Whitney U = 4,391.0, p < 0.001) but differences at other follow-up times were smaller (0–8 %), in favour of functional interviewing, and not statistically significant. Clinically important improvement during rehabilitation in functional work level (0.9/4, SRM = 0.94), pain intensity (2.0/10, SRM = 0.88) and self-reported disability (21.8/100, SRM = 1.45) were only observed in those undergoing the functional interview. Conclusions Performance-based FCE integrated into occupational rehabilitation appears to lead to higher baseline functional work levels compared to a semi-structured functional interview, but not improved RTW rates or functional work levels at follow-up. Functional interviewing has potential for efficiency gains and higher likelihood of clinically important improvement following rehabilitation, however further research is needed.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin BI, Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Turner JA, Comstock BA, Hollingworth W, et al. Expenditures and health status among adults with back and neck problems. JAMA. 2008;299(6):656–64.PubMedCrossRef Martin BI, Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Turner JA, Comstock BA, Hollingworth W, et al. Expenditures and health status among adults with back and neck problems. JAMA. 2008;299(6):656–64.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Murray CJ, Vos T, Lozano R, Naghavi M, Flaxman AD, Michaud C, et al. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2197–223.PubMedCrossRef Murray CJ, Vos T, Lozano R, Naghavi M, Flaxman AD, Michaud C, et al. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2197–223.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hadler NM. Occupational musculoskeletal disorders. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005. Hadler NM. Occupational musculoskeletal disorders. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Innes E, Straker L. A clinician’s guide to work-related assessments: 1-purposes and problems. WORK. 1998;11:183–9.PubMedCrossRef Innes E, Straker L. A clinician’s guide to work-related assessments: 1-purposes and problems. WORK. 1998;11:183–9.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Gross DP, Haws C, Niemelainen R. What is the rate of functional improvement during occupational rehabilitation in workers’ compensation claimants? J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22(3):292–300.PubMedCrossRef Gross DP, Haws C, Niemelainen R. What is the rate of functional improvement during occupational rehabilitation in workers’ compensation claimants? J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22(3):292–300.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Rainville J, Kim RS, Katz JN. A review of 1985 Volvo Award winner in clinical science: objective assessment of spine function following industrial injury: a prospective study with comparison group and 1-year follow-up. Spine. 2007;32(18):2031–4.PubMedCrossRef Rainville J, Kim RS, Katz JN. A review of 1985 Volvo Award winner in clinical science: objective assessment of spine function following industrial injury: a prospective study with comparison group and 1-year follow-up. Spine. 2007;32(18):2031–4.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ, Kishino N, Keeley J, Capra P, Mayer H, et al. Objective assessment of spine function following industrial injury. A prospective study with comparison group and one-year follow-up. Spine. 1985;10(6):482–93.PubMedCrossRef Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ, Kishino N, Keeley J, Capra P, Mayer H, et al. Objective assessment of spine function following industrial injury. A prospective study with comparison group and one-year follow-up. Spine. 1985;10(6):482–93.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Isernhagen SJ. The comprehensive guide to work injury management. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen; 1995. Isernhagen SJ. The comprehensive guide to work injury management. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen; 1995.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Wind H, Gouttebarge V, Kuijer PP, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MH. The utility of functional capacity evaluation: the opinion of physicians and other experts in the field of return to work and disability claims. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2006;79(6):528–34.PubMedCrossRef Wind H, Gouttebarge V, Kuijer PP, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MH. The utility of functional capacity evaluation: the opinion of physicians and other experts in the field of return to work and disability claims. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2006;79(6):528–34.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Menard MR, Hoens AM. Objective evaluation of functional capacity: medical, occupational, and legal settings. JOSPT. 1994;19(5):249–60.PubMedCrossRef Menard MR, Hoens AM. Objective evaluation of functional capacity: medical, occupational, and legal settings. JOSPT. 1994;19(5):249–60.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Soer R, Groothoff JW, Geertzen JH, van der Schans CP, Reesink DD, Reneman MF. Pain response of healthy workers following a functional capacity evaluation and implications for clinical interpretation. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18(3):290–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Soer R, Groothoff JW, Geertzen JH, van der Schans CP, Reesink DD, Reneman MF. Pain response of healthy workers following a functional capacity evaluation and implications for clinical interpretation. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18(3):290–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Reneman MF, Kuijer W, Brouwer S, Preuper HR, Groothoff JW, Geertzen JH, et al. Symptom increase following a functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain: an explorative study of safety. J Occup Rehabil. 2006;16(2):197–205.PubMedCrossRef Reneman MF, Kuijer W, Brouwer S, Preuper HR, Groothoff JW, Geertzen JH, et al. Symptom increase following a functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain: an explorative study of safety. J Occup Rehabil. 2006;16(2):197–205.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Gross DP, Battie MC. Factors influencing results of functional capacity evaluations in workers’ compensation claimants with low back pain. Phys Ther. 2005;85(4):315–22.PubMed Gross DP, Battie MC. Factors influencing results of functional capacity evaluations in workers’ compensation claimants with low back pain. Phys Ther. 2005;85(4):315–22.PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Reneman MF, Kool J, Oesch P, Geertzen JH, Battie MC, Gross DP. Material handling performance of patients with chronic low back pain during functional capacity evaluation: a comparison between three countries. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28(18):1143–9.PubMedCrossRef Reneman MF, Kool J, Oesch P, Geertzen JH, Battie MC, Gross DP. Material handling performance of patients with chronic low back pain during functional capacity evaluation: a comparison between three countries. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28(18):1143–9.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Asante AK, Brintnell ES, Gross DP. Functional self-efficacy beliefs influence functional capacity evaluation. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(1):73–82.PubMedCrossRef Asante AK, Brintnell ES, Gross DP. Functional self-efficacy beliefs influence functional capacity evaluation. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(1):73–82.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat van Abbema R, Lakke SE, Reneman MF, van der Schans CP, van Haastert CJ, Geertzen JH, et al. Factors associated with functional capacity test results in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;. doi:10.1007/s10926-011-9306-4.PubMed van Abbema R, Lakke SE, Reneman MF, van der Schans CP, van Haastert CJ, Geertzen JH, et al. Factors associated with functional capacity test results in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;. doi:10.​1007/​s10926-011-9306-4.PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Gross DP, Battie MC. Predicting timely recovery and recurrence following multidisciplinary rehabilitation in patients with compensated low back pain. Spine. 2005;30(2):235–40.PubMedCrossRef Gross DP, Battie MC. Predicting timely recovery and recurrence following multidisciplinary rehabilitation in patients with compensated low back pain. Spine. 2005;30(2):235–40.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Gross DP, Battie MC, Cassidy JD. The prognostic value of functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain: part 1: timely return to work. Spine. 2004;29(8):914–9.PubMedCrossRef Gross DP, Battie MC, Cassidy JD. The prognostic value of functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain: part 1: timely return to work. Spine. 2004;29(8):914–9.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Matheson LN, Isernhagen SJ, Hart DL. Relationships among lifting ability, grip force, and return to work. Phys Ther. 2002;82(3):249–56.PubMed Matheson LN, Isernhagen SJ, Hart DL. Relationships among lifting ability, grip force, and return to work. Phys Ther. 2002;82(3):249–56.PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuijer PP, Gouttebarge V, Brouwer S, Reneman MF, Frings-Dresen MH. Are performance-based measures predictive of work participation in patients with musculoskeletal disorders? A systematic review. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2012;85(2):109–23.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Kuijer PP, Gouttebarge V, Brouwer S, Reneman MF, Frings-Dresen MH. Are performance-based measures predictive of work participation in patients with musculoskeletal disorders? A systematic review. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2012;85(2):109–23.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Streibelt M, Blume C, Thren K, Reneman MF, Mueller-Fahrnow W. Value of functional capacity evaluation information in a clinical setting for predicting return to work. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(3):429–34.PubMedCrossRef Streibelt M, Blume C, Thren K, Reneman MF, Mueller-Fahrnow W. Value of functional capacity evaluation information in a clinical setting for predicting return to work. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(3):429–34.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Matheson LN, Matheson ML, Grant J. Development of a measure of perceived functional ability. J Occup Rehabil. 1993;3:15–30.PubMedCrossRef Matheson LN, Matheson ML, Grant J. Development of a measure of perceived functional ability. J Occup Rehabil. 1993;3:15–30.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Isernhagen SJ. Functional capacity evaluation: rationale, procedure, utility of the kinesiophysical approach. J Occup Rehabil. 1992;2(3):157–68.PubMedCrossRef Isernhagen SJ. Functional capacity evaluation: rationale, procedure, utility of the kinesiophysical approach. J Occup Rehabil. 1992;2(3):157–68.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Reneman MF, Soer R, Gross DP. Developing research on performance-based functional work assessment: report on the first international functional capacity evaluation research meeting. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;. doi:10.1007/s10926-013-9425-1. Reneman MF, Soer R, Gross DP. Developing research on performance-based functional work assessment: report on the first international functional capacity evaluation research meeting. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;. doi:10.​1007/​s10926-013-9425-1.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Brouwer S, Dijkstra PU, Stewart RE, Goeken LN, Groothoff JW, Geertzen JH. Comparing self-report, clinical examination and functional testing in the assessment of work-related limitations in patients with chronic low back pain. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(17):999–1005.PubMedCrossRef Brouwer S, Dijkstra PU, Stewart RE, Goeken LN, Groothoff JW, Geertzen JH. Comparing self-report, clinical examination and functional testing in the assessment of work-related limitations in patients with chronic low back pain. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(17):999–1005.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Reneman MF, Jorritsma W, Schellekens JM, Goeken LN. Concurrent validity of questionnaire and performance-based disability measurements in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2002;12(3):119–29.PubMedCrossRef Reneman MF, Jorritsma W, Schellekens JM, Goeken LN. Concurrent validity of questionnaire and performance-based disability measurements in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2002;12(3):119–29.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Wittink H, Rogers W, Sukiennik A, Carr DB. Physical functioning: self-report and performance measures are related but distinct. Spine. 2003;28(20):2407–13.PubMedCrossRef Wittink H, Rogers W, Sukiennik A, Carr DB. Physical functioning: self-report and performance measures are related but distinct. Spine. 2003;28(20):2407–13.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Elbourne DR, Campbell MK. Extending the CONSORT statement to cluster randomized trials: for discussion. Stat Med. 2001;20(3):489–96.PubMedCrossRef Elbourne DR, Campbell MK. Extending the CONSORT statement to cluster randomized trials: for discussion. Stat Med. 2001;20(3):489–96.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Gross DP, Battie MC, Asante AK. Evaluation of a short-form functional capacity evaluation: less may be best. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(3):422–35.PubMedCrossRef Gross DP, Battie MC, Asante AK. Evaluation of a short-form functional capacity evaluation: less may be best. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(3):422–35.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Klar N, Donner A. Current and future challenges in the design and analysis of cluster randomization trials. Stat Med. 2001;20(24):3729–40.PubMedCrossRef Klar N, Donner A. Current and future challenges in the design and analysis of cluster randomization trials. Stat Med. 2001;20(24):3729–40.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Eldridge S, Cryer C, Feder G, Underwood M. Sample size calculations for intervention trials in primary care randomizing by primary care group: an empirical illustration from one proposed intervention trial. Stat Med. 2001;20(3):367–76.PubMedCrossRef Eldridge S, Cryer C, Feder G, Underwood M. Sample size calculations for intervention trials in primary care randomizing by primary care group: an empirical illustration from one proposed intervention trial. Stat Med. 2001;20(3):367–76.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Stephens B, Gross DP. The influence of a continuum of care model on the rehabilitation of compensation claimants with soft tissue disorders. Spine. 2007;32(25):2898–904.PubMedCrossRef Stephens B, Gross DP. The influence of a continuum of care model on the rehabilitation of compensation claimants with soft tissue disorders. Spine. 2007;32(25):2898–904.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993;31(3):247–63.PubMedCrossRef McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993;31(3):247–63.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Pollard CA. Preliminary validity study of the pain disability index. Percept Mot Skills. 1984;59(3):974.PubMedCrossRef Pollard CA. Preliminary validity study of the pain disability index. Percept Mot Skills. 1984;59(3):974.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Finch E, Brooks D, Stratford P, Mayo N. Physical rehabilitation outcome measures: a guide to enhanced clinical decision making. 2nd ed. Toronto: Canadian Physiotherapy Association; 2002. Finch E, Brooks D, Stratford P, Mayo N. Physical rehabilitation outcome measures: a guide to enhanced clinical decision making. 2nd ed. Toronto: Canadian Physiotherapy Association; 2002.
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Soer R, Poels BJ, Geertzen JH, Reneman MF. A comparison of two lifting assessment approaches in patients with chronic low back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2006;16(4):639–46.PubMedCrossRef Soer R, Poels BJ, Geertzen JH, Reneman MF. A comparison of two lifting assessment approaches in patients with chronic low back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2006;16(4):639–46.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Brouwer S, Reneman MF, Dijkstra PU, Groothoff JW, Schellekens JMH, Goeken LNH. Test-retest reliability of the Isernhagen Work Systems Functional Capacity Evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13:207–18.PubMedCrossRef Brouwer S, Reneman MF, Dijkstra PU, Groothoff JW, Schellekens JMH, Goeken LNH. Test-retest reliability of the Isernhagen Work Systems Functional Capacity Evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13:207–18.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Reneman MF, Jaegers S, Westmaas M, Goeken L. The reliability of determining effort level of lifting and carrying in a functional capacity evaluation. Work. 2002;18:23–7.PubMed Reneman MF, Jaegers S, Westmaas M, Goeken L. The reliability of determining effort level of lifting and carrying in a functional capacity evaluation. Work. 2002;18:23–7.PubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Reneman MF, Dijkstra PU, Westmaas M, Goeken LN. Test-retest reliability of lifting and carrying in a 2-day functional capacity evaluation. J Occup Rehabil. 2002;12(4):269–75.PubMedCrossRef Reneman MF, Dijkstra PU, Westmaas M, Goeken LN. Test-retest reliability of lifting and carrying in a 2-day functional capacity evaluation. J Occup Rehabil. 2002;12(4):269–75.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Gross DP, Battie MC. Construct validity of a kinesiophysical functional capacity evaluation administered within a worker’s compensation environment. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13(4):287–95.PubMedCrossRef Gross DP, Battie MC. Construct validity of a kinesiophysical functional capacity evaluation administered within a worker’s compensation environment. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13(4):287–95.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Durand MJ, Loisel P, Hong QN, Charpentier N. Helping clinicians in work disability prevention: the work disability diagnosis interview. J Occup Rehabil. 2002;12(3):191–204.PubMedCrossRef Durand MJ, Loisel P, Hong QN, Charpentier N. Helping clinicians in work disability prevention: the work disability diagnosis interview. J Occup Rehabil. 2002;12(3):191–204.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Andrew Walsh D, Jane Kelly S, Sebastian Johnson P, Rajkumar S, Bennetts K. Performance problems of patients with chronic low-back pain and the measurement of patient-centered outcome. Spine. 2004;29(1):87–93.PubMedCrossRef Andrew Walsh D, Jane Kelly S, Sebastian Johnson P, Rajkumar S, Bennetts K. Performance problems of patients with chronic low-back pain and the measurement of patient-centered outcome. Spine. 2004;29(1):87–93.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Shannon R, Hillsdon M. Motivational interviewing in musculoskeletal care. Musculoskeletal Care. 2007;5(4):206–15.PubMedCrossRef Shannon R, Hillsdon M. Motivational interviewing in musculoskeletal care. Musculoskeletal Care. 2007;5(4):206–15.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Krause N, Dasinger LK, Deegan LJ, Brand RJ, Rudolph L. Alternative approaches for measuring duration of work disability after low back injury based on administrative workers’ compensation data. Am J Ind Med. 1999;35(6):604–18.PubMedCrossRef Krause N, Dasinger LK, Deegan LJ, Brand RJ, Rudolph L. Alternative approaches for measuring duration of work disability after low back injury based on administrative workers’ compensation data. Am J Ind Med. 1999;35(6):604–18.PubMedCrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Hopman WM, Towheed T, Anastassiades T, Tenenhouse A, Poliquin S, Berger C, et al. Canadian normative data for the SF-36 health survey. Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study Research Group. CMAJ. 2000;163(3):265–71.PubMedCentralPubMed Hopman WM, Towheed T, Anastassiades T, Tenenhouse A, Poliquin S, Berger C, et al. Canadian normative data for the SF-36 health survey. Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study Research Group. CMAJ. 2000;163(3):265–71.PubMedCentralPubMed
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Farrar JT, Portenoy RK, Berlin JA, Kinman JL, Strom BL. Defining the clinically important difference in pain outcome measures. Pain. 2000;88(3):287–94.PubMedCrossRef Farrar JT, Portenoy RK, Berlin JA, Kinman JL, Strom BL. Defining the clinically important difference in pain outcome measures. Pain. 2000;88(3):287–94.PubMedCrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Soer R, Reneman MF, Vroomen PC, Stegeman P, Coppes MH. Responsiveness and minimal clinically important change of the pain disability index in patients with chronic back pain. Spine. 2012;12(11):1035–9.CrossRef Soer R, Reneman MF, Vroomen PC, Stegeman P, Coppes MH. Responsiveness and minimal clinically important change of the pain disability index in patients with chronic back pain. Spine. 2012;12(11):1035–9.CrossRef
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Gross DP, Battie MC. Functional capacity evaluation performance does not predict sustained return to work in claimants with chronic back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(3):285–94.PubMedCrossRef Gross DP, Battie MC. Functional capacity evaluation performance does not predict sustained return to work in claimants with chronic back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(3):285–94.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Functional Capacity Evaluation and Functional Interviewing as Components of Occupational Rehabilitation Programs
verfasst von
Douglas P. Gross
Alexander K. Asante
Maxi Miciak
Michele C. Battié
Linda J. Carroll
Ambrose Sun
Marti Mikalsky
Rene Huellstrung
Riikka Niemeläinen
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Ausgabe 4/2014
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-013-9491-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2014

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 4/2014 Zur Ausgabe