Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Religion and Health 2/2009

01.06.2009 | Original Paper

Re-conceptualizing the Factor Structure of the Brief Multidimensional Measure of Religiousness/Spirituality

verfasst von: Brick Johnstone, Dong Pil Yoon, Kelly Lora Franklin, Laura Schopp, Joseph Hinkebein

Erschienen in: Journal of Religion and Health | Ausgabe 2/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Rationale This study attempted to differentiate statistically the spiritual and religious factors of the Brief Multidimensional Measure of Religiousness/Spirituality (BMMRS), which was developed based on theoretical conceptualizations that have yet to be adequately empirically validated in a population with significant health disorders. Participants One hundred sixty-four individuals with heterogeneous medical conditions [i.e., brain injury, spinal cord injury (SCI), cancer, stroke, primary care conditions]. Methods Participants completed the BMMRS as part of a pilot study on spirituality, religion, and physical and mental health. Results A principal components factor analysis with varimax rotation and Kaiser normalization identified a six-factor solution (opposed to the expected 8-factor solution) accounting for 60% of the variance in scores, labeled as: (1) Positive Spiritual Experience; (2) Negative Spiritual Experience; (3) Forgiveness; (4) Religious Practices; (5) Positive Congregational Support; and (6) Negative Congregational Support. Conclusions The results suggest the BMMRS assesses distinct positive and negative aspects of religiousness and spirituality that may be best conceptualized in a psychoneuroimmunological context as measuring: (a) Spiritual Experiences (i.e., emotional experience of feeling connected with a higher power/the universe); (b) Religious Practices (i.e., prayer, rituals, service attendance); (c) Congregational Support; and (d) Forgiveness (i.e., a specific coping strategy that can be conceptualized as religious or non-religious in context).
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Baskin, T. W., & Enright, R. D. (2004). Intervention studies on forgiveness: A meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling and Development, 82, 79–90. Baskin, T. W., & Enright, R. D. (2004). Intervention studies on forgiveness: A meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling and Development, 82, 79–90.
Zurück zum Zitat Carson, J. W., Keefe, F. J., Goli, V., Fras, A. M., Lynch, T. R., Thorp, S. R., et al. (2005). Forgiveness and chronic low back pain: A preliminary study examining the relationship of forgiveness to pain, anger, and psychological distress. Journal of Pain, 6, 84–91. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2004.10.012.PubMedCrossRef Carson, J. W., Keefe, F. J., Goli, V., Fras, A. M., Lynch, T. R., Thorp, S. R., et al. (2005). Forgiveness and chronic low back pain: A preliminary study examining the relationship of forgiveness to pain, anger, and psychological distress. Journal of Pain, 6, 84–91. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jpain.​2004.​10.​012.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cloninger, C. R., Pryzbeck, T. R., Svrakic, D. M., & Wetzel, R. D. (1994). The temperament and character inventory. St. Louis: Washington University. Cloninger, C. R., Pryzbeck, T. R., Svrakic, D. M., & Wetzel, R. D. (1994). The temperament and character inventory. St. Louis: Washington University.
Zurück zum Zitat Exline, J. J., & Rose, E. (2005). Religious and spiritual struggles. In R. F. Paloutzian & C. L. Park (Eds.), The handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 315–330). New York: Guilford. Exline, J. J., & Rose, E. (2005). Religious and spiritual struggles. In R. F. Paloutzian & C. L. Park (Eds.), The handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 315–330). New York: Guilford.
Zurück zum Zitat Fetzer Institute & National Institute on Aging Working Group. (1999). Multidimensional measurement of religiousness/spirituality for use in health research. Kalamazoo, MI: Fetzer Institute. Fetzer Institute & National Institute on Aging Working Group. (1999). Multidimensional measurement of religiousness/spirituality for use in health research. Kalamazoo, MI: Fetzer Institute.
Zurück zum Zitat Hart, T., Hanks, R., Bogner, J. A., Millis, S., & Esselman, P. (2007). Blame attribution in intentional and unintentional traumatic brain injury. Longitudinal changes and impact on subjective well being. Rehabilitation Psychology, 52, 152–161. doi:10.1037/0090-5550.52.2.152. Hart, T., Hanks, R., Bogner, J. A., Millis, S., & Esselman, P. (2007). Blame attribution in intentional and unintentional traumatic brain injury. Longitudinal changes and impact on subjective well being. Rehabilitation Psychology, 52, 152–161. doi:10.​1037/​0090-5550.​52.​2.​152.
Zurück zum Zitat Hill, P. C., & Hood, R., Jr. (Eds.) (1999). Measures of religiosity. Birmingham, AL: Religious Education Press. Hill, P. C., & Hood, R., Jr. (Eds.) (1999). Measures of religiosity. Birmingham, AL: Religious Education Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Idler, E. L., Musick, M. A., Ellison, C. G., et al. (2003). Measuring multiple dimensions of religion and spirituality for health research: Conceptual background and findings from the 1998 General Social Survey. Research on Aging, 25(4), 327–365. doi:10.1177/0164027503025004001.CrossRef Idler, E. L., Musick, M. A., Ellison, C. G., et al. (2003). Measuring multiple dimensions of religion and spirituality for health research: Conceptual background and findings from the 1998 General Social Survey. Research on Aging, 25(4), 327–365. doi:10.​1177/​0164027503025004​001.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kendler, K. S., Liu, X. Q., Gardner, C. O., McCullough, M. E., Larson, D., & Prescott, C. A. (2003). Dimensions of religiosity and their relationship to lifetime psychiatric and substance use disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160(3), 496–503.PubMedCrossRef Kendler, K. S., Liu, X. Q., Gardner, C. O., McCullough, M. E., Larson, D., & Prescott, C. A. (2003). Dimensions of religiosity and their relationship to lifetime psychiatric and substance use disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160(3), 496–503.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat King, M. (1966). Measuring the religious variable: Nine proposed dimensions. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 5, 173–190. doi:10.2307/1384880.CrossRef King, M. (1966). Measuring the religious variable: Nine proposed dimensions. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 5, 173–190. doi:10.​2307/​1384880.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat King, M. (1995). The royal free interview for religious and spiritual beliefs: Development and standardization. Psychological Medicine, 25, 1125–1134.PubMedCrossRef King, M. (1995). The royal free interview for religious and spiritual beliefs: Development and standardization. Psychological Medicine, 25, 1125–1134.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat King, M. (1998). The spiritual variable in psychiatric research. Psychological Medicine, 28, 259–1262. King, M. (1998). The spiritual variable in psychiatric research. Psychological Medicine, 28, 259–1262.
Zurück zum Zitat King, M., & Hunt, R. (1967). Dimensions of religiosity in “measuring the religious variable”. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 6, 173–190. doi:10.2307/1384044.CrossRef King, M., & Hunt, R. (1967). Dimensions of religiosity in “measuring the religious variable”. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 6, 173–190. doi:10.​2307/​1384044.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat King, M., & Hunt, R. (1969). Measuring the religious variable: Amended findings. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 8, 321–323. doi:10.2307/1384345.CrossRef King, M., & Hunt, R. (1969). Measuring the religious variable: Amended findings. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 8, 321–323. doi:10.​2307/​1384345.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat King, M., & Hunt, R. (1972). Measuring the religious variable: Replication. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 11, 240–266. doi:10.2307/1384548.CrossRef King, M., & Hunt, R. (1972). Measuring the religious variable: Replication. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 11, 240–266. doi:10.​2307/​1384548.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat King, M., & Hunt, R. (1975). Measuring the religious variable: National replication. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 14, 13–22. doi:10.2307/1384452.CrossRef King, M., & Hunt, R. (1975). Measuring the religious variable: National replication. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 14, 13–22. doi:10.​2307/​1384452.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat King, D. E., & Hunt, R. A. (1990). Measuring the religious variable: Final comment. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 29(4), 531–535. doi:10.2307/1387319.CrossRef King, D. E., & Hunt, R. A. (1990). Measuring the religious variable: Final comment. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 29(4), 531–535. doi:10.​2307/​1387319.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mokuau, N., Hishinuma, E., & Nishimura, S. (2001). Validating a measure of religousness/spirituality for Native Hawaiians. Pacific Health Dialog, 8(2), 407–416.PubMed Mokuau, N., Hishinuma, E., & Nishimura, S. (2001). Validating a measure of religousness/spirituality for Native Hawaiians. Pacific Health Dialog, 8(2), 407–416.PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Pargament, K. I. (1997). The psychology religion and coping: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Guilford Press. Pargament, K. I. (1997). The psychology religion and coping: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Guilford Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Pargament, K. I. (1999). Religious/spiritual coping. In Fetzer Institute, National Institute on Aging Working Group: Multidimensional Measurement of Religiousness/Spirituality for use in Health Research. A report of a national working group supported by Fetzer Institute in collaboration with the National Institute on Aging (pp. 43–56). Kalamazoo, MI: Fetzer Institute. Pargament, K. I. (1999). Religious/spiritual coping. In Fetzer Institute, National Institute on Aging Working Group: Multidimensional Measurement of Religiousness/Spirituality for use in Health Research. A report of a national working group supported by Fetzer Institute in collaboration with the National Institute on Aging (pp. 43–56). Kalamazoo, MI: Fetzer Institute.
Zurück zum Zitat Pargament, K., Koenig, H., & Perez, L. (2000). The many methods of religious coping: Development and initial validation of the RCOPE. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56(4), 519–543. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(200004)56:4<519::AID-JCLP6>3.0.CO;2-1PubMedCrossRef Pargament, K., Koenig, H., & Perez, L. (2000). The many methods of religious coping: Development and initial validation of the RCOPE. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56(4), 519–543. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(200004)56:4<519::AID-JCLP6>3.0.CO;2-1PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pargament, K. I., & Rye, M. (1998). Forgiveness as a method of religious coping. In E. L. Worthington, Jr (Ed.), Dimensions of forgiveness: Psychological research and theological perspectives (pp. 59–78). Philadephia, PA: The Templeton Foundation Press. Pargament, K. I., & Rye, M. (1998). Forgiveness as a method of religious coping. In E. L. Worthington, Jr (Ed.), Dimensions of forgiveness: Psychological research and theological perspectives (pp. 59–78). Philadephia, PA: The Templeton Foundation Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Piedmont, R. L. (1999). Does spirituality represent the sixth factor of personality? Spiritual transcendence and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 67, 985–1013. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00080.CrossRef Piedmont, R. L. (1999). Does spirituality represent the sixth factor of personality? Spiritual transcendence and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 67, 985–1013. doi:10.​1111/​1467-6494.​00080.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Piedmont, R. L., Mapa, A. T., & Williams, J. E. G. (2007). A factor analysis of the Fetzer/NIA brief multidimensional measure of religiousness/spirituality. Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion, 17, 177–196. Piedmont, R. L., Mapa, A. T., & Williams, J. E. G. (2007). A factor analysis of the Fetzer/NIA brief multidimensional measure of religiousness/spirituality. Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion, 17, 177–196.
Zurück zum Zitat Stewart, C., & Koeske, G. F. (2006). A preliminary construct validation of the multidimensional measurement of religiousness/spirituality instrument:: A study of southern USA samples. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 16(3), 181–196. doi:10.1207/s15327582ijpr1603_3.CrossRef Stewart, C., & Koeske, G. F. (2006). A preliminary construct validation of the multidimensional measurement of religiousness/spirituality instrument:: A study of southern USA samples. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 16(3), 181–196. doi:10.​1207/​s15327582ijpr160​3_​3.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics. New York, NY: HarperCollins. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
Zurück zum Zitat Underwood, L., & Teresi, J. (2002). The daily spiritual experience scale: Development, theoretical description, reliability, exploratory factor analysis, and preliminary construct validity using health-related data. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24, 22–33. doi:10.1207/S15324796ABM2401_04.PubMedCrossRef Underwood, L., & Teresi, J. (2002). The daily spiritual experience scale: Development, theoretical description, reliability, exploratory factor analysis, and preliminary construct validity using health-related data. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24, 22–33. doi:10.​1207/​S15324796ABM2401​_​04.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Williams, D. R. (1994). The measurement of religion in epidemiologic studies: Problems and prospects. In J. S. Levin (Ed.), Religion in aging and health: Theoretical foundations of methodological frontiers (pp. 125–148). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Williams, D. R. (1994). The measurement of religion in epidemiologic studies: Problems and prospects. In J. S. Levin (Ed.), Religion in aging and health: Theoretical foundations of methodological frontiers (pp. 125–148). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoon, D. P., & Lee, E. O. (2004). Religiousness/spirituality and subjective well-being among rural elderly Whites, African Americans, and Native Americans. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 10(1), 191–211. doi:10.1300/J137v10n01_05.CrossRef Yoon, D. P., & Lee, E. O. (2004). Religiousness/spirituality and subjective well-being among rural elderly Whites, African Americans, and Native Americans. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 10(1), 191–211. doi:10.​1300/​J137v10n01_​05.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zinnbauer, B. J., & Pargament, K. I. (2005). Religiousness and spirituality. In R. F. Paloutzian & C. L. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 21–42). New York: Guilford Press. Zinnbauer, B. J., & Pargament, K. I. (2005). Religiousness and spirituality. In R. F. Paloutzian & C. L. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 21–42). New York: Guilford Press.
Metadaten
Titel
Re-conceptualizing the Factor Structure of the Brief Multidimensional Measure of Religiousness/Spirituality
verfasst von
Brick Johnstone
Dong Pil Yoon
Kelly Lora Franklin
Laura Schopp
Joseph Hinkebein
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2009
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Religion and Health / Ausgabe 2/2009
Print ISSN: 0022-4197
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6571
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-008-9179-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2009

Journal of Religion and Health 2/2009 Zur Ausgabe