Abstract
This study seeks to provide a greater understanding of the factors that determine the perceived availability of alcohol and its role in predicting adolescents’ alcohol use. Participants were 151,703 7th–12th grade students (50% female) from a sample of 219 rural communities across the United States, with oversampling for predominantly Mexican-American and African-American communities. Multilevel analysis was used to estimate the perceived availability of alcohol as a function of physical and social availability measures and individual and community-level control variables. Physical availability was measured as the number of alcohol outlets in the community and whether beer and wine were sold in non-liquor stores. Social availability measured the availability of alcohol from social or family groups. Last month alcohol use was then estimated as a function of physical, social and perceived availabilities and control variables. Physical availability had little relationship to perceived availability or recent alcohol use while social availability was a strong predictor of both. Perceived availabilities at the individual and community levels were significant in predicting last month alcohol use. The findings suggest that altering both perceived and actual availability of alcohol can potentially have strong effects on the levels of adolescent alcohol use.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbey, A., Scott, R. O., Oliansky, D. M., Quin, B., & Andreski, P. M. (1990). Subjective, social, and physical availability. I. Their interrelationships. The International Journal of the Addictions, 25(8), 889–910.
Abbey, A., Scott, R. O., & Smith, M. J. (1993). Physical, subjective, and social availability: Their relationship to alcohol consumption in rural and urban areas. Addiction, 88, 489–499.
Delva, J., Wallace, J. M., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., Johnston, L. D., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2005). The epidemiology of alcohol, marijuana, and cocaine use among Mexican American, Puerto Rican, Cuban American, and other Latin American eighth-grade students in the United States: 1991–2002. American Journal of Public Health, 95, 696–702.
Dent, C. W., Grube, J. W., & Biglan, A. B. (2005). Community level alcohol availability and enforcement of possession laws as predictors of youth drinking. Preventive Medicine, 40, 355–362.
Edwards, R. W., Stanley, L. R., Plested, B. A., Marquart, B. S., Chen, J., & Jumper Thurman, P. (2007). Disparities in young adolescent inhalant use by rurality, gender and ethnicity. Substance Use and Misuse, 42(4), 643–670.
Gruenewald, P. J., Millar, A. B., Treno, A. J., Yang, Z., Ponicki, W. R., & Roeper, P. (1996). Geography of availability and driving after drinking. Addiction, 91, 967–983.
Gruenewald, P. J., Ponicki, W. R., & Holder, H. D. (1993). The relationship of outlet densities to alcohol consumption: A time series cross-sectional analysis. Alcohol Clinical and Experimental Research, 17, 38–46.
Gruenewald, P. J., & Remer, L. (2006). Changes in outlet densities affect violence rates. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 30(7), 1184–1193.
Harker, R., & Tymms, P. (2004). The effects of student composition on school outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15(2), 177–199.
Harrison, P. A., Fulkerson, J. A., & Park, E. (2000). The relative importance of social versus commercial sources in youth access to tobacco, alcohol, and other drugs. Preventive Medicine, 31(1), 39–40.
Hauser, R. (1970). Context and consex: A cautionary tale. American Journal of Sociology, 75(1), 645–663.
Henry, K., Slater, M., & Oetting, E. R. (2005). Alcohol use in early adolescence: The effect of changes in risk taking, perceived harm and peer alcohol use. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 66, 275–283.
Higher Education Center for Alcohol and Other Drug and Violence Prevention. (2007). Environmental management: A comprehensive strategy for reducing alcohol and other drug use on college campuses (http://www.higheredcenter.org/framework/). Retrieved April 8, 2007.
Komro, K. A., Maldonado-Molina, M. M., Tobler, A. L., Bonds, J. R., & Muller, K. E. (2007). Effects of home access and availability of alcohol on young adolescents’ alcohol use. Addiction, 102, 1597–1608.
Kuntsche, E., Kuendig, H., & Gmel, G. (2008). Alcohol outlet density, perceived availability and adolescent alcohol use: A multilevel structural equation model. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 62, 811–816.
Marshal, M. P., & Chassin, L. (2000). Peer influence on adolescent alcohol use: The moderating role of parental support and discipline. Applied Developmental Science. Special Issue: Familial and Peer Influences on Adolescent Substance Use, 4(2), 80–88.
Moore, R. S., Ames, G. M. & Cunradi, C. B. (2007). Physical and social availability of alcohol for young enlisted naval personnel in and around home port. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 2. http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/2/1/17, Retrieved last May 5, 2010.
National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse. (2000). No place to hide: Rural 8th graders using drugs, smoking, drinking at higher rates than urban 8th graders. Retrieved April 7, 2004, from http://www.casacolumbia.org/absolutenm/templates/PressReleases.asp?articleid=134&zoneid=49.
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. (2004/2005). Alcohol and development in youth: A multidisciplinary overview. Alcohol Research and Health, 28(3), 1–80.
National Institute on Drug Abuse. (2005). NIDA Research Report Series: Marijuana abuse (No. NIH Publication No. 05-3859). Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
Norton, E. C., Lindrooth, R. C., & Ennett, S. T. (1998). Controlling for the endogeneity of peer substance use on adolescent alcohol and tobacco use. Health Economics, 7(5), 439–453.
Oetting, E. R., Edwards, R., & Beauvais, F. (1985). Reliability and discriminant validity of the Children’s Drug-Use Survey. Psychological Reports, 56(3), 751–756.
Preston, D. P., & Mansfield, P. K. (Eds.). (1990). Assessing the health status of rural people: An analysis of American studies 1980–1985. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press Inc.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Rocky Mountain Behavior Science Institute, Inc. (n.d.). American drug and alcohol survey. Retrieved February 20, 2007, from http://www.rmbsi.com/A12.pdf.
Royston, P. (2004). Multiple imputation of missing values. Stata Journal, 4(3), 227–241.
Royston, P. (2005). Multiple imputation of missing values: Update. Stata Journal, 5(2), 188–201.
Royston, P. (2007). Multiple imputation of missing values: Further update of ICE, with an emphasis on interval censoring. Stata Journal, 7(4), 445–464.
Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: Wiley.
SAMHSA. (2007). SAMHSA’s Measures and Instruments Resource. Retrieved February 13, 2007, from http://preventionplatform.samhsa.gov/macro/csap/mir_search_create/redesign/search_results.cfm?Category=&Row=&CategoryID=&CFID=655964&CFTOKEN=44451760&searchmode=allinstruments.
Scribner, R. A., Cohen, D. A., & Fisher, W. (2000). Evidence of a structural effect for alcohol outlet density: A multilevel analysis. Alcoholism-Clinical and Experimental Research, 24(2), 188.
Scribner, R. A., MacKinnon, D. P., & Dwyer, J. H. (1994). Alcohol outlet density and motor vehicle crashes in Los Angeles County cities. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 55, 447–453.
Scribner, R., Mason, K., Theall, K., Simonsen, N., Schneider, S. K., Towvim, L. G., et al. (2008). The contextual role of alcohol outlet density in college drinking. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 69, 112–120.
Shafer, J., & Graham, L. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147–177.
Smart, R. A. (1980). Availability and the prevention of alcohol-related problems. In T. C. Harford, L. Parker-Langley & L. Light (Eds.), Normative approaches to the prevention of alcohol abuse and alcoholism (Vol. NIAAA Research Monograph No. 3, pp. 123–146). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
Stanley, L. R., Comello, M. L. G., Edwards, R. W., & Marquart, B. S. (2008). School adjustment in rural and urban communities: Do students from “Timbuktu” differ from their “City Slicker” peers? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37(2), 225–238.
Swaim, R. C., & Stanley, L. R. (in press). Rurality, region, ethnic community make-up and alcohol use among rural youth. Journal of Rural Health.
Treno, A. J., Grube, J. W., & Martin, S. E. (2003). Alcohol availability as a predictor of youth drinking and driving: A hierarchical analysis of survey and archival data. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 27(5), 835–840.
Treno, A. J., Gruenewald, P. J., & Johnson, F. W. (2001). Alcohol availability and injury: The role of local outlet densities. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 25, 1467–1471.
Truong, K. D., & Sturm, R. (2009). Alcohol environments and disparities in exposure associated with adolescent drinking in California. American Journal of Public Health, 99(2), 264–270.
Wagenaar, A. C., Toomey, T. L., & Lenk, K. M. (2004/2005). Environmental influences on young adult drinking. Alcohol Research & Health, 28(4), 230–235.
Wallace, J. M., Jr., Bachman, J. G., O’Malley, P. M., Schulenberg, J. E., Cooper, S. M., & Johnston, L. D. (2003). Gender and ethnic differences in smoking, drinking, and illicit drug use among American 8th, 10th, and 12th grade students: 1976–2000. Addiction, 98, 225–234.
Windle, M. (2000). Parental, sibling, and peer influences on adolescent substance use and alcohol problems. Applied Developmental Science, 4, 98–110.
Acknowledgments
Support for this research has been provided by a grant from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse & Alcoholism (R21 AA017267, Linda R. Stanley & Randall C. Swaim PI’s).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stanley, L.R., Henry, K.L. & Swaim, R.C. Physical, Social, and Perceived Availabilities of Alcohol and Last Month Alcohol Use in Rural and Small Urban Communities. J Youth Adolescence 40, 1203–1214 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9556-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9556-z