Abstract
Although self-control often requires behavioral inaction (i.e., not eating a piece of cake), the process of inhibiting impulsive behavior is commonly characterized as cognitively active (i.e., actively exerting self-control). Two experiments examined whether motivation for action or inaction facilitates self-control behavior in the presence of tempting stimuli. Experiment 1 used a delay discounting task to assess the ability to delay gratification with respect to money. Experiment 2 used a Go/No-Go task to assess the ability to inhibit a dominant but incorrect motor response to the words “condom” and “sex”. The results demonstrate that goals for inaction promote self-control, whereas goals for action promote impulsive behavior. These findings are discussed in light of recent evidence suggesting that goals for action and inaction modulate physiological resources that promote behavioral execution.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
There was a main effect of gender on the delay discounting task, such that males (M = 0.044; SD = 0.024) were significantly more impulsive than females (M = 0.017; SD = 0.017), F(1,25) = 8.30, p < .01. However, gender did not interact with prime to influence impulsivity, F(1,25) = 0.78, p = .39.
There was no main effect of gender, F(1,39) = 1.16, p = .29, no gender by prime interaction, F(2,39) = 0.00, p = .99, no gender by stimulus interaction, F(1,39) = 1.33, p = .26, and no gender by prime by stimulus interaction, F(2,39) = 0.60, p = .56.
References
Ainslie, G. (1975). Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 463–496.
Albarracin, D., & Handley, I. M. (2011). The time for doing is not the time for change: Effects of general action and inaction goals on attitude retrieval and attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 983–998.
Albarracin, D., Handley, I. M., Noguchi, K., McCulloch, K. C., Li, H., Leeper, J., et al. (2008). Increasing and decreasing motor and cognitive output: A model of general action and inaction goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 510–523.
Albarracin, D., Hepler, J., & Tannenbaum, M. (2011). General action and inaction goals: Their behavioral, cognitive, and affective origins and influences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 119–123.
Albarracin, D., Wang, W., & Leeper, J. (2009). Immediate increase in food intake following exercise messages. Obesity, 17, 1451–1452.
Bargh, J. A. (1990). Auto-motives: Preconscious determinants of social interaction. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (pp. 93–130). New York: Guilford Press.
Bargh, J. A., Gollwitzer, P. M., Lee-Chai, A., Barndollar, K., & Trötschel, R. (2001). The automated will: Nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1014–1027.
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited-resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1252–1265.
Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Tice, D. M. (2007). The strength model of self-control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 351–355.
Brehm, J. W., Wright, R. A., Solomon, S., Silka, L., & Greenberg, J. (1983). Perceived difficulty, energization, and the magnitude of goal valence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 21–48.
Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1996). Automatic activation of impression formation and memorization goals: Nonconscious goal priming reproduces effects of explicit task instructions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 464–478.
Cherek, D. R., Moeller, F. G., Dougherty, D. M., & Rhoades, H. (1997). Studies of violent and nonviolent male parolees: II. Laboratory and psychometric measurements of impulsivity. Biological Psychiatry, 41, 523–529.
Derefinko, K. J., Adams, Z. W., Milich, R., Fillmore, M. T., Lorch, E. P., & Lynam, D. R. (2008). Response style differences in the inattentive and combined subtypes of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 745–758.
Dickman, S. J. (1990). Functional and dysfunctional Impulsivity: Personality and cognitive correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 95–102.
Dolan, M., & Fullam, R. (2004). Behavioural and psychometric measures of impulsivity in a personality disordered population. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 15, 426–450.
Dom, G., de Wilde, B., Hulstijn, W., van den Brink, W., & Sabbe, B. (2006). Behavioural aspects of impulsivity in alcoholics with and without a cluster-B personality disorder. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 41, 412–420.
Förster, J., Liberman, N., & Friedman, R. (2007). Seven principles of goal activation: A systematic approach to distinguishing goal priming from priming of non-goal constructs. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 211–233.
Gailliot, M. T., Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, C. N., Maner, J. K., Plant, E. A., Tice, D. M., et al. (2007). Self-control relies on glucose as a limited energy source: Willpower is more than a metaphor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 325–336.
Gendolla, G. H. E., & Silvestrini, N. (2010). The implicit “go”: Masked action cues directly mobilize mental effort. Psychological Science, 21, 1389–1393.
Green, L., Myerson, J., & McFadden, E. (1997). Rate of temporal discounting decreases with amount of reward. Memory & Cognition, 25, 715–723.
Job, V., Dweck, C. S., & Walton, G. M. (2011). Ego depletion—Is it all in your head? Implicit theories about willpower affect self-regulation. Psychological Science, 21, 1686–1693.
Kirby, K. N., Petry, N. M., & Bickel, W. K. (1999). Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 78–87.
Laran, J. (2010). The influence of information processing goal pursuit on postdecision affect and behavioral intentions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 16–28.
Lawyer, S. R. (2008). Probability and delay discounting of erotic stimuli. Behavioral Processes, 79, 36–42.
Logan, G. D., & Cowan, W. B. (1984). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control. Psychological Review, 91, 295–327.
Metcalfe, J., & Mischel, W. (1999). A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: Dynamics of willpower. Psychological Review, 106, 3–19.
Mitchell, S. H. (2004). Measuring impulsivity and modeling its association with cigarette smoking. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3, 261–275.
Noguchi, K., Handley, I. M., & Albarracin, D. (2011). Participating in politics resembles physical activity: General action and inaction patterns in international archives, United States archives, and experiments. Psychological Science, 22, 235–242.
Swann, A. C., Bjork, J. M., Moeller, G., & Dougherty, D. M. (2002). Two models of impulsivity: Relationship to personality traits and psychopathology. Biological Psychiatry, 51, 988–994.
Wright, R. A., Brehm, J. W., & Bushman, B. J. (1989). Cardiovascular responses to threat: Effects of the difficulty and availability of a cognitive avoidant task. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 161–171.
Wright, R. A., & Kirby, L. D. (2001). Effort determination of cardiovascular response: An integrative analysis with applications in social psychology. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 255–307.
Yeomans, M. R., Leitch, M., & Mobini, S. (2008). Impulsivity is associated with the disinhibition but not restraint factor from the Three Factor Eating Questionnaire. Appetite, 50, 469–476.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hepler, J., Albarracin, D., McCulloch, K.C. et al. Being active and impulsive: The role of goals for action and inaction in self-control. Motiv Emot 36, 416–424 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-011-9263-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-011-9263-4