Skip to main content
Log in

Cytobrush-culture method to diagnose tinea capitis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Mycopathologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This is a comparative study to isolate the dermatophytes of tinea capitis using the cytobrush and comparing it versus the standard method. A prospective, observational, comparative trial of 178 probable cases of tinea capitis was conducted in two dermatological centers. Each patient underwent mycological tests that included direct exam with KOH and cultures with either of two methods: scraping the scalp to remove hair and cell debris, and the cytobrush. A total of 135 clinically and mycologically proven cases of tinea capitis were included; 119 were non-inflammatory and 16 inflammatory tinea. A total of 131 had a positive direct exam and subsequent primary isolation cultures were obtained in 135 cases. The main dermatophytes isolated were Microsporum canis (68%) and Trichophyton tonsurans (20%). A total of 115/135 (85.1%), were detected with the traditional method, with an average of 11.2 days until positive, while the number detected with the cytobrush was 132/135 (97.7%) with an average of 8.5 days until positive. The chi-square statistical method showed that the cytobrush culture was superior to the standard one with a chi-square of 5.078 (P = 0.025), with a statistically significant difference versus the standard method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Elewski B. Tinea capitis. Dermatol Clin 1996;14:23–31.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Higgins EM, Fueller LC, Smith CH. Guidelines for the management of tinea capitis. Brit J Dermatol 2000;143:53–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Elewski B. Tinea capitis: a current perspective. J Am Acad Derm atol 2000;42:1–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mohrenschlager M, Seidl HP, Ring J, Abeck D. Pediatric tinea capitis: recognition and management. Am J Clin Dermatol 2005;6:203–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sehgal VN, Saxena AK, Kumari S. Tinea capitis. A clinicoetilogic correlation. Int J Dermatol 1985;24:116–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Suh DC, Friedlander SF, Raut M, Chang J, Vo L, Shin HC, Tavakkol A. Tinea capitis in the United States: diagnosis, treatment, and costs. J Am Acad Dermatol 2006;55:1111–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Al Sogair S, Hay R. Fungal infection in children: tinea capitis. Clin Dermatol 2000; 18:679–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gupta AK, Summerbell RC. Tinea capitis. Med Mycol 2000; 38:255–87.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mackenzie DWR. Hairbrush diagnosis in detection and eradication of non-fluorescent scalp ringworm. Br Med J 1963;10:363–5.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hubbard TW, Triquet JM. Brush-culture method for diagnosing tinea capitis. Pediatrics 1992;90:416–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Head ES, Henry JC, Macdonald EM. The cotton swab technique for culture of dermatophyte infections, its efficacy and merit. J Am Acad Dermatol 1984;11:797–801.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Friedlander SF, Pickering B, Cunningham BB, Gibbs NF, Eichenfield LF. Use of cotton swab method in diagnosing tinea capitis. Pediatrics. 1999;104:276–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Aste N, Pau M, Biggio P. Kerion Celsi: a clinical epidemiological study. Mycoses 1998;41:169–73.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Alvarez MS, Silverberg NB. Tinea capitis. Cutis 2006;78:189–96.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cremer G, Bournerias I, Vandemeleubroucke E, Houin R, Revuz J. Tinea capitis in adults: misdiagnosis or reappearance? Dermatology 1997;194:8–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Medina D, Padilla MC, Fernández R, Arenas R, Bonifaz A. Tiña de la cabeza en adultos: estudio clínico micológico y epidemiológico de 30 casos de la Ciudad de México. Piel 2004;18:403–8.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Babel DE, Baughman SA. Evaluation of the adult carrier state in juvenile tinea capitis caused by Trichophyton tonsurans. J Am Acad Dermatol 1989;21:209–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Vargo K, Cohen B. Prevalence of undetected tinea capitis in household members of children with disease. Pediatrics 1993;92:155–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Frieden IJ. Tinea capitis: asymptomatic carriage of infection. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1999;18:186–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandro Bonifaz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bonifaz, A., Isa-Isa, R., Araiza, J. et al. Cytobrush-culture method to diagnose tinea capitis. Mycopathologia 163, 309–313 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-007-9019-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-007-9019-6

Keywords

Navigation