Craniopharyngiomas are locally aggressive tumors which typically are focused in the sellar and suprasellar region near a number of critical neural and vascular structures mediating endocrinologic, behavioral, and visual functions. The present study aims to summarize and compare the published literature regarding morbidity resulting from treatment of craniopharyngioma. We performed a comprehensive search of the published English language literature to identify studies publishing outcome data of patients undergoing surgery for craniopharyngioma. Comparisons of the rates of endocrine, vascular, neurological, and visual complications were performed using Pearson’s chi-squared test, and covariates of interest were fitted into a multivariate logistic regression model. In our data set, 540 patients underwent surgical resection of their tumor. 138 patients received biopsy alone followed by some form of radiotherapy. Mean overall follow-up for all patients in these studies was 54 ± 1.8 months. The overall rate of new endocrinopathy for all patients undergoing surgical resection of their mass was 37% (95% CI = 33–41). Patients receiving GTR had over 2.5 times the rate of developing at least one endocrinopathy compared to patients receiving STR alone or STR + XRT (52 vs. 19 vs. 20%, χ2P < 0.00001). On multivariate analysis, GTR conferred a significant increase in the risk of endocrinopathy compared to STR + XRT (OR = 3.45, 95% CI = 2.05–5.81, P < 0.00001), after controlling for study size and the presence of significant hypothalamic involvement. There was a statistical trend towards worse visual outcomes in patients receiving XRT after STR compared to GTR or STR alone (GTR = 3.5% vs. STR 2.1% vs. STR + XRT 6.4%, P = 0.11). Given the difficulty in obtaining class 1 data regarding the treatment of this tumor, this study can serve as an estimate of expected outcomes for these patients, and guide decision making until these data are available.
Introduction
Craniopharyngiomas are locally aggressive tumors which typically are focused in the sellar and suprasellar region near a number of critical neural and vascular structures mediating endocrinologic, behavioral, and visual functions. Multimodality therapy for these tumors can be challenging, given the significant potential for harm with any intervention involving the structures in this region, as well as the young age of many of the patients with these lesions.
For many years, gross total resection (GTR) was felt to be the treatment of choice, given the better rates of tumor control compared to subtotal resection (STR) alone, and the avoidance of radiotherapy in young patients. Experience with aggressive surgical resection has led some to conclude that a general goal of GTR in all cases might lead to unacceptable rates of endocrinologic and behavioral morbidity, and that GTR could be replaced with subtotal debulking followed by stereotactic conformal radiotherapy [1‐4]. This potential benefit must be tempered against the risk of radiation induced injury to nearby radiosensitive normal structures, notably the optic chiasm [5, 6]. The present study aims to summarize and compare the published literature regarding morbidity resulting from treatment of craniopharyngioma.
Anzeige
Materials and methods
Article selection
Articles were identified via a PubMed search using the key phrases “craniopharyngioma,” alone and in combination with “optic,” “morbidity,” “pituitary,” “hypopituitarism,” “endocrine,” “complications,” “visual,” and “vision.” Inclusion criteria were: (1) All patients had to have follow-up data available. (2) Articles had to have enough information for each patient to be disaggregated. The rationale for the exclusion of aggregated data sets is described below. Exclusion criteria were: (1) Articles that combined patient outcomes of craniopharyngioma with other childhood tumors were excluded, unless there was a clear distinction between the two separate groups of patients. (2) Rathke’s Pouch tumors were excluded from this study. After reviewing these articles, a thorough review of all referenced sources was also performed.
All references that contained disaggregated data specifically addressing complication rates with adequate follow up in patients who had undergone surgical resection with or without fXRT or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as adjuvant or monotherapy were included in our analysis. In addition, we included patients undergoing surgery via the extended transsphenoidal route in the surgery cohort, where appropriate.
Data extraction
Our searches yielded a total of 274 studies [3, 7‐279] (Table 1) reporting data for 8058 non-duplicated craniophayngioma patients. After analyzing the complication rates in aggregated cohorts, we concluded that complication rates were likely underreported in aggregated data sets (for example, the reported rate of endocrinopathy with GTR was 2.1% in the aggregated datasets, compared with a more realistic 52% in series which presented individual patients separately). Thus, we chose to analyze only these disaggregated datasets.
Table 1
Pubmed ID’s of identified studies
102623
3984798
8607079
11322455
15141142
16700314
290201
4084876
8748817
11345343
15185112
16700318
290203
4308176
8869189
11441284
15206435
16798405
290204
4542715
8869774
11465396
15272926
16825115
290207
5059968
8883637
11515727
15290187
16850111
408309
5573248
9007857
11585327
15322844
16888556
430156
5648949
9068702
11685525
15335421
17015135
615967
5821004
9112447
11740179
15367800
17041520
622676
5842310
9224913
11769865
15558704
17042979
928713
6156805
9298276
11810394
15570985
17046151
975700
6168950
9361074
11841735
15670196
17161483
1011020
6293388
9361075
11862438
15681858
17185886
1110394
6381061
9364961
11938361
15759158
17233305
1174243
6470759
9440495
11942362
15800425
17330531
1403127
6511526
9482551
11949829
15807869
17337922
1414528
6657077
9728244
11961313
15851090
17407137
1527612
6673882
9782245
11981627
15871507
17415187
1669245
6833018
9806520
11990811
15895298
17469176
1727168
6853252
9814465
12060820
15928963
17533510
1772600
6886754
9840379
12062594
15931512
17566208
1803868
7099406
9950494
12099569
15957193
17592268
1955511
7104980
9950495
12116534
15959732
17627142
2002381
7105886
10066013
12134929
15959733
17762741
2013769
7121821
10070421
12197795
15959734
18311527
2080379
7264728
10086237
12243827
15959735
2095298
7413035
10232528
12376777
15965667
2116387
7431164
10424206
12382167
15971075
2204689
7438834
10433322
12419438
15989759
2311109
7530989
10445444
12420123
15995885
2352012
7530989
10461071
12447234
16001286
2398383
7568823
10616560
12456941
16028088
2441286
7596502
10616561
12495299
16034620
2494851
7616262
10659012
12507105
16044343
2501242
7619722
10681689
12507107
16055476
2672706
7673031
10690718
12555247
16124175
2689398
7818929
10703499
12677102
16133275
2894566
7841079
10726829
12786772
16133276
2912938
7841080
10760417
12820755
16133277
3336845
7841081
10867561
12823875
16175850
3396018
7841082
10883334
12825216
16216361
3396019
7841084
10892270
12845200
16320025
3442400
7841085
10975938
12922045
16327556
3489356
7885544
11013625
12925239
16383245
3628817
7942198
11014425
14519213
16500745
3712025
8021691
11118572
14558670
16580494
3738985
8027806
11124639
14961770
16630407
3794057
8272006
11131489
14967425
16700308
3799245
8327728
11143262
15035280
16700310
3968554
8422329
11155065
15040718
16700311
3968556
8438080
11234912
15046646
16700313
Disaggregated data useable for analysis were presented for 800 individual patients. Data were stratified into five groups based on treatment paradigm: STR alone, GTR alone, STR plus adjuvant post-operative radiotherapy (STR + XRT), biopsy followed by fractionated radiotherapy (fXRT), or biopsy followed by radiosurgery (SRS) alone. We did not directly compare the radiation only groups (SRS and fXRT) to the surgically treated patients.
Anzeige
Endocrinopathy was defined as the development of any new monohormonal or polyhormonal anterior hypopituitarism, or diabetes insipidus. Vascular injury referred to any gross injury to the circle of Willis or perforating vessel, as well as any reported post-treatment cerebral infarction. Neurologic injury referred to the development of a post-treatment non-endocrine, non-visual neurologic deficit. Visual deterioration was defined as permanent loss or decrease in visual acuity, or a new visual field cut in either eye. Studies which did not present patient data in a way that these variables could reliably be determined were excluded from further analysis.
Statistical analysis
Pearson’s χ2 test was used to analyze for differences in categorical factors. Fisher’s exact test was used if there were less than five values per cell. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to evaluate for statistical differences in pre-operative continuous factors, including age and tumor size. Post-hoc between group analyses were performed when the ANOVA demonstrated P < 0.05 using Tukey’s test. All analyses were carried out using SPSS version 16.0 (SPPS, Inc.).
Logistic regression analysis
Univariate analysis was used to identify covariates which might affect the rate of neurologic, endrocrinologic, vascular, or visual complications in these patients. Binary and categorical variables were compared using Pearson’s χ2 test, or the χ2 test for trend, respectively. Cut-offs for variables were determined empirically by first analyzing the data in smaller categories, and then aggregating groups which seemed statistically homogeneous. Variables which impacted rates of complication with a P = 0.2 or less on univariate analysis were included in stepwise binary logistic regression modeling [280]. All odds ratios on multivariate analysis, reflect the risk of having nonservicable hearing a neurologic or endocrine complication compared to the reference group. Reference groups included the STR + XRT cohort for the extent of resection analysis and the large sample size studies for the surgeon experience analysis. The goodness of fit of the regression model was confirmed by demonstrating a non-significant P-value on the Hosmer-Lemeshow test [280, 281].
We tested interaction terms between each of the three variables to significantly impact hearing on univariate analysis. The statistical significance of the interactions was assessed with the use of backward stepwise regression, in which statistical significance was estimated by means of the likelihood-ratio test to assess the effect of removing interaction terms for all strata of the given variable [280]. After finding that none of the interaction terms would significantly (unadjusted P > 0.2 for all terms) alter the log likelihood of the regression model if removed, we calculated the adjusted odds ratios without adjusting for interactions.
Of note, while tumor size is a variable of interest, it is inconsistently presented in most studies, and we were only able to collect data on tumor size for 87 patients. Because these data were not enough to include in the multivariate regression modeling, we present only univariate data regarding the relationship between tumor size and complications.
Results
Clinical characteristics of included patients
In our data set, 540 patients underwent surgical resection of their tumor. GTR was achieved in 289 cases, while STR was achieved in 251 cases. Of patients receiving STR, 110 patients received fXRT, and 141 did not. Surgical patients in different cohorts did not differ in mean age at the time of surgery, gender distribution, or pre-operative tumor size.
138 patients received biopsy alone followed by some form of radiotherapy. 72/138 of these patients received fXRT, and 66/138 patients received SRS. Age and gender distribution did not differ between patients receiving fXRT and SRS.
The remaining patients did not have adequate data to facilitate our analysis and were excluded. Mean overall follow-up for all patients in these studies was 54 ± 1.8 months.
Anzeige
The mean number of patients per study was 5.8 patients, (range 1–45 patients per study). 34% of the patients in the study came from series of 10 or less patients, 22% came from series of 10–20 patients, and 43% came from series larger than 20 patients. The modest sample sizes in many of the included studies is an inevitable consequence of the decision to use only disaggregated data, as larger studies generally provide summary statistics instead of individual patient data, and as discussed below, frequently do not report rates of morbidity in a way which can be realistically analyzed.
The rates of neurologic injury after treatment for craniopharyngioma
New neurologic deficits were reported in 5.1% of patients undergoing surgery (95% CI = 3.3–7.1), and in 2.2% of patients undergoing fXRT or SRS alone (95% CI = 0–4.6) (Table 2). There was no statistically significant difference in the rates of neurologic deficits between patients receiving GTR alone, STR alone, or STR + XRT (6.9 vs. 4.2 vs. 1.8%, P = NS) in the univariate analysis, or between patients receiving fXRT and those receiving SRS (1.4 vs. 3.0%, P = NS) (Fig. 2).
Table 2
Summary of overall rates of morbidity
95% CI
Endocrinopathy
Surgery
33–41
fXRT/SRS
8.8–28
Vascular injury
Surgery
0–0.9
fXRT/SRS
0
Neurologic deficit
Surgery
3.3–7.1
fXRT/SRS
0–4.6
Vision deterioration
Surgery
2.1–5.3
fXRT/SRS
3.9–13.4
Interestingly, on multivariate analysis, GTR conferred a significant increase in the risk of neurologic deficits compared to STR + XRT (OR = 5.05, 95% CI = 1.15–22.21, P = 0.03) (Table 5), after controlling for study size.
Gross total resection markedly increases the rate of endocrinopathy
The overall rate of new endocrinopathy for all patients undergoing surgical resection of their mass was 37% (95% CI = 33–41) (Table 2). Table 3 summarizes the rates of individual endocrinopathies. Significant monoendocrinopathies of TSH and ACTH were reported commonly, as was diabetes insipidus (DI). Anterior panhypopituitarism was reported in as many as 11.8% in patients undergoing GTR.
Table 3
Summary of various types of monohormonal and polyhormonal endocrinopathy following treatment of craniopharyngioma
GTR (%)
STR (%)
STR + XRT (%)
fXRT
SRS (%)
Hyperprolactinemia
0.0
0.0
0.9
N/A
0.0
Hypogonadism
3.5
2.1
1.8
N/A
3.0
Hypothyroid
13.8
5.7
1.8
N/A
7.6
GH deficiency
6.2
1.4
1.8
N/A
0.0
ACTH deficiency
14.5
6.4
0.9
N/A
3.0
Anterior panhypopituitarism
11.8
3.5
10.0
N/A
3.0
DI
18.7
6.4
5.5
N/A
0.0
Obesity
2.1
0.7
2.7
N/A
1.5
Any endocrinopathy
51.9
19.9
20.0
N/A
18.2
Anzeige
Patients receiving GTR had over 2.5 times the rate of developing at least one endocrinopathy compared to patients receiving STR alone or STR + XRT (52 vs. 19 vs. 20%, χ2P < 0.00001) (Fig. 1). The rates of endocrinopathy for patients receiving fXRT alone were not reported, and thus these data were not analyzed.
×
On multivariate analysis, GTR conferred a significant increase in the risk of endocrinopathy compared to STR + XRT (OR = 3.45, 95% CI = 2.05–5.81, P < 0.00001) (Table 5), after controlling for study size and the presence of significant hypothalamic involvement.
The rates of vascular injury after surgery for craniopharyngioma
Vascular injury was an uncommon complication of craniopharyngioma surgery, occurring in just two cases (95% CI = 0–0.9) (Table 2), both resulting in ischemic cerebral infarction. No vascular complications were reported in any patients undergoing radiation treatment alone.
The rates of visual decline after treatment for craniopharyngioma
Visual decline was reported in 3.7% of patients undergoing surgery (95% CI = 2.1–5.3), and 8.6% of patients undergoing fXRT or SRS alone (95% CI = 3.9–13.4) (Table 2). There was a statistical trend towards worse visual outcomes in patients receiving XRT after STR compared to GTR or STR alone (GTR = 3.5% vs. STR 2.1% vs. STR + XRT 6.4%, P = 0.11). Visual outcomes did not differ between patients receiving fXRT and those receiving SRS (11.1 vs. 6.1%, P = NS) (Fig. 2).
×
Anzeige
Univariate risk factors for morbidity after craniopharyngioma surgery
Table 4 demonstrates univariate comparisons of rates of morbidities with patients stratified by age, tumor size, and extent of hypothalamic involvement. Note that in our univariate analysis, Patient age was not a significant univariate predictor of any form of complication, regardless of where the cut-off was placed in this analysis (one such analysis is provided in Table 4). Extensive hypothalamic involvement did increase the risk of endocrinologic complications, however this was not an independent predictor of morbidity when extent of resection was controlled for (Table 5).
Table 4
Univariate analyses of the effect of potential confounding variables on rates of neurologic, endocrinologic, vascular, and visual morbidity in the published literature
Neurologic
Endocrine
Vascular
Visual
# Patients in study
1–10
9%
2%
1%
6%
11–20
2%
7%
0%
2%
21+
1%
1%
0%
4%
P < 0.001
P < 0.01
P = 0.12
P = 0.45
Patient age
0–2
9%
48%
0%
4%
2.1–5
5%
41%
0%
0%
5.1–10
5%
44%
1%
2%
11–20
5%
34%
0%
2%
21–50
5%
37%
1%
4%
51+
2%
31%
0%
3%
P = 0.84
P = 0.41
P = 0.85
P = 0.73
Tumor size
<3 cm
0%
36%
0%
6%
≥3 cm
10%
43%
2%
0%
P = 0.06
P = 0.33
P = 0.59
P = 0.16
Hypothalamic involvement
Minor or none
5%
40%
5%
3%
Extensive
5%
33%
5%
5%
P = 0.50
P = 0.09
P = 0.43
P = 0.35
Table 5
Multivariate logistic regression demonstrating the risk of neurologic and endocrinologic morbidity controlling for extent of resection, study size, and presence of extensive hypothalamic involvement
OR
95% CI
P-value
−
+
Neurologic
GTR
5.05
1.15
22.21
0.03
STR
2.41
0.45
12.79
0.30
Study size 1–10
2.54
1.02
6.29
0.04
Study size 11–20
0.31
0.06
1.53
0.15
Endocrine
Extensive hypothalamic involvement
1.28
0.78
2.08
0.33
GTR
3.45
2.05
5.81
<0.00001
STR
1.89
1.05
3.38
0.03
Study size 1–10
1.02
0.66
1.58
0.92
Study size 11–20
0.61
0.35
1.05
0.08
Note that the odds ratio for the GTR and STR groups are expressed relative to the STR + XRT group, and that the odds ratios for the study size groups are expressed relative to studies with the group with the largest study size
As stated in the methods, while tumor size is a variable of interest, it is inconsistently presented in most studies, and we were only able to collect data on tumor size for 87 patients. Because these data were not enough to include in the multivariate regression modeling, we present only univariate data regarding the relationship between tumor size and complications. Patients undergoing surgery for tumors with a size greater than or equal to 3 cm experienced a statistical trend towards a higher rate of neurologic complications compared to patients with smaller tumors (10 vs. 0%, P = 0.06) (Table 4). The rates of endocrinologic, vascular, and visual complications were similar between patients with larger and smaller tumors (Fig. 3).
×
The effect of surgical experience on rates of morbidity following treatment for craniopharyngioma
Surgical experience is generally not specifically reported in craniopharyngioma series in the literature. Using the sample size in these studies as a surrogate for surgical experience, we found a significant reduction in rates of most complications with increasing sample size (Table 4). More specifically, there was a linear decrease in the rates of neurologic complications with increasing study sample size (1–10 patients: 9%, 11–20 patients: 2%, 21+ patients: 1%, P < 0.0001), and a decrease in rates of endocrinopathy favoring studies larger than 20 patients (1–10 patients: 2%, 11–20 patients: 7%, 21+ patients: 1%, P < 0.01). Vascular injuries were also only reported in small series 1–10 patients: 1%, 11–20 patients: 0%, 21+ patients: 0%, P = 0.12), however this did not reach statistical significance due to the small number of events. Rates of visual complications did not differ between groups of different sample size (1–10 patients: 6%, 11–20 patients: 2%, 21+ patients: 4%, P = 0.45).
On multivariate analysis, studies with small sample sizes remained an independent predictor of increased rates of neurologic morbidity compared to those with large sample size (OR = 2.54, 95% CI = 1.02–6.29, P = 0.04) (Table 5), after controlling for treatment paradigm administered. Study sample size was not an independent predictor of endocrinologic morbidity on multivariate analysis.
Discussion
Currently, there are few definitive studies regarding management strategies for patients with craniopharyngiomas. This study aims to utilize a systematic collection of the published data on craniopharyngioma, to critically evaluate the idea that subtotal resection with adjuvant radiotherapy can serve as a desirable replacement for gross total resection, with lower post-surgical rates of monohormonal and panhormonal hypothalamic/pituitary endocrinopathy.
Based on our analyses, endocrinopathy is a common iatrogenic complication of treatment of craniopharyngiomas with either surgical resection or radiosurgery, however it is not unexpectedly higher with surgery. Gross total resection markedly increases the rate of hormonal disturbances compared to subtotal resection with or without radiotherapy, with over half of patients experiencing at least one endocrinopathy, and over 10% of patients being left with panhypopituitarism. Even after correcting for as many covariates as the data would allow, GTR still increased the rate of post-operative endocrinopathy by over three fold. These data support the concept that attempting gross total resection in these lesions is a difficult trade of endocrine function for tumor control, and that subtotal resection might be better for the patient’s overall quality of life. Further, previous work focusing on craniopharyngioma suggests that craniopharyngiomas frequently recur despite GTR, and that subtotal resection followed by adjuvant radiotherapy provides similar rates of tumor control to that achieved with gross total resection [282]. Taken together, these data argue that gross total resection of craniopharyngiomas may not be the best treatment option for most patients, however further work specifically focusing on the quality of life concerns of patients undergoing these treatment paradigms is needed to definitively conclude that STR + XRT is better for the patients than GTR.
The remaining argument against adjuvant radiation in this region is the risk of visual deterioration with administering radiotherapy or radiosurgery in close proximity to the optic apparatus. In our study, all irradiated patient cohorts experienced an increased rate of visual compromise compared to surgery only cohorts. While adjuvant radiotherapy following subtotal cytoreductive surgery did not reach statistical significance for worse visual outcomes, It is possible that a lack of statistical power in our cohort prevented statistical significance that would have been demonstrated by a larger study. It is important to note that this difference might be as large as a 10% in visual decline over GTR at the extremes of the confidence intervals, which would be a serious argument in favor of eliminating the need for XRT with GTR. This idea clearly deserves additional inquiry, especially for driving subtotal resections towards a targeted attack aimed at creating distance between the tumor and the optic apparatus.
Additionally, our analysis demonstrates that experience with craniopharyngiomas matters, and that experienced surgeons have lower rates of complications, even after correcting for tumor characteristics, and surgical philosophy. More specifically, using study size as a surrogate for surgical experience, more experienced surgeons have lower rates of neurologic complications than less experienced surgeons. We speculate that increased familiarity with the pathoanatomy of these tumors, combined with decreased need for brain retraction by experienced surgeons, leads to decreased rates of injury of surrounding neural structures.
Study limitations
While these findings represent a helpful summary of the published literature on this topic, an analysis of published data is limited by the data published by others, and may reflect source study biases. It is impossible for us to control for the quality of the data reported in the literature. For example, the majority of this data set is derived from self-reported outcomes largely assessed by the treating surgeon and colleagues. It is impossible for us to assess or control for the quality of the data reported in the literature, or the unwillingness to report complications. Such omissions would inevitably change the rates reported in our study. Further, subjectively defined variables, such as histologic diagnosis, extent of resection, and the adequacy of radiation therapy likely vary between studies, and we cannot independently confirm the validity of these definitions in other groups’ publications.
Finally, due to the diverse range of data presentation, the number of variables able to be studied and controlled for is limited. Variables that might be of interest which are inconsistently presented across studies cannot be reviewed. Specifically, we cannot completely control for the effect of tumor size on rates of complications, because unfortunately, not everyone publishes these data.
Conclusion
In this study, we summarized and compared the rates of endocrine, neurologic, vascular, and visual complications reported in craniopharyngioma patients. Given the difficulty in obtaining class 1 data regarding the treatment of this tumor, this study can serve as an estimate of expected outcomes for these patients, and guide decision making until these data become available.
Acknowledgments
Dr Parsa is supported, in part, by the Reza and Georgianna Khatib endowed chair in skull base tumor surgery. Dr Sughrue is supported by the AANS NREF. Mr Rutkowski is supported by the Doris Duke foundation. Mr Kane is supported by the Howard Hughes Medical Foundation and the Ivy Foundation.
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Open AccessThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Mit e.Med Neurologie & Psychiatrie erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen der Fachgebiete, den Premium-Inhalten der dazugehörigen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.
Mit e.Med Neurologie erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen des Fachgebietes, den Premium-Inhalten der neurologischen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten Neurologie-Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.