Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 6/2010

01.12.2010 | Research Article

Evaluation of three brands of drug interaction software for use in intensive care units

verfasst von: Adriano Max Moreira Reis, Silvia Helena De Bortoli Cassiani

Erschienen in: International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy | Ausgabe 6/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective To evaluate drug interaction software programs and determine their accuracy in identifying drug-drug interactions that may occur in intensive care units. Setting The study was developed in Brazil. Method Drug interaction software programs were identified through a bibliographic search in PUBMED and in LILACS (database related to the health sciences published in Latin American and Caribbean countries). The programs’ sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were determined to assess their accuracy in detecting drug–drug interactions. The accuracy of the software programs identified was determined using 100 clinically important interactions and 100 clinically unimportant ones. Stockley’s Drug Interactions 8th edition was employed as the gold standard in the identification of drug-drug interaction. Main outcome Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values. Results The programs studied were: Drug Interaction Checker (DIC), Drug-Reax (DR), and Lexi-Interact (LI). DR displayed the highest sensitivity (0.88) and DIC showed the lowest (0.69). A close similarity was observed among the programs regarding specificity (0.88–0.92) and positive predictive values (0.88–0.89). The DIC had the lowest negative predictive value (0.75) and DR the highest (0.91). Conclusion The DR and LI programs displayed appropriate sensitivity and specificity for identifying drug–drug interactions of interest in intensive care units. Drug interaction software programs help pharmacists and health care teams in the prevention and recognition of drug–drug interactions and optimize safety and quality of care delivered in intensive care units.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Mouly S, Meune C, Bergmann JF. Mini-series: I. Basic science. Uncertainty and inaccuracy of predicting CYP-mediated in vivo drug interactions in the ICU from in vitro models: focus on CYP3A4. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35(3):417–29.CrossRefPubMed Mouly S, Meune C, Bergmann JF. Mini-series: I. Basic science. Uncertainty and inaccuracy of predicting CYP-mediated in vivo drug interactions in the ICU from in vitro models: focus on CYP3A4. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35(3):417–29.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Spriet I, Meersseman W, de Hoon J, et al. Mini-series: II. Clinical aspects. Clinically relevant CYP450-mediated drug interactions in the ICU. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35(4):603–12.CrossRefPubMed Spriet I, Meersseman W, de Hoon J, et al. Mini-series: II. Clinical aspects. Clinically relevant CYP450-mediated drug interactions in the ICU. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35(4):603–12.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Barrons R. Evaluation of personal digital assistant software for drug interactions. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2004;61(4):380–5.PubMed Barrons R. Evaluation of personal digital assistant software for drug interactions. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2004;61(4):380–5.PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Weideman RA, Bernstein IH, McKinney WP. Pharmacist recognition of potential drug interactions. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1999;56(15):1524–9.PubMed Weideman RA, Bernstein IH, McKinney WP. Pharmacist recognition of potential drug interactions. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1999;56(15):1524–9.PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Abarca J, Colon LR, Wang VS, Malone DC, Murphy JE. Armstrong E. Evaluation of the performance of drug–drug interaction screening software in community and hospital pharmacies. J Manag Care Pharm. 2006;12(5):383–9.PubMed Abarca J, Colon LR, Wang VS, Malone DC, Murphy JE. Armstrong E. Evaluation of the performance of drug–drug interaction screening software in community and hospital pharmacies. J Manag Care Pharm. 2006;12(5):383–9.PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Dallenbach MF, Bovier PA, Desmeules J. Detecting drug interactions using personal digital assistants in an out-patient clinic. QJM. 2007;100(11):691–7.CrossRefPubMed Dallenbach MF, Bovier PA, Desmeules J. Detecting drug interactions using personal digital assistants in an out-patient clinic. QJM. 2007;100(11):691–7.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Clauson KA, Polen HH, Marsh WA. Clinical decision support tools: performance of personal digital assistant versus online drug information databases. Pharmacotherapy. 2007;27(12):1651–8.CrossRefPubMed Clauson KA, Polen HH, Marsh WA. Clinical decision support tools: performance of personal digital assistant versus online drug information databases. Pharmacotherapy. 2007;27(12):1651–8.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Perkins NA, Murphy JE, Malone DC, Armstrong EP. Performance of drug–drug interaction software for personal digital assistants. Ann Pharmacother. 2006;40(5):850–5.CrossRefPubMed Perkins NA, Murphy JE, Malone DC, Armstrong EP. Performance of drug–drug interaction software for personal digital assistants. Ann Pharmacother. 2006;40(5):850–5.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Lam MV, McCart MG, Tsourounis C. An assessment of free, online drug–drug interaction screening programs (DSPs). Hosp Pharm. 2003;38(7):662–8. Lam MV, McCart MG, Tsourounis C. An assessment of free, online drug–drug interaction screening programs (DSPs). Hosp Pharm. 2003;38(7):662–8.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Pham PA. Drug–drug interaction programs in clinical practice. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008;83(3):396–8.CrossRefPubMed Pham PA. Drug–drug interaction programs in clinical practice. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008;83(3):396–8.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Vonbach P, Dubied A, Krähenbühl S, Beer JH. Evaluation of frequently used drug interaction screening programs. Pharm World Sci. 2008;30(4):367–74.CrossRefPubMed Vonbach P, Dubied A, Krähenbühl S, Beer JH. Evaluation of frequently used drug interaction screening programs. Pharm World Sci. 2008;30(4):367–74.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Baxter K (Ed). Stockley’s drug interactions. 8th ed. London: Pharmaceutical Press; 2008. ISBN 978-0-85369-755-8. Baxter K (Ed). Stockley’s drug interactions. 8th ed. London: Pharmaceutical Press; 2008. ISBN 978-0-85369-755-8.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Romac DR, Albertson TE. Drug interactions in the intensive care unit. Clin Chest Med. 1999;20(2):385–99.CrossRefPubMed Romac DR, Albertson TE. Drug interactions in the intensive care unit. Clin Chest Med. 1999;20(2):385–99.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Mann HJ, Wittbrodt ET. Identifying drug usage patterns in the intensive care unit. Pharmacoeconomics. 1993;4(4):235–9.CrossRefPubMed Mann HJ, Wittbrodt ET. Identifying drug usage patterns in the intensive care unit. Pharmacoeconomics. 1993;4(4):235–9.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Mann HJ. Drug-associated disease: cytocrome P450 interactions. Crit Care Clin. 2006;22(2):329–45.CrossRefPubMed Mann HJ. Drug-associated disease: cytocrome P450 interactions. Crit Care Clin. 2006;22(2):329–45.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Biswal SP, Mishra S, Malhotra, Puri GD, Pandhi P. Drug utilization pattern in the intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital. J.Clin.Pharmacol. 2006;46(8):945–51.CrossRefPubMed Biswal SP, Mishra S, Malhotra, Puri GD, Pandhi P. Drug utilization pattern in the intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital. J.Clin.Pharmacol. 2006;46(8):945–51.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Hammes JA, Pfuetzenreiter F, Silveira F, Koenig A, Westphal GA. Potential drug interactions prevalence in intensive care units. Rev Bras Terap Intensiva. 2008;20(4):349–54. Hammes JA, Pfuetzenreiter F, Silveira F, Koenig A, Westphal GA. Potential drug interactions prevalence in intensive care units. Rev Bras Terap Intensiva. 2008;20(4):349–54.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Bustamante GDD, Cabrera C, Duran GMG, Medina TJN. Detección de interacciones medicamentosas, em pacientes ingresados a la unidad de cuidados intensivos del Instituto Autônomo Hospital Universitário de los Andes. Vitae Academia Biomédica Digita. 2005;25(7):1–16. Bustamante GDD, Cabrera C, Duran GMG, Medina TJN. Detección de interacciones medicamentosas, em pacientes ingresados a la unidad de cuidados intensivos del Instituto Autônomo Hospital Universitário de los Andes. Vitae Academia Biomédica Digita. 2005;25(7):1–16.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Gordis L. Epidemiology. 2 ed. Philadelphia: W.B.Saunders Company; 2000. ISBN 0-7216-8338-X. Gordis L. Epidemiology. 2 ed. Philadelphia: W.B.Saunders Company; 2000. ISBN 0-7216-8338-X.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Rodríguez-Terol A, Caraballo MO, Palma D, Santos-Ramos B, Molina T, Desongles T, Aguilar A. Quality of interaction database management systems. Farm Hosp. 2009;33(3):134–46.CrossRefPubMed Rodríguez-Terol A, Caraballo MO, Palma D, Santos-Ramos B, Molina T, Desongles T, Aguilar A. Quality of interaction database management systems. Farm Hosp. 2009;33(3):134–46.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Ko Y, Abarca J, Malone DC, Dare DC, Geraets D, Houranieh A, Jones WN, Nichol WP, Schepers GP, Wilhardt M. Practitioners’ views on computerized drug-drug interaction alerts in the VA system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14(1):56–64.CrossRefPubMed Ko Y, Abarca J, Malone DC, Dare DC, Geraets D, Houranieh A, Jones WN, Nichol WP, Schepers GP, Wilhardt M. Practitioners’ views on computerized drug-drug interaction alerts in the VA system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14(1):56–64.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Paterno MD, Maviglia SM, Gorman PN, et al. Tiering drug–drug interaction alerts by severity increases compliance rates. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16(1):40–6.CrossRefPubMed Paterno MD, Maviglia SM, Gorman PN, et al. Tiering drug–drug interaction alerts by severity increases compliance rates. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16(1):40–6.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams NT. Medication administration through enteral feeding tubes. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008;65(24):2347–57.CrossRefPubMed Williams NT. Medication administration through enteral feeding tubes. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008;65(24):2347–57.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Amariles P, Giraldo NA, Faus MJ. Interacciones medicamentosas : aproximación para estabelecer y evaluar su relevância clínica. Med Clin. 2007;129(1):27–35.CrossRef Amariles P, Giraldo NA, Faus MJ. Interacciones medicamentosas : aproximación para estabelecer y evaluar su relevância clínica. Med Clin. 2007;129(1):27–35.CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Rodríguez Terol A, Santos Ramos B, Caraballo Camacho M, Ollero Baturone M. Relevancia clínica de las interacciones medicamentosas. Med Clin. 2008;130(19):758–9.CrossRef Rodríguez Terol A, Santos Ramos B, Caraballo Camacho M, Ollero Baturone M. Relevancia clínica de las interacciones medicamentosas. Med Clin. 2008;130(19):758–9.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Evaluation of three brands of drug interaction software for use in intensive care units
verfasst von
Adriano Max Moreira Reis
Silvia Helena De Bortoli Cassiani
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2010
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy / Ausgabe 6/2010
Print ISSN: 2210-7703
Elektronische ISSN: 2210-7711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-010-9445-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2010

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 6/2010 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.