Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Decision-Making Patterns and Contraceptive Use: Evidence from Uganda

  • Published:
Population Research and Policy Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Literature on the effect of decision-making patterns on contraceptive use often does not (1) distinguish between women participating in decisions and controlling them, and (2) account for effects of common decision-making patterns within the community. In Uganda where high fertility persists, both of these factors may be relevant to adoption of contraception. We used data from the 1995/96 Negotiating Reproductive Outcomes (NRO) Study which surveyed 1,750 women in 78 communities located in two districts in Uganda. We assessed the effects of individual and community factors on the adoption of modern contraceptive methods using multilevel logistic regression. We included measures of decision-making patterns at both the individual and community levels that distinguished husband-dominated, joint, and wife-dominated decision-making patterns. Contraceptive use is 29% more likely in communities where women more commonly have unilateral control over household decisions. This strong effect of normative decision-making patterns within the community is net of individual education and community education, both of which had strong and significant effects. Less traditional gender roles as measured by normative decision-making patterns seem to support more innovative fertility behavior. Community decision-making patterns matter importantly for contraceptive use in this low contraceptive prevalence setting and need to be assessed elsewhere. Further, women’s influence is inadequately measured where joint decision-making and wife-dominated decision-making are considered together.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al Riyami, A., Afifi, M., & Mabry, R. M. (2004). Women’s autonomy, education and employment in Oman and their influence on contraceptive use. Reproductive Health Matters, 12(23), 144–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angina, Z., & Shorter, F. C. (1998). Negotiating reproduction and gender during the fertility decline in Turkey. Social Science and Medicine, 47(5), 555–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balk, D. (1994). Individual and community aspects of women’s status and fertility in rural Bangladesh. Population Studies, 48(1), 21–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bawah, A. A., Akweongo, P., Simmons, R., & Phillips, J. F. (1999). Women’s fears and men’s anxieties: The impact of family planning on gender relations in northern Ghana. Studies in Family Planning, 30(1), 54–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, S. (1996). Couples and reproductive health: A review of couple studies. Studies in Family Planning, 27(6), 291–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biddlecom, A. E., Casterline, J. C., & Perez, A. E. (1997). Spouses’ views of contraception in the Philippines. International Family Planning Perspectives, 23(3), 108–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanc, A. K. (2001). The effect of power in sexual relationships on sexual and reproductive health: An examination of the evidence. Studies in Family Planning, 32(3), 189–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanc, A. K., & Wolff, B. (2001). Gender and decision-making over condom use in two districts in Uganda. African Journal of Reproductive Health, 5(3), 15–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanc, A. K., Wolff, B., Gage, A., Ezeh, A. C., Neema, S., & Ssekamatte-Ssebuliba, J. (1996). Negotiating reproductive outcomes in Uganda. Calverton, Maryland and Kampala, Uganda: Macro International Inc and Institute of Statistics and Applied Economics [Uganda].

    Google Scholar 

  • Ezeh, A. C. (1997). Polygyny and reproductive behavior in sub-Saharan Africa: A contextual analysis. Demography, 34(3), 355–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govindasamy, P., & Malhotra, A. (1996). Women’s position and family planning in Egypt. Studies in Family Planning, 27(6), 328–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grady, W. R., Klepinger, D. H., & Billy, J. O. G. (1993). The influence of community characteristics on the practice of effective contraception. Family Planning Perspectives, 25(4), 4–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gwako, E. L. M. (1997). Conjugal power in rural Kenya families: Its influence on women’s decisions about family size and family planning practice. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 36(3/4), 127–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helzner, J. F. (1996). Men’s involvement in family planning. Reproductive Health Matters, 4(7), 146–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R., Stycos, J. M., & Back, K. W. (1959). The family and population control: A Puerto Rican experiment in social change. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindin, M. J. (2000). Women’s autonomy, women’s status and fertility-related behavior in Zimbabwe. Population Research and Policy Review, 19(3), 255–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hindin, M. J. (2006). Women’s input into household decisions and their nutritional status in three resource-constrained settings. Public Health Nutrition, 9(4), 485–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hindin, M. J., & Adair, L. S. (2002). Who’s at risk? Factors associated with intimate partner violence in the Philippines. Social Science and Medicine, 55(8), 1385–1399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hof, C., & Richters, A. (1995). Exploring intersections between teenage pregnancy and gender violence: Lessons from Zimbabwe. African Journal of Reproductive Health, 3(1), 51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kritz, M. M., Makinwa-Adebusoye, P., & Gurak, D. T. (2000). The role of gender context in shaping reproductive behaviour in Nigeria. In H. B. Presser & G. Sen (Eds.), Women’s empowerment and demographic processes (pp. 239–260). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, U., & Hollos, M. (2003). Women’s empowerment and fertility decline among the Pare of Kilimanjaro Region, northern Tanzania. Social Science and Medicine, 57(6), 1099–1115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, K. O. (1997). Gender and demographic change: What do we know? In G. W. Jones, R. M. Douglas, J. C. Caldwell, & R. M. D’Souza (Eds.), The continuing demographic transition (pp. 158–182). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, K. O., & Smith, H. (2000). Husbands’ versus wives’ fertility goals and contraceptive use: The influence of gender context in five Asian countries. Demography, 37(3), 299–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mbonye, A. K., Neema, S., & Magnussen, P. (2006). Treatment-seeking practice for malaria in pregnancy among rural women in Mukono district, Uganda. Journal of Biosocial Science, 38(2), 221–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, S. P., & Niraula, B. B. (1995). Gender inequality and fertility in two Nepali villages. Population and Development Review, 21(3), 541–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, S. P., Stash, S., Smith, H. L., & Mason, K. O. (2002). Muslim and non-Muslim differences in female autonomy and fertility: Evidence from four Asian countries. Population and Development Review, 28(3), 515–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moursund, A., & Kravdal, Ø. (2003). Individual and community effects of women’s education and autonomy on contraceptive use in India. Population Studies, 57(3), 285–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullany, B. C., Becker, S., & Hindin, M. J. (2007). The impact of including husbands in antenatal health education services on maternal health practices in urban Nepal: Results from a randomized controlled trial. Health Education Research, 22(2), 166–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullany, B. C., Hindin, M. J., & Becker, S. (2005). Can women’s autonomy impede male involvement in pregnancy health in Katmandu, Nepal? Social Science and Medicine, 61(9), 1993–2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Njovana, E., & Watts, C. (1996). Gender violence in Zimbabwe: A need for collaborative action. Reproductive Health Matters, 4(7), 46–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pallittoa, C. C., & O’Campo, P. (2005). Community level effects of gender inequality on intimate partner violence and unintended pregnancy in Colombia: Testing the feminist perspective. Social Science and Medicine, 60(10), 2205–2216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piotrow, P. T., Kincaid, D. L., Hindin, M. J., Lettenmaier, C. L., Kuseka, I., Silberman, T., et al. (1992). Changing men’s attitude and behavior: The Zimbabwe male motivation project. Studies in Family Planning, 23(6), 365–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabe-Hesketh, S., Skrondal, A., & Pickles, A. (2005). Maximum likelihood estimation of limited and discrete dependent variable models with nested random effects. Journal of Econometrics, 128(2), 301–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, S. R., Hashemi, S. M., & Riley, A. P. (1997). The influence of women’s changing roles and status in Bangladesh’s fertility transition: Evidence from a study of credit programs and contraceptive use. World Development, 25(4), 563–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soliman, M. H. (1999). Impact of antenatal counselling on couples’ knowledge and practice of contraception in Mansoura, Egypt. East Mediterranean Health Journal, 5(5), 1002–1013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speizer, I. S., Whittle, L., & Carter, M. (2005). Gender relations and reproductive decision making in Honduras. International Family Planning Perspectives, 31(3), 131–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Department [Uganda] and Macro International Inc. (1996). Uganda demographic and health survey, 1995. Calverton, Maryland: Statistics Department [Uganda] and Macro International Inc.

  • Stephenson, R., & Tsui, A. O. (2002). Contextual influences on reproductive health service use in Uttar Pradesh, India. Studies in Family Planning, 33(4), 309–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamale, S. (2004). Gender trauma in Africa: Enhancing women’s links to resources. Journal of African Law, 48(1), 50–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terefe, A., & Larson, C. P. (1993). Modern contraception use in Ethiopia: Does involving husbands make a difference? American Journal of Public Health, 83(11), 1567–1571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upadhyay, U. D., & Hindin, M. J. (2005). Do higher status and more autonomous women have longer birth intervals? Results from Cebu, Philippines. Social Science and Medicine, 60(11), 2641–2655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. C., Vittinghoff, E., Hua, L. S., Yun, W. H., & Rong, Z. M. (1998). Reducing pregnancy and induced abortion rates in China: Family planning with husband participation. American Journal of Public Health, 88(4), 646–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, B., Blanc, A. K., & Gage, A. J. (2000a). Who decides? Women’s status and negotiation of sex in Uganda. Culture, Health, and Sexuality, 2(3), 303–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, B., Blanc, A. K., & Ssekamatte-Ssebuliba, J. (2000b). The role of couple negotiation in unmet need for contraception and the decision to stop childbearing in Uganda. Studies in Family Planning, 31(2), 124–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Anastasia Gage for her contributions to earlier versions of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurie F. DeRose.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 5.

Table 5 Variables used in constructing decision-making index

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DeRose, L.F., Ezeh, A.C. Decision-Making Patterns and Contraceptive Use: Evidence from Uganda. Popul Res Policy Rev 29, 423–439 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-009-9151-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-009-9151-8

Keywords

Navigation