nach oben

Prevention Science

Erschienen in:

01.03.2011

When to Intervene: Elementary School, Middle School or Both? Effects of keepin’ It REAL on Substance Use Trajectories of Mexican Heritage Youth

verfasst von: Flavio F. Marsiglia, Stephen Kulis, Scott T. Yabiku, Tanya A. Nieri, Elizabeth Coleman

Erschienen in: Prevention Science | Ausgabe 1/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

This article presents the findings of a study exploring two questions: What age is most efficacious to expose Mexican heritage youth to drug abuse prevention interventions, and what dosage of the prevention intervention is needed? These issues are relevant to Mexican heritage youth—many from immigrant families—in particular ways due to the acculturation process and other contextual factors. The study utilized growth curve modeling to investigate the trajectory of recent substance use (alcohol, cigarettes, marijuana, inhalants) among Mexican heritage students (N = 1,670) participating in the keepin’ it REAL drug prevention program at different developmental periods: the elementary school (5th grade), middle school (7th grade), or both. The findings provide no evidence that intervening only in elementary school was effective in altering substance use trajectories from 5th to 8th grade, either for licit nor illicit substances. Implementing keepin’ it REAL in middle school alone altered the trajectories of use of all four substances for Mexican heritage youth. A double dose of prevention, in elementary and middle school proved to be equally as effective as intervening in 7th grade only, and only for marijuana and inhalants. The decrease in use of marijuana and inhalants among students in the 7th-grade-only or the 5th- and 7th-grade interventions occurred just after students received the curriculum intervention in 7th grade. These results are interpreted from an ecodevelopmental and culturally specific perspective and recommendations for prevention and future research are discussed.

Aneshensel, C. S., Becerra, R. M., Fielder, E. P., & Schuler, R. (1989). Participation of Mexican American female adolescents in a longitudinal panel survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 53, 548–562.CrossRef

Andrews, J. A., Tildesley, E., Hops, H., Duncan, S. C., & Severson, H. H. (2003). Elementary school age children’s future intentions and use of substances. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 32, 556–567.CrossRefPubMed

Beets, M. W., Flay, B. R., Vuchinich, S., Snyder, F. J., Acock, A., Li, K. K., et al. (2009). Use of a social and character development program to prevent substance use, violent behaviors, and sexual activity among elementary-school students in Hawaii. American Journal of Public Health, 99, 1438–1445.CrossRefPubMed

Berkowitz, M., & Begun, A. L. (2006). Designing prevention programs: The developmental perspective. In Z. Sloboda & W. J. Bukoski (Eds.), Handbook of drug abuse prevention (pp. 327–348). New York: Springer.CrossRef

Bernat, D. H., August, G. J., Hektner, J. M., & Bloomquist, M. L. (2007). The Early Risers preventive intervention: Testing for six-year outcomes and meditational processes. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35, 605–617.CrossRefPubMed

Botvin, G. J. (2000). Preventing drug abuse in schools: Social and competence enhancement approaches targeting individual-level etiologic factors. Addictive Behaviors, 25, 887–897.CrossRefPubMed

Botvin, G. J., Baker, C., Filazzola, A. D., & Botvin, E. N. (1990). A cognitive behavioral approach to substance abuse prevention: One year follow-up. Addictive Behaviors, 15, 47–63.CrossRefPubMed

Brook, J. S., Brook, D. W., Richter, L., & Whiteman, M. (2006). Risk and protective factors of adolescent drug use: Implications for prevention programs. In Z. Sloboda & W. J. Bukoski (Eds.), Handbook of drug abuse prevention (pp. 265–287). New York: Springer.CrossRef

Case, R. (1985). Intellectual development: Birth to adulthood. New York: Academic.

Castro, F. G., & Nieri, T. (2010). Cultural factors in drug use etiology: Concepts, methods, and recent findings. In L. Scheier (Ed.), Handbook of drug use etiology: Theory, methods, and empirical findings (pp. 305–324). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Chun, K. M., & Akutsu, P. D. (2003). Acculturation among ethnic minority families. In K. M. Chun, P. Balls Organista, & G. Marín (Eds.), Acculturation: Advances in theory, measurement, and applied research (pp. 95–119). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRef

Coatsworth, J. D., Pantin, H., & Szapocznik, J. (2002). Familias Unidas: A family-centered ecodevelopmental intervention to reduce risk for problem behavior among Hispanic adolescents. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 5, 113–132.CrossRefPubMed

Collins, D., Pan, Z., Johnson, K., Courser, M., & Shamblen, S. (2008). Individual and contextual predictors of inhalant use among 8th graders: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Drug Education, 38, 193–210.CrossRefPubMed

Delva, J., Wallace, J. M., O’Malley, P., Bachman, J. G., Johnston, L. D., & Schulenberg, J. (2005). The epidemiology of alcohol, marijuana, and cocaine use among Mexican American, Puerto Rican, Cuban American, and other Latin American eighth-grade students in the United States: 1991–2002. American Journal of Public Health, 95, 696–702.CrossRefPubMed

Donaldson, S. I., Graham, J. W., & Hansen, W. B. (1994). Testing the generalizability of intervening mechanism theories: Understanding the effects of adolescent drug use prevention interventions. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 17, 195–216.CrossRefPubMed

Donaldson, S. I., Graham, J. W., Piccinin, A. M., & Hansen, W. B. (1995). Resistance-skills training and onset of alcohol use: Evidence for beneficial and potentially harmful effects in public schools and in private Catholic schools. Health Psychology, 14, 291–300.CrossRefPubMed

Donovan, J. E. (2007). Really underage drinkers: The epidemiology of children’s alcohol use in the United States. Prevention Science, 8, 192–205.CrossRefPubMed

Eddy, M. J., Reid, J. B., & Fetrow, R. A. (2000). An elementary school-based prevention program targeting modifiable antecedents of youth delinquency and violence: Linking the interests of families and teachers (LIFT). Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8, 166–176.CrossRef

Ellickson, P. L., Bell, R. M., & McGuigan, K. (1993). Preventing adolescent drug use: Long-term results of a junior high program. American Journal of Public Health, 83, 856–861.CrossRefPubMed

Finke, L., Williams, J., Ritter, M., Kemper, D., Kersey, S., Nightenhauser, J., et al. (2002). Survival against drugs: Education for school-aged children. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 15, 163–169.CrossRefPubMed

Flay, B. R., & Petraitis, J. (2006). Bridging the gap between substance use prevention theory and practice. In Z. Sloboda & W. J. Bukoski (Eds.), Handbook of drug abuse prevention (pp. 289–306). New York: Springer.CrossRef

Gosin, M., Marsiglia, F. F., & Hecht, M. L. (2003). keepin' it REAL: A drug resistance curriculum tailored to the strengths and needs of preadolescents of the Southwest. Journal of Drug Education, 33, 119–142.CrossRefPubMed

Gottfredson, D. C., & Wilson, D. B. (2003). Characteristics of effective school-based substance abuse prevention. Prevention Science, 4, 27–38.CrossRefPubMed

Graham, J. W., Roberts, M. M., Tatterson, J. W., & Johnston, S. E. (2002). Data quality in evaluation of an alcohol-related harm prevention program. Evaluation Review, 26, 147–189.CrossRefPubMed

Greene, K., Rubin, D. L., Walters, L. H., & Hale, J. L. (1996). The utility of understanding egocentrism in designing health promotion messages. Health Communication, 8, 131–152.CrossRef

Griffin, K. W. (2010). The epidemiology of substance use among adolescents and young adults: A developmental perspective. In L. Scheier (Ed.), Handbook of drug use etiology: Theory, methods, and empirical findings (pp. 73–93). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Harthun, M. L., Dustman, P. A., Reeves, L. J., Marsiglia, F. F., & Hecht, M. L. (2009). Using community-based participatory research to adapt keepin’ it REAL: Creating a socially, developmental, and academically appropriate prevention curriculum for 5th graders. Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education, 53, 12–38.PubMed

Hecht, M. L., Elek, E., Wagstaff, D. A., Kam, J. A., Marsiglia, F., Dustman, P., et al. (2008). Immediate and short-term effects of the 5th grade version of the keepin' it REAL substance use prevention intervention. Journal of Drug Education, 38, 225–251.CrossRefPubMed

Hecht, M. L., Marsiglia, F. F., Elek, E., Wagstaff, D. A., Kulis, S., & Dustman, P. (2003). Culturally grounded substance use prevention: An evaluation of the keepin’ it REAL curriculum. Prevention Science, 4, 233–248.CrossRefPubMed

Johnson, K. W., Shamblen, S. R., Ogilvie, K. A., Collins, D., & Saylor, B. (2009). Preventing youths’ use of inhalants and other harmful legal products in frontier Alaskan communities: A randomized trial. Prevention Science, 10, 298–312.CrossRefPubMed

Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2006). Monitoring the Future: National results on adolescent drug use: Overview of key findings. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIH Publication No. 07-6202).

Johnston, L. D., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2009). Monitoring the Future national results on adolescent drug use: Overview of key findings, 2008. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIH Publication No. 09-7401).

Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., & Bachman, J. G. (1998). National survey results on drug use from the Monitoring the Future study, 1975–1997. Volume II: College students and young adults. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse. NIH Publication No. 98-4346.

Josephson, E., & Rosen, M. A. (1978). Panel loss in a high school drug study. In D. Kandel (Ed.), Longitudinal research on drug use: Empirical findings and methodological issues (pp. 115–133). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.

Kam, J. A., Elek, E., & Hecht, M. L. (2007). Reviewing the effectiveness of elementary school-based substance use prevention programs. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Prevention Research, Washington, DC.

Kandel, D. B., & Wu, P. (1995). The contribution of mothers and fathers to the intergenerational transmission of cigarette smoking in adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 5, 225–252.CrossRef

Kandel, D. B., Yamaguchi, K., & Chen, K. (1992). Stages of progression in drug involvement from adolescence to adulthood: Further evidence for the gateway theory. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 53, 447–457.PubMed

Kulis, S., Marsiglia, F. F., Elek, E., Dustman, P., Wagstaff, D. A., & Hecht, M. L. (2005). Mexican/Mexican American adolescents and keepin’ it REAL: An evidence-based substance use prevention program. Children & Schools, 27, 133–145.

Kulis, S., Nieri, T., Yabiku, S., Stromwall, L., & Marsiglia, F. F. (2007). Promoting reduced and discontinued substance use among adolescent substance users: Effectiveness of a universal prevention program. Prevention Science, 8, 35–49.CrossRefPubMed

Lewis, A. (2003). Race in the schoolyard: Negotiating the color line in classrooms and communities. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Marsiglia, F. F., & Hecht, M. L. (2005). Keepin’it REAL: An evidence-based program. Santa Cruz, CA: ETR.

Marsiglia, F. F., & Kulis, S. (2009). Diversity, oppression and change: Culturally grounded social work. Chicago, IL: Lyceum.

Moon, D. G., Hecht, M. L., Jackson, K. M., & Spellers, R. E. (1999). Ethnic and gender differences and similarities in adolescent drug use and refusals of drug offers. Substance Use & Misuse, 34, 1059–1083.CrossRef

Murray, D. M., Pirie, P., Leupker, R. V., & Pallonen, U. (1989). Five- and six-year follow-up results from four seventh-grade smoking prevention strategies. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 12, 207–18.CrossRefPubMed

National Institute on Drug Abuse. (2003). Drug use among racial/ethnic minorities. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health. (NIH Publication No. 03-3888).

Piaget, J. (2000). Piaget’s theory. In K. Lee (Ed.), Childhood cognitive development: The essential readings. Essential readings in developmental psychology (pp. 33–47). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchial linear models (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Rayle, A. D., Kulis, S., Okamoto, S. K., Tann, S. S., LeCroy, C. W., Dustman, P., et al. (2006). Who is offering and how often? Gender differences in drug offers among American Indian adolescents of the Southwest. Journal of Early Adolescence, 26, 296–317.CrossRef

Sakai, J. T., Hall, S. K., Mikulich-Gilbertson, S. K., & Crowley, T. J. (2006). Adolescent inhalant use among male patients in treatment for substance and behavior problems: Two-year outcome. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 32, 29–40.CrossRefPubMed

Schafer, J. L. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. New York: Chapman and Hall.CrossRef

Schinke, S. P., Tepavac, L., & Cole, K. C. (2000). Preventing substance use among Native American youth: Three-year results. Addictive Behaviors, 25, 387–397.CrossRefPubMed

Selman, R. (1980). The growth of interpersonal understanding: Developmental and clinical analyses. New York: Academic.

Stipek, D., de la Sota, A., & Weishaupt, L. (1999). Life lessons: An embedded classroom approach to preventing high-risk behaviors among preadolescents. The Elementary School Journal, 99, 433–451.CrossRef

Thorne, B. (2005). Unpacking school lunchtime: Structure, practice, and the negotiation of differences. In C. R. Cooper, C. T. G. Coll, W. T. Bartko, H. Davis, & C. Chatman (Eds.), Developmental pathways through middle childhood: Rethinking context and diversity as resources (pp. 63–88). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Tolan, P. H., Gorman-Smith, D., Henry, D., & Schoeny, M. (2009). The benefits of booster interventions: Evidence from a family-focused prevention program. Prevention Science, 10, 287–297.CrossRefPubMed

Weiden Consulting. (2000). Science, tobacco, & you outcome evaluation: Phase 2 report. Downloaded on 1/5/10 from http://scienceu.fsu.edu/evaluations/index.html.

Wilson, N., Battistich, V., Syme, S. L., & Boyce, W. T. (2002). Does elementary school alcohol, tobacco, and marijuana use increase middle school risk? Journal of Adolescent Health, 30, 442–447.CrossRefPubMed

Yin, Z., Zapata, J. T., & Katims, D. S. (1995). Risk factors for substance use among Mexican American school-age youth. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 17, 61–76.CrossRef

Zuckerman, M. (1994). Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Titel: When to Intervene: Elementary School, Middle School or Both? Effects of keepin’ It REAL on Substance Use Trajectories of Mexican Heritage Youth
verfasst von: Flavio F. Marsiglia
Stephen Kulis
Scott T. Yabiku
Tanya A. Nieri
Elizabeth Coleman
Publikationsdatum: 01.03.2011
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Prevention Science / Ausgabe 1/2011
Print ISSN: 1389-4986
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6695
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-010-0189-y

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2011

Short-Term Efficacy of Click City®: Tobacco: Changing Etiological Mechanisms Related to the Onset of Tobacco Use

Social Networking Technology, Social Network Composition, and Reductions in Substance Use Among Homeless Adolescents

Corporate Externalities: A Challenge to the Further Success of Prevention Science

The Prevalence of Evidence-based Drug Use Prevention Curricula in U.S. Middle Schools in 2008

Putting the Pieces Together: An Integrated Model of Program Implementation

Assessing Media Campaigns Linking Marijuana Non-Use with Autonomy and Aspirations: “Be Under Your Own Influence” and ONDCP’s “Above the Influence”