Skip to main content
Log in

A multi-product cost function for physician private practices

  • Published:
Journal of Productivity Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper provides an empirical analysis of the production of physician services using a multi-product cost function. Prior studies examine the physician production process in a theoretical setting and do not provide empirical insight. We expand upon the theoretical work in the literature by specifying a four-product generalized Leontief cost function for physician services that recovers measures of marginal cost, scale, scope, and elasticity. Our study is based on physician survey data from the 1998 American Medical Association Physician Socioeconomic Monitoring Survey and motivates a scientific framework for advancing the existing reimbursement fee schedule. Our analysis indicates that physician office visits are generally priced above marginal cost, implying there may be evidence of market power in physician private practices. Furthermore, our analysis lends to the policy debate over whether the use of a Resource-Based Relative Value Scale system is the most appropriate mechanism for facilitating Medicare reimbursements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://seniorjournal.com/NEWS/Medicare/6-07-19-ReductionInMedicare.htm. See the 2006 American Medical Association report on Medicare physician payments.

  2. See Haas-Wilson and Gaynor (1998) for an examination and summary of competition in physician markets.

  3. “Medicare physician fees geographic adjustment indices are valid in design, but data and methods need refinement.” Washington, DC: Government Accountability Office, March 2005. Publication GAO-05-119.

  4. See Hsiao et al. (1988).

  5. Escarce and Pauly (1998).

  6. Escarce and Pauly (1998) note that their analysis is purely illustrative and should not be relied upon for empirical purposes.

  7. Examples of non-physician inputs include nurses, clerical support, malpractice rents, and office supplies.

  8. We refer the reader to Escarce and Pauly (1998) for a formal derivation and a detailed discussion.

  9. See McFadden (1978).

  10. Or a variety of its extensions. See Berndt and Christensen (1979) or Christensen et al. (1971).

  11. We note these are true zero measures and not missing values.

  12. See McFadden (1979) for a summary.

  13. The globally flexible Symmetric Generalized McFadden proposed by Diewert and Wales (1987) was also considered. However the authors found its “flexibility” was distorted by the need to impose global concavity. Moreover, with the presence of several categories of outputs, the Symmetric Generalized McFadden produced estimates of technology that were unstable as well as economically unmeaningful without the restrictions. We opted instead for a generalized Leontief flexible functional form which circumvented the issues we encountered with the Symmetric Generalized McFadden.

  14. Li and Rosenman (2001) noted that the generalized Leontief has traditionally been used in a single output setting; however its extension to the multi-product setting has been seen in studies dating back to Hall (1973).

  15. We use office visits as physician output. There are other measures of physician output that are more comprehensive but less easily observed and measured. For a discussion of these alternatives, health outcomes that can be constructed for these alternatives, and their use in static and intertemporal models of health production see, for example, Sickles and Taubman (1997), Behrman et al. (1998), and Sickles and Yazbeck (1998).

  16. The authors note that hospital visits may be endogenous if physicians can accurately plan the time they commit in a hospital setting. We performed a Durban-Wu-Hausman test to examine the endogeneity of the hospital visits. Our results indicate that hospital visits are exogenous. This is most likely attributable to the unpredictable nature of the time required to consult with patients in a specialized setting, due to the potential complications that often arise in hospital visits.

  17. However, it is important to note that T is a representation of physician labor and does not satisfy the traditional properties of a cost function, hence there is no need to impose restrictions.

  18. This category represents only 7% of the sample.

  19. Malpractice insurance may include legal fees associated with malpractice cases.

  20. The method by Pope and Burge (1990) is rather problematic, since it precludes measurement of share equations, economies of scale and scope, and the interaction of second-order prices. The result is a functional form that does not adhere to economic theory.

  21. One of the demand equations is excluded to avoid singularity.

  22. 3SLS was selected due its notable history in simultaneous equation models. It is also worth noting that in our case, 3SLS is asymptotically equivalent to the Generalized Method of Moments estimator.

  23. A regression test of the overidentifying restrictions found that these restrictions could not be rejected (χ2=2.60; p=0.63).

  24. Standard errors are calculated by taking the square root of the variance for all four measures of output and then dividing by the square root of the sample size. An alternative methodology is to interact the coefficients derived from the cost function against the statistical means of the data to derive a marginal cost “at the mean”, with standard errors derived by way of the Delta Method. We note that this approach produced roughly the same results.

  25. The limited sample size and inflexibility of the Escarce and Pauly (1998) specification is most likely a contributing factor in the reported differences.

  26. In theory, physician private practices exhibit returns based on outputs and practice size. Our study focuses on the former.

  27. See Elbasha and Messonnier (2004) for a summary.

  28. It is well-known that these measures, as ratios of terms whose denominator is not bounded away from zero, do not have finite moments. We use a standard trimming proportion of 2.5% in each tail of the empirical distribution in calculating the mean and standard deviation of the sample statistics for scale.

  29. We note that values of zero are within the range of outputs.

  30. This result is most likely attributable to long-term contractual obligations on office rent and office equipment, in addition to a high demand for specialized assistants.

  31. The existing survey lacks the necessary data to examine this.

  32. For example, see The United States of America vs. The Marshfield Clinic.

References

  • Allen R (1938) Mathematical analysis for economists. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrman J, Sickles RC, Taubman P (1998) The causes, some methodological approaches and substantive analysis: correlates and consequences of death among older adults. Kluwer, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger A, Demsetz R, Strahan P (1999) The consolidation of the financial services industry: causes, consequences and implications for the future. J Bank Finance 23:135–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berndt E, Christensen L (1979) The translog function and substitution of equipment, structures, and labor in U.S. manufacturing. J Econom 1:81–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caves D, Christensen L, Trethaway M (1980) Flexible cost functions for multi-product firms. Rev Econ Stat 62:477–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen L, Jorgensen D, Lau L (1971) Conjugate duality and the transcendental logarithmic production function. Econometrica 39:255–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowing T, Holtmann A (1983) Multi-product short-run hospital cost functions: empirical evidence and policy implications from cross-section data. South Econ J 49:637–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowing T, Holtmann A, Powers S (1983) Hospital cost analysis: a survey and evaluation of recent studies. In: Scheffler R (ed) Advances in health economics and health services research, vol 4. JAI Press, Greenwich, pp 257–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Diewert W (1971) An application of the Shephard duality theorem: a generalized Leontief production function. J Pol Econ 79:481–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diewert W, Wales T (1987) Flexible functional forms and global curvature conditions. Econometrica 55:43–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbasha E, Messonnier M (2004) Cost effectiveness analysis and health care resource allocation: decision rules under variable returns to scale. Health Econ 13:21–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escarce J (1996) Using physician practice cost functions in payment policy: the problem of endogeneity bias. Inquiry 33:66–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Escarce J, Pauly M (1998) Physician opportunity costs in physician practice cost functions. J Health Econ 17:129–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer A, Laking G, Lord J (2006) Non-linearity in the cost-effectiveness frontier. Health Econ 15:565–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaynor M, Pauly M (1990) Compensation and productive efficiency in partnerships: evidence from medical group practice. J Pol Econ 98:544–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaynor M, Vogt W (2000) Antitrust and competition in health care markets. In: Culyer A, New House J (eds) Handbook of health economics, vol 1B. Amsterdam, North-Holland

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilkey D, Lovell C, Sickles RC (1983) A comparison of the performance of three flexible functional forms. Int Econ Rev 24:591–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunning T, Sickles R (2008) Competition and market power in physician private practices. Mimeo, Rice University

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas-Wilson D, Gaynor M (1998) Physician networks and their implications for competition in health care markets. Health Econ 7:179–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall R (1973) The specification of technology with several kinds of output. J Pol Econ 81:878–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao W, Braun P, Dunn D, Becker E, DeNicola M, Ketcham T (1988) Results and policy implications of the resource-based relative-value study. N Engl J Med 13:881–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kass D (1987) Economies of scale and scope in the provision of home health services. J Health Econ 6:129–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li T, Rosenman R (2001) Estimating hospital costs with a generalized Leontief cost function. Health Econ 10:523–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden D (1978) Cost, revenue, and profit functions. In: Fuss M, McFadden DL (eds) Production economics: a dual approach to theory and applications, vol 1. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 2–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Panzar J, Willig R (1977) Economies of scale in multi-output production. Quart J Econ 91:481–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pope G, Burge R (1995) The marginal practice cost of physicians’ services. J Socioecon Plann Sci 29:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulley L, Braunstein Y (1992) A composite cost function for multi-product firms with an application to economies of scope in banking. Rev Econ Stat 74:221–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhardt U (1972) A production function for physician services. Rev Econ Stat 54:55–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roller L-H (1990) Proper quadratic cost functions with an application to the bell system. Rev Econ Stat 72:202–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sickles RC, Streitwieser M (1998) The structure of technology, substitution and productivity in the interstate natural gas transmission industry under the natural gas policy act of l978. J Appl Econom 13:377–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sickles RC, Taubman P (1997) Mortality and morbidity among adults and the elderly. In: Rosenzweig M, Stark O (eds) The handbook of population and family economics. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Sickles RC, Yazbeck A (1998) On the dynamics of demand for leisure and production of health: evidence from the retirement history survey. J Bus Econ Stat 16:187–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thurston N, Libby A (2002) A production function for physician services revisited. Rev Econ Stat 84:184–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzawa H (1962) Production functions with constant elasticities of substitution. Rev Econ Stud 29:291–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vita M (1990) Exploring hospital production relationship with flexible functional forms. J Health Econ 9:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Washington, DC: Government Accountability Office (2005) Medicare physician fees geographic adjustment indices are valid in design, but data and methods need refinement. Publication GAO-05-119

  • Weninger Q (2003) Estimating multi-product costs when some outputs are not produced. Empir Econ 28:753–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman S, Welch W, Pope G (1990) A geographic index of physician practice costs. J Health Econ 9:39–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy S. Gunning.

Additional information

Note: The views expressed in this paper are those of the author and not those of Ernst & Young LLP.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gunning, T.S., Sickles, R.C. A multi-product cost function for physician private practices. J Prod Anal 35, 119–128 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-009-0167-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-009-0167-1

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation