Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A typology of mixed methods research designs

  • Research Note
  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The mixed methods paradigm is still in its adolescence, and, thus, is still relatively unknown and confusing to many researchers. In general, mixed methods research represents research that involves collecting, analyzing, and interpreting quantitative and qualitative data in a single study or in a series of studies that investigate the same underlying phenomenon. Over the last several years, a plethora of research designs have been developed. However, the number of designs that currently prevail leaves the doctoral student, the beginning researcher, and even the experienced researcher who is new to the field of mixed methods research with the challenge of selecting optimal mixed methods designs. This paper presents a three-dimensional typology of mixed methods designs that represents an attempt to rise to the challenge of creating an integrated typology of mixed methods designs. An example for each design is included as well as a notation system that fits our eight-design framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bos J., Huston A.C., Granger R., Duncan G., Brock T., McLoyd W.C. (1999). New Hope for People with Low Incomes: Two-year Results of a Program to Reduce Poverty and Reform Welfare. Manpower Research Demonstration Corporation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Collins K.M.T. (2000, October). Implementing mathematics curricula standards: Effective instruction for “all” students?. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the mid-western Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  3. Creswell J.W. (1994). Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  4. Creswell J.W. (2002). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  5. Creswell J.W., Plano Clark V.L., Guttmann M.L., Hanson E.E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research design. In: Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (eds) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, pp 209–240. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  6. Currall S.C., Towler A.J. (2003). Research methods in management and organizational research: toward integration of qualitative and quantitative techniques. In: Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (eds) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research., pp 513–526. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  7. Daley C.E., Onwuegbuzie A.J. (2004). Attributions toward violence of male juvenile delinquents: a concurrent mixed methods analysis. J. Soc. Psychol. 144: 549–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Denzin N.K., Lincoln Y.S. (2000). Introduction: the discipline and practice of qualitative research. In: Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S. (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd edn., pp 1–28. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dzurec L.C., Abraham J.L. (1993). The nature of inquiry: linking quantitative and qualitative research. Adv. Nurs. Sci. 16: 73–79

    Google Scholar 

  10. Forthofer M.S. (2003). Status of mixed methods in the health sciences. In: Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (eds) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research., pp 527–540. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  11. Greene J.C., Caracelli V.J.: Advances in Mixed-Method Evaluation: The Challenges and Benefits of Integrating Diverse Paradigms (New Directions for Evaluation, NO. 74). Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1997)

  12. Greene J.C., Caracelli V.J., Graham W.F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educ. Eval. Policy Anal. 11: 255–274

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hayter M. (1999). Burnout and AIDS care-related factors in HIV community clinical nurse specialists in the north of England. J. Adv. Nurs. 29: 984–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hunter A., Brewer J. (2003). Multimethod research in sociology. In: Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (eds) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, pp 577–594. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  15. Johnson R.B., Onwuegbuzie A.J. (2004). Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educ. Res. 33(7): 14–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Maxwell J.A., Loomis D.M. (2003). Mixed methods design: an alternative approach. In: Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (eds) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, pp 241–272. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  17. McMillan J.H., Schumacher S. (2001). Research in Education: A Conceptual Introduction, 5th edn. Longman, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  18. Morgan D.L. (1998). Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: applications to health research. Qual. Health Res. 3: 362–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Morse J.M. (1991). Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nurs. Res. 40: 120–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Morse J.M. (2003). Principles of mixed methods and multimethod research design. In: Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (eds) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, pp 189–208. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  21. Onwuegbuzie A.J., Daniel L.G., eds. (2006) Special issue on mixed methods research [Special issue]. Res. Schools 13(1): 1–99

    Google Scholar 

  22. Onwuegbuzie A.J., DaRos-Voseles D.A. (2001). The role of cooperative learning in research methodology courses: a mixed-methods analysis. Res. Schools 8: 61–75

    Google Scholar 

  23. Onwuegbuzie A.J., Jiao Q.G., Bostick S.L. (2004). Library Anxiety: Theory, Research, and Applications. Scarecrow Press, Lanham, MD

    Google Scholar 

  24. Onwuegbuzie A.J., Johnson R.B. (2004). Mixed method and mixed model research. In: Johnson, R.B., Christensen, L.B. (eds) Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative and Mixed Approaches., pp 408–431. Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights, MA

    Google Scholar 

  25. Patton M.Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Sage, Newbury Park, CA

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rallis S.F., Rossman G.B. (2003). Mixed methods in evaluation context: a pragmatic framework. In: Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (eds) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research., pp 491–512. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rocco T.S., Bliss L.A., Gallagher S., Perez-Prado A., Alacaci C., Dwyer E.S., Fine J.C., Pappamihiel N.E. (2003). The pragmatic and dialectical lenses: two views of mixed methods use in education. In: Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (eds) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research., pp 595–615. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sandelowski M. (2001). Real qualitative researchers don’t count: the use of numbers in qualitative research. Res. Nurs. Health 24: 230–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Senne T.A., Rikard G.L. (2002). Experiencing the portfolio process during the internship: a comparative analysis of two PETE portfolio models. J. Teach. Phys. Educ. 21: 309–336

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tashakkori A., Teddlie C. (1998). Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Applied Social Research Methods Series, vol. 46. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tashakkori A., Teddlie C., eds. (2003a). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tashakkori A., Teddlie C. (2003b). The past and future of mixed methods research: from data triangulation to mixed model designs. In: Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (eds) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research., pp 671–701. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  33. Taylor D.L., Tashakkori A. (1997). Toward an understanding of teachers’ desire for participation in decision making. J. School Leadership 7: 1–20

    Google Scholar 

  34. Teddlie C., Tashakkori A. (2003). Major issues and controversies in the use mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. In: Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (eds) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research., pp 3–50. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  35. Twinn S. (2003). Status of mixed methods research in nursing. In: Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (eds) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research., pp 541–556. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  36. Waszak C., Sines M.C. (2003). Mixed methods in psychological research. In: Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (eds) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research., pp 557–576. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  37. Waysman M., Savaya R. (1997). Mixed method evaluation: a case study. Eval. Pract. 18: 227–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Weisner T. (2000). Understanding better the lives of poor families: ethnographic and survey studies in the New Hope experiment. Poverty Res. News 4(1): 10–12

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Education, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, Campus Box 106, P.O. Box 173364, Denver, CO, 80217-3364, USA

    Nancy L. Leech

  2. University of South Florida, Tampa, USA

    Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie

Authors
  1. Nancy L. Leech
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nancy L. Leech.

Additional information

This paper won the James E. McLean outstanding paper award.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leech, N.L., Onwuegbuzie, A.J. A typology of mixed methods research designs. Qual Quant 43, 265–275 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9105-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9105-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation