Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Konkret geht es um den Diabetes-Patienten mit kardiovaskulären Erkrankungen oder Risiken, die Herzinsuffizienz sowie die kardiovaskuläre Primär- und Sekundärprävention. Sind Sie hier schon auf dem neuesten Stand? Unsere Experten beleuchten, wo und warum das bisherige Procedere geändert werden soll und was in der Praxis sinnvoll ist. Holen Sie sich Ihr Update und 2 CME-Punkte beim MMW-Webinar am 24. April von 17.30 bis 19 Uhr. 
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Quality of Life Research
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research 5/2007

01.06.2007 | Original Paper

The OVIS study: health related quality of life measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 and -BR23 in German female patients with breast cancer from Schleswig-Holstein

verfasst von: A. Waldmann, R. Pritzkuleit, H. Raspe, A. Katalinic

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 5/2007

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The OVIS study is a population-based study that aims at evaluating medical care in Schleswig-Holstein (Germany). In this paper, the health related quality of life (QoL, EORTC QLQ-C30 and -BR23) of 1,927 women with breast cancer is reported. The global health status/QoL score was comparable to reference data of the age-adjusted German general population, but clinical meaningful differences (≥ 10 points) were found for all functioning scales (with the exception of physical functioning) and for three of the symptom scales/items (fatigue, dyspnoe, insomnia) with OVIS patients showing more deficits. Furthermore, OVIS patients scored higher on the item financial difficulties. Logistic regression analyses revealed that coming from an urban surrounding, having a higher social status and attendance to a regular aftercare predicted a good overall QoL, while factors that were related to perceived complications in the course of the therapy raised the risk for a low QoL rating. It is of interest, that attendance to a rehabilitation and interest in self-help groups independently predicted an increased risk for a low quality of life. Overall, we assume the global QoL is rating slightly too optimistic since major deficits were reported on the specific physical and functional scales/items.
Literatur
1.
Aranda, S., Schofield, P., Weih, L., Yates, P., Milne, D., Faulkner, R., & Voudouris, N. (2005). Mapping the quality of life and unmet needs of urban women with metastatic breast cancer. European Journal of Cancer Care (England), 14, 211–222.CrossRef
2.
Arndt, C., Merx, H., Stürmer, T., Stegmaier, C., Ziegler, H., & Brenner, H. (2004). Age-specific detriments to quality of life among breast cancer patients one year after diagnosis. European Journal of Cancer, 40, 673–680.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Bernhard, J., Huerny, C., Maybach, R., Herrmann, R., & Laffer, U. (1999). Quality of life as a subjective experience: Reframing of perception in patients with colon cancer undergoing radical resection with or without adjuvant chemotherapy. Swiss Group for Clinical cancer Research (SAKK). Annals of Oncol, 10, 775–782.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Bernhard, J., Lowy, A., Maibach, R., & Huerny, C. (2001). Response shift in the perception of health for utility evaluation. An explorative investigation. European Journal of Cancer, 37, 1729–1735.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Bottomley, A., Therasse, P., Piccart, M., Efficace, F., Coens, C., Gotay, C., Welnicka-Jaskiewicz, M., Mauriac, L., Dyczka, J., Cufer, T., Lichinitser, M. R., Schornagel, J. H., Bonnefoi, H., & Shepherd, L. (2005). European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Breast Cancer Group; National Cancer Institute of Canada; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research. Health-related quality of life in survivors of locally advanced breast cancer: An international randomised controlled phase III trial. Lancet Oncology, 6, 287–294.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Cocquyt, V. F., Blondeel, P. N., Depypere, H. T., Van De Sijpe, K. A., Daems, K. K., Monstrey, S. J., & Van Belle, S. J. (2003). Better cosmetic results and comparable quality of life after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate autologous breast reconstruction compared to breast conservative treatment. British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 56, 462–470.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Deck, R., Roeckelein, E. (1999). Zur Erhebung soziodemographischer und sozialmedizinischer Indikatoren in den rehabilitationswissenschaftlichen Forschungsverbünden. In Verband Deutscher Rentenversicherungsträger (Eds.), DRV-Schriften Band 16: Foerderschwerpunkt “Rehabilitationswissenschaften” Empfehlungen der Arbeitsgruppen “Generische Methoden”, “Routinedaten und Reha-OEkonomie”. Heusenstamm: Central-Druck Trost GmbH & Co., 84–96.
8.
Engel, J., Kerr, J., Schlesinger-Raab, A., Eckel, R., Sauer, H., & Hoelzel, D. (2003). Predictors of quality of life of breast cancer patients. Acta Oncologica, 42, 710–718.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Engel, J., Kerr, J., Schlesinger-Raab, A., Sauer, H., & Hoelzel, D. (2004). Quality of life following breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy: Results of a 5-year prospective study. The Breast Journal, 10, 223–231.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Fayers, P. M., Aaronson, N. K., Bjordal, K., Groenvold, M., Curran, D., & Bottomley, A. (2001). On behalf of the EORTC quality of life group. The EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring manual (3rd edn.). Brussels: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer.
11.
Ganz, P. A., Schag, A. C., Lee, J. J., Polinsky, M. L., & Tan, S. J. (1992). Breast conservation versus mastectomy. Is there a difference in psychological adjustment or quality of life in the year after surgery? Cancer, 69, 1729–1738.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Giersiepen, K., Heitmann, C., Janhsen K., & Lange, C. (2005). Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes, Heft 25: Brustkrebs, Robert-Koch-Institut (Hrsg.); Berlin: Oktoberdruck.
13.
Gulbrandsen, N., Hjermstad, M. J., & Wisloff, F. (2004). For the Nordic Myeloma study Group: Interpretation of quality of life scores in multiple myeloma by comparison with a reference population and assessment of the clinical importance of score differences. European Journal of Haematology, 72, 172–180.
14.
Hakamies-Blomquist, L., Louma, M. L., Sjoestroem, J., Pluzanska, A., Sjoedin, M., Mouridsen, H., Ostenstad, B., Mjaaland, I., Ottosson, S., Bergh, J., Malmstroem, P. O., & Blomquist, C. (2001). Timing of quality of life (QoL) assessments as a source of error in oncological trails. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 35, 709–716.CrossRef
15.
Helgeson, V. S., & Tomich, P. L. (2005). Surviving cancer: A comparison of 5-year disease-free breast cancer survivors with healthy women. Psychooncology, 14, 307–317.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Hjermstad, M. J., Fayers, P. M., Bjordal, K., & Kaasa, S. (1998). Using reference data on quality of life—the importance of adjusting for age and gender, exemplified by the EORTC QLQ-C30 (+3). European Journal of Cancer, 34, 1381–1389.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Institut für Krebsepidemiologie e.V. Krebs in Schleswig-Holstein. Band 5: Inzidenz und Mortalität im Jahr 2003 [Institute for Cancer Epidemiology e.V. Cancer in Schleswig-Holstein. Volume 5: Incidence and mortality in the year 2003.] Lübeck: Schmidt-Roemhild 2005.
18.
Irvine, D., Brown, B., Crooks, D., Roberts, J., & Browne, G. (1991). Psychosocial adjustment in women with breast cancer. Cancer, 67, 1097–1117.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Janni, W., Rjosk, D., Dimpfl, T. H., Haertl, K., Strobl, B., Hepp, F., Hanke, A., Bergauer, F., & Sommer, H. (2001). Quality of life influenced by primary surgical treatment for stage I–III breast cancer-long-term follow-up of a matched-pair analysis. Annals of surgical oncology, 8, 542–548.PubMed
20.
Joly, F., Espie, M., Marty, M., Heron, J. F., & Henry-Amar, M. (2000). Long-term quality of life in premenopausal women with node-negative localized breast cancer treated with or without adjuvant chemotherapy. British Journal of Cancer, 83, 577–582.PubMedCrossRef
21.
King, M. T., Kenny, P., Shiell, A., Hall, J., & Boyages, J. (2000). Quality of life three months and one year after first treatment for early stage breast cancer: Influence of treatment and patient characteristics. Quality of Life Research, 9, 789–800.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Landesraumordnungsplan Schleswig-Holstein, (1998). Herausgegeben von der Ministerpräsidentin des Landes Schleswig-Holstein.
23.
Osoba, D., Rodrigues, G., Myles, J., Myles, J., Zee, B., & Pater, J. (1998). Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality of life scores. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 16, 139–144.
24.
Pozo, C., Carver, C. S., Noriega, V., Harris, S. D., Robinson, D. S., Ketcham, A. S., Legaspi, A., Moffat, F. L. Jr., & Clark, K. C. (1992). Effects of mastectomy versus lumpectomy on emotional adjustment to breast cancer: A prospective study of the first year postsurgery. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 10, 1292–1298.PubMed
25.
Sauer, H., & Hoelzel, D. (1995). Mammakarzinom—Revision der Nachsorgeempfehlungen. Teil 2: Spezielle Aussagen zu Skelettszintigraphie, Roentgen-Thorax, Lebersonographie, Mammographie und Laboruntersuchungen. [Breast carcinoma—revision of follow-up recommendations. 2: Special diagnostic value of bone scintigraphy, thoracic radiography, liver ultrasonic, mammography and laboratory tests] Fortschr Med 113, 210–214.
26.
Schou, I., Ekeberg, O., Sandvik, L., Hjermstad, M. J., & Ruland, C. M. (2005). Multiple predictors of health-related quality of life in early stage breast cancer. Data from a year follow-up study compared with the general population. Quality Life Research, 14, 1813–1823.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Schwarz, R., & Hinz, A. (2001). Reference data for the quality of life questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30 in the general German population. European Journal of Cancer, 37, 1345–1351.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Stead, M. L. (2003). Sexual dysfunction after treatment for gynaecologic and breast malignancies. Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 15, 57–61.CrossRef
29.
Zieren, H. U., Jacobi, A., Zieren, J., & Müller, J. M. (1996). Lebensqualitäterfassung nach Resektion colorectaler Carcinome. Der Chirurg, 67, 703–709.
Metadaten
Titel
The OVIS study: health related quality of life measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 and -BR23 in German female patients with breast cancer from Schleswig-Holstein
verfasst von
A. Waldmann
R. Pritzkuleit
H. Raspe
A. Katalinic
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2007
Verlag
Kluwer Academic Publishers
Erschienen in
Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 5/2007
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-006-9161-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2007

Quality of Life Research 5/2007 Zur Ausgabe

Original Paper

Evaluating the discriminatory power of EQ-5D, HUI2 and HUI3 in a US general population survey using Shannon’s indices

Original Paper

Small-cell lung cancer patients are just ‘a little bit’ tired: response shift and self-presentation in the measurement of fatigue

OriginalPaper

Quality-of-life outcome after hallux valgus surgery

Original Paper

The mathematical relationship among different forms of responsiveness coefficients

Brief Communication

The usefulness of the EQ-5D in differentiating among persons with major depressive episode and anxiety

Original Paper

Parent-proxy and child self-reported health-related quality of life: using qualitative methods to explain the discordance