Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research 8/2009

01.10.2009

Concordance of cancer patients’ function, symptoms, and supportive care needs

verfasst von: Claire F. Snyder, Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer, Amanda L. Blackford, Julie R. Brahmer, Michael A. Carducci, Roberto Pili, Vered Stearns, Antonio C. Wolff, Sydney M. Dy, Albert W. Wu

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 8/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Although patients’ function, symptoms, and supportive care needs are obviously related, a better understanding of these relationships could improve patient management.

Methods

In this cross-sectional, observational study, 117 cancer patients completed the Supportive Care Needs Survey-34 and EORTC-QLQ-C30. Each symptom and function domain from the EORTC-QLQ-C30 was dichotomized (high vs. low) using a cut-off of reference sample mean scores. Each need domain was dichotomized using a cut-off of an average score representing an unmet need. We explored within-patient patterns of function, symptom, and need domains using latent class analysis. Based on these patterns, patients were categorized as high versus low function; high versus low symptom; and high versus low need. We examined the concordance between categorizations of patients’ function, symptoms, and needs.

Results

The categorizations of function, symptoms, and needs were concordant for 66 patients (56%). Among patients with deficits in at least one area (n = 68), categorizations for 51 patients (75%) were discordant.

Conclusions

About 50% of patients have similar classifications of their level of function, symptoms, and needs, but discordance was common among patients with deficits in at least one area, emphasizing the importance of assessing all of these outcomes as part of patient evaluations.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Solano, J. P., Gomes, B., & Higginson, I. J. (2006). A comparison of symptom prevalence in far advanced cancer, AIDS, heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and renal disease. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 31, 58–69.PubMedCrossRef Solano, J. P., Gomes, B., & Higginson, I. J. (2006). A comparison of symptom prevalence in far advanced cancer, AIDS, heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and renal disease. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 31, 58–69.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilson, I. B., & Cleary, P. D. (1995). Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life: A conceptual model of patient outcomes. JAMA, 273, 59–65.PubMedCrossRef Wilson, I. B., & Cleary, P. D. (1995). Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life: A conceptual model of patient outcomes. JAMA, 273, 59–65.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Whelan, T. J., Mohide, E. A., Willan, A. R., et al. (1997). The supportive care needs of newly diagnosed cancer patients attending a regional cancer center. Cancer, 80, 1518–1524.PubMedCrossRef Whelan, T. J., Mohide, E. A., Willan, A. R., et al. (1997). The supportive care needs of newly diagnosed cancer patients attending a regional cancer center. Cancer, 80, 1518–1524.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Snyder, C. F., Garrett-Mayer, E., Brahmer, J. R., et al. (2008). Symptoms, supportive care needs, and function in cancer patients: How are they related? Quality of Life Research, 17, 665–677.PubMedCrossRef Snyder, C. F., Garrett-Mayer, E., Brahmer, J. R., et al. (2008). Symptoms, supportive care needs, and function in cancer patients: How are they related? Quality of Life Research, 17, 665–677.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat McLachlan, S.-A., Allenby, A., Matthews, J., et al. (2001). Randomized trial of coordinated psychosocial interventions based on patient self-assessment versus standard care to improve the psychosocial functioning of patients with cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 19, 4117–4125.PubMed McLachlan, S.-A., Allenby, A., Matthews, J., et al. (2001). Randomized trial of coordinated psychosocial interventions based on patient self-assessment versus standard care to improve the psychosocial functioning of patients with cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 19, 4117–4125.PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Velikova, G., Brown, J. M., Smith, A. B., et al. (2002). Computer-based quality of life questionnaires may contribute to doctor-patient interactions in oncology. British Journal of Cancer, 86, 51–59.PubMedCrossRef Velikova, G., Brown, J. M., Smith, A. B., et al. (2002). Computer-based quality of life questionnaires may contribute to doctor-patient interactions in oncology. British Journal of Cancer, 86, 51–59.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Detmar, S. B., & Aaronson, N. K. (1998). Quality of life assessment in daily clinical oncology practice: A feasibility study. European Journal of Cancer, 34, 1181–1186.PubMedCrossRef Detmar, S. B., & Aaronson, N. K. (1998). Quality of life assessment in daily clinical oncology practice: A feasibility study. European Journal of Cancer, 34, 1181–1186.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Detmar, S. B., Muller, M. J., Schornagel, J. H., et al. (2002). Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communications. A randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 288, 3027–3034.PubMedCrossRef Detmar, S. B., Muller, M. J., Schornagel, J. H., et al. (2002). Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communications. A randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 288, 3027–3034.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Velikova, G., Booth, L., Smith, A. B., et al. (2004). Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 22, 714–724.PubMedCrossRef Velikova, G., Booth, L., Smith, A. B., et al. (2004). Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 22, 714–724.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Snyder, C. F., Dy, S. M., Hendricks, D. E., et al. (2007). Asking the right questions: Investigating needs assessments and health-related quality-of-life questionnaires for use in oncology clinical practice. Supportive Care in Cancer, 15, 1075–1085.PubMedCrossRef Snyder, C. F., Dy, S. M., Hendricks, D. E., et al. (2007). Asking the right questions: Investigating needs assessments and health-related quality-of-life questionnaires for use in oncology clinical practice. Supportive Care in Cancer, 15, 1075–1085.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bonevski, B., Sanson-Fisher, R. W., Girgis, A., et al. (2000). Evaluation of an instrument to assess the needs of patients with cancer. Cancer, 88, 217–225.PubMedCrossRef Bonevski, B., Sanson-Fisher, R. W., Girgis, A., et al. (2000). Evaluation of an instrument to assess the needs of patients with cancer. Cancer, 88, 217–225.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Sanson-Fisher, R., Girgis, A., Boyes, A., et al. (2000). The unmet supportive care needs of patients with cancer. Cancer, 88, 226–237.PubMedCrossRef Sanson-Fisher, R., Girgis, A., Boyes, A., et al. (2000). The unmet supportive care needs of patients with cancer. Cancer, 88, 226–237.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Aaronson, N. K., Cull, A. M., & Kaasa, S. (1996). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) modular approach to quality of life assessment in oncology: An update. In B. Spilker (Ed.), Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials (2nd ed., pp. 179–189). Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven. Aaronson, N. K., Cull, A. M., & Kaasa, S. (1996). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) modular approach to quality of life assessment in oncology: An update. In B. Spilker (Ed.), Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials (2nd ed., pp. 179–189). Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Fayers, P. M., Weeden, S., Curran, D., on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Study Group. (1998). EORTC QLQ-C30 Reference Values. Brussels: EORTC (ISBN: 2-930064-11-0). Fayers, P. M., Weeden, S., Curran, D., on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Study Group. (1998). EORTC QLQ-C30 Reference Values. Brussels: EORTC (ISBN: 2-930064-11-0).
15.
Zurück zum Zitat McCutcheon, A. L. (1987). Latent class analysis. Quantitative applications in the social sciences series No. 64. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. McCutcheon, A. L. (1987). Latent class analysis. Quantitative applications in the social sciences series No. 64. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Clogg, C. C. (1995). Latent class models. In G. Arminger, C. C. Clogg, & M. E. Sobel (Eds.), Handbook of statistical modeling for the social and behavioral sciences, (Chapter 6 (pp. 311–359). New York: Plenum Press. Clogg, C. C. (1995). Latent class models. In G. Arminger, C. C. Clogg, & M. E. Sobel (Eds.), Handbook of statistical modeling for the social and behavioral sciences, (Chapter 6 (pp. 311–359). New York: Plenum Press.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Formann, A. K. (1996). Latent class analysis in medical research. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 5, 179–211.PubMedCrossRef Formann, A. K. (1996). Latent class analysis in medical research. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 5, 179–211.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Newell, S., Sanson-Fisher, R. W., Girgis, A., et al. (1998). How well do medical oncologists’ perceptions reflect their patients’ reported physical and psychosocial problems? Data from a survey of five oncologists. Cancer, 83, 1640–1651.PubMedCrossRef Newell, S., Sanson-Fisher, R. W., Girgis, A., et al. (1998). How well do medical oncologists’ perceptions reflect their patients’ reported physical and psychosocial problems? Data from a survey of five oncologists. Cancer, 83, 1640–1651.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Concordance of cancer patients’ function, symptoms, and supportive care needs
verfasst von
Claire F. Snyder
Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer
Amanda L. Blackford
Julie R. Brahmer
Michael A. Carducci
Roberto Pili
Vered Stearns
Antonio C. Wolff
Sydney M. Dy
Albert W. Wu
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2009
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 8/2009
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9519-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2009

Quality of Life Research 8/2009 Zur Ausgabe